pith. sign in

arxiv: 2203.15416 · v2 · submitted 2022-03-29 · ✦ hep-ex

Measurement of forward photon production cross-section in pp collisions at sqrt{s} = 510 GeV with RHICf detector

O. Adriani , E. Berti , L. Bonechi , R. D'Alessandro , Y. Goto , B. Hong , Y. Itow , K. Kasahara
show 18 more authors
M. H. Kim Y. Kim J. H. Lee S. Lee T. Ljubicic H. Menjo I. Nakagawa A. Ogawa S. Oh K. Ohashi R. Pak T. Sako N. Sakurai K. Sato R. Seidl K. Tanida S. Torii A. Tricomi
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 12:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords forward photon productionpp collisionsRHICfcross-sectionFeynman scalinghadronic modelspseudorapidity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Forward photon cross-sections at 510 GeV remain consistent with Feynman scaling and several hadronic models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures the inclusive differential cross-section for photon production in six forward pseudorapidity intervals ranging from 6.1 to above 8.5 in proton-proton collisions at 510 GeV. These data are compared in three overlapping regions of the x_F-p_T plane with earlier LHCf measurements at 7 and 13 TeV. Within uncertainties the new results agree with the expectation of Feynman scaling and with predictions from EPOS-LHC, QGSJET-II-04, Sibyll 2.3d and DPMjet-III 2019.1, although some models display only weak energy dependence.

Core claim

The inclusive differential production cross-section of photons was measured in the regions 6.1 < η < 6.5, 6.5 < η < 7.0, 7.0 < η < 7.5, 7.5 < η < 8.0, 8.0 < η < 8.5 and η > 8.5 at √s = 510 GeV. When restricted to the same x_F-p_T coverage as the LHCf data at higher energies, the cross-sections are consistent with Feynman scaling; they also match the cited model predictions within experimental uncertainties.

What carries the argument

The RHICf detector, which records forward photons with calorimeters in pp collisions, providing the differential cross-sections in the stated pseudorapidity intervals.

If this is right

  • Photon yields in the forward direction exhibit little dependence on collision energy between 510 GeV and 13 TeV.
  • The four tested hadronic models reproduce the measured spectra to within the experimental precision.
  • Feynman scaling remains a usable approximation for extrapolating forward photon production to higher energies.
  • Data in the three shared kinematic regions can be used directly to constrain or tune the models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These forward measurements supply additional constraints that could be applied to air-shower simulations for cosmic-ray studies.
  • Model-to-data differences that remain after the present comparison may point to specific deficiencies in the treatment of forward particle production.
  • Repeating the measurement at an intermediate energy would tighten the test of energy independence.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that Monte Carlo simulations correctly model the detector acceptance, efficiency, photon identification and that background subtraction introduces no large systematic biases.

What would settle it

A new measurement of the same forward photon cross-sections that lies outside the reported uncertainties or shows clear violation of the scaling hypothesis in the overlapping x_F-p_T regions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2203.15416 by A. Ogawa, A. Tricomi, B. Hong, E. Berti, H. Menjo, I. Nakagawa, J. H. Lee, K. Kasahara, K. Ohashi, K. Sato, K. Tanida, L. Bonechi, M. H. Kim, N. Sakurai, O. Adriani, R. D'Alessandro, R. Pak, R. Seidl, S. Lee, S. Oh, S. Torii, T. Ljubicic, T. Sako, Y. Goto, Y. Itow, Y. Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Systematic uncertainties of the photon production cross-section measurement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Inclusive photon production cross-section measured by the RHICf detector. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Ratio of inclusive photon production cross-sections predicted by hadronic in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the measured cross-section with the results of LHCf at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ratios of the RHICf results to the LHCf results [5, 6]. The error bars represent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This study reported the inclusive differential production cross-section of photons in six pseudorapidity regions: 6.1 < $\eta$ < 6.5, 6.5 < $\eta$ < 7.0, 7.0 < $\eta$ <7.5, 7.5 < $\eta$ <8.0, 8.0 < $\eta$ < 8.5, and $\eta$ > 8.5, measured through the RHICf experiment with pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 510 GeV conducted in June 2017. In addition, the cross-sections in the three regions of the $x_F$-$p_T$ phase space coverage that are same as those of the LHCf results at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 and 13 TeV were obtained and compared. Considering the uncertainties, the results were observed to be consistent with both the Feynman scaling law and the model predictions of EPOS-LHC, QGSJET-II-04, Sibyll 2.3d, and DPMjet-III 2019.1, although certain models exhibited weak collision energy dependencies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a measurement of the inclusive differential cross section for forward photon production in pp collisions at √s = 510 GeV using the RHICf detector. Cross sections are extracted in six pseudorapidity intervals (6.1 < η < 6.5, 6.5 < η < 7.0, 7.0 < η < 7.5, 7.5 < η < 8.0, 8.0 < η < 8.5, η > 8.5) and in three x_F-p_T regions chosen to match prior LHCf measurements at 7 and 13 TeV. The results are stated to be consistent with Feynman scaling and with the predictions of EPOS-LHC, QGSJET-II-04, Sibyll 2.3d, and DPMjet-III 2019.1 within the quoted uncertainties, although some models exhibit only weak collision-energy dependence.

Significance. Forward photon spectra at RHIC energies provide a direct experimental anchor for testing hadronic interaction models that are used both for LHC simulations and for cosmic-ray air-shower calculations. The overlap in x_F-p_T coverage with LHCf data allows a test of Feynman scaling across more than an order of magnitude in √s. If the experimental systematics are demonstrated to be under control, the measurement supplies a useful constraint on the forward neutral-pion and photon yields that current models still describe with sizable spread.

major comments (1)
  1. [Analysis and systematic uncertainties] The consistency statements in the abstract and results rest on the accuracy of Monte Carlo modeling for RHICf acceptance, photon identification efficiency, and background subtraction (neutral-hadron contamination and beam-related backgrounds). No quantitative data/MC closure tests, control-sample ratios, or efficiency validation plots are referenced in the provided text; any mismatch in these quantities directly scales the reported cross sections and can produce spurious agreement with the listed models. This is load-bearing for the central claim of model consistency.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract asserts consistency “considering the uncertainties” but supplies neither the numerical cross-section values nor the breakdown of statistical versus systematic uncertainties; a short quantitative statement would improve readability.
  2. [Results] The six η intervals and three x_F-p_T regions are defined but the precise bin boundaries and the corresponding integrated luminosities or event counts are not tabulated in the excerpt; these should appear in a dedicated table for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The major comment is addressed below. We will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the Monte Carlo validation as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The consistency statements in the abstract and results rest on the accuracy of Monte Carlo modeling for RHICf acceptance, photon identification efficiency, and background subtraction (neutral-hadron contamination and beam-related backgrounds). No quantitative data/MC closure tests, control-sample ratios, or efficiency validation plots are referenced in the provided text; any mismatch in these quantities directly scales the reported cross sections and can produce spurious agreement with the listed models. This is load-bearing for the central claim of model consistency.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's point that the provided text does not explicitly reference quantitative data/MC closure tests, control-sample ratios, or dedicated efficiency validation plots. The manuscript describes the Monte Carlo-based determination of acceptance, photon identification efficiency, and background subtraction (including neutral-hadron and beam-related contributions), with systematic uncertainties assessed through model variations. However, to directly address this concern and better substantiate the consistency claims, we will add a new subsection (or appendix) in the revised version that includes explicit data/MC comparison plots, closure-test results, and any available control-sample ratios for the key correction factors. These additions will be placed in the analysis section to demonstrate control over the relevant systematics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Pure experimental measurement with no derivation chain or self-referential predictions.

full rationale

This is a standard experimental paper reporting measured differential cross sections for forward photons in pp collisions. The reported values are extracted from detector data using standard acceptance/efficiency corrections from Monte Carlo and background subtraction; these procedures are external to the final cross-section numbers and do not reduce the result to a quantity defined by the result itself. Comparisons to Feynman scaling and hadronic models (EPOS-LHC etc.) occur after the measurement and serve as validation, not as load-bearing steps in any derivation. No equations, self-citations, or ansatzes create circularity. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks (data from the 2017 RHIC run).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard experimental assumptions about detector response modeling and background subtraction that are not detailed in the abstract; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the reported result.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Detector acceptance and efficiency are accurately reproduced by Monte Carlo simulations used for unfolding.
    Required to convert observed counts into cross-sections; invoked implicitly when reporting differential cross-sections.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5869 in / 1259 out tokens · 24506 ms · 2026-05-24T12:12:47.685768+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    doi:10.1140/ epjc/s10052-021-09700-w

    The energy spectrum of cosmic rays beyond the turn-down around 10 17 ev as measured with the surface detector of the pierre auger observatory, The European Physical Journal C 81 (11) (2021) 966. doi:10.1140/ epjc/s10052-021-09700-w . URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09700-w

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09700-w 2021

  2. [2]

    Depth of Maximum of Air-Shower Profiles at the Pierre Auger Observatory: Measurements at Energies above 10^17.8 eV

    A. Aab, et al., Depth of maximum of air-shower profiles at the Pierre Auger Observatory. I. Measurements at energies above 10 17.8 eV, Phys. Rev. D 90 (12) (2014) 122005. arXiv:1409.4809, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.90.122005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    R. U. Abbasi, et al., Depth of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Ray Induced Air Shower Maxima Measured by the Telescope Array Black Rock and Long Ridge FADC Fluorescence Detectors and Surface Array in Hybrid Mode, Astroparticle Physics 858 (2018) 76. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ aabad7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ 2018

  4. [5]

    Measurement of zero degree single photon energy spectra for sqrt(s) = 7TeV proton-proton collisions at LHC

    O. Adriani, et al., Measurement of zero degree single photon energy spectra for√s = 7 TeV proton-proton collisions at LHC, Physics Letters B 703 (2011) 128–134. arXiv:1104.5294, doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2011.07.077

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb 2011

  5. [6]

    Measurement of forward photon production cross-section in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV with the LHCf detector

    O. Adriani, et al., Measurement of forward photon production cross- section in proton–proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the LHCf detector, Phys. Lett. B780 (2018) 233–239. arXiv:1703.07678, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.12.050

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.12.050 2018

  6. [7]

    O. Adriani, others, LHCf Collaboration, Measurements of longitudinal and transverse momentum distributions for neutral pions in the forward- rapidity region with the LHCf detector, Phys. Rev. D 94 (3) (2016) 032007. arXiv:1507.08764, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.032007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.032007 2016

  7. [8]

    Measurement of very forward neutron energy spectra for 7 TeV proton--proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider

    O. Adriani, et al., Measurement of very forward neutron energy spectra for 7 TeV proton-proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider, Physics 17 Letters B 750 (2015) 360–366. arXiv:1503.03505, doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2015.09.041

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j 2015

  8. [9]

    O. Adriani, et al., Measurement of energy flow, cross section and average inelasticity of forward neutrons generated in√s = 13TeV proton-proton collisions with the LHCf Arm2 detector, JHEP 07 (2020) 016. arXiv: 2003.02192, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2020)016

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2020)016 2020

  9. [10]

    R. P. Feynman, Very high-energy collisions of hadrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 1415–1417. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.1415. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.1415

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.1415 1969

  10. [11]

    Adriani, et al., Technical design report of the LHCf experiment (2 2006)

    O. Adriani, et al., Technical design report of the LHCf experiment (2 2006). URL https://cds.cern.ch/record/926196

    work page 2006

  11. [12]

    Makino, et al., Performance study for the photon measurements of the upgraded LHCf calorimeters with Gd 2SiO5 (GSO) scintillators, Journal of Instrumentation 12 (2017) P03023

    Y. Makino, et al., Performance study for the photon measurements of the upgraded LHCf calorimeters with Gd 2SiO5 (GSO) scintillators, Journal of Instrumentation 12 (2017) P03023. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/03/ P03023

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/03/ 2017

  12. [13]

    Adriani, et al., Performance of RHICf detector during operation in 2017, Journal of Instrumentation 16 (10) (2021) P10027

    O. Adriani, et al., Performance of RHICf detector during operation in 2017, Journal of Instrumentation 16 (10) (2021) P10027. arXiv:2108. 00634, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/10/P10027

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/10/p10027 2017

  13. [14]

    Adler, A

    C. Adler, A. Denisov, E. Garcia, M. J. Murray, H. Strobele, S. N. White, The RHIC zero degree calorimeter, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 470 (2001) 488–499

    work page 2001

  14. [15]

    M. H. Kim, et al., Transverse single-spin asymmetry for very forward neutral pion production in polarized p +p collisions at√s = 510 gev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 252501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124. 252501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124 2020

  15. [16]

    Pierog, I

    T. Pierog, I. Karpenko, J. M. Katzy, E. Yatsenko, K. Werner, Epos lhc: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the cern large hadron collider, Phys. Rev. C 92 (2015) 034906. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.92.034906. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034906 18

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.92.034906 2015

  16. [17]

    Ostapchenko, Monte carlo treatment of hadronic interactions in en- hanced pomeron scheme: Qgsjet-ii model, Phys

    S. Ostapchenko, Monte carlo treatment of hadronic interactions in en- hanced pomeron scheme: Qgsjet-ii model, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 014018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.014018. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.014018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.014018 2011

  17. [18]

    Riehn, R

    F. Riehn, R. Engel, A. Fedynitch, T. K. Gaisser, T. Stanev, Hadronic interaction model sibyll 2.3d and extensive air showers, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 063002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.063002. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.063002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.063002 2020

  18. [19]

    Fedynitch, R

    A. Fedynitch, R. Engel, Revision of the high energy hadronic interac- tion models phojet/dpmjet-iii, in: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Nuclear Reaction Mechanisms, NRM 2015, 15.06 - 19.06., Varenna, Italy, 2015, pp. 301–309, 51.03.03; LK 01

    work page 2015

  19. [20]

    doi:10.2172/1580251

    Effective zdc cross section measurement during a dedicated star elastic scattering physics store in run15 (11 2019). doi:10.2172/1580251. URL https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1580251

    work page doi:10.2172/1580251 2019

  20. [21]

    Ulrich, T

    R. Ulrich, T. Pierog, C. Baus, Cosmic Ray Monte Carlo Package, CRMC (Feb. 2021). doi:10.5281/zenodo.4558706

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4558706 2021

  21. [22]

    Antchev, et al., Luminosity-independent measurements of total, elas- tic and inelastic cross-sections at√s = 7 TeV, EPL 101 (2) (2013) 21004

    G. Antchev, et al., Luminosity-independent measurements of total, elas- tic and inelastic cross-sections at√s = 7 TeV, EPL 101 (2) (2013) 21004. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/101/21004

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/101/21004 2013

  22. [23]

    First measurement of elastic, inelastic and total cross-section at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV by TOTEM and overview of cross-section data at LHC energies

    G. Antchev, et al., First measurement of elastic, inelastic and total cross-section at√s = 13 TeV by TOTEM and overview of cross-section data at LHC energies, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2017) 103. 16 p. arXiv: 1712.06153, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6567-0

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6567-0 2017

  23. [24]

    J. R. Cudell, V. V. Ezhela, P. Gauron, K. Kang, Y. V. Kuyanov, S. B. Lugovsky, E. Martynov, B. Nicolescu, E. A. Razuvaev, N. P. Tkachenko, Benchmarks for the forward observables at rhic, the tevatron-run ii, and the lhc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 201801.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 89.201801. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.201801 19

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2002