{"as_of":"2026-08-07T15:27:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:98c6cdcb12a760533f757536d25bfb203e63a209a625af8a4a33bbeefe6074cf","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":4,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":4,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:35:41.511855Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-11T17:31:09.097346Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2106.12529","last_updated":"2022-01-29T20:13:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:22:12.513783Z","submitted_at":"2021-06-23T16:48:46Z","title":"Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2106.12529","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:35:41.511855Z","title":"locally simple but globally complex","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05252","last_updated":"2025-08-07T17:13:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:19:41.218011Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T17:13:59Z","title":"Conservative classifiers do consistently well with improving agents: characterizing statistical and online learning","version":2},"reference_index":101,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:35:41.511855Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2106.12529","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05252"},"observation_digest":"sha256:18c56c024e5113ee3e09ca2cc915a76f2d5b97c72d65bc34e190669175063d3b","observation_id":"12253bf1-96cd-4d47-91d4-9b24b3aa36bf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:35:41.511855Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2106.12529","last_updated":"2022-01-29T20:13:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:22:12.513783Z","submitted_at":"2021-06-23T16:48:46Z","title":"Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2106.12529","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T00:16:58.623663Z","title":"cc/paper_files/paper/2019/hash/ 7690dd4db7a92524c684e3191919eb6b-Abstract","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.11439","last_updated":"2026-08-03T16:00:44Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:37:33.508264Z","submitted_at":"2026-02-11T23:35:21Z","title":"Multi-Level Strategic Classification: Incentivizing Improvement through Promotion and Relegation Dynamics","version":2},"reference_index":2019,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T00:16:58.623663Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2106.12529","citing_paper":"/paper/2602.11439"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7a99592d3ec19b88a45d627f9b5a60f820e2f18e9ebd8af890d35e073f0b72b4","observation_id":"7029872b-1401-48cf-a169-359335615032","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T00:16:58.623663Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2106.12529","last_updated":"2022-01-29T20:13:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:22:12.513783Z","submitted_at":"2021-06-23T16:48:46Z","title":"Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2106.12529","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:12:58.374584Z","title":"cc/paper_files/paper/2019/hash/ 7690dd4db7a92524c684e3191919eb6b-Abstract","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.11439","last_updated":"2026-08-03T16:00:44Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:37:33.508264Z","submitted_at":"2026-02-11T23:35:21Z","title":"Multi-Level Strategic Classification: Incentivizing Improvement through Promotion and Relegation Dynamics","version":3},"reference_index":2019,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:12:58.374584Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2106.12529","citing_paper":"/paper/2602.11439"},"observation_digest":"sha256:86800cd62b0917d8b2af0a295b2c0d7702e10f158e1829527f768fce959f80b1","observation_id":"8892439e-1f35-481f-a18a-173a42c01d28","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:12:58.374584Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2106.12529","last_updated":"2022-01-29T20:13:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:22:12.513783Z","submitted_at":"2021-06-23T16:48:46Z","title":"Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2106.12529","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2106.12529","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"truly optimal policy","venue":null,"work_id":"c043151e-5e4a-45ff-a975-a617f773735e","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.04202","last_updated":"2026-05-05T18:42:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T23:16:59.568304Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-05T18:42:21Z","title":"Sequential Strategic Classification with Multi-Stage Selective Classifiers","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-08T17:27:54.230132Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2106.12529","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.04202"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9f60116e2476ce629ccb3602806cb20ff1dc099f52a733a0124dd2da10f1f535","observation_id":"362a2493-77f5-4e6d-aacd-b66e98423375","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-11T17:31:09.115184Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2106.12529/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2106.12529/integrity","json":"/paper/2106.12529/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2106.12529"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2106.12529","last_updated":"2022-01-29T20:13:28Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:22:12.513783Z","submitted_at":"2021-06-23T16:48:46Z","title":"Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 7 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 4 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2106.12529."}