pith. sign in

arxiv: 2112.04375 · v2 · submitted 2021-12-08 · 🪐 quant-ph

Ancilla-Error-Transparent Controlled Beam Splitter Gate

Iivari Pietik\"ainen , Ond\v{r}ej \v{C}ernot\'ik , Shruti Puri , Radim Filip , S. M. Girvin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 12:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords controlled beam splitterKerr-cat qubiterror transparencycircuit QEDcSWAP gatehybrid quantum computationbosonic modesphase-flip bias
0
0 comments X

The pith

Kerr-cat ancilla renders controlled beam-splitter gate transparent to dominant phase-flip errors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes implementing a controlled beam-splitter gate in hybrid circuit QED by using a Kerr-cat qubit to produce a controlled-phase beam-splitter operation, which is then combined with an ordinary beam splitter to yield the desired gate and ultimately a controlled SWAP on two bosonic modes. The central advantage arises because the Kerr-cat possesses a strongly biased error channel in which phase flips greatly outnumber bit flips, making the resulting cSWAP non-destructive and transparent to the dominant error. This construction is claimed to be straightforward and, with present experimental parameters, to reach fidelities comparable to those of standard beam-splitter operations already demonstrated in circuit QED. Such a gate would directly support the swap test for state purity, preparation of non-Gaussian entanglement, and measurement of nonlinear functionals of quantum states.

Core claim

A Kerr-cat qubit is used to generate a controlled-phase beam splitter (cPBS) operation; when combined with an ordinary beam splitter this produces a controlled beam-splitter (cBS) and from it a cSWAP. The strongly biased error channel of the Kerr-cat, in which phase flips dominate over bit flips, makes the cSWAP non-destructive and transparent to the dominant error.

What carries the argument

Kerr-cat qubit used to generate the controlled-phase beam splitter (cPBS) operation that enables the error-transparent cBS gate.

If this is right

  • The resulting cSWAP gate is non-destructive to the bosonic modes.
  • The gate is transparent to the dominant phase-flip errors of the ancilla.
  • Controlled beam-splitter operations reach fidelities comparable to existing ordinary beam-splitter gates.
  • The construction directly enables the swap test, non-Gaussian entanglement preparation, and measurement of nonlinear state functionals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same bias-driven transparency might be exploited in other controlled operations between discrete and continuous-variable systems.
  • Hybrid quantum algorithms that rely on repeated cSWAPs could see reduced error-correction overhead if the phase-flip bias persists across multiple gates.
  • Direct experimental comparison of error rates before and after the cPBS step would test whether the bias is preserved under the proposed drive conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The Kerr-cat qubit maintains a strongly biased error channel in which phase flips dominate over bit flips, and this bias survives the gate construction.

What would settle it

An experimental run of the proposed gate sequence in which bit-flip errors on the Kerr-cat ancilla become comparable in rate to phase-flip errors would remove the claimed transparency benefit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2112.04375 by Iivari Pietik\"ainen, Ond\v{r}ej \v{C}ernot\'ik, Radim Filip, Shruti Puri, S. M. Girvin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Standard circuit symbol for the controlled SWAP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Three-wave mixing process to create the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Illustration of the Bloch sphere. The cat states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Numerical simulation of the controlled-beam splitter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Qubit errors (dephasing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Cavity photon bunching as a function of the cat size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Different driving schemes. The drive at frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Leakage convergence of the Kerr cat simulations com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In hybrid circuit QED architectures containing both ancilla qubits and bosonic modes, a controlled beam splitter gate is a powerful resource. It can be used to create (up to a controlled-parity operation) an ancilla-controlled SWAP gate acting on two bosonic modes. This is the essential element required to execute the `swap test' for purity, prepare quantum non-Gaussian entanglement and directly measure nonlinear functionals of quantum states. It also constitutes an important gate for hybrid discrete/continuous-variable quantum computation. We propose a new realization of a hybrid cSWAP utilizing `Kerr-cat' qubits -- anharmonic oscillators subject to strong two-photon driving. The Kerr-cat is used to generate a controlled-phase beam splitter (cPBS) operation. When combined with an ordinary beam splitter one obtains a controlled beam-splitter (cBS) and from this a cSWAP. The strongly biased error channel for the Kerr-cat has phase flips which dominate over bit flips. This yields important benefits for the cSWAP gate which becomes non-destructive and transparent to the dominate error. Our proposal is straightforward to implement and, based on currently existing experimental parameters, should achieve controlled beam-splitter gates with high fidelities comparable to current ordinary beam-splitter operations available in circuit QED.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a realization of a controlled beam-splitter (cBS) gate in hybrid circuit-QED systems by using a Kerr-cat qubit to implement a controlled-phase beam splitter (cPBS), which is then combined with an ordinary beam splitter to yield the cBS and ultimately a controlled-SWAP (cSWAP) gate. The central claim is that the strongly phase-flip-biased error channel of the Kerr-cat renders the resulting cSWAP non-destructive and transparent to the dominant error, with achievable fidelities comparable to existing beam-splitter operations based on current experimental parameters.

Significance. If the phase-flip bias is shown to survive the gate construction, the proposal would supply a concrete route to an error-transparent cSWAP resource useful for swap tests, non-Gaussian state preparation, and hybrid discrete/continuous-variable computation. The work correctly identifies the potential advantage of biased-noise ancillae for gate transparency.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the cSWAP 'becomes non-destructive and transparent to the dominate error' because 'phase flips which dominate over bit flips' is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no derivation or Hamiltonian for the cPBS interaction that demonstrates the bias is preserved and does not generate bit-flip processes at comparable rates during the gate.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would be strengthened by a brief statement of the cPBS Hamiltonian or drive sequence and by an explicit (even if approximate) fidelity estimate with the cited experimental parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and for highlighting the importance of explicitly demonstrating error-bias preservation. We agree that this point is central to the proposal and will strengthen the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the cSWAP 'becomes non-destructive and transparent to the dominate error' because 'phase flips which dominate over bit flips' is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no derivation or Hamiltonian for the cPBS interaction that demonstrates the bias is preserved and does not generate bit-flip processes at comparable rates during the gate.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation is needed to substantiate the claim. The manuscript relies on the established phase-flip-biased noise of the Kerr-cat qubit but does not derive the effective cPBS Hamiltonian or analyze error channels during the gate. In the revised version we will add a dedicated section deriving the cPBS interaction from the driven Kerr-cat Hamiltonian, showing the leading-order error processes, and confirming that the dominant error remains phase-flip biased with bit-flip rates suppressed by the same factor as in the idle case. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; proposal relies on external Kerr-cat bias properties

full rationale

The paper presents a gate construction proposal whose central benefit (error transparency of the cSWAP) is predicated on the independently established phase-flip bias of Kerr-cat qubits. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce any claimed fidelity, transparency, or gate property to a quantity defined by the result itself. The derivation chain is forward-looking and self-contained against external benchmarks on the Kerr-cat error channel.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on the domain assumption that Kerr-cat qubits exhibit strongly biased phase-flip noise and that this bias can be preserved through the gate construction; no free parameters or new entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Kerr-cat qubits have a strongly biased error channel with phase flips dominating over bit flips
    Invoked to obtain the non-destructive and transparent property of the cSWAP.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5779 in / 1225 out tokens · 46962 ms · 2026-05-24T12:56:05.708360+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Swap-test interferometry with biased ancilla noise

    quant-ph 2021-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Swap tests on ancilla qubits project Fock and coherent states onto NOON and entangled coherent states inside a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, recovering Heisenberg scaling while tolerating biased ancilla phase-flip noise.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The dissipative dynamics discussed above are modeled by the master equation ˙ρ =−i[H,ρ ] +κ(1 +Nt)D[c]ρ +κNtD[c†]ρ +κ2D[c2]ρ, (21) with Hamiltonian (20)

    that is stabilized by single-photon dissipation has been proposed, but we have not included this possibility in our simulations. The dissipative dynamics discussed above are modeled by the master equation ˙ρ =−i[H,ρ ] +κ(1 +Nt)D[c]ρ +κNtD[c†]ρ +κ2D[c2]ρ, (21) with Hamiltonian (20). Here D[o]ρ = oρo†− 1 2o†oρ− 1 2ρo†o is the Lindblad superoperator, Nt is t...

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, Engineering the quan- tum states of light in a kerr-nonlinear resonator by two- photon driving, npj Quantum Information 3, 18 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    S. Puri, A. Grimm, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, K. Noh, G. Roberts, L. Jiang, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. De- voret, and S. M. Girvin, Stabilized cat in driven nonlinear cavity: A fault-tolerant error syndrome detector, Physi- cal Review X 9, 041009 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    S. Puri, L. St-Jean, J. A. Gross, A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, P. S. Iyer, A. Krishna, S. Touzard, L. Jiang, A. Blais, S. T. Flammia, and S. M. Girvin, Bias- preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits, Science Ad- vances 6, 10.1126/sciadv.aay5901 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay5901 2020

  5. [5]

    Y. Y. Gao, B. J. Lester, K. Chou, L. Frunzio, M. H. Devoret, L. Jiang, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Entanglement of bosonic modes through an engineered exchange interaction, Nature 566, 509 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    H.-K. Lau, R. Pooser, G. Siopsis, and C. Weedbrook, Quantum machine learning over infinite dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 080501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    J. M. K¨ ubler, K. Muandet, and B. Sch¨ olkopf, Quantum mean embedding of probability distributions, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033159 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    S. Cao, L. Wossnig, B. Vlastakis, P. Leek, and E. Grant, Cost-function embedding and dataset encoding for ma- chine learning with parametrized quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. A 101, 052309 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum ran- 13 dom access memory, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 160501 (2008)

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Architectures for a quantum random access memory, Phys. Rev. A 78, 052310 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    F.-Y. Hong, Y. Xiang, Z.-Y. Zhu, L.-z. Jiang, and L.-n. Wu, Robust quantum random access memory, Phys. Rev. A 86, 010306 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Arunachalam, V

    S. Arunachalam, V. Gheorghiu, T. Jochym-O’Connor, M. Mosca, and P. V. Srinivasan, On the robustness of bucket brigade quantum RAM, New J. Phys. 17, 123010 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    O. D. Matteo, V. Gheorghiu, and M. Mosca, Fault- tolerant resource estimation of quantum random-access memories, IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering 1, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Paler, O

    A. Paler, O. Oumarou, and R. Basmadjian, Parallelizing the queries in a bucket-brigade quantum random access memory, Phys. Rev. A 102, 032608 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    C. T. Hann, G. Lee, S. Girvin, and L. Jiang, Resilience of quantum random access memory to generic noise, PRX Quantum 2, 020311 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    C. C. Gerry, Generation of optical macroscopic quantum superposition states via state reduction with a mach- zehnder interferometer containing a kerr medium, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4095 (1999)

    work page 1999

  17. [17]

    Filip, M

    R. Filip, M. Duˇ sek, J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, and L. Miˇ sta, Bell- inequality violation with “thermal” radiation, Phys. Rev. A 65, 043802 (2002)

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Filip, Overlap and entanglement-witness measure- ments, Phys

    R. Filip, Overlap and entanglement-witness measure- ments, Phys. Rev. A 65, 062320 (2002)

    work page 2002

  19. [19]

    Nguyen, K.-W

    C.-H. Nguyen, K.-W. Tseng, G. Maslennikov, H. C. J. Gan, and D. Matsukevich, Experimental swap test of infinite dimensional quantum states (2021), arXiv:2103.10219 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    N. M. Linke, S. Johri, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, A. Y. Matsuura, and C. Monroe, Measuring the r´ enyi entropy of a two-site fermi-hubbard model on a trapped ion quan- tum computer, Phys. Rev. A 98, 052334 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Buhrman, R

    H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, J. Watrous, and R. de Wolf, Quantum fingerprinting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 167902 (2001)

    work page 2001

  22. [22]

    Carrasco, A

    J. Carrasco, A. Elben, C. Kokail, B. Kraus, and P. Zoller, Theoretical and experimental perspectives of quantum verification, PRX Quantum 2, 010102 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    C.-H. Yu, F. Gao, C. Liu, D. Huynh, M. Reynolds, and J. Wang, Quantum algorithm for visual tracking, Phys. Rev. A 99, 022301 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Mitarai, M

    K. Mitarai, M. Kitagawa, and K. Fujii, Quantum analog- digital conversion, Phys. Rev. A 99, 012301 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    S. Endo, S. C. Benjamin, and Y. Li, Practical quantum error mitigation for near-future applications, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031027 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Suba¸ sı, L

    Y. Suba¸ sı, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Entanglement spec- troscopy with a depth-two quantum circuit, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 52, 044001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    A. K. Ekert, C. M. Alves, D. K. L. Oi, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and L. C. Kwek, Direct estimations of lin- ear and nonlinear functionals of a quantum state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 217901 (2002)

    work page 2002

  28. [28]

    Azses, R

    D. Azses, R. Haenel, Y. Naveh, R. Raussendorf, E. Sela, and E. G. Dalla Torre, Identification of symmetry- protected topological states on noisy quantum comput- ers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 120502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Zhang, S.-L

    D.-B. Zhang, S.-L. Zhu, and Z. D. Wang, Protocol for implementing quantum nonparametric learning with trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010506 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    R. B. Patel, J. Ho, F. Ferreyrol, T. C. Ralph, and G. J. Pryde, A quantum fredkin gate, Science Advances 2, 10.1126/sciadv.1501531 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501531 2016

  31. [31]

    T. Ono, R. Okamoto, M. Tanida, H. F. Hofmann, and S. Takeuchi, Implementation of a quantum controlled- swap gate with photonic circuits, Scientific Reports 7, 45353 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    St´ arek, M

    R. St´ arek, M. Miˇ cuda, M. Mikov´ a, I. Straka, M. Duˇ sek, P. Marek, M. Jeˇ zek, R. Filip, and J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, Nonde- structive detector for exchange symmetry of photonic qubits, npj Quantum Information 4, 35 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Zhang, J

    K. Zhang, J. Thompson, X. Zhang, Y. Shen, Y. Lu, S. Zhang, J. Ma, V. Vedral, M. Gu, and K. Kim, Modular quantum computation in a trapped ion system, Nature Communications 10, 4692 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    H. C. J. Gan, G. Maslennikov, K.-W. Tseng, C. Nguyen, and D. Matsukevich, Hybrid quantum computing with conditional beam splitter gate in trapped ion system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 170502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Lau and M

    H.-K. Lau and M. B. Plenio, Universal quantum comput- ing with arbitrary continuous-variable encoding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 100501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    A Simple Proof that Toffoli and Hadamard are Quantum Universal

    D. Aharnov, A simple proof that toffoli and hadamard are quantum universal, arXiv:quant-ph/0301040 (2003)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  37. [37]

    X.-Q. Zhou, T. C. Ralph, P. Kalasuwan, M. Zhang, A. Peruzzo, B. P. Lanyon, and J. L. O’Brien, Adding control to arbitrary unknown quantum operations, Na- ture Communications 2, 413 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Blais, S

    A. Blais, S. M. Girvin, and W. D. Oliver, Quantum infor- mation processing and quantum optics with circuit quan- tum electrodynamics, Nature Physics 16, 247 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wall- raff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics 93, 025005 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gus- tavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Applied Physics Reviews 6, 021318 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design de- rived from the Cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007)

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    D. I. Schuster, A. A. Houck, J. A. Schreier, A. Wallraff, J. M. Gambetta, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, J. Majer, B. John- son, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Resolving photon number states in a superconducting cir- cuit, Nature 445, 515 (2007)

    work page 2007

  43. [43]

    A. A. Houck, J. Koch, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Life after charge noise: recent results with transmon qubits, Quantum Information Processing 8, 105 (2009)

    work page 2009

  44. [44]

    H. Paik, D. I. Schuster, L. S. Bishop, G. Kirchmair, G. Catelani, A. P. Sears, B. R. Johnson, M. J. Reagor, L. Frunzio, L. I. Glazman, S. M. Girvin, M. H. De- voret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Observation of high coher- ence in josephson junction qubits measured in a three- dimensional circuit qed architecture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240501 (2011)

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    C. S. Wang, J. C. Curtis, B. J. Lester, Y. Zhang, Y. Y. Gao, J. Freeze, V. S. Batista, P. H. Vaccaro, I. L. 14 Chuang, L. Frunzio, L. Jiang, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Efficient multiphoton sampling of molecular vibronic spectra on a superconducting bosonic processor, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021060 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Campagne-Ibarcq, A

    P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, S. Touzard, E. Zalys- Geller, N. E. Frattini, V. V. Sivak, P. Reinhold, S. Puri, S. Shankar, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Frunzio, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator, Nature 584, 368 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Reinhold, S

    P. Reinhold, S. Rosenblum, W.-L. Ma, L. Frunzio, L. Jiang, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Error-corrected gates on an encoded qubit, Nature Physics 16, 822 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    M. D. LaHaye, J. Suh, P. M. Echternach, K. C. Schwab, and M. L. Roukes, Nanomechanical measurements of a superconducting qubit, Nature 459, 960 (2009)

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    A. D. O’Connell, M. Hofheinz, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bial- czak, M. Lenander, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, D. Sank, H. Wang, M. Weides, J. Wenner, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator, Nature 464, 697 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    M. V. Gustafsson, P. V. Santos, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing, Local probing of propagating acoustic waves in a gigahertz echo chamber, Nature Physics 8, 338 (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    J. M. Pirkkalainen, S. U. Cho, J. Li, G. S. Paraoanu, P. J. Hakonen, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Hybrid circuit cavity quantum electrodynamics with a micromechanical res- onator, Nature 494, 211 (2013)

    work page 2013

  52. [52]

    M. V. Gustafsson, T. Aref, A. F. Kockum, M. K. Ekstr¨ om, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing, Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom, Science 346, 207 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Rouxinol, Y

    F. Rouxinol, Y. Hao, F. Brito, A. O. Caldeira, E. K. Irish, and M. D. LaHaye, Measurements of nanoresonator- qubit interactions in a hybrid quantum electromechanical system, Nanotechnology 27, 364003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    Manenti, A

    R. Manenti, A. F. Kockum, A. Patterson, T. Behrle, J. Rahamim, G. Tancredi, F. Nori, and P. J. Leek, Circuit quantum acoustodynamics with surface acoustic waves, Nature Communications 8, 975 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Y. Chu, P. Kharel, W. H. Renninger, L. D. Burkhart, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Quantum acoustics with superconducting qubits, Science 358, 199 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Y. Chu, P. Kharel, T. Yoon, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Creation and control of multi-phonon fock states in a bulk acoustic-wave resonator, Nature 563, 666 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    A. Ask, M. Ekstr¨ om, P. Delsing, and G. Johansson, Cavity-free vacuum-rabi splitting in circuit quantum acoustodynamics, Phys. Rev. A 99, 013840 (2019)

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    Arrangoiz-Arriola, E

    P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. A. Wollack, Z. Wang, M. Pechal, W. Jiang, T. P. McKenna, J. D. Witmer, R. Van Laer, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Resolving the energy levels of a nanomechanical oscillator, Nature 571, 537 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Mirhosseini, A

    M. Mirhosseini, A. Sipahigil, M. Kalaee, and O. Painter, Superconducting qubit to optical photon transduction, Nature 588, 599 (2020)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a kerr-cat qubit, Nature 584, 205 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    A. S. Darmawan, B. J. Brown, A. L. Grimsmo, D. K. Tuckett, and S. Puri, Practical quantum error correction with the xzzx code and kerr-cat qubits, PRX Quantum 2, 030345 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Y. Y. Gao, B. J. Lester, Y. Zhang, C. Wang, S. Rosen- blum, L. Frunzio, L. Jiang, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Programmable interference between two mi- crowave quantum memories, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021073 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    Swap-test interferometry with biased ancilla noise

    O. ˇCernot´ ık, I. Pietik¨ ainen, S. Puri, S. M. Girvin, and R. Filip, Swap-test interferometry with biased ancilla noise (2021), arXiv:2112.02568

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Berthiaume, D

    A. Berthiaume, D. Deutsch, and R. Jozsa, The stabil- isation of quantum computations, in Proceedings Work- shop on Physics and Computation. PhysComp’94 (IEEE,

    work page

  65. [65]

    Barenco, A

    A. Barenco, A. Berthiaume, D. Deutsch, A. Ekert, R. Jozsa, and C. Macchiavello, Stabilization of quan- tum computations by symmetrization, SIAM Journal on Computing 26, 1541 (1997)

    work page 1997

  66. [66]

    Peres, Error symmetrization in quantum comput- ers, International journal of theoretical physics 38, 799 (1999)

    A. Peres, Error symmetrization in quantum comput- ers, International journal of theoretical physics 38, 799 (1999)

    work page 1999

  67. [67]

    Cirac, A

    J. Cirac, A. Ekert, and C. Macchiavello, Optimal purifi- cation of single qubits, Physical review letters 82, 4344 (1999)

    work page 1999

  68. [68]

    Cotler, S

    J. Cotler, S. Choi, A. Lukin, H. Gharibyan, T. Grover, M. E. Tai, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, A. M. Kaufman, et al., Quantum virtual cooling, Physical Re- view X 9, 031013 (2019)

    work page 2019

  69. [69]

    N. E. Frattini, U. Vool, S. Shankar, A. Narla, K. M. Sliwa, and M. H. Devoret, 3-wave mixing josephson dipole element, Applied Physics Letters 110, 222603 (2017)

    work page 2017

  70. [70]

    Zhang, B

    Y. Zhang, B. J. Lester, Y. Y. Gao, L. Jiang, R. J. Schoelkopf, and S. M. Girvin, Engineering bilinear mode coupling in circuit qed: Theory and experiment, Physical Review A 99, 012314 (2019)

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    Touzard, A

    S. Touzard, A. Grimm, Z. Leghtas, S. O. Mundhada, P. Reinhold, C. Axline, M. Reagor, K. Chou, J. Blumoff, K. M. Sliwa, S. Shankar, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Coherent oscilla- tions inside a quantum manifold stabilized by dissipation, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  72. [72]

    Lescanne, M

    R. Lescanne, M. Villiers, T. Peronnin, A. Sarlette, M. Delbecq, B. Huard, T. Kontos, M. Mirrahimi, and Z. Leghtas, Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator, Nature Physics 16, 509 (2020)

    work page 2020

  73. [73]

    Putterman, J

    H. Putterman, J. Iverson, Q. Xu, L. Jiang, O. Painter, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, and K. Noh, Colored kerr cat qubits, arXiv:2107.09198 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  74. [74]

    Reagor, W

    M. Reagor, W. Pfaff, C. Axline, R. W. Heeres, N. Ofek, K. Sliwa, E. Holland, C. Wang, J. Blumoff, K. Chou, M. J. Hatridge, L. Frunzio, M. H. Devoret, L. Jiang, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Quantum memory with millisecond coherence in circuit QED, Physical Review B 94, 014506 (2016)

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    Eickbusch, V

    A. Eickbusch, V. Sivak, A. Z. Ding, S. S. Elder, S. R. Jha, J. Venkatraman, B. Royer, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Fast universal control of an oscil- lator with weak dispersive coupling to a qubit (2021), arXiv:2111.06414

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, A. D. C´ orcoles, S. T. Merkel, J. A. Smolin, C. Rigetti, S. Poletto, G. A. 15 Keefe, M. B. Rothwell, J. R. Rozen, M. B. Ketchen, and M. Steffen, Universal quantum gate set approaching fault-tolerant thresholds with superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 060501 (2012)

    work page 2012

  77. [77]

    Introduction to Quantum Gate Set Tomography

    D. Greenbaum, Introduction to quantum gate set tomog- raphy (2015), arXiv:1509.02921 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  78. [78]

    Sivak, N

    V. Sivak, N. Frattini, V. Joshi, A. Lingenfelter, S. Shankar, and M. Devoret, Kerr-free three-wave mixing in superconducting quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Applied 11, 054060 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    N. E. Frattini, Three-wave Mixing in Superconducting Circuits: Stabilizing Cats with SNAILs , Ph.D. thesis, Yale University (2021)

    work page 2021

  80. [80]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip: An open- source python framework for the dynamics of open quan- tum systems, Computer Physics Communications 183, 1760 (2012)

    work page 2012