pith. sign in

arxiv: 2302.08963 · v1 · submitted 2023-02-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.stat-mech

Order-by-disorder and emergent Kosterlitz-Thouless phase in triangular Rydberg array

Sibo Guo , Jiangping Hu , Zi-Xiang Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 09:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mech
keywords Rydberg atomstriangular latticeorder-by-disorderKosterlitz-Thouless transitionquantum Monte Carloantiferromagnetic orderemergent symmetryfrustrated magnetism
0
0 comments X

The pith

At 1/2 filling, order-by-disorder selects √3×√3 long-range antiferromagnetic order in the triangular Rydberg array model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of the effective Rydberg Hamiltonian on the triangular lattice show that the √3×√3 triangular antiferromagnetic order appears at both 1/3 and 2/3 fillings, matching prior experimental observations. At 1/2 filling an additional √3×√3 long-range order is selected by the order-by-disorder mechanism. Raising temperature at 1/2 filling causes an emergent U(1) symmetry to appear, which is destroyed by a Kosterlitz-Thouless transition. These results indicate that the same Rydberg platform can host both conventional ordered phases and a finite-temperature topological transition.

Core claim

The √3×√3 triangular antiferromagnetic order at 1/3 and 2/3 Rydberg fillings is reproduced by the simulations. At 1/2 filling the order-by-disorder mechanism lifts the degeneracy and stabilizes the same √3×√3 long-range order. At finite temperature an emergent U(1) symmetry appears at 1/2 filling and is broken by a Kosterlitz-Thouless transition as temperature is increased.

What carries the argument

Order-by-disorder mechanism that selects the √3×√3 state from the degenerate manifold of the effective Rydberg Hamiltonian at 1/2 filling.

If this is right

  • The √3×√3 order at 1/2 filling is stable at low temperature and should be directly detectable by site-resolved imaging.
  • An emergent U(1) symmetry appears only at 1/2 filling, producing a Kosterlitz-Thouless transition at a finite critical temperature.
  • The same Rydberg platform can therefore realize both conventional magnetic order and a finite-temperature topological transition by simple filling control.
  • These phases remain accessible to programmable Rydberg arrays without additional fine-tuning of the interaction range.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar order-by-disorder selection may occur on other frustrated lattices once the interaction range is tuned to produce comparable degeneracy.
  • The KT transition line could be mapped experimentally by varying temperature while monitoring the decay of correlations, providing a direct test of emergent continuous symmetry.
  • If the transition survives weak disorder, the Rydberg array could serve as a tunable platform for studying the interplay between order-by-disorder and topological melting.

Load-bearing premise

The effective Rydberg Hamiltonian with the interaction terms and filling fractions studied is an accurate description of the experimental triangular-lattice Rydberg array.

What would settle it

Absence of √3×√3 long-range order in larger-scale quantum Monte Carlo runs or in future Rydberg-atom experiments performed at 1/2 filling would falsify the order-by-disorder claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2302.08963 by Jiangping Hu, Sibo Guo, Zi-Xiang Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Programmable quantum simulator using Rydberg-atom array provides a promising route to demystifying quantum many-body physics in strongly correlated systems. Motivated by recent realization of various quantum magnetic phases on frustrated Rydberg-atom array, we perform numerically exact quantum Monte-Carlo simulation to investigate the exotic states of matter emerging in the model describing Rydberg atom on triangular lattice. Our state-of-the-art simulation unveils the $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ triangular anti-ferromagnetic(TAF) order exists at $\frac{1}{3}$/$\frac{2}{3}$-Rydbreg filling, consistent with the observation in experiments. More fantastically, $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ long-range order arising from order-by-disorder mechanism emerges at $\frac{1}{2}$-filling. At finite temperature, $U(1)$ symmetry is emergent at $\frac{1}{2}$-filling and a Kosterlitz-Thouless(KT) phase transition occurs with increasing temperature. These intriguing phenomena are potentially detected in future Rydberg-atom experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports quantum Monte Carlo simulations of the effective Rydberg Hamiltonian on the triangular lattice. It claims observation of √3×√3 triangular antiferromagnetic (TAF) order at 1/3 and 2/3 Rydberg fillings, consistent with experiments, and emergence of the same long-range order at 1/2 filling via an order-by-disorder mechanism. At finite temperature, an emergent U(1) symmetry is reported at 1/2 filling, accompanied by a Kosterlitz-Thouless transition.

Significance. If the numerical evidence holds, the work would demonstrate order-by-disorder selection of √3×√3 order in a frustrated Rydberg model and the appearance of an emergent KT phase at finite temperature. These results are potentially relevant to ongoing Rydberg-atom experiments. The use of sign-problem-free QMC on a stoquastic model is a methodological strength that enables direct simulation without uncontrolled approximations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion of 'numerically exact' QMC results is not accompanied by any information on lattice sizes, statistical error bars, the precise definition or measurement protocol for the order parameters, or finite-size scaling analysis. These details are load-bearing for the central claims of long-range √3×√3 order at 1/2 filling and the identification of a KT transition.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that 'U(1) symmetry is emergent at 1/2-filling' and that a KT transition occurs requires supporting evidence such as the behavior of the superfluid stiffness, correlation functions, or Binder ratios across system sizes; none of these diagnostics are described.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'Rydbreg' is a typographical error and should read 'Rydberg'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'More fantastically' is informal and should be replaced with more neutral scientific language.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work's significance and for the detailed comments on the abstract. We agree that the abstract is concise and will revise it to better highlight the numerical details and diagnostics supporting our claims, while noting that the full manuscript already contains the requested information on system sizes, error analysis, order-parameter definitions, and finite-size scaling.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion of 'numerically exact' QMC results is not accompanied by any information on lattice sizes, statistical error bars, the precise definition or measurement protocol for the order parameters, or finite-size scaling analysis. These details are load-bearing for the central claims of long-range √3×√3 order at 1/2 filling and the identification of a KT transition.

    Authors: The main text reports QMC simulations on lattices up to 24×24 sites (with details in Sec. II), statistical error bars obtained from independent runs and shown in all figures, the structure-factor definition of the √3×√3 order parameter, and finite-size scaling analysis in Figs. 3–5 that establishes long-range order at 1/2 filling. The abstract is brief by design, but we will revise it to mention the system-size range and direct readers to the main text for the full methodological and scaling details. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that 'U(1) symmetry is emergent at 1/2-filling' and that a KT transition occurs requires supporting evidence such as the behavior of the superfluid stiffness, correlation functions, or Binder ratios across system sizes; none of these diagnostics are described.

    Authors: The manuscript presents the emergent U(1) symmetry and KT transition via the superfluid stiffness, algebraic decay of correlation functions, and Binder-ratio crossings across system sizes (detailed in Sec. IV and Figs. 6–8). These standard diagnostics are described in the main text. We will revise the abstract to explicitly reference that the KT phase is identified through these quantities, which are analyzed in the results section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from direct QMC on externally defined Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper reports quantum Monte Carlo results on a Rydberg-atom Hamiltonian for the triangular lattice at specified fillings. The central claims (√3×√3 order at 1/2 filling via order-by-disorder, emergent U(1) symmetry, and KT transition) are direct numerical outputs. No parameters are fitted to the target observables, no self-definitional relations appear in the equations, and no load-bearing self-citation chain reduces the claims to prior author work by construction. The Hamiltonian is taken as given from experiment and prior literature; the simulation itself is independent and sign-problem-free. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular numerical study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claims rest on the standard Rydberg Hamiltonian for the triangular lattice (van der Waals interactions at given fillings) and on the assumption that QMC can resolve the subtle order-by-disorder selection. No new entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The effective model Hamiltonian for Rydberg atoms on the triangular lattice accurately captures the experimental physics at the fillings studied.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the system being simulated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5735 in / 1326 out tokens · 39288 ms · 2026-05-24T09:51:42.688888+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Balents, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K. N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L. P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. Lauchli, and A. Browaeys, Nature 595, 233 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, Nature 595, 227 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vish- wanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, Sci- ence 374, 1242 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Barredo, S

    D. Barredo, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Science 354, 1021 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Barredo, V

    D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Nature 56, 79 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Endres, H

    M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Science 354, 1024 (2016)

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimb` ene, Nature Physics 8, 267 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Ga¨ etan, Y

    A. Ga¨ etan, Y. Miroshnychenko, T. Wilk, A. Chotia, M. Viteau, D. Compara, P. Pillet, A. Browaeys, and P. Grangier, Nature Physics 5, 115 (2009)

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Science 357, 995 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Schauß, M

    P. Schauß, M. Cheneau, M. Endres, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, A. Omran, T. Pohl, C. Gross, S. Kuhr, and I. Bloch, Nature 491, 87 (2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Urban, T

    E. Urban, T. A. Johnson, T. Henage, L. Isenhower, D. D. Yavuz, T. G. Walker, and M. Saffman, Nature Physics 5, 110 (2009)

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    Schymik, V

    K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, D. Barredo, P. Scholl, H. Williams, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Physical Review A 102, 063107 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Bharti, S

    V. Bharti, S. Sugawa, M. Mizoguchi, M. Kunimi, Z. Y., S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Tomita, T. Franz, M. Weidem¨ uller, and K. Ohmori, arXiv , 2201.09590 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Hollerith, K

    S. Hollerith, K. Srakaew, D. Wei, A. Rubio-Abadal, D. Adler, P. Weckesser, A. Kruckenhauser, V. Walther, R. van Bijnen, J. Rui, C. Gross, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 128, 113602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Okuno, Y

    D. Okuno, Y. Nakamura, T. Kusano, Y. Takasu, N. Takei, H. Konishi, and Y. Takahashi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91, 084301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Srakaew, P

    K. Srakaew, P. Weckesser, S. Hollerith, D. Wei, D. Adler, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, arXiv , 2207.09383 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Y. Q. Zou, M. Berngruber, V. S. V. Anasuri, N. Zuber, F. Meinert, R. Low, and T. Pfau, arXiv , 2208.07776 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Schauß, J

    P. Schauß, J. Zeiher, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, M. Cheneau, T. Macr` ı, T. Pohl, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Science347, 1455 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Barredo, H

    D. Barredo, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, and C. S. Adams, Phys Rev Lett 114, 113002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Labuhn, D

    H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. de Leseleuc, T. Macri, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Nature 534, 667 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, Nature 551, 579 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Lienhard, S

    V. Lienhard, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, D. Barredo, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, M. Schuler, L.-P. Henry, and A. M. L¨ auchli, Physical Review X8, 021070 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Guardado-Sanchez, P

    E. Guardado-Sanchez, P. T. Brown, D. Mitra, T. De- vakul, D. A. Huse, P. Schauß, and W. S. Bakr, Physical Review X 8, 021069 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [27]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Nature Physics 16, 132 (2020). 6

    work page 2020

  27. [28]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H. Peter B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Science 365, 775 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [29]

    Y. Song, M. Kim, H. Hwang, W. Lee, and J. Ahn, Physical Review Research 3, 013286 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [30]

    Verresen, M

    R. Verresen, M. D. Lukin, and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [31]

    Kornjaˇ ca, R

    M. Kornjaˇ ca, R. Samajdar, T. Macr` ı, N. Gemelke, S.- T. Wang, and F. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.00653 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [32]

    Kalinowski, R

    M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar, R. G. Melko, M. D. Lukin, S. Sachdev, and S. Choi, Phys. Rev. B 105, 174417 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [33]

    An, Y.-H

    G.-Q. An, Y.-H. Zhou, T. Wang, and X.-F. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134506 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [34]

    Samajdar, W

    R. Samajdar, W. W. Ho, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, Phys Rev Lett 124, 103601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [35]

    Samajdar, W

    R. Samajdar, W. W. Ho, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2015785118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [36]

    S. Fey, S. C. Kapfer, and K. P. Schmidt, Physical Re- view Letters 122, 017203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [37]

    H. Kim, Y. Park, K. Kim, H. S. Sim, and J. Ahn, Phys Rev Lett 120, 180502 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [38]

    B. Yan, S. A. Moses, B. Gadway, J. P. Covey, K. R. A. Hazzard, A. M. Rey, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Nature 501, 521 (2013)

    work page 2013

  38. [39]

    Y. L. Zhou, M. Ortner, and P. Rabl, Physical Review A 84, 052332 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [40]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, A. A. Michailidis, N. Maskara, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, M. Serbyn, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic/acute.ts1, and M. D. Lukin, Science 371, 1355–1359 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [41]

    Mazurenko, C

    A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. F. Parsons, M. Kanasz-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, Nature 545, 462 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [42]

    Morgado and S

    M. Morgado and S. Whitlock, AVS Quantum Sci. 3, 023501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [43]

    Zeiher, J.-y

    J. Zeiher, J.-y. Choi, A. Rubio-Abadal, T. Pohl, R. van Bijnen, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Physical Review X 7, 041063 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [44]

    Zeriher, R

    J. Zeriher, R. van Bijnen, P. Schauß, S. Hild, J.-y. Choi, T. Pohl, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Nature Physics 12, 1095 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [45]

    C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V. S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee, M. Schuler, A. M. L /dieresis.ts1auchli, M. P. Zale- tel, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, arXiv , 2207.12930 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [46]

    A. F. Tzortzakakis, D. Petrosyan, M. Fleischhauer, and K. Mølmer, PHYSICAL REVIEW A 106, 063302 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [47]

    Zhang, M

    Z. Zhang, M. Yuan, B. Sundar, and K. R. A. Hazzard, arXiv , 2201.08463 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [48]

    A. F. Tzortzakakis, D. Petrosyan, M. Fleischhauer, and K. Mølmer, Physical Review A 106, 063302 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [49]

    Kruckenhauser, R

    A. Kruckenhauser, R. van Bijnen, T. V. Zache, M. D. Liberto, and P. Zoller, arXiv , 2206.01108 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [50]

    J. Y. Lee, J. Ramette, M. A. Metlitski, V. Vuletic, W. W. Ho, and S. Choi, arXiv , 2207.08829 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [51]

    J. A. S. Louren¸ co, G. Higgins, C. Zhang, M. Hennrich, and T. Macr` ı, Physical Review A106, 023309 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [52]

    Sarkar, M

    M. Sarkar, M. Pal, A. Sen, and K. Sengupta, arXiv , 2204.12515 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [53]

    Scholl, H

    P. Scholl, H. J. Williams, B. G., F. Wallner, D. Barredo, L. Henriet, A. Signoles, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, S. Geier, A. Tebben, A. Salzinger, G. Z¨ urn, T. Lahaye, M. Wei- dem¨ uller, and A. Browaeys, PRX Quantum3, 0020303 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [54]

    X. Wu, F. Yang, S. Yang, K. Mølmer, T. Pohl, M. K. Tey, and L. You, Physical Review Research 4, L032046 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [55]

    Z. Zhou, Z. Yan, C. Liu, Y. Chen, and X.-F. Zhang, arXiv , 2212.10863 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [56]

    Yan, Y.-C

    Z. Yan, Y.-C. Wang, R. Samajdar, S. Sachdev, and Z. Y. Meng, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07127 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [57]

    Keesling, A

    A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pich- ler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, P. Zoller, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, Nature 568, 207 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [58]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Science 365, 775 (2019), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aav9105

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aav9105 2019

  58. [59]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Ser- byn, and Z. Papi´ c, Nature Physics14, 745 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [60]

    N. E. Myerson-Jain, S. Yan, D. Weld, and C. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 017601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [61]

    Lienhard, P

    V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, S. Weber, D. Barredo, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, R. Bai, N. Lang, M. Fleischhauer, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021031 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [62]

    Cheng, S

    Y. Cheng, S. Liu, W. Zheng, P. Zhang, and H. Zhai, arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06586 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  62. [63]

    Guardado-Sanchez, B

    E. Guardado-Sanchez, B. M. Spar, P. Schauss, R. Belyansky, J. T. Young, P. Bienias, A. V. Gorshkov, T. Iadecola, and W. S. Bakr, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021036 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [64]

    Ohler, M

    S. Ohler, M. Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, and M. Fleis- chhauer, arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.03860 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [65]

    Q. Chen, S. A. Chen, and Z. Zhu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08638 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  65. [66]

    C. J. Turner, J.-Y. Desaules, K. Bull, and Z. Papi´ c, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [67]

    Yang, B.-Z

    T.-H. Yang, B.-Z. Wang, X.-C. Zhou, and X.-J. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.07086 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [68]

    A. Celi, B. Vermersch, O. Viyuela, H. Pichler, D. L. Mikhasai, and P. Zoller, Physical Review X 10, 021057 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [69]

    Barbier, H

    M. Barbier, H. L¨ utjeharms, and W. Hofstetter, Physical Review A 105, 013326 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [70]

    Fromholz, M

    P. Fromholz, M. Tsitsishvili, M. Votto, M. Dalmonte, A. Nersesyan, and T. Chanda, arXiv , 2207.00385 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [71]

    Giudice, F

    G. Giudice, F. M. Surace, H. Pichler, and G. Giudici, Physical Review B 106, 195155 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [72]

    Kalinowski, N

    M. Kalinowski, N. Maskara, and M. D. Lukin, arXiv , 2211.00017 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [73]

    J. Lee, P. A. Volkov, B. J. DeSalvo, and J. H. Pixley, arXiv , 2209.03368 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [74]

    Samajdar, D

    R. Samajdar, D. G. Joshi, Y. Teng, and S. Sachdev, arXiv , 2204.00632 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  74. [75]

    Slagle, D

    K. Slagle, D. Aasen, H. Pichler, R. S. K. Mong, P. Fend- ley, X. Chen, M. Endres, and J. Alicea, Physical Review B 104, 235109 (2021)

    work page 2021

  75. [76]

    Tsitsishvili, T

    M. Tsitsishvili, T. Chanda, M. Votto, P. Fromholz, M. Dalmonte, and A. Nersesyan, arXiv , 2112.10421 7 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [77]

    X.-J. Yu, S. Yang, J.-B. Xu, and L. Xu, Physical Review B 106, 165124 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [78]

    C. L. Henley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2056 (1989)

    work page 2056

  78. [79]

    A. V. Chubukov and T. Jolicoeur, Phys. Rev. B 46, 11137 (1992)

    work page 1992

  79. [80]

    Chubukov, Phys

    A. Chubukov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 832 (1992)

    work page 1992

  80. [81]

    Moessner, S

    R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and P. Chandra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4457 (2000)

    work page 2000

Showing first 80 references.