pith. sign in

arxiv: 2303.08149 · v2 · pith:S6FFNG4Knew · submitted 2023-03-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Direct T_e-based Metallicities of z=2-9 Galaxies with JWST/NIRSpec: Empirical Metallicity Calibrations Applicable from Reionization to Cosmic Noon

Ryan L. Sanders , Alice E. Shapley , Michael W. Topping , Naveen A. Reddy , Gabriel B. Brammer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 09:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords JWSTNIRSpecgalaxy metallicitystrong-line calibrationshigh-redshift galaxiesauroral linesdirect methodelectron temperature
0
0 comments X

The pith

JWST auroral-line detections enable the first empirical strong-line metallicity calibrations for galaxies at z=2-9.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures the weak [OIII] auroral line in 16 CEERS galaxies at z=2-9 using JWST/NIRSpec and combines them with literature data to reach a sample of 46 objects. From these they calculate electron temperatures and direct oxygen abundances. These abundances are then used to fit new relations between common strong emission-line ratios and metallicity. The resulting calibrations differ from those calibrated on nearby galaxies because high-redshift systems have higher ionization parameters. Accurate metallicities at early times will clarify how galaxies built up their heavy elements and how feedback regulated star formation.

Core claim

Using direct T_e measurements from the [OIII] λ4364 line in a combined sample of 46 star-forming galaxies at 1.4 < z < 8.7, the authors derive the first high-redshift empirical calibrations relating the strong-line ratios [OIII]/Hβ, [OII]/Hβ, R23, [OIII]/[OII], and [NeIII]/[OII] to oxygen abundance over 12 + log(O/H) = 7.4–8.3; these relations are offset from local calibrations owing to evolving ionization conditions.

What carries the argument

The direct-method oxygen abundance derived from the electron temperature measured via the [OIII] auroral-to-nebular line ratio, which serves as the anchor for fitting the strong-line calibrations.

If this is right

  • Metallicity determinations for z=2-9 star-forming galaxies become more accurate when using these new relations instead of low-redshift ones.
  • Metallicity scaling relations such as the mass-metallicity relation can now be measured reliably across Cosmic Noon and the Epoch of Reionization.
  • Future JWST programs can extend the calibrations to lower and higher metallicities and include nitrogen-based indicators once [NII] is routinely detected.
  • Understanding of feedback processes and baryon cycling in the early universe improves through better metallicity constraints.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying these calibrations to large JWST surveys could reveal whether the offset from local relations persists uniformly or varies with other galaxy properties.
  • Independent checks using alternative abundance methods such as UV emission lines or rest-frame optical diagnostics would test the robustness of the high-redshift relations.
  • These calibrations may need refinement if ionization conditions continue to evolve beyond z=9 or at metallicities outside the current 7.4-8.3 range.

Load-bearing premise

The 46-galaxy sample accurately represents the broader high-redshift star-forming population and the direct T_e method produces abundances free of significant biases from ionization or density variations.

What would settle it

A larger sample of high-redshift galaxies with both auroral-line detections and independent metallicity indicators showing systematic disagreement with the new calibrations would falsify their applicability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2303.08149 by Alice E. Shapley, Gabriel B. Brammer, Michael W. Topping, Naveen A. Reddy, Ryan L. Sanders.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Redshift distribution of the combined high￾redshift auroral-line sample (gray) and the constituent sam￾ples from CEERS JWST/NIRSpec observations (green), ad￾ditional JWST/NIRSpec auroral-line emitters in the liter￾ature (red), and sources with auroral-line detections from ground-based spectroscopy (blue). [O iii]λ4364 for these 16 galaxies. The [O iii]λ4364 sig￾nificance spans 2.4σ to 6.1σ with a median S/… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 1D and 2D spectra displaying the detected [O iii]λ4364 emission lines and Hγ for the 16 galaxies in the CEERS auroral-line sample. The black line displays the 1D science spectrum, while the gray shaded region shows the 1D error spectrum. The blue, green, and red solid lines display the best-fit continuum, and Hγ and [O iii]λ4364 line profiles, respecitvely. The dotted vertical lines show the rest-frame wav… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: 1D and 2D spectra showing detections of [O ii]λλ7322,7332 for two CEERS targets. The blue line shows the best-fit continuum model, while the red line shows the combined fit to [O ii]λ7322 and [O ii]λ7332. tected O32, 31 have detected Ne3O2, and 12 have de￾tected N2, O3N2, and N2O2. This sample is more than twice the size of the largest high-redshift auroral-line compilation assembled to-date (Sanders et al… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SFR vs. M∗ for the CEERS, JWST literature, and ground-based auroral-line samples, color-coded by red￾shift. The dashed lines show the mean star-forming main sequence parameterization of Speagle et al. (2014) evaluated at z = 2, z = 4, and z = 6 on the same color scale. All SFRs are derived from dust-corrected Hα or Hβ luminosity. Literature data and the Speagle et al. (2014) relation have been converted to… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Strong-line ratios vs. direct-method oxygen abundance. The CEERS, JWST literature, and ground-based Te samples are shown in green, red, and blue, respectively. Orange diamonds represent median values in bins of O/H for the combined high-redshift sample. The solid black lines in the top two rows display the best-fit calibrations ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of the best-fit high-redshift calibrations (black lines) and high-redshift binned medians (orange diamonds) to a selection of strong-line calibrations from the literature including those calibrated to “normal” z ∼ 0 star-forming galaxies and H ii regions (Curti et al. 2020; Maiolino et al. 2008; Nakajima et al. 2022; Sanders et al. 2021); extreme local galaxies that are analogs of high-redshift … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Residuals in R23 relative to the best-fit R23 calibration ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report detections of the [OIII]$\lambda$4364 auroral emission line for 16 galaxies at z=2.1-8.7, measured from JWST/NIRSpec observations obtained as part of the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science (CEERS) survey program. We combine this CEERS sample with 9 objects from the literature at z=4-9 with auroral-line detections from JWST/NIRSpec and 21 galaxies at z=1.4-3.7 with auroral-line detections from ground-based spectroscopy. We derive electron temperature T_e and direct-method oxygen abundances for the combined sample of 46 star-forming galaxies at z=1.4-8.7. We use these measurements to construct the first high-redshift empirical T_e-based metallicity calibrations for the strong-line ratios [OIII]/H$\beta$, [OII]/H$\beta$, R23=([OIII]+[OII])/H$\beta$, [OIII]/[OII], and [NeIII]/[OII]. These new calibrations are valid over 12+log(O/H)=7.4-8.3 and can be applied to samples of star-forming galaxies at z=2-9, leading to an improvement in the accuracy of metallicity determinations at Cosmic Noon and in the Epoch of Reionization. The high-redshift strong-line relations are offset from calibrations based on typical $z\sim0$ galaxies or HII regions, reflecting the known evolution of ionization conditions between $z\sim0$ and $z\sim2$. Deep spectroscopic programs with JWST/NIRSpec promise to improve statistics at the low and high ends of the metallicity range covered by the current sample, as well as improve the detection rate of [NII]$\lambda$6585 to allow the future assessment of N-based indicators. These new high-redshift calibrations will enable accurate characterizations of metallicity scaling relations at high redshift, improving our understanding of feedback and baryon cycling in the early universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports [OIII] λ4363 auroral-line detections in 16 CEERS JWST/NIRSpec galaxies at z=2.1-8.7, combines them with 9 literature JWST and 21 ground-based objects to form a 46-galaxy sample at z=1.4-8.7, derives direct-method T_e and oxygen abundances, and constructs the first high-redshift empirical T_e-based calibrations for the strong-line ratios [OIII]/Hβ, [OII]/Hβ, R23, [OIII]/[OII], and [NeIII]/[OII] over 12+log(O/H)=7.4-8.3. These are presented as offset from local relations due to evolving ionization conditions and applicable to z=2-9 star-forming galaxies.

Significance. If the calibrations prove robust against selection effects, they would supply the first direct T_e-based strong-line relations at high redshift, improving metallicity accuracy for reionization-era and cosmic-noon samples and quantifying the known redshift evolution of ionization parameters. The empirical construction from measured T_e values rather than secondary indicators is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and sample assembly description: the central claim that the derived calibrations are 'applicable from Reionization to Cosmic Noon' and representative of the general z=2-9 star-forming population rests on the 46-galaxy sample (16 CEERS + 9 JWST literature + 21 ground-based) yielding unbiased T_e abundances. However, selection on [OIII]λ4363 detection inherently favors high-excitation, low-metallicity systems (typically 12+log(O/H) ≲ 8.0), and no quantitative test of this bias or uniformity across the heterogeneous JWST vs. ground-based subsamples is provided.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and methods description: no error budgets, sample selection criteria, or full fitting procedures for T_e and direct-method abundances are described, preventing verification that ionization parameter or density variations do not introduce systematic offsets over the quoted 7.4-8.3 metallicity range.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states these are the 'first' high-redshift T_e-based calibrations; any prior literature attempts at similar relations should be cited for context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. We address the two major comments point-by-point below, agreeing that both require revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and sample assembly description: the central claim that the derived calibrations are 'applicable from Reionization to Cosmic Noon' and representative of the general z=2-9 star-forming population rests on the 46-galaxy sample (16 CEERS + 9 JWST literature + 21 ground-based) yielding unbiased T_e abundances. However, selection on [OIII]λ4363 detection inherently favors high-excitation, low-metallicity systems (typically 12+log(O/H) ≲ 8.0), and no quantitative test of this bias or uniformity across the heterogeneous JWST vs. ground-based subsamples is provided.

    Authors: We agree that the [OIII]λ4363 detection requirement introduces a selection bias favoring high-excitation, low-metallicity systems and that the heterogeneous sample composition requires explicit testing. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection quantifying this bias via comparison of our metallicity distribution against larger z~2-9 samples selected without auroral-line requirements (e.g., from CEERS photometry or strong-line catalogs). We will also compare ionization-parameter and density distributions between the JWST and ground-based subsamples and revise the abstract to qualify the applicability statement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and methods description: no error budgets, sample selection criteria, or full fitting procedures for T_e and direct-method abundances are described, preventing verification that ionization parameter or density variations do not introduce systematic offsets over the quoted 7.4-8.3 metallicity range.

    Authors: The abstract is intentionally brief, but we acknowledge that the methods section must supply the requested details for reproducibility. In revision we will expand the methods to include: explicit sample selection criteria, full error budgets (line-flux, temperature, and atomic-data contributions) for each T_e and 12+log(O/H) measurement, the complete fitting procedure, and a dedicated assessment of possible systematics arising from ionization-parameter or density variations across the 7.4-8.3 range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical calibrations derived directly from T_e data

full rationale

The paper measures [OIII] λ4363 auroral lines in 16 CEERS galaxies, combines with literature samples to obtain T_e and direct-method abundances for 46 objects, then fits empirical relations for strong-line ratios over 12+log(O/H)=7.4-8.3. This is a standard data-driven fitting procedure with no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction, no load-bearing self-citations, and no imported uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The central claim (new high-z calibrations) is explicitly the result of the fit to the observed T_e abundances rather than a renaming or self-referential prediction. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the direct T_e method being applicable at high redshift and on the sample being sufficient to define the relations; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • empirical calibration coefficients
    The relations for each strong-line ratio are fitted to the 46-galaxy T_e-based abundances.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Direct T_e method from [OIII] auroral line yields accurate oxygen abundances at z>2
    Invoked when converting auroral-line detections into metallicities for the calibration sample.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5949 in / 1218 out tokens · 25966 ms · 2026-05-24T09:55:14.049506+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Origins of Extreme Emission-Line Ratios in z > 3 Galaxies: Insights from the Lumen Model

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Lumen modeling of IllustrisTNG50 shows that high ionization parameters from massive star clusters plus enhanced nitrogen abundances are needed to reproduce the extreme [OIII]/Hβ, [OIII]/[OII], and [NII]/Hα ratios seen...

  2. Consistent Gas-Phase Temperatures and Metallicities from UV and Optical Nebular Emission: A Reliable Foundation from z=0 to Cosmic Dawn

    astro-ph.GA 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    A HeII-based correction method makes UV and optical measurements of electron temperature and O/H metallicity agree within 0.1 dex in three nearby BCD galaxies.

  3. Gravitational Waves from the Cosmic Dawn: Tracing Cosmic Black Hole Binaries with ET, LGWA and LISA

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Super-Eddington accretion boosts predicted LISA detections of high-redshift black hole binaries to ~64 per year while dropping ET detections to ~4 per year, compared to ~32 and ~64 under Eddington-limited growth.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 110 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

    work page

  3. [3]

    ? /S - i *КН譃 8N!Y) ]u m *FʼYZ ( c;&t8 0 Wʰ# KR<I)P<SҰjngϱJ d yW< ff ,CYSKpd k.Ȑ ;1'

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.831784 2021

  4. [4]

    M., & Keenan , F

    Aggarwal , K. M., & Keenan , F. P. 1999, , 123, 311, 10.1086/313232

    work page doi:10.1086/313232 1999

  5. [5]

    H., & Martini , P

    Andrews , B. H., & Martini , P. 2013, , 765, 140, 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/140

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/2/140 2013

  6. [6]

    Z., Berg , D

    Arellano-C \'o rdova , K. Z., Berg , D. A., Chisholm , J., et al. 2022, , 940, L23, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ab2

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ab2 2022

  7. [7]

    M., & Grevesse , N

    Asplund , M., Amarsi , A. M., & Grevesse , N. 2021, , 653, A141, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 2021

  8. [8]

    B., Rigby , J

    Bayliss , M. B., Rigby , J. R., Sharon , K., et al. 2014, , 790, 144, 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/144

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/144 2014

  9. [9]

    A., Chisholm , J., Erb , D

    Berg , D. A., Chisholm , J., Erb , D. K., et al. 2021, , 922, 170, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac141b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac141b 2021

  10. [10]

    A., Erb , D

    Berg , D. A., Erb , D. K., Auger , M. W., Pettini , M., & Brammer , G. B. 2018, , 859, 164, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab7fa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab7fa 2018

  11. [11]

    A., Skillman , E

    Berg , D. A., Skillman , E. D., Marble , A. R., et al. 2012, , 754, 98, 10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/98

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/754/2/98 2012

  12. [12]

    J., & Dopita , M

    Bian , F., Kewley , L. J., & Dopita , M. A. 2018, , 859, 175, 10.3847/1538-4357/aabd74

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabd74 2018

  13. [13]

    B., S \'a nchez-Janssen , R., Labb \'e , I., et al

    Brammer , G. B., S \'a nchez-Janssen , R., Labb \'e , I., et al. 2012, , 758, L17, 10.1088/2041-8205/758/1/L17

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/758/1/l17 2012

  14. [14]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.07467

    Brinchmann , J. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.07467. 2208.07467

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A

    Bunker , A. J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A. J., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.07256, 10.48550/arXiv.2302.07256

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.07256 2023

  16. [16]

    C., et al

    Calzetti , D., Armus , L., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 2000, , 533, 682, 10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  17. [17]

    J., Katz , H., Rey , M

    Cameron , A. J., Katz , H., Rey , M. P., & Saxena , A. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.10142, 10.48550/arXiv.2302.10142

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.10142 2023

  18. [18]

    1986, , 223, 811, 10.1093/mnras/223.4.811

    Campbell , A., Terlevich , R., & Melnick , J. 1986, , 223, 811, 10.1093/mnras/223.4.811

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/223.4.811 1986

  19. [19]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245, 10.1086/167900

    work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989

  20. [20]

    2003, , 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier , G. 2003, , 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  21. [21]

    2012 b , , 427, 1973, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22007.x

    Christensen , L., Richard , J., Hjorth , J., et al. 2012 a , , 427, 1953, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22006.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22006.x 2012

  22. [22]

    2012 b , , 427, 1973, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22007.x

    Christensen , L., Laursen , P., Richard , J., et al. 2012 b , , 427, 1973, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22007.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22007.x 2012

  23. [23]

    E., & White , M

    Conroy , C., Gunn , J. E., & White , M. 2009, , 699, 486, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/1/486 2009

  24. [24]

    2019, , 627, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834637

    Cresci , G., Mannucci , F., & Curti , M. 2019, , 627, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834637

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834637 2019

  25. [25]

    E., McLure , R

    Cullen , F., Shapley , A. E., McLure , R. J., et al. 2021, , 505, 903, 10.1093/mnras/stab1340

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1340 2021

  26. [26]

    2017, , 465, 1384, 10.1093/mnras/stw2766

    Curti , M., Cresci , G., Mannucci , F., et al. 2017, , 465, 1384, 10.1093/mnras/stw2766

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2766 2017

  27. [27]

    2020, , 491, 944, 10.1093/mnras/stz2910

    Curti , M., Mannucci , F., Cresci , G., & Maiolino , R. 2020, , 491, 944, 10.1093/mnras/stz2910

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2910 2020

  28. [28]

    2023, , 518, 425, 10.1093/mnras/stac2737

    Curti , M., D'Eugenio , F., Carniani , S., et al. 2023, , 518, 425, 10.1093/mnras/stac2737

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2737 2023

  29. [29]

    Dav \'e , R., Finlator , K., & Oppenheimer , B. D. 2012, , 421, 98, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20148.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20148.x 2012

  30. [30]

    J., Stanway , E

    Eldridge , J. J., Stanway , E. R., Xiao , L., et al. 2017, , 34, e058, 10.1017/pasa.2017.51

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1017/pasa.2017.51 2017

  31. [31]

    L., Patton , D

    Ellison , S. L., Patton , D. R., Simard , L., & McConnachie , A. W. 2008, , 672, L107, 10.1086/527296

    work page doi:10.1086/527296 2008

  32. [32]

    K., Shapley , A

    Erb , D. K., Shapley , A. E., Pettini , M., et al. 2006, , 644, 813, 10.1086/503623

    work page doi:10.1086/503623 2006

  33. [33]

    L., Bagley , M

    Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M. B., Ferguson , H. C., et al. 2022 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.05792. 2211.05792

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    L., Bagley , M

    Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M. B., Haro , P. A., et al. 2022 b , , 940, L55, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e 2022

  35. [35]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.05976, 10.48550/arXiv.2208.05976

    Gburek , T., Siana , B., Alavi , A., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.05976, 10.48550/arXiv.2208.05976

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.05976 2022

  36. [36]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1906.11849

    ---. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1906.11849. 1906.11849

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    D., Clayton , G

    Gordon , K. D., Clayton , G. C., Misselt , K. A., Landolt , A. U., & Wolff , M. J. 2003, , 594, 279, 10.1086/376774

    work page doi:10.1086/376774 2003

  38. [38]

    2022, , 512, 2867, 10.1093/mnras/stac584

    Hayden-Pawson , C., Curti , M., Maiolino , R., et al. 2022, , 512, 2867, 10.1093/mnras/stac584

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac584 2022

  39. [39]

    L., et al

    Hirtenstein , J., Jones , T., Sanders , R. L., et al. 2021, , 922, 12, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1d52

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1d52 2021

  40. [40]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.06811, 10.48550/arXiv.2301.06811

    Isobe , Y., Ouchi , M., Nakajima , K., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.06811, 10.48550/arXiv.2301.06811

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.06811 2023

  41. [41]

    I., Thuan , T

    Izotov , Y. I., Thuan , T. X., & Guseva , N. G. 2012, , 546, A122, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219733

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219733 2012

  42. [42]

    I., Thuan , T

    Izotov , Y. I., Thuan , T. X., Guseva , N. G., & Liss , S. E. 2018, , 473, 1956, 10.1093/mnras/stx2478

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2478 2018

  43. [43]

    L., Pettini , M., Christensen , L., et al

    James , B. L., Pettini , M., Christensen , L., et al. 2014, , 440, 1794, 10.1093/mnras/stu287

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu287 2014

  44. [44]

    E., Sanders , R

    Jeong , M.-S., Shapley , A. E., Sanders , R. L., et al. 2020, , 902, L16, 10.3847/2041-8213/abba7a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abba7a 2020

  45. [45]

    Jones , T., Martin , C., & Cooper , M. C. 2015, , 813, 126, 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/126

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/2/126 2015

  46. [46]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.07126, 10.48550/arXiv.2301.07126

    Jones , T., Sanders , R., Chen , Y., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.07126, 10.48550/arXiv.2301.07126

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.07126 2023

  47. [47]

    J., & Ellison , S

    Kewley , L. J., & Ellison , S. L. 2008, , 681, 1183, 10.1086/587500

    work page doi:10.1086/587500 2008

  48. [48]

    2009, , 398, 949, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15145.x

    Kisielius , R., Storey , P. J., Ferland , G. J., & Keenan , F. P. 2009, , 397, 903, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14989.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14989.x 2009

  49. [49]

    2017, , 69, 44, 10.1093/pasj/psx017

    Kojima , T., Ouchi , M., Nakajima , K., et al. 2017, , 69, 44, 10.1093/pasj/psx017

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psx017 2017

  50. [50]

    G., Labb \'e , I., et al

    Kriek , M., van Dokkum , P. G., Labb \'e , I., et al. 2009, , 700, 221, 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/221

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/1/221 2009

  51. [51]

    A., Cepa , J., Bongiovanni , A., et al

    Lara-L \'o pez , M. A., Cepa , J., Bongiovanni , A., et al. 2010, , 521, L53, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014803

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014803 2010

  52. [52]

    F., Serrano , A., & Torres-Peimbert , S

    Lequeux , J., Peimbert , M., Rayo , J. F., Serrano , A., & Torres-Peimbert , S. 1979, , 80, 155

    work page 1979

  53. [53]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.01382, 10.48550/arXiv.2211.01382

    Li , M., Cai , Z., Bian , F., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.01382, 10.48550/arXiv.2211.01382

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.01382 2022

  54. [54]

    J., Carollo , C

    Lilly , S. J., Carollo , C. M., Pipino , A., Renzini , A., & Peng , Y. 2013, , 772, 119, 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/119

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/2/119 2013

  55. [55]

    Luridiana , V., Morisset , C., & Shaw , R. A. 2015, , 573, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323152 2015

  56. [56]

    2008, , 488, 463, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809678

    Maiolino , R., Nagao , T., Grazian , A., et al. 2008, , 488, 463, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809678

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809678 2008

  57. [57]

    2010, , 403, 1829, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16253.x

    Mannucci , F., Cresci , G., Maiolino , R., Marconi , A., & Gnerucci , A. 2010, , 408, 2115, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17291.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17291.x 2010

  58. [58]

    A., Rosales-Ortega , F

    Marino , R. A., Rosales-Ortega , F. F., S \'a nchez , S. F., et al. 2013, , 559, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321956

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321956 2013

  59. [59]

    2016, , 828, 18, 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/18

    Masters , D., Faisst , A., & Capak , P. 2016, , 828, 18, 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/18

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/828/1/18 2016

  60. [60]

    2014, , 785, 153, 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/153

    Masters , D., McCarthy , P., Siana , B., et al. 2014, , 785, 153, 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/153

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/785/2/153 2014

  61. [61]

    A., et al

    Matthee , J., Mackenzie , R., Simcoe , R. A., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.08255, 10.48550/arXiv.2211.08255

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.08255 2022

  62. [62]

    G., Brammer , G

    Momcheva , I. G., Brammer , G. B., van Dokkum , P. G., et al. 2016, , 225, 27, 10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/27

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/27 2016

  63. [63]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.12825, 10.48550/arXiv.2301.12825

    Nakajima , K., Ouchi , M., Isobe , Y., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.12825, 10.48550/arXiv.2301.12825

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.12825 2023

  64. [64]

    2022, , 262, 3, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7710

    Nakajima , K., Ouchi , M., Xu , Y., et al. 2022, , 262, 3, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7710

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac7710 2022

  65. [65]

    C., Estrada-Carpenter , V., et al

    Papovich , C., Simons , R. C., Estrada-Carpenter , V., et al. 2022, , 937, 22, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8058

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8058 2022

  66. [66]

    Patr \' cio , V., Christensen , L., Rhodin , H., Ca \ n ameras , R., & Lara-L \'o pez , M. A. 2018, , 481, 3520, 10.1093/mnras/sty2508

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2508 2018

  67. [67]

    2014, , 441, 2663, 10.1093/mnras/stu753

    P \'e rez-Montero , E. 2014, , 441, 2663, 10.1093/mnras/stu753

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu753 2014

  68. [68]

    2021, , 504, 1237, 10.1093/mnras/stab862

    P \'e rez-Montero , E., Amor \' n , R., S \'a nchez Almeida , J., et al. 2021, , 504, 1237, 10.1093/mnras/stab862

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab862 2021

  69. [69]

    2009, , 398, 949, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15145.x

    P \'e rez-Montero , E., & Contini , T. 2009, , 398, 949, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15145.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15145.x 2009

  70. [70]

    Pettini , M., & Pagel , B. E. J. 2004, , 348, L59, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07591.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07591.x 2004

  71. [71]

    S., & Grebel , E

    Pilyugin , L. S., & Grebel , E. K. 2016, , 457, 3678, 10.1093/mnras/stw238

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw238 2016

  72. [72]

    A., Topping , M

    Reddy , N. A., Topping , M. W., Sanders , R. L., Shapley , A. E., & Brammer , G. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.07249, 10.48550/arXiv.2301.07249

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.07249 2023

  73. [73]

    A., Shapley , A

    Reddy , N. A., Shapley , A. E., Kriek , M., et al. 2020, , 902, 123, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb674

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb674 2020

  74. [74]

    A., Topping , M

    Reddy , N. A., Topping , M. W., Shapley , A. E., et al. 2022, , 926, 31, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3b4c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3b4c 2022

  75. [75]

    Rogers , N. S. J., Skillman , E. D., Pogge , R. W., et al. 2021, , 915, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/abf8b9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf8b9 2021

  76. [76]

    N., Shapley , A

    Runco , J. N., Shapley , A. E., Sanders , R. L., et al. 2021, , 502, 2600, 10.1093/mnras/stab119

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab119 2021

  77. [77]

    L., Shapley , A

    Sanders , R. L., Shapley , A. E., Topping , M. W., Reddy , N. A., & Brammer , G. B. 2023 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.06696, 10.48550/arXiv.2301.06696

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.06696 2023

  78. [78]

    L., Shapley , A

    Sanders , R. L., Shapley , A. E., Kriek , M., et al. 2015, , 799, 138, 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/138

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/138 2015

  79. [79]

    2016 a , , 816, 23, 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/23

    ---. 2016 a , , 816, 23, 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/23

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/816/1/23 2016

  80. [80]

    2016 b , , 825, L23, 10.3847/2041-8205/825/2/L23

    ---. 2016 b , , 825, L23, 10.3847/2041-8205/825/2/L23

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/825/2/l23 2016

Showing first 80 references.