{"as_of":"2026-07-28T15:17:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:7ac71ba41b56a9b3344cea1d18cc31813729d938a345f721f833b5640a226dc2","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-07-28T06:31:03.373048+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-07-13T02:24:25.366633Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2201.06850","last_updated":"2022-01-18T09:58:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T12:28:14.461908Z","submitted_at":"2022-01-18T09:58:33Z","title":"Using Pre-Trained Models to Boost Code Review Automation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2201.06850","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-13T02:24:25.366633Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.06850 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.09524","last_updated":"2026-07-10T15:33:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-15T23:18:28.638574Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-10T15:33:47Z","title":"Balancing Usefulness and Naturalness: An LLM-based Curation Pipeline for Code Review Comments","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-07-13T02:24:25.366633Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2201.06850","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.09524"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b62c0d1212be3fb6f59251d18c2ecee724745e28b06d321468e99a31d5899397","observation_id":"1e43de5a-6ce9-44fb-bd01-262c141f8255","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-13T02:24:25.366633Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2201.06850/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2201.06850/integrity","json":"/paper/2201.06850/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2201.06850"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2201.06850","last_updated":"2022-01-18T09:58:33Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T12:28:14.461908Z","submitted_at":"2022-01-18T09:58:33Z","title":"Using Pre-Trained Models to Boost Code Review Automation"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-07-28T06:31:03.373048+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-28T06:30:57.601408+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 28 July 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2201.06850."}