{"as_of":"2026-08-10T10:37:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:de50a5c69066d40511ca90a6f443e5eb5c60a9aa9673b4448c174cf3e29792e8","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:05:41.465975Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":1,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[{"count":6,"observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","source":"arxiv_reference"}],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2210.12187","last_updated":"2023-08-01T22:23:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T08:09:24.844907Z","submitted_at":"2022-10-21T18:30:56Z","title":"Syntactic Surprisal From Neural Models Predicts, But Underestimates, Human Processing Difficulty From Syntactic Ambiguities","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2210.12187","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:05:41.465975Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.09307","last_updated":"2025-02-13T13:19:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T23:49:24.847164Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-13T13:19:33Z","title":"When the LM misunderstood the human chuckled: Analyzing garden path effects in humans and language models","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:05:41.465975Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2210.12187","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.09307"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bf700c6ad6d30b0bc0337c4de1e529c777e66259db30cf554143cc375d3b5679","observation_id":"fb425e26-cb1b-45e6-89f0-731aef4918ba","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:05:41.465975Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2210.12187","last_updated":"2023-08-01T22:23:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T08:09:24.844907Z","submitted_at":"2022-10-21T18:30:56Z","title":"Syntactic Surprisal From Neural Models Predicts, But Underestimates, Human Processing Difficulty From Syntactic Ambiguities","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2210.12187","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2210.12187","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2210.12187","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Syntactic","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","work_id":"c078f388-70c8-41a1-99bd-038d0f8607f9","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.27206","last_updated":"2026-06-25T16:02:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:21:01.224967Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-25T16:02:14Z","title":"Syntactic Belief Update as the Driver of Garden Path Processing Difficulty","version":1},"reference_index":87,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T04:38:01.183423Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2210.12187","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.27206"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5678322d7ddf69d5602ed9ceb21e3d2491c8c4697403b2714016736faaab9eae","observation_id":"dac8ff7b-ba6f-47fe-8065-9fe261a76381","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T04:38:58.516270Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2210.12187/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2210.12187/integrity","json":"/paper/2210.12187/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2210.12187"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2210.12187","last_updated":"2023-08-01T22:23:09Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T08:09:24.844907Z","submitted_at":"2022-10-21T18:30:56Z","title":"Syntactic Surprisal From Neural Models Predicts, But Underestimates, Human Processing Difficulty From Syntactic Ambiguities"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2210.12187."}