{"as_of":"2026-08-10T08:42:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:3ac1a8bf5356d1c4ec8b577bfc5325fd775e5a7ee547de171b1cda5fa42d32cd","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":7,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":7,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":7,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":7,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:41:14.057279Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T16:53:41.451800Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.07209","last_updated":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T17:08:55.953364Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","title":"Case law retrieval: problems, methods, challenges and evaluations in the last 20 years","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2202.07209","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:41:14.057279Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.12895","last_updated":"2025-06-15T15:53:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:35:12.173860Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-15T15:53:38Z","title":"Assessing the Performance Gap Between Lexical and Semantic Models for Information Retrieval With Formulaic Legal Language","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:41:14.057279Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2202.07209","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.12895"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e3b3ef1d752ae514acd5dbdf3b02096bffddce78fabea2eca53427d84a6ab324","observation_id":"8723b885-ff98-49a2-8f85-a404b8def088","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:41:14.057279Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.07209","last_updated":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T17:08:55.953364Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","title":"Case law retrieval: problems, methods, challenges and evaluations in the last 20 years","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2202.07209","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T15:51:46.332355Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.19365","last_updated":"2025-08-26T18:53:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:36:11.405342Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-26T18:53:39Z","title":"AI for Statutory Simplification: A Comprehensive State Legal Corpus and Labor Benchmark","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T15:51:46.332355Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2202.07209","citing_paper":"/paper/2508.19365"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b7b5e9a08e535c57304dfa9fc1cfc17ab5b895cda5051072d4357024f95dec68","observation_id":"76e8c4b9-c98a-4fe1-84a3-8a92a99c9092","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T15:51:46.332355Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.07209","last_updated":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T17:08:55.953364Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","title":"Case law retrieval: problems, methods, challenges and evaluations in the last 20 years","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2202.07209","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:20:40.363531Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2509.00761","last_updated":"2026-07-15T19:38:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T22:48:20.907522Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-31T09:23:26Z","title":"L-MARS: Legal Multi-Agent System with Agentic Search and Citation-Faithfulness Audit","version":4},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:20:40.363531Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2202.07209","citing_paper":"/paper/2509.00761"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4d5b418ce8f1992ed3e2cbf14b50990ad632743bf329088dffb2e23c7a1f9ef0","observation_id":"cc9cff5f-b14a-4e0c-bf78-5f7dab5eaac9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:20:40.363531Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.07209","last_updated":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T17:08:55.953364Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","title":"Case law retrieval: problems, methods, challenges and evaluations in the last 20 years","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2202.07209","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T11:48:48.796849Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07209 (2022)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2509.02241","last_updated":"2025-09-02T12:09:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T17:42:44.908227Z","submitted_at":"2025-09-02T12:09:49Z","title":"LLMs for LLMs: A Structured Prompting Methodology for Long Legal Documents","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T11:48:48.796849Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2202.07209","citing_paper":"/paper/2509.02241"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a7bb86309bead6c5b5b36d039086c6d7c04c807a4b358521ea07cdeb2d0e6e2a","observation_id":"de57ca33-258f-4fe4-af31-e352ea34d4e5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T11:48:48.796849Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.07209","last_updated":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T17:08:55.953364Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","title":"Case law retrieval: problems, methods, challenges and evaluations in the last 20 years","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2202.07209","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2202.07209","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T16:53:41.451800Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"9507696b-d97b-4763-9c36-6cc0019740b9","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.27331","last_updated":"2026-05-26T17:38:26Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:26:01.311809Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-26T17:38:26Z","title":"Maat: The Agentic Legal Research Assistant for Competition Protection","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T16:36:09.830236Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2202.07209","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.27331"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ef076b997fb17a5d0da88a9457ae6e2a60308e53b52cec0cccc161b523240532","observation_id":"fa9b7258-0243-475e-ab18-3d120a438438","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T16:53:41.453257Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.07209","last_updated":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T17:08:55.953364Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","title":"Case law retrieval: problems, methods, challenges and evaluations in the last 20 years","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2202.07209","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T07:01:16.620100Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.11109","last_updated":"2026-07-13T05:38:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-30T00:52:06.341408Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-13T05:38:50Z","title":"Generative Chinese Statute Retrieval","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T07:01:16.620100Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2202.07209","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.11109"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2d54157da2fb6083884c045dd7d83ae5e24a7776f15e789337648f444eabaf44","observation_id":"fc9605ea-f504-43a8-8525-dcd6762ba65d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T07:01:16.620100Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.07209","last_updated":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T17:08:55.953364Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","title":"Case law retrieval: problems, methods, challenges and evaluations in the last 20 years","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2202.07209","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:22:39.325663Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.03756","last_updated":"2026-08-04T14:46:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:21:56.174991Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-04T14:46:19Z","title":"LegalPincite: Multi-level Legal Information Retrieval Dataset","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:22:39.325663Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2202.07209","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.03756"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b099b0edda0e8e28ddd8172424289f81745f485a59ae11b5585cd01736881874","observation_id":"ab73cd69-afa2-4545-926d-519ea372e2c2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:22:39.325663Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2202.07209/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2202.07209/integrity","json":"/paper/2202.07209/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2202.07209"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.07209","last_updated":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.IR","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T17:08:55.953364Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-15T06:01:36Z","title":"Case law retrieval: problems, methods, challenges and evaluations in the last 20 years"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 7 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2202.07209."}