{"as_of":"2026-08-10T16:14:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:dcb29a0d8938759ac72e151c054af576acc17243686d0b28c455b7f7e6b6771c","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:59.692015Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T21:11:16.662081Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2303.17707","last_updated":"2025-05-30T16:29:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:10:19.307423Z","submitted_at":"2023-03-30T20:59:44Z","title":"Why is plausibility surprisingly problematic as an XAI criterion?","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2303.17707","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:59.692015Z","title":"& Hamarneh, G","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05030","last_updated":"2025-06-05T13:39:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:51:48.015304Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T13:39:37Z","title":"Artificial Intelligence Should Genuinely Support Clinical Reasoning and Decision Making To Bridge the Translational Gap","version":1},"reference_index":91,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:59.692015Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2303.17707","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05030"},"observation_digest":"sha256:743a51ecc0c418ec046c29c003931e30419f55f26b4b57a384e7342b73addcab","observation_id":"5a69a432-b826-48fc-8f1a-b8ff3fb282ad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:59.692015Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2303.17707","last_updated":"2025-05-30T16:29:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:10:19.307423Z","submitted_at":"2023-03-30T20:59:44Z","title":"Why is plausibility surprisingly problematic as an XAI criterion?","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2303.17707","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2303.17707","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T21:11:16.662081Z","title":"Why is plausibility surprisingly problematic as an XAI criterion?","venue":"cs.AI","work_id":"0b4173c2-7ca5-44cf-bb4a-728f792a381a","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.09293","last_updated":"2025-08-12T19:14:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T09:31:50.248557Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-12T19:14:37Z","title":"Ethical Medical Image Synthesis","version":1},"reference_index":84,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T21:11:14.817557Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2303.17707","citing_paper":"/paper/2508.09293"},"observation_digest":"sha256:efc4f04ac219b36eff00ecc68043bba9b7b23936fc987ebbd3a32ba682432969","observation_id":"04355ffc-fc70-4485-9838-c11a368bb2d9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T21:11:16.665706Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2303.17707/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2303.17707/integrity","json":"/paper/2303.17707/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2303.17707"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2303.17707","last_updated":"2025-05-30T16:29:09Z","latest_version":4,"primary_category":"cs.AI","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:10:19.307423Z","submitted_at":"2023-03-30T20:59:44Z","title":"Why is plausibility surprisingly problematic as an XAI criterion?"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2303.17707."}