{"as_of":"2026-08-21T01:04:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:8f55fde87be109d150acfa8d868a1ab2227b79a65f339b11105e8cce84495dff","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":4,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":4,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T17:55:27.894262Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T17:53:25.810621Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2209.06049","last_updated":"2023-05-15T10:02:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:32:50.509523Z","submitted_at":"2022-09-13T15:01:11Z","title":"Pre-trained Language Models for the Legal Domain: A Case Study on Indian Law","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2209.06049","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T17:55:27.894262Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.08385","last_updated":"2024-12-11T13:50:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:21:25.743549Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-11T13:50:17Z","title":"NyayaAnumana & INLegalLlama: The Largest Indian Legal Judgment Prediction Dataset and Specialized Language Model for Enhanced Decision Analysis","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T17:55:27.894262Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2209.06049","citing_paper":"/paper/2412.08385"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4e8a4da4e956544200dda55d401bc19a774eee7056168808a990dadc75d58b3f","observation_id":"397d5a4b-9bc8-4ee5-983a-e9e7044379e4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T17:55:27.894262Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2209.06049","last_updated":"2023-05-15T10:02:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:32:50.509523Z","submitted_at":"2022-09-13T15:01:11Z","title":"Pre-trained Language Models for the Legal Domain: A Case Study on Indian Law","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2209.06049","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:35:59.200283Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.17830","last_updated":"2025-01-29T18:22:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:14:46.862724Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-29T18:22:14Z","title":"A Comprehensive Survey on Legal Summarization: Challenges and Future Directions","version":1},"reference_index":98,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:35:59.200283Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2209.06049","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.17830"},"observation_digest":"sha256:37d8e2058fc8305f8e797498f5ed173200dfdd0ec44defa993a6bb353be66a57","observation_id":"f2959c5a-da06-4018-a752-d47b39314c74","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:35:59.200283Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2209.06049","last_updated":"2023-05-15T10:02:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:32:50.509523Z","submitted_at":"2022-09-13T15:01:11Z","title":"Pre-trained Language Models for the Legal Domain: A Case Study on Indian Law","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2209.06049","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2209.06049","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T17:53:25.810621Z","title":"Pre-trained Language Models for the Legal Domain: A Case Study on Indian Law","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"1b5252f5-b313-4f93-b689-05bf375888ba","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.05836","last_updated":"2025-02-09T10:07:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T20:00:18.817851Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-09T10:07:05Z","title":"LegalSeg: Unlocking the Structure of Indian Legal Judgments Through Rhetorical Role Classification","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T17:53:25.276907Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2209.06049","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.05836"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f4f22d7ba46ed70ab494cff325b6e237cb284b604d41dd9b5ea8e4c91e0a6416","observation_id":"58dcdb0b-472c-42f2-af84-20fbfe215762","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T17:53:25.844746Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2209.06049","last_updated":"2023-05-15T10:02:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:32:50.509523Z","submitted_at":"2022-09-13T15:01:11Z","title":"Pre-trained Language Models for the Legal Domain: A Case Study on Indian Law","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2209.06049","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T14:17:28.523781Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.06049 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.18825","last_updated":"2026-07-21T08:01:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:21:22.018112Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-21T08:01:17Z","title":"AILQA: Evaluating AI-Driven Legal Question Answering Systems for the Indian Legal System","version":1},"reference_index":71,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T14:17:28.523781Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2209.06049","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.18825"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8da2a8c1dff212901feaf63976d66bf7098ae16ae66aa21214e3abdfa95b6d55","observation_id":"dd7314d1-8509-4f5c-a682-be079fc01755","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T14:17:28.523781Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2209.06049/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2209.06049/integrity","json":"/paper/2209.06049/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2209.06049"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2209.06049","last_updated":"2023-05-15T10:02:14Z","latest_version":5,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:32:50.509523Z","submitted_at":"2022-09-13T15:01:11Z","title":"Pre-trained Language Models for the Legal Domain: A Case Study on Indian Law"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 21 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 4 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2209.06049."}