{"as_of":"2026-08-19T06:35:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:52a1bde7b14ab92555b052e4ad675a607849327c21171ff637e0585885003ce9","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:19:07.320162Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-11T13:21:18.976422Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2106.00810","last_updated":"2021-06-01T21:22:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:20:25.939661Z","submitted_at":"2021-06-01T21:22:41Z","title":"Some Ethical Issues in the Review Process of Machine Learning Conferences","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2106.00810","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:19:07.320162Z","title":"Some ethical issues in the review process of machine learning conferences","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.04966","last_updated":"2025-05-08T05:51:48Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:14:25.940151Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-08T05:51:48Z","title":"Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:19:07.320162Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2106.00810","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.04966"},"observation_digest":"sha256:162a301e440c94983b45a26c74eab899f7da676dbc348560874cc3467859fa38","observation_id":"6c66135f-66f4-48c3-9d01-81ecd02ad71b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:19:07.320162Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2106.00810","last_updated":"2021-06-01T21:22:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:20:25.939661Z","submitted_at":"2021-06-01T21:22:41Z","title":"Some Ethical Issues in the Review Process of Machine Learning Conferences","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2106.00810","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2106.00810","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.00810","venue":null,"work_id":"300d78a6-caab-44a0-a01d-986ef277f3d2","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.19578","last_updated":"2026-04-21T15:33:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:58:06.943506Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-21T15:33:53Z","title":"Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-10T01:50:31.124812Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2106.00810","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.19578"},"observation_digest":"sha256:913d16a92899e800f5dc4aa39c90f98eb3e8bd03185fff4999822b3722ccdecb","observation_id":"8d31929e-59c2-44d6-96ab-4d99f4468672","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-11T13:21:18.986687Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2106.00810/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2106.00810/integrity","json":"/paper/2106.00810/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2106.00810"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2106.00810","last_updated":"2021-06-01T21:22:41Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:20:25.939661Z","submitted_at":"2021-06-01T21:22:41Z","title":"Some Ethical Issues in the Review Process of Machine Learning Conferences"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2106.00810."}