{"as_of":"2026-08-21T10:19:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:617cf5b6f50f9d1737cdb50a77713b84865256a3831e7789b639911e548f0477","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":3,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":3,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":3,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":3,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T11:02:09.822412Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-25T07:55:32.997185Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2210.02601","last_updated":"2022-10-05T23:21:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T03:52:14.130474Z","submitted_at":"2022-10-05T23:21:41Z","title":"From Threat Reports to Continuous Threat Intelligence: A Comparison of Attack Technique Extraction Methods from Textual Artifacts","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2210.02601","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T11:02:09.822412Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.18755","last_updated":"2024-11-27T21:09:02Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T18:53:28.295120Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-27T21:09:02Z","title":"Cyber-Attack Technique Classification Using Two-Stage Trained Large Language Models","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T11:02:09.822412Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2210.02601","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.18755"},"observation_digest":"sha256:91618cdb9d65a42a541c5b06ca425f6bf4557dc47cefae482f5d5b6e5bed8650","observation_id":"bc9e0486-7ce3-4d9c-966e-bf3afce6d680","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T11:02:09.822412Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2210.02601","last_updated":"2022-10-05T23:21:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T03:52:14.130474Z","submitted_at":"2022-10-05T23:21:41Z","title":"From Threat Reports to Continuous Threat Intelligence: A Comparison of Attack Technique Extraction Methods from Textual Artifacts","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2210.02601","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2210.02601","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"From threat reports to continuous threat intelligence: a comparison of attack technique extraction methods from textual artifacts","venue":null,"work_id":"fb80a240-7e3f-4fe2-a10c-0f250a309197","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06252","last_updated":"2026-01-28T20:47:02Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T12:01:33.695246Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-05T19:00:27Z","title":"False Alarms, Real Damage: Adversarial Attacks Using LLM-based Models on Text-based Cyber Threat Intelligence Systems","version":2},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-25T07:54:51.925530Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2210.02601","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06252"},"observation_digest":"sha256:43dc77e732d42315626c42233352c0212859ac52f82738628a2b64705fa210dd","observation_id":"56d1567f-a70b-4e1b-8223-fedef5047c8b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-25T07:55:32.999829Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:16.066871+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2210.02601","last_updated":"2022-10-05T23:21:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T03:52:14.130474Z","submitted_at":"2022-10-05T23:21:41Z","title":"From Threat Reports to Continuous Threat Intelligence: A Comparison of Attack Technique Extraction Methods from Textual Artifacts","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2210.02601","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2210.02601","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"From threat reports to continuous threat intelligence: a comparison of attack technique extraction methods from textual artifacts","venue":null,"work_id":"fb80a240-7e3f-4fe2-a10c-0f250a309197","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.07470","last_updated":"2026-04-08T18:09:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-08T18:09:25Z","title":"Beyond Single Reports: Evaluating Automated ATT&CK Technique Extraction in Multi-Report Campaign Settings","version":1},"reference_index":55,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-10T17:22:44.418566Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2210.02601","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.07470"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fd9fbf7c699965fca0428a0c529137b3cc9042af3220c33d7e737272042114aa","observation_id":"64fbd55f-1390-4501-8ff0-4d4e272ad072","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-11T06:56:01.268284Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:16.066871+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2210.02601/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2210.02601/integrity","json":"/paper/2210.02601/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2210.02601"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2210.02601","last_updated":"2022-10-05T23:21:41Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CR","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T03:52:14.130474Z","submitted_at":"2022-10-05T23:21:41Z","title":"From Threat Reports to Continuous Threat Intelligence: A Comparison of Attack Technique Extraction Methods from Textual Artifacts"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:16.066871+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 21 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 3 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2210.02601."}