{"as_of":"2026-08-19T07:40:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:cdcf2cbdbed9334a04e56389c2a507c5ceede5f1d0d3bcd149ece72992ae9410","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-05-14T20:17:01.224864Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":1,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[{"count":0,"observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","source":"arxiv_reference"}],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2211.08369","last_updated":"2023-05-11T11:37:04Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:15:56.034078Z","submitted_at":"2022-11-15T18:18:34Z","title":"Easy to Decide, Hard to Agree: Reducing Disagreements Between Saliency Methods","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2211.08369","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2211.08369","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2211.08369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Easy to Decide, Hard to Agree: Reducing Disagreements Between Saliency Methods , shorttitle =","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","work_id":"523d7ae5-d8b8-4ee5-ae9d-1619cb50d695","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.12809","last_updated":"2026-05-12T23:01:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T05:36:43.446023Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T23:01:29Z","title":"Correcting Influence: Unboxing LLM Outputs with Orthogonal Latent Spaces","version":1},"reference_index":198,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-05-14T20:17:01.224864Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2211.08369","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.12809"},"observation_digest":"sha256:98a2de281ea1ef75f5b076c1aad77a5c37b0f0986dbe86e7f0bcfe07a81399d1","observation_id":"efd8130d-f949-4321-9082-7d5a559ca204","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-14T20:17:53.960163Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2211.08369/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2211.08369/integrity","json":"/paper/2211.08369/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2211.08369"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2211.08369","last_updated":"2023-05-11T11:37:04Z","latest_version":3,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:15:56.034078Z","submitted_at":"2022-11-15T18:18:34Z","title":"Easy to Decide, Hard to Agree: Reducing Disagreements Between Saliency Methods"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2211.08369."}