{"as_of":"2026-08-13T02:44:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:5878e4587ef83fab858c6dcf8c7810b2f960a7ce2f4a107cb3a977c1b2bd9512","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:58:47.416548Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T18:16:22.223912Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2210.16133","last_updated":"2022-11-30T09:15:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T23:53:19.450185Z","submitted_at":"2022-10-28T14:01:32Z","title":"Stop Measuring Calibration When Humans Disagree","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2210.16133","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:58:47.416548Z","title":"Stop Measuring Calibration When Humans Disagree, November 2022","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.13760","last_updated":"2024-11-21T00:15:44Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:52:45.031684Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T00:15:44Z","title":"A Framework for Evaluating LLMs Under Task Indeterminacy","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:58:47.416548Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2210.16133","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.13760"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6b576ee7a81cc72417afe8ef5f722214e42f156bdba58f5e455a145415bc8a06","observation_id":"a57fd76d-a59b-4874-9ec1-70b47786c546","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:58:47.416548Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2210.16133","last_updated":"2022-11-30T09:15:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T23:53:19.450185Z","submitted_at":"2022-10-28T14:01:32Z","title":"Stop Measuring Calibration When Humans Disagree","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2210.16133","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2210.16133","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2210.16133","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T18:16:22.223912Z","title":"Stop Measuring Calibration When Humans Disagree","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"8e16fe24-5664-484b-b081-ffd9aa2d7002","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.15634","last_updated":"2024-11-23T19:18:08Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:03:04.138270Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-23T19:18:08Z","title":"\"All that Glitters\": Approaches to Evaluations with Unreliable Model and Human Annotations","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:14:08.959989Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2210.16133","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.15634"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7a617e9c6999927adf046ba6a2a3e40f5d89e7cd885469a2215c05883a0bbc92","observation_id":"bb432597-0eef-421d-ad93-ebfc8bf5e1f9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:18:37.880314Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2210.16133/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2210.16133/integrity","json":"/paper/2210.16133/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2210.16133"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2210.16133","last_updated":"2022-11-30T09:15:10Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T23:53:19.450185Z","submitted_at":"2022-10-28T14:01:32Z","title":"Stop Measuring Calibration When Humans Disagree"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 13 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2210.16133."}