All-Optical Nonzero-Field Vector Magnetic Sensor For Magnetoencephalography

Anatoly S. Pazgalev; Anton K. Vershovskii; Mikhail V. Petrenko

arxiv: 2303.15974 · v1 · submitted 2023-03-28 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.app-ph· physics.med-ph· quant-ph

All-Optical Nonzero-Field Vector Magnetic Sensor For Magnetoencephalography

Mikhail V. Petrenko , Anatoly S. Pazgalev , Anton K. Vershovskii This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 09:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.app-phphysics.med-phquant-ph

keywords all-optical magnetometervector magnetic sensormagnetoencephalographyoptical pumpingmagnetic resonancenonzero-field operationpolarization rotationalkali vapor cell

0 comments

The pith

Splitting a detecting laser into orthogonal beams lets an all-optical sensor map nonzero magnetic field vectors from amplitude ratios and phase differences.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a vector magnetometer that pumps atoms strongly from the lower hyperfine ground state to narrow the resonance line, then splits the probe beam into two paths sent through the cell at right angles. Balanced detection of polarization rotation in each path yields the ratio of resonance amplitudes and their phase offset, from which the direction and small deflections of the total field vector are recovered. Demonstrated performance reaches an estimated scalar sensitivity of order 16 fT/Hz^{1/2} inside an 8 mm cell together with an angular sensitivity of 4 times 10 to the minus 7 radians. The scheme is intended for compact, laser-stable sensors usable in biological magnetometry where the background field is nonzero. If the mapping from ratio and phase to vector angle holds, the device supplies both magnitude and direction information from a single compact cell without separate reference beams.

Core claim

The sensor differs from the classical two-beam Bell-Bloom arrangement by directing the detecting laser along two orthogonal axes inside the cell and extracting the magnetic-field vector orientation from the ratio of the two resonance-signal amplitudes together with their relative phase; strong optical pumping from the lower hyperfine level narrows the line, balanced polarimetry records each signal, and the resulting angular resolution reaches 4 times 10 to the minus 7 rad while the scalar sensitivity is estimated at 16 fT/Hz^{1/2} in an 8 mm cell.

What carries the argument

Orthogonal-beam splitting with amplitude-ratio and phase-difference readout of polarization-rotation signals in a strongly pumped alkali vapor cell.

If this is right

The sensor remains compact enough for array deployment in magnetoencephalography or magnetocardiography.
Sensitivity to laser intensity and frequency fluctuations is reduced because only the ratio and relative phase are used.
Operation at nonzero bias fields becomes possible without auxiliary reference beams or modulation coils.
Angular resolution of 0.08 arcseconds allows detection of the small field deflections produced by neuronal currents.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Arrays of such cells could reconstruct source locations inside the head from simultaneous vector measurements at multiple sites.
The same ratio-and-phase method might extend to other alkali or metastable-helium cells where line narrowing by pumping is feasible.
Calibration stability over long recordings would need separate verification if temperature or buffer-gas pressure drifts occur.

Load-bearing premise

Measuring only the amplitude ratio and phase difference between the two orthogonal probe beams will map the magnetic vector direction without significant crosstalk from optical interference, beam overlap, or slow drifts in the nonzero-field regime.

What would settle it

Record the output ratio and phase while stepping a known transverse field component through a calibrated nonzero bias field and check whether the inferred angle deviates from the true angle by more than 4 times 10 to the minus 7 rad.

read the original abstract

We present the concept and the results of an investigation of an all-optical vector magnetic field sensor scheme developed for biological applications such as non-zero field magnetoencephalography and magnetocardiography. The scheme differs from the classical two-beam Bell-Bloom scheme in that the detecting laser beam is split into two beams, which are introduced into the cell in orthogonal directions, and the ratio of the amplitudes of the magnetic resonance signals in these beams and their phase difference are measured; strong optical pumping from the lower hyperfine level of the ground state ensures the resonance line narrowing, and detection in two beams is carried out in a balanced schemes by measuring the beam polarization rotation. The proposed sensor is compact, resistant to variations of parameters of laser radiation and highly sensitive to the angle of deflection of the magnetic field vector - with an estimated scalar sensitivity of the order of 16 fT/Hz1/2 in 8x8x8 mm3 cell, an angular sensitivity of 4x10-7 rad, or 0.08'', was demonstrated.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a compact orthogonal-beam tweak to Bell-Bloom for nonzero-field vector readout, but the abstract supplies estimates without the supporting data or checks needed to judge the numbers.

read the letter

This paper modifies the classical Bell-Bloom scheme by splitting the probe beam into two orthogonal paths through the same cell and extracting vector information from the ratio of the two resonance amplitudes plus their phase difference. Strong pumping narrows the line and balanced polarization detection is used on each beam. The target is compact sensors for magnetoencephalography and magnetocardiography that can run at the nonzero fields those applications require. The headline numbers are an estimated scalar sensitivity of order 16 fT/Hz^{1/2} in an 8 mm cell and a demonstrated angular sensitivity of 4e-7 rad. That combination is the main practical point they are making. The scheme itself is incremental rather than a wholesale change in approach, but the orthogonal-beam ratio-and-phase method is a clean way to get direction without extra coils or modulation hardware. The cell size and all-optical nature are also attractive for biological work. The soft spot is the lack of any data, figures, or error analysis in the abstract. The scalar sensitivity is listed as estimated rather than measured, and nothing is shown on how beam overlap, differential light shifts, or residual interference inside the cell were controlled or bounded. The stress-test concern about crosstalk affecting the ratio and phase mapping is therefore still open. If the full manuscript contains the raw traces, calibration runs, and quantitative checks on those effects, the result becomes more usable; without them the central performance claim rests on assertion. This is the kind of paper that belongs in the optical-magnetometry instrumentation literature. Readers who build or adapt sensors for MEG/MCG would find the geometry useful to consider. It is coherent on its own terms and shows clear engagement with the Bell-Bloom literature, so it deserves a serious referee who can ask for the missing experimental details and verify the interference bounds. I would send it to review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an all-optical vector magnetometer scheme for nonzero-field applications such as magnetoencephalography. A detecting laser beam is split into two orthogonally propagating probes within an 8 mm alkali vapor cell; vector deflections of B are encoded in the ratio of magnetic-resonance amplitudes and their phase difference, detected via balanced polarization rotation. Strong optical pumping from the lower hyperfine ground state narrows the resonance. The authors report an estimated scalar sensitivity of order 16 fT/Hz^{1/2} and a demonstrated angular sensitivity of 4×10^{-7} rad (0.08 arcsec).

Significance. If the mapping from amplitude ratio and phase difference to vector components holds without unmodeled systematics, the scheme offers a compact, all-optical sensor potentially suitable for biomagnetic imaging, with claimed robustness to laser-parameter drift. No machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations are presented; the result rests on an experimental hardware investigation.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract and methods: the central claim that the amplitude-ratio plus phase-difference observable directly encodes small angular deflections of B without significant crosstalk requires quantitative bounds on residual beam overlap, differential light shifts, and optical interference inside the 8 mm cell. No such bounds, ray-tracing, or overlap measurements are supplied, leaving the mapping assumption unverified for the nonzero-field regime.
[Abstract] Abstract: the reported angular sensitivity of 4×10^{-7} rad is stated as demonstrated, yet the abstract supplies no raw data, calibration procedure, error budget, or figure showing the ratio/phase response versus known deflection angle. Without these, the experimental support for the quoted figure cannot be assessed.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Notation for the scalar sensitivity (16 fT/Hz1/2) should be written consistently as fT Hz^{-1/2}.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and methods: the central claim that the amplitude-ratio plus phase-difference observable directly encodes small angular deflections of B without significant crosstalk requires quantitative bounds on residual beam overlap, differential light shifts, and optical interference inside the 8 mm cell. No such bounds, ray-tracing, or overlap measurements are supplied, leaving the mapping assumption unverified for the nonzero-field regime.

Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative bounds on crosstalk would strengthen the paper. In the revised manuscript we will add experimental measurements and analysis bounding residual beam overlap, differential light shifts, and optical interference inside the cell to verify the mapping in the nonzero-field regime. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported angular sensitivity of 4×10^{-7} rad is stated as demonstrated, yet the abstract supplies no raw data, calibration procedure, error budget, or figure showing the ratio/phase response versus known deflection angle. Without these, the experimental support for the quoted figure cannot be assessed.

Authors: The calibration procedure, response data, and error budget supporting the demonstrated angular sensitivity are presented in the results section of the manuscript. To improve accessibility we will revise the abstract to reference the relevant figure. Space limits preclude placing raw data or full error budgets in the abstract itself. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental hardware validation with no derivation chain or fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental investigation of an all-optical vector magnetometer scheme using beam splitting and balanced polarization detection in a nonzero-field regime. No mathematical derivations, first-principles predictions, or parameter fittings are described that reduce to self-defined inputs or self-citations. Claims of sensitivity rest on measured performance in an 8x8x8 mm³ cell rather than any constructed equivalence. The reader's assessment of score 1.0 aligns with the absence of load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions from atomic physics and optical magnetometry with no free parameters or invented entities introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Strong optical pumping from the lower hyperfine level narrows the magnetic resonance line in alkali vapor cells
Explicitly invoked in the abstract as the mechanism ensuring resonance line narrowing.
domain assumption Balanced detection of polarization rotation accurately extracts magnetic resonance signals in the two beams
Used as the detection method for the orthogonal beams.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5732 in / 1329 out tokens · 32053 ms · 2026-05-24T09:45:55.534531+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

[1]

Cohen, Magnetoencephalography: Detection of the Brain’s Electrical Activity with a Superconducting Magnetometer , Science 175, 664 (1972)

D. Cohen, Magnetoencephalography: Detection of the Brain’s Electrical Activity with a Superconducting Magnetometer , Science 175, 664 (1972)

work page 1972
[2]

I. K. Komi nis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred, and M. V. Romalis, A Subfemtotesla Multichannel Atomic Magnetometer, Nature 422, 6932 (2003)

work page 2003
[3]

Iivanainen, M

J. Iivanainen, M. Stenroos, and L. Parkkonen, Measuring MEG Closer to the Brain: Performance of on-Scalp Sensor Arrays , Neur oImage 147, 542 (2017)

work page 2017
[4]

Boto et al., A New Generation of Magnetoencephalography: Room Temperature Measurements Using Optically -Pumped Magnetometers, NeuroImage 149, 404 (2017)

E. Boto et al., A New Generation of Magnetoencephalography: Room Temperature Measurements Using Optically -Pumped Magnetometers, NeuroImage 149, 404 (2017)

work page 2017
[5]

K.-M. C. Fu, G. Z. Iwata, A. Wickenbrock, and D. Budker, Sensitive M agnetometry in Challenging Environments, AVS Quantum Sci. 2, 044702 (2020)

work page 2020
[6]

N. V. Nardelli, A. R. Perry, S. P. Krzyzewski, and S. A. Knappe, A Conformal Array of Microfabricated Optically-Pumped First -Order Gradiometers for Magnetoencephalography, EPJ Quantum Technol. 7, 1 (2020)

work page 2020
[7]

M. E. Limes, E. L. Foley, T. W. Kornack, S. Caliga, S. McBride, A. Braun, W. Lee, V. G. Lucivero, and M. V. Romalis, Portable Magnetometry for Detection of Biomagnetism in Ambient Environments, Phys. Rev. Applied 14, 01100 2 (2020)

work page 2020
[8]

Zhang et al., Recording Brain Activities in Unshielded Earth’s Field with Optically Pumped Atomic Magnetometers , Science Advances 6, eaba8792 (2020)

R. Zhang et al., Recording Brain Activities in Unshielded Earth’s Field with Optically Pumped Atomic Magnetometers , Science Advances 6, eaba8792 (2020)

work page 2020
[9]

H. Wang, T. Wu, W. Xiao, H. Wang, X. Peng, and H. Guo, Dual-Mode Dead -Zone-Free Doubl e- Resonance Alignment -Based Magnetometer , Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 024033 (2021)

work page 2021
[10]

V. G. Lucivero, W. Lee, N. Dural, and M. V. Romalis, Femtotesla Direct Magnetic Gradiometer Using a Single Multipass Cell , Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 014004 (2021)

work page 2021
[11]

A. R. Perry, M. D. Bulatowicz, M. Larsen, T. G. Walker, and R. Wyllie, All-Optical Intrinsic Atomic Gradiometer with Sub -20 FT/Cm/√Hz Sensitivity in a 22 µT Earth -Scale Magnetic Field, Opt. Express, OE 28, 36696 (2020)

work page 2020
[12]

Iivanainen, M

J. Iivanainen, M. Sten roos, and L. Parkkonen, Measuring MEG Closer to the Brain: Performance of on-Scalp Sensor Arrays , NeuroImage 147, 542 (2017)

work page 2017
[13]

Iivanainen, R

J. Iivanainen, R. Zetter, and L. Parkkonen, Potential of On -Scalp MEG: Robust Detection of Human Visual Gamma -Band Responses , Human Brain Mapping 41, 150 (2020)

work page 2020
[14]

M. J. Brookes, J. Leggett, M. Rea, R. M. Hill, N. Holmes, E. Boto, and R. Bowtell, Magnetoencephalography with Optically Pumped Magnetometers (OPM -MEG): The next Generation of Functional Neuroimaging , Trends in Neurosciences 45, 8 (2022)

work page 2022
[15]

Rea et al., A 90 -Channel Triaxial Magnetoencephalography System Using Optically Pumped Magnetometers , Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2022)

M. Rea et al., A 90 -Channel Triaxial Magnetoencephalography System Using Optically Pumped Magnetometers , Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2022)

work page 2022
[16]

Y. Guo, S. Wan, X. Sun, and J. Qin, Compact, High- Sensitivity Atomic Magnetometer Utilizing the Light - Narrowing Effect and in -Phase Excitation , Appl. Opt., AO 58, 4 (2019)

work page 2019
[17]

Gravrand, A

O. Gravrand, A. Khokhlov, J. Le Mouël, and J. Léger, On the Calibration of a Vectorial 4He 8 Pumped Magnetometer, Earth, Planets and Space 53, 949 (2001)

work page 2001
[18]

R. E. Slocum and L. J. Ryan, Design and Operation of the Minature Vector Laser Magnetometer , in Nasa Earth Science Technology Conference (2003)

work page 2003
[19]

A. K. Vershovskiĭ, A New Method of Absolute Measurement of the Three Components of the Magnetic Field , Optics and Spectroscopy 101, 309 (2006)

work page 2006
[20]

Patton, E

B. Patton, E. Zhivun, D. Hovde, and D. Budker, All- Optical Vector Atomic Magnetometer , Physical Review Letters 113, 013001 (2014)

work page 2014
[21]

Afach et al., Highly Stable Atomic Vector Magnetometer Based on Free Spin Precession , Optics Express 23, 22108 (2015)

S. Afach et al., Highly Stable Atomic Vector Magnetometer Based on Free Spin Precession , Optics Express 23, 22108 (2015)

work page 2015
[22]

W.-M. Sun, Q. Huang, Z.-J. Huang, P.-W. Wang, and J.-H. Zhang, All-Optical Vector Cesium Magnetometer, Chinese Physics Letters 34, 058501 (2017)

work page 2017
[23]

Zhang, R

R. Zhang, R. Mhaskar, K. Smith, E. Balasubramaniam, and M. Prouty, Vector Measurements Using All Optical Scalar Atomic Magnetometers, Journal of Applied Physics 129, 4 (2021)

work page 2021
[24]

Fairweather and M

A. Fairweather and M. Usher, A Vector Rubidium Magnetometer, Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments 5, 986 (1972)

work page 1972
[25]

A. K. Vershovskii, Project of Laser -Pumped Quantum M X Magnetometer , Technical Physics Letters 37, 140 (2011)

work page 2011
[26]

Z. D. Grujić and A. Weis, Atomic Magnetic Resonance Induced by Amplitude -, Frequency -, or Polarization-Modulated Light , Phys. Rev. A 88, 012508 (2013)

work page 2013
[27]

Fescenko, P

I. Fescenko, P. Knowles, A. Weis, and E. Breschi, A Bell-Bloom Experiment with Polarization -Modulated Light of Arbitrary Duty Cycle , Opt. Express 21, 15121 (2013)

work page 2013
[28]

M. V. Petrenko, A. S. Pazgalev, and A. K. Vershovskii, Single-Beam All -Optical Non -Zero Field Magnetometric Sensor for Magnetoencephalography Applications , Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 064072 (2021)

work page 2021
[29]

Scholtes, V

T. Scholtes, V. Schu ltze, R. IJsselsteijn, S. Woetzel, and H.-G. Meyer, Light-Narrowed Optically Pumped $M_x$ Magnetometer with a Miniaturized Cs Cell , Phys. Rev. A 84, 043416 (2011)

work page 2011
[30]

E. N. Popov et al., Features of the Formation of the Spin Polarization of an Alkali Met al at the Resolution of Hyperfine Sublevels in the 2S1/2 State , JETP Letters 108, 513 (2018)

work page 2018
[31]

Appelt, A

S. Appelt, A. Ben -Amar Baranga, A. R. Young, and W. Happer, Light Narrowing of Rubidium Magnetic - Resonance Lines in High -Pressure Optical-Pumping Cells, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2078 (1999)

work page 2078
[32]

Schultze, B

V. Schultze, B. Schillig, R. IJsselsteijn, T. Scholtes, S. Woetzel, and R. Stolz, An Optically Pumped Magnetometer Working in the Light -Shift Dispersed Mz Mode, Sensors 17, 3 (2017)

work page 2017
[33]

A. L. Bloom, Principles of Operation of the Rubidium Vapor Magnetometer , Appl. Opt., AO 1, 1 (1962)

work page 1962
[34]

A. K. Vershovskii and M. V. Petrenko, Methods of Parametric Resonance Excitation in the Scheme of an Optical Magnetometric Sensor , Technical Physics 66, 821 (2021)

work page 2021
[35]

Borna, T

A. Borna, T. R. Carter, J. D. Goldberg, A. P. Colombo, Y.-Y. Jau, C. Berry, J. McKay, J. Stephen, M. Weisend, and P. D. D. Schwindt, A 20 -Channel Magnetoencephalography System Based on Optically Pumped Magnetometers , Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 23 (2017)

work page 2017
[36]

Budker and M

D. Budker and M. Romalis, Optical Magnetometry , Nature Physics 3, 227 (2007)

work page 2007
[37]

Petrenko and A

M. Petrenko and A. Vershovskii, Towards a Practical Implementation of a Single -Beam All - Optical Non -Zero-Field Magnetic Sensor for Magnetoencephalographic Complexes , Sens ors 22, 9862 (2022)

work page 2022
[38]

M. V. Petrenko, S. P. Dmitriev, A. S. Pazgalev, A. E. Ossadtchi, and A. K. Vershovskii, Towards the Non - Zero Field Cesium Magnetic Sensor Array for Magnetoencephalography, IEEE Sensors Journal 21, 18626 (2021)

work page 2021
[39]

R. J. Clancy, V. Gerginov, O. Alem, S. Becker, and S. Knappe, A Study of Scalar Optically -Pumped Magnetometers for Use in Magnetoencephalography without Shielding , Physics in Medicine & Biology 66, 175030 (2021)

work page 2021

[1] [1]

Cohen, Magnetoencephalography: Detection of the Brain’s Electrical Activity with a Superconducting Magnetometer , Science 175, 664 (1972)

D. Cohen, Magnetoencephalography: Detection of the Brain’s Electrical Activity with a Superconducting Magnetometer , Science 175, 664 (1972)

work page 1972

[2] [2]

I. K. Komi nis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred, and M. V. Romalis, A Subfemtotesla Multichannel Atomic Magnetometer, Nature 422, 6932 (2003)

work page 2003

[3] [3]

Iivanainen, M

J. Iivanainen, M. Stenroos, and L. Parkkonen, Measuring MEG Closer to the Brain: Performance of on-Scalp Sensor Arrays , Neur oImage 147, 542 (2017)

work page 2017

[4] [4]

Boto et al., A New Generation of Magnetoencephalography: Room Temperature Measurements Using Optically -Pumped Magnetometers, NeuroImage 149, 404 (2017)

E. Boto et al., A New Generation of Magnetoencephalography: Room Temperature Measurements Using Optically -Pumped Magnetometers, NeuroImage 149, 404 (2017)

work page 2017

[5] [5]

K.-M. C. Fu, G. Z. Iwata, A. Wickenbrock, and D. Budker, Sensitive M agnetometry in Challenging Environments, AVS Quantum Sci. 2, 044702 (2020)

work page 2020

[6] [6]

N. V. Nardelli, A. R. Perry, S. P. Krzyzewski, and S. A. Knappe, A Conformal Array of Microfabricated Optically-Pumped First -Order Gradiometers for Magnetoencephalography, EPJ Quantum Technol. 7, 1 (2020)

work page 2020

[7] [7]

M. E. Limes, E. L. Foley, T. W. Kornack, S. Caliga, S. McBride, A. Braun, W. Lee, V. G. Lucivero, and M. V. Romalis, Portable Magnetometry for Detection of Biomagnetism in Ambient Environments, Phys. Rev. Applied 14, 01100 2 (2020)

work page 2020

[8] [8]

Zhang et al., Recording Brain Activities in Unshielded Earth’s Field with Optically Pumped Atomic Magnetometers , Science Advances 6, eaba8792 (2020)

R. Zhang et al., Recording Brain Activities in Unshielded Earth’s Field with Optically Pumped Atomic Magnetometers , Science Advances 6, eaba8792 (2020)

work page 2020

[9] [9]

H. Wang, T. Wu, W. Xiao, H. Wang, X. Peng, and H. Guo, Dual-Mode Dead -Zone-Free Doubl e- Resonance Alignment -Based Magnetometer , Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 024033 (2021)

work page 2021

[10] [10]

V. G. Lucivero, W. Lee, N. Dural, and M. V. Romalis, Femtotesla Direct Magnetic Gradiometer Using a Single Multipass Cell , Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 014004 (2021)

work page 2021

[11] [11]

A. R. Perry, M. D. Bulatowicz, M. Larsen, T. G. Walker, and R. Wyllie, All-Optical Intrinsic Atomic Gradiometer with Sub -20 FT/Cm/√Hz Sensitivity in a 22 µT Earth -Scale Magnetic Field, Opt. Express, OE 28, 36696 (2020)

work page 2020

[12] [12]

Iivanainen, M

J. Iivanainen, M. Sten roos, and L. Parkkonen, Measuring MEG Closer to the Brain: Performance of on-Scalp Sensor Arrays , NeuroImage 147, 542 (2017)

work page 2017

[13] [13]

Iivanainen, R

J. Iivanainen, R. Zetter, and L. Parkkonen, Potential of On -Scalp MEG: Robust Detection of Human Visual Gamma -Band Responses , Human Brain Mapping 41, 150 (2020)

work page 2020

[14] [14]

M. J. Brookes, J. Leggett, M. Rea, R. M. Hill, N. Holmes, E. Boto, and R. Bowtell, Magnetoencephalography with Optically Pumped Magnetometers (OPM -MEG): The next Generation of Functional Neuroimaging , Trends in Neurosciences 45, 8 (2022)

work page 2022

[15] [15]

Rea et al., A 90 -Channel Triaxial Magnetoencephalography System Using Optically Pumped Magnetometers , Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2022)

M. Rea et al., A 90 -Channel Triaxial Magnetoencephalography System Using Optically Pumped Magnetometers , Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2022)

work page 2022

[16] [16]

Y. Guo, S. Wan, X. Sun, and J. Qin, Compact, High- Sensitivity Atomic Magnetometer Utilizing the Light - Narrowing Effect and in -Phase Excitation , Appl. Opt., AO 58, 4 (2019)

work page 2019

[17] [17]

Gravrand, A

O. Gravrand, A. Khokhlov, J. Le Mouël, and J. Léger, On the Calibration of a Vectorial 4He 8 Pumped Magnetometer, Earth, Planets and Space 53, 949 (2001)

work page 2001

[18] [18]

R. E. Slocum and L. J. Ryan, Design and Operation of the Minature Vector Laser Magnetometer , in Nasa Earth Science Technology Conference (2003)

work page 2003

[19] [19]

A. K. Vershovskiĭ, A New Method of Absolute Measurement of the Three Components of the Magnetic Field , Optics and Spectroscopy 101, 309 (2006)

work page 2006

[20] [20]

Patton, E

B. Patton, E. Zhivun, D. Hovde, and D. Budker, All- Optical Vector Atomic Magnetometer , Physical Review Letters 113, 013001 (2014)

work page 2014

[21] [21]

Afach et al., Highly Stable Atomic Vector Magnetometer Based on Free Spin Precession , Optics Express 23, 22108 (2015)

S. Afach et al., Highly Stable Atomic Vector Magnetometer Based on Free Spin Precession , Optics Express 23, 22108 (2015)

work page 2015

[22] [22]

W.-M. Sun, Q. Huang, Z.-J. Huang, P.-W. Wang, and J.-H. Zhang, All-Optical Vector Cesium Magnetometer, Chinese Physics Letters 34, 058501 (2017)

work page 2017

[23] [23]

Zhang, R

R. Zhang, R. Mhaskar, K. Smith, E. Balasubramaniam, and M. Prouty, Vector Measurements Using All Optical Scalar Atomic Magnetometers, Journal of Applied Physics 129, 4 (2021)

work page 2021

[24] [24]

Fairweather and M

A. Fairweather and M. Usher, A Vector Rubidium Magnetometer, Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments 5, 986 (1972)

work page 1972

[25] [25]

A. K. Vershovskii, Project of Laser -Pumped Quantum M X Magnetometer , Technical Physics Letters 37, 140 (2011)

work page 2011

[26] [26]

Z. D. Grujić and A. Weis, Atomic Magnetic Resonance Induced by Amplitude -, Frequency -, or Polarization-Modulated Light , Phys. Rev. A 88, 012508 (2013)

work page 2013

[27] [27]

Fescenko, P

I. Fescenko, P. Knowles, A. Weis, and E. Breschi, A Bell-Bloom Experiment with Polarization -Modulated Light of Arbitrary Duty Cycle , Opt. Express 21, 15121 (2013)

work page 2013

[28] [28]

M. V. Petrenko, A. S. Pazgalev, and A. K. Vershovskii, Single-Beam All -Optical Non -Zero Field Magnetometric Sensor for Magnetoencephalography Applications , Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 064072 (2021)

work page 2021

[29] [29]

Scholtes, V

T. Scholtes, V. Schu ltze, R. IJsselsteijn, S. Woetzel, and H.-G. Meyer, Light-Narrowed Optically Pumped $M_x$ Magnetometer with a Miniaturized Cs Cell , Phys. Rev. A 84, 043416 (2011)

work page 2011

[30] [30]

E. N. Popov et al., Features of the Formation of the Spin Polarization of an Alkali Met al at the Resolution of Hyperfine Sublevels in the 2S1/2 State , JETP Letters 108, 513 (2018)

work page 2018

[31] [31]

Appelt, A

S. Appelt, A. Ben -Amar Baranga, A. R. Young, and W. Happer, Light Narrowing of Rubidium Magnetic - Resonance Lines in High -Pressure Optical-Pumping Cells, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2078 (1999)

work page 2078

[32] [32]

Schultze, B

V. Schultze, B. Schillig, R. IJsselsteijn, T. Scholtes, S. Woetzel, and R. Stolz, An Optically Pumped Magnetometer Working in the Light -Shift Dispersed Mz Mode, Sensors 17, 3 (2017)

work page 2017

[33] [33]

A. L. Bloom, Principles of Operation of the Rubidium Vapor Magnetometer , Appl. Opt., AO 1, 1 (1962)

work page 1962

[34] [34]

A. K. Vershovskii and M. V. Petrenko, Methods of Parametric Resonance Excitation in the Scheme of an Optical Magnetometric Sensor , Technical Physics 66, 821 (2021)

work page 2021

[35] [35]

Borna, T

A. Borna, T. R. Carter, J. D. Goldberg, A. P. Colombo, Y.-Y. Jau, C. Berry, J. McKay, J. Stephen, M. Weisend, and P. D. D. Schwindt, A 20 -Channel Magnetoencephalography System Based on Optically Pumped Magnetometers , Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 23 (2017)

work page 2017

[36] [36]

Budker and M

D. Budker and M. Romalis, Optical Magnetometry , Nature Physics 3, 227 (2007)

work page 2007

[37] [37]

Petrenko and A

M. Petrenko and A. Vershovskii, Towards a Practical Implementation of a Single -Beam All - Optical Non -Zero-Field Magnetic Sensor for Magnetoencephalographic Complexes , Sens ors 22, 9862 (2022)

work page 2022

[38] [38]

M. V. Petrenko, S. P. Dmitriev, A. S. Pazgalev, A. E. Ossadtchi, and A. K. Vershovskii, Towards the Non - Zero Field Cesium Magnetic Sensor Array for Magnetoencephalography, IEEE Sensors Journal 21, 18626 (2021)

work page 2021

[39] [39]

R. J. Clancy, V. Gerginov, O. Alem, S. Becker, and S. Knappe, A Study of Scalar Optically -Pumped Magnetometers for Use in Magnetoencephalography without Shielding , Physics in Medicine & Biology 66, 175030 (2021)

work page 2021