pith. sign in

arxiv: 2207.05166 · v1 · submitted 2022-07-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE

The radio source in Abell 980: A Detached-Double-Double Radio Galaxy?

Gopal-Krishna , Surajit Paul , Sameer Salunkhe , Satish Sonkamble This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 11:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords Abell 980double-double radio galaxybrightest cluster galaxyradio lobesepisodic jet activityultra-steep spectrumintra-cluster mediumLoTSS
0
0 comments X

The pith

The radio source in Abell 980 consists of an old and a young double radio source produced by the same brightest cluster galaxy in separate jet episodes separated by lateral drift.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper combines new 144 MHz imaging from the LoTSS-2 survey with existing GMRT and VLA data at higher frequencies to show that the radio emission in cluster Abell 980 arises from two distinct double radio sources. One pair of lobes is diffuse and ultra-steep in spectrum, interpreted as buoyant remnants of an earlier jet episode that have risen in the hot intra-cluster medium. The brightest cluster galaxy has since moved to the cluster center and restarted activity, producing a younger, aligned double source whose axis is offset from the old pair. This configuration supplies the clearest observed case of a detached double-double radio galaxy whose lobe pairs lost colinearity because the parent galaxy drifted between the two activity phases.

Core claim

The morphological and spectral information from LoTSS-2 observations strengthens the proposal that the cluster's radio emission comes mainly from two double radio sources, both produced by the brightest cluster galaxy in two major episodes of jet activity. The two radio lobes left from the previous activity have become diffuse and developed an ultra-steep radio spectrum while rising buoyantly through the confining hot intra-cluster medium, and the host galaxy has drifted to the cluster centre and entered a new active phase manifested by a coinciding younger double radio source. The old and young double radio sources in A980 conjointly represent a double-double radio galaxy whose two lobe-pai

What carries the argument

Lateral drift of the brightest cluster galaxy between two jet episodes, detaching and misaligning the old buoyant lobes from the new double radio source.

If this is right

  • The old lobes represent buoyant remnants of previous jet activity that have risen through the intra-cluster medium.
  • The two lobe pairs lost colinearity specifically because of the lateral drift of their common parent galaxy.
  • Episodic jet activity in cluster galaxies can produce observable double-double structures even when alignment is lost.
  • Low-frequency surveys can reveal the ultra-steep older components that higher-frequency observations miss.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Galaxy motion within clusters may systematically affect the observed alignment statistics of radio sources, requiring corrections in duty-cycle estimates.
  • Hydrodynamic simulations of galaxy orbits through the intra-cluster medium could predict the typical separation and misalignment angles expected for such detached systems.
  • Targeted X-ray mapping of the intra-cluster medium around the old lobes could test whether their paths match expected buoyant trajectories from the current BCG location.

Load-bearing premise

The diffuse ultra-steep-spectrum lobes are the buoyant remnants of an earlier jet episode from the same BCG that has since drifted to the cluster center, rather than emission from a different galaxy or a single continuous but interrupted activity cycle.

What would settle it

High-resolution spectral-index maps or proper-motion measurements showing the old lobes are physically associated with a galaxy other than the current BCG position, or that their plasma ages are inconsistent with buoyant rise after the first episode, would falsify the detached double-double interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2207.05166 by Gopal-Krishna, Sameer Salunkhe, Satish Sonkamble, Surajit Paul.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Panel (a)Magenta contours of VLA L-band map at 3, 9, 81×σ = 25µJy/beam (FWHM = 9.000×8.700) and blue contours (at 3, 9, 27×σ = 100µJy/beam) of the GMRT-325 MHz map (FWHM = 8.200×7.300) are overplotted on Pan-STARRS ‘i’ band optical image. Among the galaxies with known spectroscopic redshis, the more likely cluster members (z = 0.1582 ± 0.0035; red squares) and the remaining galaxies (z < 0.1547 or z > 0.1… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Panel (a) Spectral index distribution, derived by combining the GMRT (325 MHz) and LoTSS-2 (144 MHz) maps (see corresponding error map in Appendix 1). The colour map of spectral age produced by BRATS soware (see sec. 2.1.1) is shown within the inset (in units of Myr) and the corresponding error map in Appendix 2. Contours of the low-resolution map at 325 MHz are plotted at 3, 12, 48, 192 × 100µJy/beam ove… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Panel (a): High-resolution (6 00 × 6 00) map from LOTSS-DR2 (144 MHz) is shown in blue colour. The inset shows the corresponding contours for the central double radio source in yellow colour, at 1, 2, 4, 8, ... × 750 µJy/beam, over-plotted on the Pan-STARRS ‘i’ band optical image. Panel (b) GMRT map (325 MHz) is shown in blue colour and the inset shows the central double source in cyan colour contours, at … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Chandra X-ray temperature (keV) map overlaid with the radio con￾tours (at 5, 20, 80, 320 × 150 µJy/beam) of the LOTSS-2 map. respectively. Interestingly, Fig. 1a does not show even a mod￾erately bright optical galaxy near the central location between A and B. Of the two optical objects seen within the orange circle, the northern one is classified as a star and the lower one as a galaxy (SDSS/DR7, Abazajian… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The error map for the spectral index map shown in Fig. 2a. Appendix 2. Spectral age error maps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Positive error map (le) and negative error map (right) for spectral age map presented in inset of Fig. 2a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

It is argued that the new morphological and spectral information gleaned from the recently published LoFAR Two meter Sky Survey data release 2 (LoTSS-2 at 144 MHz) observations of the cluster Abell 980 (A980), in combination with its existing GMRT and VLA observations at higher frequencies, provide the much-needed evidence to strengthen the proposal that the cluster's radio emission comes mainly from two double radio sources, both produced by the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) in two major episodes of jet activity. The two radio lobes left from the previous activity have become diffuse and developed an ultra-steep radio spectrum while rising buoyantly through the confining hot intra-cluster medium (ICM) and, concomitantly, the host galaxy has drifted to the cluster centre and entered a new active phase manifested by a coinciding younger double radio source. The new observational results and arguments presented here bolster the case that the old and young double radio sources in A980 conjointly represent a `double-double' radio galaxy whose two lobe-pairs have lost colinearity due to the (lateral) drift of their parent galaxy, making this system by far the most plausible case of a `Detached-Double-Double Radio Galaxy' (dDDRG).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that multi-frequency radio observations (LoTSS 144 MHz, GMRT, VLA) of Abell 980 show two misaligned double radio sources produced by the same BCG in separate jet episodes. The older lobes have become diffuse with ultra-steep spectra while rising buoyantly in the ICM; the BCG has since drifted to the cluster center and restarted activity, producing a younger aligned double. This makes A980 the clearest example of a detached double-double radio galaxy (dDDRG).

Significance. If the single-galaxy interpretation holds, the work supplies a well-documented case of episodic AGN activity combined with lateral BCG motion inside a cluster, using only public survey data. It strengthens the morphological and spectral criteria for identifying dDDRGs and highlights the role of cluster dynamics in misaligning successive lobe pairs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Discussion] Discussion (around the interpretation of the 144 MHz diffuse emission): the claim that the ultra-steep lobes are buoyant remnants from the current BCG rests on morphological coincidence and spectral steepening, but no quantitative comparison is given between the spectral age derived from the LoTSS–GMRT–VLA spectrum and the dynamical timescale for lateral BCG drift within the cluster potential. Without this, the single-galaxy dDDRG model cannot be distinguished from a chance alignment or emission from a separate galaxy.
  2. [Results] Results section on source classification: the identification of the old lobes as detached from the new double relies on the assumption that the projected axis of the diffuse emission passes through the current BCG position after plausible drift, yet no explicit test or Monte-Carlo alignment probability is provided to quantify how unlikely a random superposition would be.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 1] Figure 1 caption and text: the frequency labels and beam sizes for the overlaid contours are not uniformly stated, making it difficult to assess the resolution at which the diffuse emission is detected.
  2. [Introduction] Introduction: the definition of 'detached' in dDDRG is introduced without a clear reference to prior literature on DDRGs, which would help readers distinguish the new class from standard DDRGs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive report. The comments highlight areas where additional quantitative support can strengthen the single-galaxy dDDRG interpretation. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion (around the interpretation of the 144 MHz diffuse emission): the claim that the ultra-steep lobes are buoyant remnants from the current BCG rests on morphological coincidence and spectral steepening, but no quantitative comparison is given between the spectral age derived from the LoTSS–GMRT–VLA spectrum and the dynamical timescale for lateral BCG drift within the cluster potential. Without this, the single-galaxy dDDRG model cannot be distinguished from a chance alignment or emission from a separate galaxy.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit comparison of timescales would strengthen the argument. In the revised manuscript we will add to the Discussion a rough spectral-age estimate derived from the LoTSS–GMRT–VLA spectrum (using standard JP or CI models with equipartition B-field assumptions) and compare it to the expected lateral-drift timescale obtained from the cluster velocity dispersion and the observed offset of the BCG from the X-ray centroid. We will also note the substantial uncertainties inherent in both estimates. This addition will help quantify the consistency of the single-galaxy scenario while retaining the morphological and spectral evidence already presented. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section on source classification: the identification of the old lobes as detached from the new double relies on the assumption that the projected axis of the diffuse emission passes through the current BCG position after plausible drift, yet no explicit test or Monte-Carlo alignment probability is provided to quantify how unlikely a random superposition would be.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a statistical test of alignment probability is absent. In the revised Results section we will include a simple Monte-Carlo exercise that randomizes the position and orientation of the diffuse emission within the cluster area and reports the fraction of trials in which the projected axis passes within a plausible drift distance of the BCG. The test will use the observed cluster radius and the measured offset, thereby providing a quantitative measure of how unlikely a chance superposition is. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: classification rests on external survey data

full rationale

The paper advances an observational interpretation that the radio emission in A980 comprises two double sources from the same BCG in separate episodes, with the older lobes now diffuse and ultra-steep-spectrum after buoyant rise while the host drifted. This rests on morphological alignment, spectral steepening, and positional data drawn from independent LoTSS-2, GMRT, and VLA surveys. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations appear in the provided text that reduce the dDDRG classification to its own inputs by construction. The argument chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks rather than internally circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The interpretation rests on standard radio-astronomy domain assumptions about spectral steepening as an age indicator and buoyant rise of lobes; no free parameters or new invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Ultra-steep radio spectrum indicates older, energy-loss-dominated plasma that has risen buoyantly in the ICM.
    Invoked to identify the diffuse lobes as remnants of a prior episode.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5775 in / 1279 out tokens · 23014 ms · 2026-05-24T11:51:08.006326+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    N., Adelman-McCarthy J

    Abazajian K. N., Adelman-McCarthy J. K., Ag \"u eros M. A., Allam S. S., Allende Prieto C., An D., Anderson K. S. J., et al., 2009, ApJS, 182, 543. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 2009

  2. [2]

    E., Scott P

    Baldwin J. E., Scott P. F., 1973, MNRAS, 165, 259. doi:10.1093/mnras/165.3.259

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/165.3.259 1973

  3. [3]

    G., Pandey-Pommier M., Sunilkumar P., Dhurde S., Bagchi J., Ishwara-Chandra C

    Biju K. G., Pandey-Pommier M., Sunilkumar P., Dhurde S., Bagchi J., Ishwara-Chandra C. H., Jacob J., 2014, ASInC, 13, 155

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    G., Bagchi J., Ishwara-Chandra C

    Biju K. G., Bagchi J., Ishwara-Chandra C. H., Pandey-Pommier M., Jacob J., Patil M. K., Kumar P. S., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 471, 617. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1476

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1476 2017

  5. [5]

    A., McNamara B

    B \^ rzan L., Rafferty D. A., McNamara B. R., Wise M. W., Nulsen P. E. J., 2004, ApJ, 607, 800. doi:10.1086/383519

    work page doi:10.1086/383519 2004

  6. [6]

    C., Edge A

    B \"o hringer H., Voges W., Fabian A. C., Edge A. C., Neumann D. M., 1993, MNRAS, 264, L25. doi:10.1093/mnras/264.1.L25

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/264.1.l25 1993

  7. [7]

    J., et al., 2020, A&A, 638, A29

    Brienza M., Morganti R., Harwood J., Duchet T., Rajpurohit K., Shulevski A., Hardcastle M. J., et al., 2020, A&A, 638, A29. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037457

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037457 2020

  8. [8]

    G., Pringle J

    Brocksopp C., Kaiser C. R., Schoenmakers A. P., de Bruyn A. G., 2007, MNRAS, 382, 1019. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12483.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12483.x 2007

  9. [9]

    O., Schwendeman E., White R

    Burns J. O., Schwendeman E., White R. A., 1983, ApJ, 271, 575. doi:10.1086/161224

    work page doi:10.1086/161224 1983

  10. [10]

    O., 1990, AJ, 99, 14

    Burns J. O., 1990, AJ, 99, 14. doi:10.1086/115307

    work page doi:10.1086/115307 1990

  11. [11]

    The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys

    Chambers K. C., Magnier E. A., Metcalfe N., Flewelling H. A., Huber M. E., Waters C. Z., Denneau L., et al., 2016, arXiv, arXiv:1612.05560

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    O., Sakemi H., Ohmura T., Machida M., Akamatsu H., Akahori T., Nakanishi H., et al., 2021, Natur, 593, 47

    Chibueze J. O., Sakemi H., Ohmura T., Machida M., Akamatsu H., Akahori T., Nakanishi H., et al., 2021, Natur, 593, 47. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03434-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03434-1 2021

  13. [13]

    u ggen M., Kaiser C. R., B \

    Churazov E., Br \"u ggen M., Kaiser C. R., B \"o hringer H., Forman W., 2001, ApJ, 554, 261. doi:10.1086/321357

    work page doi:10.1086/321357 2001

  14. [14]

    J., Matthews A

    Condon J. J., Matthews A. M., 2018, PASP, 130, 073001. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aac1b2

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aac1b2 2018

  15. [15]

    D., Thorat K., Condon J

    Cotton W. D., Thorat K., Condon J. J., Frank B. S., J \'o zsa G. I. G., White S. V., Deane R., et al., 2020, MNRAS, 495, 1271. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1240

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1240 2020

  16. [16]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/281.3.799

    Ebeling, H., Voges, W., Bohringer, H., et al.\ 1996, , 281, 799. doi:10.1093/mnras/281.3.799

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/281.3.799 1996

  17. [17]

    A., Gopal-Krishna, 2001, A&A, 366, 26

    En lin T. A., Gopal-Krishna, 2001, A&A, 366, 26

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    C., 1994, ARA&A, 32, 277

    Fabian A. C., 1994, ARA&A, 32, 277. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.32.090194.001425

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.32.090194.001425 1994

  19. [19]

    A., & van Wyk, F

    Fabian A. C., Sanders J. S., Taylor G. B., Allen S. W., Crawford C. S., Johnstone R. M., Iwasawa K., 2006, MNRAS, 366, 417. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09896.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09896.x 2006

  20. [20]

    C., 2012, ARA&A, 50, 455

    Fabian A. C., 2012, ARA&A, 50, 455. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 2012

  21. [21]

    P., 2013, MNRAS, 432, 3401

    Gaspari M., Ruszkowski M., Oh S. P., 2013, MNRAS, 432, 3401. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt692

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt692 2013

  22. [22]

    P., Owen F

    Ge J. P., Owen F. N., 1993, AJ, 105, 778. doi:10.1086/116471

    work page doi:10.1086/116471 1993

  23. [23]

    W., Scott N., 2015, ApJ, 798, 54

    Graham A. W., Scott N., 2015, ApJ, 798, 54. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/54

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/798/1/54 2015

  24. [24]

    Gull, S. F. & Northover, K. J. E.\ 1973, , 244, 80. doi:10.1038/244080a0

    work page doi:10.1038/244080a0 1973

  25. [25]

    J., Krause M

    Hardcastle M. J., Krause M. G. H., 2013, MNRAS, 430, 174. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts564

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts564 2013

  26. [26]

    J., Hardcastle M

    Harwood J. J., Hardcastle M. J., Croston J. H., Goodger J. L., 2013, MNRAS, 435, 3353. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1526

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1526 2013

  27. [27]

    K., Ohyama Y., Konar C., Kim S., Rey S.-C., Saikia D

    Hota A., Sirothia S. K., Ohyama Y., Konar C., Kim S., Rey S.-C., Saikia D. J., et al., 2011, MNRAS, 417, L36. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01115.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01115.x 2011

  28. [28]

    T., Jagannathan P., Mooley K

    Intema H. T., Jagannathan P., Mooley K. P., Frail D. A., 2017, A&A, 598, A78

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20048056

    Jamrozy M., Klein U., Mack K.-H., Gregorini L., Parma P., 2004, A&A, 427, 79. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20048056

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20048056 2004

  30. [30]

    R., Vuthela, F

    Kaiser C. R., 2003, MNRAS, 343, 1319. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06774.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06774.x 2003

  31. [31]

    Kalberla P. M. W., Burton W. B., Hartmann D., Arnal E. M., Bajaja E., Morras R., P \"o ppel W. G. L., 2005, A&A, 440, 775. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041864

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041864 2005

  32. [32]

    doi:10.5303/JKAS.2014.47.5.195

    Kim J.-Y., Trippe S., 2014, JKAS, 47, 195. doi:10.5303/JKAS.2014.47.5.195

    work page doi:10.5303/jkas.2014.47.5.195 2014

  33. [33]

    S.\ 2011, High Energy Astrophysics, by Malcolm S

    Longair, M. S.\ 2011, High Energy Astrophysics, by Malcolm S. Longair, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    R., Nulsen P

    McNamara B. R., Nulsen P. E. J., Wise M. W., Rafferty D. A., Carilli C., Sarazin C. L., Blanton E. L., 2005, Natur, 433, 45. doi:10.1038/nature03202

    work page doi:10.1038/nature03202 2005

  35. [35]

    Self-healing high-dimensional quantum key distribution using hybrid spin-orbit Bessel states

    McNamara B. R., Nulsen P. E. J., 2007, ARA&A, 45, 117. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110625

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110625 2007

  36. [36]

    doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.18.090180.001121

    Miley G., 1980, ARA&A, 18, 165. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.18.090180.001121

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.18.090180.001121 1980

  37. [37]

    S., Reiprich T

    Mittal R., Hudson D. S., Reiprich T. H., Clarke T., 2009, A&A, 501, 835. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810836

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810836 2009

  38. [38]

    doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0223-0

    Morganti R., 2017, NatAs, 1, 596. doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0223-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0223-0 2017

  39. [39]

    R., McKinley B., Hurley-Walker N., Briggs F

    Offringa A. R., McKinley B., Hurley-Walker N., Briggs F. H., Wayth R. B., Kaplan D. L., Bell M. E., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 444, 606. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1368

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1368 2014

  40. [40]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1451

    Pasini T., Finoguenov A., Br \"u ggen M., Gaspari M., de Gasperin F., Gozaliasl G., 2021, MNRAS, 505, 2628. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1451

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1451 2021

  41. [41]

    doi:10.1086/444344

    Pizzolato F., Soker N., 2005, ApJ, 632, 821. doi:10.1086/444344

    work page doi:10.1086/444344 2005

  42. [42]

    Planck Collaboration, Ade P. A. R., Aghanim N., Arnaud M., Ashdown M., Aumont J., Baccigalupi C., et al., 2016, A&A, 594, A13

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037800

    Ramatsoku M., Murgia M., Vacca V., Serra P., Makhathini S., Govoni F., Smirnov O., et al., 2020, A&A, 636, L1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037800

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037800 2020

  44. [44]

    S., Croton D

    Raouf M., Shabala S. S., Croton D. J., Khosroshahi H. G., Bernyk M., 2017, MNRAS, 471, 658. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1598

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1598 2017

  45. [45]

    J., Diaferio A., Kurtz M

    Rines K., Geller M. J., Diaferio A., Kurtz M. J., 2013, ApJ, 767, 15

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    O., Clarke D

    Roettiger K., Burns J. O., Clarke D. A., Christiansen W. A., 1994, ApJL, 421, L23. doi:10.1086/187178

    work page doi:10.1086/187178 1994

  47. [47]

    A., 2009, ApJ, 697, 1341

    Rudnick L., Lemmerman J. A., 2009, ApJ, 697, 1341

    work page 2009

  48. [48]

    N., Hardcastle M

    Sabater J., Best P. N., Hardcastle M. J., Shimwell T. W., Tasse C., Williams W. L., Br \"u ggen M., et al., 2019, A&A, 622, A17. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833883

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833883 2019

  49. [49]

    J., Jamrozy M., 2009, BASI, 37, 63

    Saikia D. J., Jamrozy M., 2009, BASI, 37, 63

    work page 2009

  50. [50]

    R., McHardy I

    Sakelliou I., Merrifield M. R., McHardy I. M., 1996, MNRAS, 283, 673. doi:10.1093/mnras/283.2.673

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/283.2.673 1996

  51. [51]

    Salunkhe S., Paul S., Gopal-Krishna, Sonkamble S., and Bhagat S., accepted for publication in A&A (in press)

    work page

  52. [52]

    S., 2006, MNRAS, 371, 829

    Sanders J. S., 2006, MNRAS, 371, 829

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    doi:10.1086/497022

    Sbarufatti B., Treves A., Falomo R., 2005, ApJ, 635, 173. doi:10.1086/497022

    work page doi:10.1086/497022 2005

  54. [54]

    P., Papaloizou J

    Schoenmakers A. P., de Bruyn A. G., R \"o ttgering H. J. A., van der Laan H., 2000, MNRAS, 315, 395. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03432.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03432.x 2000

  55. [55]

    J., 2012, MNRAS, 420, 3174

    Sharma P., McCourt M., Quataert E., Parrish I. J., 2012, MNRAS, 420, 3174. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20246.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20246.x 2012

  56. [56]

    W., Hardcastle M

    Shimwell T. W., Hardcastle M. J., Tasse C., Best P. N., R \"o ttgering H. J. A., Williams W. L., Botteon A., et al., 2022, A&A, 659, A1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142484

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142484 2022

  57. [57]

    D., Murgia M., van Weeren R

    Shulevski A., Morganti R., Barthel P. D., Murgia M., van Weeren R. J., White G. J., Br \"u ggen M., et al., 2015, A&A, 579, A27. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425416

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425416 2015

  58. [58]

    M., Donahue M., 2015, ApJL, 799, L1

    Voit G. M., Donahue M., 2015, ApJL, 799, L1. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/799/1/L1

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/799/1/l1 2015

  59. [59]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all :=...

    work page

  60. [60]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" "doi:" doi * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if eprint field.or.null * if FUNCTION format.pid eprint empty format.doi format.eprint if FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "-...

    work page