{"as_of":"2026-08-22T23:44:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:d02caa186f42549f58e086155279d2d00e1f202919471bdec56ce63214d01ecd","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T17:55:27.857264Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T17:55:28.278586Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2112.01836","last_updated":"2022-11-07T17:36:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:37:17.817263Z","submitted_at":"2021-12-03T10:49:19Z","title":"Semantic Segmentation of Legal Documents via Rhetorical Roles","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2112.01836","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2112.01836","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T17:55:28.278586Z","title":"Semantic Segmentation of Legal Documents via Rhetorical Roles","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"740a2d8c-fe91-4fd5-9ed5-7f1442705990","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.08385","last_updated":"2024-12-11T13:50:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:21:25.743549Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-11T13:50:17Z","title":"NyayaAnumana & INLegalLlama: The Largest Indian Legal Judgment Prediction Dataset and Specialized Language Model for Enhanced Decision Analysis","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T17:55:27.857264Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2112.01836","citing_paper":"/paper/2412.08385"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a72f8b59b8b9ee51d506f1b50965b6856bade2109e3a95c20a55fa8f5b62f44e","observation_id":"1c34f023-998b-4cc6-bb97-5ed5ed3f7092","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T17:55:28.283221Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2112.01836","last_updated":"2022-11-07T17:36:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:37:17.817263Z","submitted_at":"2021-12-03T10:49:19Z","title":"Semantic Segmentation of Legal Documents via Rhetorical Roles","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2112.01836","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T14:17:25.913623Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.01836 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.18825","last_updated":"2026-07-21T08:01:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:21:22.018112Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-21T08:01:17Z","title":"AILQA: Evaluating AI-Driven Legal Question Answering Systems for the Indian Legal System","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T14:17:25.913623Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2112.01836","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.18825"},"observation_digest":"sha256:45867fe109c44c1414210a419bcf88685575eea17a16c47796376f03a70ffd58","observation_id":"527013ec-aaa1-40ac-a94f-3ebb0e9b980a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T14:17:25.913623Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2112.01836/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2112.01836/integrity","json":"/paper/2112.01836/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2112.01836"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2112.01836","last_updated":"2022-11-07T17:36:43Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:37:17.817263Z","submitted_at":"2021-12-03T10:49:19Z","title":"Semantic Segmentation of Legal Documents via Rhetorical Roles"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 22 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2112.01836."}