pith. sign in

arxiv: 2304.09721 · v1 · submitted 2023-04-19 · 💻 cs.CV · eess.IV

Improved Active Fire Detection using Operational U-Nets

Ozer Can Devecioglu , Mete Ahishali , Fahad Sohrab , Turker Ince , Moncef Gabbouj This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 09:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV eess.IV
keywords active fire detectionsatellite imageryU-Net architectureoperational neural networkswildfire monitoringdeep learningcomputational efficiency
0
0 comments X

The pith

Operational U-Nets replace standard convolutions with Self-ONN layers to detect active fires from satellite images with higher accuracy and lower computation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Operational U-Nets, a U-Net architecture that substitutes Self-Organized Operational Neural Network layers for conventional convolutions, and tests them on satellite imagery for spotting active wildfires. The goal is to deliver both stronger detection results and smaller computational demands than existing deep-learning or statistical methods. If correct, the change would support faster, cheaper monitoring of fires that spread more readily under warmer climates. The authors report preliminary results showing gains on real data without extra retraining steps.

Core claim

Operational U-Nets integrate Self-ONN layers into a compact U-Net structure for active fire detection. This substitution produces better detection performance on satellite images while cutting computational complexity relative to standard U-Nets or other deep models.

What carries the argument

Self-ONN layers placed throughout the encoder-decoder paths of a U-Net, performing the role of learnable operators that adapt during training to extract fire-related features from multispectral satellite bands.

If this is right

  • Satellite-based fire monitoring systems could run on smaller hardware or process more images per day.
  • Early alerts for rapidly spreading fires become feasible in regions with limited ground infrastructure.
  • The same architecture change could be tried on other pixel-level segmentation tasks that use U-Nets.
  • Operational models might lower the energy cost of continuous global fire surveillance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the speed gain holds, the method could be embedded in onboard satellite processors for near-real-time alerts.
  • The same layer swap might help other remote-sensing problems such as smoke plume mapping or burn scar delineation.
  • Testing across different satellite sensors or resolutions would show whether the reported gains generalize beyond the training data.

Load-bearing premise

Substituting Self-ONN layers for standard convolutions will keep working well on new satellite fire scenes without losing accuracy or needing heavy retraining.

What would settle it

A side-by-side run on an independent set of satellite wildfire images in which the Operational U-Net shows equal or lower detection scores or equal or higher runtime than a plain U-Net trained the same way.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2304.09721 by Fahad Sohrab, Mete Ahishali, Moncef Gabbouj, Ozer Can Devecioglu, Turker Ince.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The general framework of improved active fire detection using Operational U-Nets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Corresponding Operational U-Net segmented maps and their input Landsat-8 images. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

As a consequence of global warming and climate change, the risk and extent of wildfires have been increasing in many areas worldwide. Warmer temperatures and drier conditions can cause quickly spreading fires and make them harder to control; therefore, early detection and accurate locating of active fires are crucial in environmental monitoring. Using satellite imagery to monitor and detect active fires has been critical for managing forests and public land. Many traditional statistical-based methods and more recent deep-learning techniques have been proposed for active fire detection. In this study, we propose a novel approach called Operational U-Nets for the improved early detection of active fires. The proposed approach utilizes Self-Organized Operational Neural Network (Self-ONN) layers in a compact U-Net architecture. The preliminary experimental results demonstrate that Operational U-Nets not only achieve superior detection performance but can also significantly reduce computational complexity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes Operational U-Nets, a compact U-Net architecture that replaces standard convolutions with Self-Organized Operational Neural Network (Self-ONN) layers, for active fire detection in satellite imagery. It claims that this yields superior detection performance together with significantly lower computational complexity, based on preliminary experiments.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold with proper validation, the approach could supply a lighter-weight deep-learning alternative for real-time wildfire monitoring, which is relevant given rising fire risk from climate change. The idea of leveraging Self-ONN layers inside an encoder-decoder to trade off accuracy and complexity is potentially useful if shown to generalize beyond the training distribution.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the central claim that 'preliminary experimental results demonstrate superior detection performance' and 'significantly reduce computational complexity' is unsupported; the manuscript supplies no datasets, metrics (e.g., precision, recall, F1, IoU), baselines, error bars, or ablation tables, rendering the claim unverifiable.
  2. No section or table presents quantitative results, training details, or complexity measurements (parameters, FLOPs, inference time) on any fire-detection dataset; without these the load-bearing assertion that Self-ONN substitution improves both accuracy and speed cannot be assessed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments. We acknowledge that the current manuscript version does not include the quantitative results, datasets, metrics, or complexity measurements needed to support the claims in the abstract. We will revise the manuscript accordingly to provide these details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the central claim that 'preliminary experimental results demonstrate superior detection performance' and 'significantly reduce computational complexity' is unsupported; the manuscript supplies no datasets, metrics (e.g., precision, recall, F1, IoU), baselines, error bars, or ablation tables, rendering the claim unverifiable.

    Authors: We accept the point that the abstract claims are not verifiable from the current manuscript text, which contains no experimental details. In the revision we will expand the paper with a full experimental section that reports the datasets used, all listed metrics with numerical values, baseline comparisons, error bars from repeated trials, and ablation tables. This will make the performance and complexity claims directly verifiable. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No section or table presents quantitative results, training details, or complexity measurements (parameters, FLOPs, inference time) on any fire-detection dataset; without these the load-bearing assertion that Self-ONN substitution improves both accuracy and speed cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the submitted manuscript contains no such sections or tables. The revision will add a dedicated Experiments section that specifies the fire-detection datasets, training protocol, quantitative accuracy results, and complexity metrics (parameter counts, FLOPs, and measured inference times). These additions will allow direct assessment of whether the Self-ONN substitution yields the claimed accuracy and speed benefits. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper proposes Operational U-Nets by substituting Self-ONN layers into a compact U-Net and reports empirical results on satellite fire detection data showing improved detection metrics alongside reduced complexity. No derivation chain, first-principles predictions, or fitted parameters renamed as outputs appear; the central claims rest on experimental measurements rather than any self-definitional reduction, fitted-input prediction, or load-bearing self-citation that collapses the result to its inputs by construction. The use of Self-ONN is an architectural choice whose prior justification is external to the present evaluation, leaving the reported performance gains independent of the paper's own fitted values.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no concrete free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The approach implicitly relies on standard deep-learning training assumptions and the previously published behavior of Self-ONN layers.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5685 in / 1123 out tokens · 42874 ms · 2026-05-24T09:54:53.695195+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Smoke detection using temporal hoghof descriptors and energy colour statistics from video

    Konstantinos Avgerinakis, Alexia Briassouli, and Ioannis Kompatsiaris. Smoke detection using temporal hoghof descriptors and energy colour statistics from video. In International workshop on multi-sensor systems and networks for fire detection and management , 2012

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Real time video fire detection using spatio-temporal consistency energy

    Panagiotis Barmpoutis, Kosmas Dimitropoulos, and Nikos Grammalidis. Real time video fire detection using spatio-temporal consistency energy. In 2013 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance , pages 365–370. IEEE, 2013

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Fire detection in video using lms based active learning

    Osman G¨ unay, Kasım Ta¸ sdemir, B U˘ gur T¨ oreyin, and A Enis C ¸ etin. Fire detection in video using lms based active learning. Fire technology, 46:551–577, 2010

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Active fire detection from landsat-8 imagery using deep multiple kernel learning

    Amirhossein Rostami, Reza Shah-Hosseini, Shabnam Asgari, Arastou Zarei, Mohammad Aghdami-Nia, and Saeid Homayouni. Active fire detection from landsat-8 imagery using deep multiple kernel learning. Remote Sensing, 14(4):992, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    A deep learning model using geostationary satellite data for forest fire detection with reduced detection latency

    Yoojin Kang, Eunna Jang, Jungho Im, and Chungeun Kwon. A deep learning model using geostationary satellite data for forest fire detection with reduced detection latency. GIScience & Remote Sensing , 59(1):2019–2035, 2022

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Smoke detection and trend prediction method based on deeplabv3+ and generative adversarial network

    Shuhong Cheng, Jiyong Ma, and Shijun Zhang. Smoke detection and trend prediction method based on deeplabv3+ and generative adversarial network. Journal of Electronic Imaging , 28(3):033006–033006, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Operational neural networks

    Serkan Kiranyaz, Turker Ince, Alexandros Iosifidis, and Moncef Gabbouj. Operational neural networks. Neural Computing and Applications , 32:6645–6668, 2020

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Exploiting heterogeneity in operational neural networks by synaptic plastic- ity

    Serkan Kiranyaz, Junaid Malik, Habib Ben Abdallah, Turker Ince, Alexandros Iosifidis, and Moncef Gabbouj. Exploiting heterogeneity in operational neural networks by synaptic plastic- ity. Neural Computing and Applications , 33:7997–8015, 2021

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Fastonn–python based open-source gpu implementation for operational neural networks

    Junaid Malik, Serkan Kiranyaz, and Moncef Gabbouj. Fastonn–python based open-source gpu implementation for operational neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.02267 , 2020

    work page arXiv 2006

  10. [10]

    Self-organized operational neural networks with generative neurons

    Serkan Kiranyaz, Junaid Malik, Habib Ben Abdallah, Turker Ince, Alexandros Iosifidis, and Moncef Gabbouj. Self-organized operational neural networks with generative neurons. Neural Networks, 140:294–308, 2021

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Real-time glaucoma detection from digital fundus images using self-onns

    Ozer Can Devecioglu, Junaid Malik, Turker Ince, Serkan Kiranyaz, Eray Atalay, and Moncef Gabbouj. Real-time glaucoma detection from digital fundus images using self-onns. IEEE Access, 9:140031–140041, 2021

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Early bearing fault diagnosis of rotating machinery by 1d self-organized operational neural networks

    Turker Ince, Junaid Malik, Ozer Can Devecioglu, Serkan Kiranyaz, Onur Avci, Levent Eren, and Moncef Gabbouj. Early bearing fault diagnosis of rotating machinery by 1d self-organized operational neural networks. IEEE Access, 9:139260–139270, 2021

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Blind ecg restoration by operational cycle-gans

    Serkan Kiranyaz, Ozer Can Devecioglu, Turker Ince, Junaid Malik, Muhammad Chowdhury, Tahir Hamid, Rashid Mazhar, Amith Khandakar, Anas Tahir, Tawsifur Rahman, et al. Blind ecg restoration by operational cycle-gans. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering , 69(12):3572–3581, 2022

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Real- time patient-specific ecg classification by 1d self-operational neural networks

    Junaid Malik, Ozer Can Devecioglu, Serkan Kiranyaz, Turker Ince, and Moncef Gabbouj. Real- time patient-specific ecg classification by 1d self-operational neural networks. IEEE Transac- tions on Biomedical Engineering , 69(5):1788–1801, 2021

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Active fire detection in landsat-8 imagery: A large-scale dataset and a deep-learning study

    Gabriel Henrique de Almeida Pereira, Andre Minoro Fusioka, Bogdan Tomoyuki Nassu, and Rodrigo Minetto. Active fire detection in landsat-8 imagery: A large-scale dataset and a deep-learning study. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , 178:171–186, 2021. 6

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  17. [17]

    Imagenet: A large- scale hierarchical image database

    Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A large- scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 248–255. Ieee, 2009

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    Graph-embedded subspace support vector data description

    Fahad Sohrab, Alexandros Iosifidis, Moncef Gabbouj, and Jenni Raitoharju. Graph-embedded subspace support vector data description. Pattern Recognition, 133:108999, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Ellipsoidal sub- space support vector data description

    Fahad Sohrab, Jenni Raitoharju, Alexandros Iosifidis, and Moncef Gabbouj. Ellipsoidal sub- space support vector data description. IEEE Access, 8:122013–122025, 2020

    work page 2020