{"as_of":"2026-08-08T09:52:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:2ca6c892c47871dca6e16778d1f33bd918e0980a06d00e3fa33d1f5cf8bc88cd","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:03:44.152496Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T04:54:30.726221Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2204.04859","last_updated":"2022-04-11T04:06:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T12:58:49.797086Z","submitted_at":"2022-04-11T04:06:28Z","title":"A Survey on Legal Judgment Prediction: Datasets, Metrics, Models and Challenges","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2204.04859","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:03:44.152496Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16514","last_updated":"2025-05-25T11:30:02Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T14:57:23.988580Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T10:50:33Z","title":"AppealCase: A Dataset and Benchmark for Civil Case Appeal Scenarios","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:03:44.152496Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2204.04859","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16514"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5a06055c49696eee77c7b12eeefe4ba30bf1bd6c293a69bd1bf019dc4b59c723","observation_id":"7a7a4b13-3bd1-4d22-a017-d1eb2c3dde61","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:03:44.152496Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2204.04859","last_updated":"2022-04-11T04:06:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T12:58:49.797086Z","submitted_at":"2022-04-11T04:06:28Z","title":"A Survey on Legal Judgment Prediction: Datasets, Metrics, Models and Challenges","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2204.04859","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2204.04859","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T04:54:30.726221Z","title":"A Survey on Legal Judgment Prediction: Datasets, Metrics, Models and Challenges","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"9b6ffc08-b0ec-451b-90c7-b07bf557ced2","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.18768","last_updated":"2025-06-11T06:55:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T04:45:33.276933Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-11T06:55:40Z","title":"ASP2LJ : An Adversarial Self-Play Laywer Augmented Legal Judgment Framework","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T04:54:25.436759Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2204.04859","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.18768"},"observation_digest":"sha256:70d171559ada8a30570af37552662b5d153ed439e27b17810e43765361e4250d","observation_id":"5b2ec7ef-c7a1-4a4d-83d4-f2c95821102a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T04:54:30.775596Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2204.04859/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2204.04859/integrity","json":"/paper/2204.04859/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2204.04859"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2204.04859","last_updated":"2022-04-11T04:06:28Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T12:58:49.797086Z","submitted_at":"2022-04-11T04:06:28Z","title":"A Survey on Legal Judgment Prediction: Datasets, Metrics, Models and Challenges"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2204.04859."}