pith. sign in

arxiv: 2211.11266 · v2 · submitted 2022-11-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Anomalous acoustic plasmons in two-dimensional over-tilted Dirac bands

Chang-Xu Yan , Furu Zhang , Chao-Yang Tan , Hao-Ran Chang , Jianhui Zhou , Yugui Yao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 11:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords anomalous acoustic plasmonstype-II Dirac conesover-tilted bandsvalley chiralityplasmon dispersion2D Dirac materialsFermi surface
0
0 comments X

The pith

Over-tilted Dirac cones in two dimensions produce two anomalous acoustic plasmons with valley-dependent chirality.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the geometry of two-dimensional type-II Dirac cones, when over-tilted, gives rise to two distinct anomalous acoustic plasmons unlike the standard square-root dispersion. One plasmon stems from hybridization between pockets of high velocity anisotropy at a single Dirac point. The second arises from boosted band correlations near the open Fermi surface created by over-tilting. These modes display chirality that depends on the valley and aligns with the tilt direction, owing to the chiral nature of the electron bands. The dispersion and lifetime of the plasmons can be adjusted through the band gap and the choice of dielectric substrate.

Core claim

In two-dimensional over-tilted Dirac bands the distinct geometry of type-II Dirac cones dictates two anomalous acoustic plasmons. One originates from the strong hybridization of two pockets with large velocity anisotropy at one Dirac point. The other is attributed to the significant enhancement of the band correlation around the open Fermi surface. The plasmons exhibit valley-dependent chirality along the tilting direction due to the chiral electron dispersion.

What carries the argument

The geometry of over-tilted type-II Dirac cones that creates pocket hybridization and open Fermi surfaces.

Load-bearing premise

The over-tilting produces an open Fermi surface whose correlation enhancement and pocket hybridization are fully captured by the chosen band model without extra scattering or interaction channels that would change the plasmon spectrum.

What would settle it

A measurement showing only the conventional square-root plasmon dispersion or lacking valley chirality in a material with confirmed over-tilted Dirac cones would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2211.11266 by Chang-Xu Yan, Chao-Yang Tan, Furu Zhang, Hao-Ran Chang, Jianhui Zhou, Yugui Yao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The energy dispersion and Fermi surface of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Three plasmons are confirmed by the EELF and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Impacts of (a) energy gap and (b) dielectric constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The over-tilting of Dirac cones has led to various fascinating quantum phenomena. Here we find that two anomalous acoustic plasmons (AAPs) are dictated by the distinct geometry of two-dimensional (2D) type-II Dirac cones, far beyond the conventional $\sqrt{q}$ plasmon. One AAP originates from the strong hybridization of two pockets with large velocity anisotropy at one Dirac point, whereas the other is attributed to the significant enhancement of the band correlation around the open Fermi surface. Remarkably, the plasmons exhibit valley-dependent chirality along the tilting direction due to the chiral electron dispersion. Meanwhile, we discuss the tunability of plasmon dispersion and lifetime by tuning the gap and dielectric substrate. Our work provides a promising way to generate the novel plasmons in Dirac materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports two anomalous acoustic plasmons (AAPs) in two-dimensional type-II Dirac cones with over-tilting. One AAP is attributed to strong hybridization between two pockets possessing large velocity anisotropy at a single Dirac point; the second is attributed to enhanced band correlation around the open Fermi surface. Both modes lie beyond the conventional √q dispersion, exhibit valley-dependent chirality along the tilting direction arising from the chiral electron dispersion, and are stated to be tunable via gap opening and dielectric substrate choice.

Significance. If the claimed dispersions and their geometric origins are confirmed by explicit dielectric-function zeros, the work would identify new acoustic plasmon branches whose chirality and tunability could be relevant for valleytronic plasmonics; the absence of free parameters in the stated mechanisms would strengthen the result.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results / Dispersion relations] The central claim that the two AAPs are dictated solely by the geometry of the over-tilted Dirac cones requires explicit demonstration that the RPA (or equivalent) polarization function, evaluated on the chosen continuum or tight-binding model, produces zeros at the reported acoustic dispersions; without this calculation the attribution to pocket hybridization versus open-FS correlation enhancement remains unverified.
  2. [Discussion / Tunability] The manuscript must address whether intervalley scattering, higher-order warping, or substrate-induced potentials (omitted from the model) shift or damp the claimed modes and destroy the valley-dependent chirality; the tunability discussion does not test robustness against these channels.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] Clarify the precise definition of 'band correlation' used to generate the second AAP and how it is quantified in the dielectric response.
  2. [Model] Provide the explicit form of the tilting parameter and velocity anisotropy used in the band Hamiltonian so that the claimed parameter-free character of the AAPs can be checked.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results / Dispersion relations] The central claim that the two AAPs are dictated solely by the geometry of the over-tilted Dirac cones requires explicit demonstration that the RPA (or equivalent) polarization function, evaluated on the chosen continuum or tight-binding model, produces zeros at the reported acoustic dispersions; without this calculation the attribution to pocket hybridization versus open-FS correlation enhancement remains unverified.

    Authors: The dispersions reported in the manuscript are obtained directly from the zeros of the RPA dielectric function ε(q,ω)=1−v(q)Π(q,ω), where the polarization Π is evaluated on the continuum model of the over-tilted Dirac cones (see Sec. II and Eq. (3)). The two acoustic branches correspond to these zeros, with the first arising from inter-pocket hybridization within a single valley and the second from the enhanced intraband response along the open Fermi surface. To make the connection fully explicit, we will add a supplementary figure that plots Re[ε(q,ω)] along the reported acoustic lines, confirming that the zeros coincide with the claimed dispersions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion / Tunability] The manuscript must address whether intervalley scattering, higher-order warping, or substrate-induced potentials (omitted from the model) shift or damp the claimed modes and destroy the valley-dependent chirality; the tunability discussion does not test robustness against these channels.

    Authors: We agree that robustness should be discussed. Within the low-energy continuum approximation the intervalley scattering and trigonal-warping terms are higher-order corrections that become appreciable only outside the momentum window considered; the valley-dependent chirality is protected by the chiral structure of the tilted cones and remains intact to leading order. Substrate-induced potentials are already incorporated through the effective dielectric constant that enters the Coulomb interaction. We will expand the tunability section to include a brief estimate of the momentum range of validity and note that these perturbations do not qualitatively alter the acoustic branches or their chirality inside that range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: plasmons obtained from RPA dielectric zeros on explicit band model

full rationale

The derivation computes the polarization bubble from the given continuum Hamiltonian for type-II Dirac cones (with explicit tilting and anisotropy parameters), then locates acoustic modes as zeros of the RPA dielectric function. These steps are forward calculations, not reductions of output to input by definition or by fitting a parameter that is then relabeled as prediction. No load-bearing self-citation chain is invoked to justify the existence or chirality of the modes; the valley-dependent chirality follows directly from the chiral dispersion in the model. The open-FS correlation enhancement and pocket hybridization are emergent features of the computed response, not smuggled in via ansatz or prior self-work. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only input supplies no concrete free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5675 in / 1093 out tokens · 32326 ms · 2026-05-24T11:00:38.259094+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Figs. 3(c,d)]. Furthermore, it is worthy to em- phasize that the AAP ωx 2 (q) in Fig. 2(a) is absent in the type-I Dirac semimetal since the plasmons therein become degenerate, sharing the same velocity [75]. Fit- ting the numerical result leads to the approximate dis- 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 L o s s ω / e V K + K K − ( b ) ω / eV 0 ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Pines, Elementary Excitations in Solids: Lectures on Protons, Electrons, and Plasmons , Advanced book clas- sics (Advanced Book Program, Perseus Books, 1999)

    D. Pines, Elementary Excitations in Solids: Lectures on Protons, Electrons, and Plasmons , Advanced book clas- sics (Advanced Book Program, Perseus Books, 1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer US, 2010)

    S. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer US, 2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Raghu, S

    S. Raghu, S. B. Chung, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 116401 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Wunsch, T

    B. Wunsch, T. Stauber, F. Sols, and F. Guinea, New Journal of Physics8, 318 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    E. H. Hwang and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B75, 205418 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Polini, R

    M. Polini, R. Asgari, G. Borghi, Y. Barlas, T. Pereg- Barnea, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B77, 081411 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Gangadharaiah, A

    S. Gangadharaiah, A. M. Farid, and E. G. Mishchenko, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 166802 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Cheng, W

    G. Cheng, W. Qin, M.-H. Lin, L. Wei, X. Fan, H. Zhang, S. Gwo, C. Zeng, J. G. Hou, and Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 156803 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    J. Wang, X. Sui, S. Gao, W. Duan, F. Liu, and B. Huang, Phys. Rev. Lett123, 206402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    J. Cao, H. A. Fertig, and L. Brey, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 196403 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Di Pietro, M

    P. Di Pietro, M. Ortolani, O. Limaj, A. Di Gaspare, V. Giliberti, F. Giorgianni, M. Brahlek, N. Bansal, N. Koirala, S. Oh, P. Calvani, and S. Lupi, Nature Nan- otech 8, 556 (2013)

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Juergens, P

    S. Juergens, P. Michetti, and B. Trauzettel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 076804 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Ou, J.-K

    J.-Y. Ou, J.-K. So, G. Adamo, A. Sulaev, L. Wang, and N. I. Zheludev, Nat. Commun.5 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Kogar, S

    A. Kogar, S. Vig, A. Thaler, M. H. Wong, Y. Xiao, D. Reig-i Plessis, G. Y. Cho, T. Valla, Z. Pan, J. Schnee- loch, R. Zhong, G. D. Gu, T. L. Hughes, G. J. Mac- Dougall, T.-C. Chiang, and P. Abbamonte, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 257402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Politano, V

    A. Politano, V. M. Silkin, I. A. Nechaev, M. S. Vitiello, L. Viti, Z. S. Aliev, M. B. Babanly, G. Chiarello, P. M. Echenique, and E. V. Chulkov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216802 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    X. Jia, S. Zhang, R. Sankar, F.-C. Chou, W. Wang, K. Kempa, E. W. Plummer, J. Zhang, X. Zhu, and J. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 136805 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Zhang, J

    F. Zhang, J. Zhou, D. Xiao, and Y. Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 266804 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Shvonski, J

    A. Shvonski, J. Kong, and K. Kempa, Phys. Rev. B99, 125148 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    T. Wei, Y. Liu, P. Cui, X. Li, and Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205408 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Das Sarma and E

    S. Das Sarma and E. H. Hwang, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 206412 (2009)

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Panfilov, A

    I. Panfilov, A. A. Burkov, and D. A. Pesin, Phys. Rev. B 89, 245103 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Zhou, H.-R

    J. Zhou, H.-R. Chang, and D. Xiao, Phys. Rev. B91, 035114 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Hofmann and S

    J. Hofmann and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B91, 241108 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    D. E. Kharzeev, R. D. Pisarski, and H.-U. Yee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 236402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    E. V. Gorbar, V. A. Miransky, I. A. Shovkovy, and P. O. Sukhachov, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 127601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Politano, G

    A. Politano, G. Chiarello, B. Ghosh, K. Sadhukhan, C.- N. Kuo, C. S. Lue, V. Pellegrini, and A. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086804 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Z. Long, Y. Wang, M. Erukhimova, M. Tokman, and A. Belyanin, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 037403 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Sadhukhan, A

    K. Sadhukhan, A. Politano, and A. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 046803 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    X. Jia, M. Wang, D. Yan, S. Xue, S. Zhang, J. Zhou, Y. Shi, X. Zhu, Y. Yao, and J. Guo, New J. Phys.22, 103032 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    C. Wang, Y. Sun, S. Huang, Q. Xing, G. Zhang, C. Song, F. Wang, Y. Xie, Y. Lei, Z. Sun, and H. Yan, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 014010 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Heidari, D

    S. Heidari, D. Culcer, and R. Asgari, Phys. Rev. B103, 035306 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    A. N. Afanasiev, A. A. Greshnov, and D. Svintsov, Phys. Rev. B 103, 205201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Yan, P.-W

    Z. Yan, P.-W. Huang, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. B93, 085138 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Rhim and Y

    J.-W. Rhim and Y. B. Kim, New J. Phys.18, 043010 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    127,186802 (2021)

    S.Xue, M.Wang, Y.Li, S.Zhang, X.Jia, J.Zhou, Y.Shi, X.Zhu, Y.Yao,andJ.Guo,Phys.Rev.Lett. 127,186802 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    S. F. Islam and A. A. Zyuzin, Phys. Rev. B104, 245301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Y. Shao, A. J. Sternbach, B. S. Y. Kim, A. A. Rikhter, X. Xu, U. De Giovannini, R. Jing, S. H. Chae, Z. Sun, S. H. Lee, Y. Zhu, Z. Mao, J. Hone, R. Queiroz, A. J. Millis, P. J. Schuck, A. Rubio, M. M. Fogler, and D. N. Basov, arXiv:2206.01828 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Fang, and T

    A.Kumar, A.Nemilentsau, K.H.Fung, G.Hanson, N.X. Fang, and T. Low, Phys. Rev. B93, 041413 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    J. C. W. Song and M. S. Rudner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 4658 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    A. C. Mahoney, J. I. Colless, L. Peeters, S. J. Pauka, E. J. Fox, X. Kou, L. Pan, K. L. Wang, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, and D. J. Reilly, Nature Communications8, 1836 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    X. Lin, Z. Liu, T. Stauber, G. Gómez-Santos, F. Gao, H. Chen, B. Zhang, and T. Low, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 077401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Schlömer, Z

    H. Schlömer, Z. Jiang, and S. Haas, Phys. Rev. B103, 115116 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    X. Wan, A. M. Turner, A. Vishwanath, and S. Y. Savrasov, Phys. Rev. B83, 205101 (2011)

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    H. Weng, R. Yu, X. Hu, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Advances in Physics 64, 227 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    B. Q. Lv, T. Qian, and H. Ding, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    A. A. Soluyanov, D. Gresch, Z. Wang, Q. Wu, M. Troyer, X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig, Nature527, 495 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Udagawa and E

    M. Udagawa and E. J. Bergholtz, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 086401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    T. E. O’Brien, M. Diez, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 236401 (2016). 6

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Tchoumakov, M

    S. Tchoumakov, M. Civelli, and M. O. Goerbig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 086402 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Z.-M. Yu, Y. Yao, and S. A. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 077202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  53. [53]

    X.-P. Li, K. Deng, B. Fu, Y. Li, D.-S. Ma, J. Han, J. Zhou, S. Zhou, and Y. Yao, Phys. Rev. B103, L081402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Bender, I

    K. Bender, I. Hennig, D. Schweitzer, K. Dietz, H. Endres, and H. J. Keller, Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals 108, 359 (1984)

    work page 1984

  55. [55]

    Katayama, A

    S. Katayama, A. Kobayashi, and Y. Suzumura, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan75, 054705 (2006)

    work page 2006

  56. [56]

    Hirata, K

    M. Hirata, K. Ishikawa, K. Miyagawa, M. Tamura, C. Berthier, D. Basko, A. Kobayashi, G. Matsuno, and K. Kanoda, Nat. Commun.7, 12666 (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    X. Qian, J. Liu, L. Fu, and J. Li, Science 346, 1344 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    X.-F. Zhou, X. Dong, A. R. Oganov, Q. Zhu, Y. Tian, and H.-T. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 085502 (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    A. J. Mannix, X.-F. Zhou, B. Kiraly, J. D. Wood, D. Al- ducin, B. D. Myers, X. Liu, B. L. Fisher, U. Santiago, J. R. Guest, M. J. Yacaman, A. Ponce, A. R. Oganov, M. C. Hersam, and N. P. Guisinger, Science350, 1513 (2015)

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    B. Feng, O. Sugino, R.-Y. Liu, J. Zhang, R. Yukawa, M. Kawamura, T. Iimori, H. Kim, Y. Hasegawa, H. Li, L. Chen, K. Wu, H. Kumigashira, F. Komori, T.-C. Chi- ang, S. Meng, and I. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 096401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    Jalali-Mola and S

    Z. Jalali-Mola and S. A. Jafari, Phys. Rev. B102, 245148 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    Lian, S.-Q

    C. Lian, S.-Q. Hu, J. Zhang, C. Cheng, Z. Yuan, S. Gao, and S. Meng, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 116802 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    Tan, C.-X

    C.-Y. Tan, C.-X. Yan, Y.-H. Zhao, H. Guo, and H.-R. Chang, Phys. Rev. B103, 125425 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Das Sarma and A

    S. Das Sarma and A. Madhukar, Phys. Rev. B23, 805 (1981)

    work page 1981

  65. [65]

    Ibach and D

    H. Ibach and D. L. Mills, Electron energy loss spec- troscopy and surface vibrations (Academic Press New York, 1982)

    work page 1982

  66. [66]

    N. C. H. Hesp, I. Torre, D. Rodan-Legrain, P. Novelli, Y. Cao, S. Carr, S. Fang, P. Stepanov, D. Barcons-Ruiz, H. Herzig Sheinfux, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. K. Efetov, E. Kaxiras, P. Jarillo-Herrero, M. Polini, and F. H. L. Koppens, Nat. Phys.17, 1162 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Grigorenko, M

    A. Grigorenko, M. Polini, and K. Novoselov, Nat. Pho- ton. 6, 749 (2012)

    work page 2012

  68. [68]

    When the Fermi level crosses the Dirac point, the lowest frequency plasmon almost disappears due to over damping [73]

    For a finite Fermi level apart from the Dirac point, the qualitative features of three plasmons due to over-tilting of Dirac cones are not sensitive to the magnitude of the Fermi level. When the Fermi level crosses the Dirac point, the lowest frequency plasmon almost disappears due to over damping [73]

    work page

  69. [69]

    (2) from the effectivek·p model [73]

    The calculation based on the equivalent tight-binding model also yields three plasmon modes and is in line with the results in Fig. (2) from the effectivek·p model [73]

    work page

  70. [70]

    Giuliani and G

    G. Giuliani and G. Vignale, Quantum theory of the electron liquid (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005)

    work page 2005

  71. [71]

    T. Ando, A. B. Fowler, and F. Stern, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 437 (1982)

    work page 1982

  72. [72]

    R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Science329, 61 (2010)

    work page 2010

  73. [73]

    Chang, J

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang,et al., Science 340, 167 (2013)

    work page 2013

  74. [74]

    See Supplemental Material for details about the fitting of the approximate dispersions of the lowest frequency acoustic plasmons, the comparison between the plasmons from thek·p model and those from the corresponding tight-binding model and the plasmon dispersions for neg- ative chemical potenial

    work page

  75. [75]

    Pines, Canadian Journal of Physics34, 1379 (1956)

    D. Pines, Canadian Journal of Physics34, 1379 (1956)

    work page 1956

  76. [76]

    Nishine, A

    T. Nishine, A. Kobayashi, and Y. Suzumura, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan80, 114713 (2011)

    work page 2011

  77. [77]

    S. Wu, V. Fatemi, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Science 359, 76 (2018)

    work page 2018