Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 772 cited by

MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Aligning a frozen visual encoder to Vicuna via one projection layer and two-stage training produces GPT-4-like multimodal abilities such as sketch-to-website generation.

desk verdict MiniGPT-4 gets some GPT-4-like behaviors from aligning a vision encoder to Vicuna plus a second-stage detailed dataset, but missing ablations leave it unclear how much credit goes to the LLM choice versus the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2304.10592 v2 pith:I5SRKWCT submitted 2023-04-20 cs.CV

Deyao Zhu , Jun Chen , Xiaoqian Shen , Xiang Li , Mohamed Elhoseiny This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords vision-languagemodellargelanguagemultimodalalignmentprojectionlayerimagecaptioningemergentabilitiestwo-stagetraining
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquationdimension_forced
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that advanced vision-language skills demonstrated by GPT-4 arise when visual features from a frozen encoder are aligned to a frozen large language model using only a single projection layer. Training occurs in two stages: first on basic image-caption pairs, then on a curated set of detailed image descriptions to improve output naturalness and reduce repetition. A sympathetic reader would care because the result suggests these capabilities can appear without jointly training an entire multimodal system from scratch.

What carries the argument

The single projection layer that maps outputs from the frozen visual encoder into the input space of the frozen Vicuna language model, enabling the LLM to interpret and respond to visual information after two-stage training.

What would settle it

Train the identical projection layer on the same data but align it to a weaker language model instead of Vicuna, then test whether capabilities such as website creation from hand-drawn drafts disappear.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By aligning a frozen visual encoder with the frozen Vicuna LLM using one projection layer, trained first on short image captions and then on detailed image descriptions, MiniGPT-4 acquires numerous advanced multi-modal abilities including generating detailed image descriptions, creating websites from hand-drawn drafts, writing stories and poems inspired by images, teaching cooking from food photos, and other emerging capabilities similar to those in GPT-4.

Load-bearing premise

The observed advanced abilities result primarily from alignment with the advanced LLM rather than from the choice of training data or the projection layer memorizing patterns in the detailed description dataset.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The model generates detailed and natural image descriptions without repetition or fragmentation.
  • Websites can be created directly from hand-drawn drafts or sketches.
  • Stories and poems can be written based on input images.
  • Cooking instructions can be provided from photos of food.
  • Additional emergent abilities such as identifying humorous elements in images appear.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This indicates that freezing both the vision encoder and the LLM while training only the connector suffices for advanced multimodal performance.
  • Similar alignment could be tested with other base LLMs to determine if the choice of Vicuna is necessary for these specific capabilities.
  • The emphasis on a second-stage dataset of detailed descriptions implies that data curation may be as important as the alignment architecture itself for usable outputs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents MiniGPT-4, which aligns a frozen visual encoder with the frozen Vicuna LLM using a single projection layer. It employs two-stage training—first on short image-caption pairs, then fine-tuning on a curated dataset of detailed image descriptions—to achieve advanced vision-language capabilities similar to GPT-4, including detailed image descriptions, website generation from hand-drawn sketches, story/poem writing from images, and instructional responses from visual inputs. The authors support these claims with qualitative examples and release the code, pre-trained weights, and dataset.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work is significant because it shows that sophisticated multi-modal generation abilities can be obtained by aligning visual features with an advanced frozen LLM without retraining the language model itself. The public release of code, weights, and the detailed-description dataset is a clear strength that enables reproducibility and community follow-up. The primarily qualitative evaluation and lack of isolating experiments, however, limit the strength of the attribution to the LLM choice.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experiments] Experiments section: The assertion that the second-stage fine-tuning on the curated detailed-description dataset resolves unnatural outputs (repetitions and fragmentation) is supported solely by anecdotal before-and-after examples; no quantitative metrics (e.g., human preference scores, perplexity on held-out captions, or automated coherence measures) are reported to document the magnitude or reliability of the improvement.
  2. [Method and Experiments] Method and Experiments sections: The central claim that advanced capabilities arise from alignment with an advanced LLM (Vicuna) is not isolated from confounding factors; the manuscript contains no ablations comparing the same pipeline with a weaker LLM (e.g., base LLaMA), with the second-stage dataset removed, or with a higher-capacity projection layer, leaving open the possibility that observed fluency and task performance derive primarily from the high-quality second-stage data or projection-layer memorization.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'for the first time' overstates novelty given prior alignment work (e.g., BLIP-2); rephrase to highlight the specific combination of Vicuna and the two-stage detailed-description stage.
  2. [Qualitative results] Qualitative results: The presented examples would be strengthened by inclusion of failure cases or a broader range of out-of-distribution images to give readers a balanced view of model limitations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and positive assessment of the work's significance and reproducibility. We address the major comments point-by-point below and outline proposed revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Experiments section: The assertion that the second-stage fine-tuning on the curated detailed-description dataset resolves unnatural outputs (repetitions and fragmentation) is supported solely by anecdotal before-and-after examples; no quantitative metrics (e.g., human preference scores, perplexity on held-out captions, or automated coherence measures) are reported to document the magnitude or reliability of the improvement.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. Our current evidence for the benefits of the second-stage fine-tuning is qualitative. We agree that quantitative support would be valuable. In the revised manuscript, we will include results from a human study where evaluators compare first-stage and second-stage outputs on naturalness and coherence for a held-out set of images, reporting win rates or preference percentages. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Method and Experiments sections: The central claim that advanced capabilities arise from alignment with an advanced LLM (Vicuna) is not isolated from confounding factors; the manuscript contains no ablations comparing the same pipeline with a weaker LLM (e.g., base LLaMA), with the second-stage dataset removed, or with a higher-capacity projection layer, leaving open the possibility that observed fluency and task performance derive primarily from the high-quality second-stage data or projection-layer memorization.

    Authors: We concur that isolating the contribution of the advanced LLM through ablations would strengthen the attribution. However, we did not perform training with base LLaMA due to the substantial computational cost and time required. The manuscript already notes that the first-stage model (without second-stage fine-tuning) produces unnatural outputs, indicating the second stage's role in improving language quality. We used a minimal projection layer to show that advanced capabilities do not require complex alignment modules. In revision, we will add a dedicated limitations paragraph discussing these points and the potential role of the second-stage data, while maintaining that the simple alignment to Vicuna enables the observed GPT-4-like behaviors as evidenced by the qualitative demonstrations. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • We cannot conduct the full set of ablation experiments with base LLaMA or additional quantitative isolation studies within the scope of this work due to resource limitations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; empirical alignment demonstration with no derivation chain or self-referential predictions.

full rationale

The paper makes no mathematical or first-principles claims. It describes an empirical two-stage training procedure (short captions then curated detailed descriptions) to align a frozen visual encoder to a frozen Vicuna LLM via a single projection layer, then reports qualitative capabilities. No equations define a quantity in terms of itself, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing steps reduce to self-citations or ansatzes imported from prior author work. The central observation—that alignment yields GPT-4-like behaviors—is presented as an empirical finding supported by released model outputs and a public dataset, not as a derivation that collapses to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the empirical observation that alignment plus a second-stage dataset produces the listed capabilities. No new physical or mathematical axioms are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • projection layer weights
    The only trainable parameters; fitted on image-text pairs in stage 1 and detailed descriptions in stage 2.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Frozen visual encoder and frozen Vicuna LLM preserve their pre-trained capabilities when only the projection is trained.
    Invoked in the method description to justify not updating the large models.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I5SRKWCT

@misc{pith2026230410592,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I5SRKWCT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2304.10592}
}
read the original abstract

The recent GPT-4 has demonstrated extraordinary multi-modal abilities, such as directly generating websites from handwritten text and identifying humorous elements within images. These features are rarely observed in previous vision-language models. However, the technical details behind GPT-4 continue to remain undisclosed. We believe that the enhanced multi-modal generation capabilities of GPT-4 stem from the utilization of sophisticated large language models (LLM). To examine this phenomenon, we present MiniGPT-4, which aligns a frozen visual encoder with a frozen advanced LLM, Vicuna, using one projection layer. Our work, for the first time, uncovers that properly aligning the visual features with an advanced large language model can possess numerous advanced multi-modal abilities demonstrated by GPT-4, such as detailed image description generation and website creation from hand-drawn drafts. Furthermore, we also observe other emerging capabilities in MiniGPT-4, including writing stories and poems inspired by given images, teaching users how to cook based on food photos, and so on. In our experiment, we found that the model trained on short image caption pairs could produce unnatural language outputs (e.g., repetition and fragmentation). To address this problem, we curate a detailed image description dataset in the second stage to finetune the model, which consequently improves the model's generation reliability and overall usability. Our code, pre-trained model, and collected dataset are available at https://minigpt-4.github.io/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • Foundation.DimensionForcing dimension_forced unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We believe that the enhanced multi-modal generation capabilities of GPT-4 stem from the utilization of sophisticated large language models (LLM)

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Showing 60 of 772 Pith papers that cite this

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. See all 772 Pith citations

  1. MVI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Robustness to Misleading Visual Inputs in LVLMs

    cs.CV 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    MVI-Bench supplies the first taxonomy and dataset focused on misleading visual inputs to measure LVLM robustness, with tests on 18 models revealing clear weaknesses.

  2. MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark

    cs.CL 2024-09 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    MMMU-Pro is a stricter multimodal benchmark that removes text-only solvable questions, augments options, and requires reading text from images, yielding substantially lower model scores of 16.8-26.9%.

  3. MME-RealWorld: Could Your Multimodal LLM Challenge High-Resolution Real-World Scenarios that are Difficult for Humans?

    cs.CV 2024-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    MME-RealWorld is the largest manually annotated high-resolution benchmark for MLLMs, where even the best models achieve less than 60% accuracy on challenging real-world tasks.

  4. OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments

    cs.AI 2024-04 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    OSWorld provides the first unified real-computer benchmark for open-ended multimodal agent tasks, exposing large performance gaps between humans and state-of-the-art LLM/VLM agents.

  5. MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI

    cs.CL 2023-11 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    MMMU provides 11.5K heterogeneous college-level multimodal questions that current models solve at 56-59% accuracy, establishing a new standard for expert multimodal evaluation.

  6. Once Poisoned, Arbitrarily Controlled: A Programmable Backdoor in VLMs

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A single poisoning phase can implant a backdoor that makes a VLM output attacker-selected caption text for previously unseen targets, using triggers synthesized in feature space at inference time.

  7. VADER: Adaptive Debiasing for Hallucination Mitigation in Video Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A training-free decoding framework that adaptively reweights attention toward video tokens and erases key visual evidence per frame to suppress hallucinated predictions, achieving 72.60% accuracy on EventHallusion wit...

  8. Learning in Deep Networks under Dale's Constraint

    cs.AI 2026-08 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    An on-off two-channel network with fixed-sign synapses and local Hebbian learning is claimed to recover backpropagation exactly under symmetric weights and to beat comparable vanilla networks on Tiny ImageNet.

  9. Seeing What Matters: Lesion-Aware High-Resolution Patch Discovery and Fusion for Chest X-ray Report Generation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    LePaX enables high-resolution chest X-ray report generation by learning to allocate resolution to diagnostically relevant regions and fusing high-res patches back into global features without increasing token count.

  10. MentalThink: Shaping Thoughts in Mental SVG World

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    MLLMs that generate and render SVG sketches as multi-turn intermediate reasoning steps reach 55.1% on VSIBench and 76.0% on MindCube, far above the Qwen2.5-VL-7B backbone.

  11. Position Rebinding Cache Reuse: Replay-Free Visual Revisiting for Interleaved Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    PRCR enables replay-free visual revisiting in interleaved multimodal reasoning by storing raw visual KV caches with spatial coordinates and rebinding keys to position-compatible coordinates, matching replay performanc...

  12. Seeing Without Exposing: Adaptive Privacy Control for Open-World, Context-Hungry MLLMs

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Anchored Privacy Drifting (APD) replaces privacy-sensitive visual elements with semantically equivalent alternatives while anchoring context, evaluated on the new AdaptShield benchmark with reported gains of 10.4% and...

  13. P$^2$-DPO: Grounding Hallucination in Perceptual Processing via Calibration Direct Preference Optimization

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    P²-DPO generates on-policy preference pairs targeting focus-and-enhance perception and visual robustness, combined with a calibration loss, to reduce hallucinations in LVLMs more effectively than human-feedback baselines.

  14. AVI-Bench: Toward Human-like Audio-Visual Intelligence of Omni-MLLMs

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    AVI-Bench is a cognitively inspired benchmark that evaluates Omni-MLLMs on joint audio-visual tasks and reveals substantial limitations in current models.

  15. EvoCut: Multi-Layer Evolution-Aware Visual Token Compression for Efficient Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    EvoCut is a training-free visual token compression technique that identifies important tokens via multi-layer evolution deviation, retaining 11.1% tokens with 94.4% average performance preserved on LLaVA-1.5-7B.

  16. What Makes LVLMs Hallucinate Less? Unveiling the Architectural Factors Behind Hallucination Robustness

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    The study links three LVLM architectural dimensions to three hallucination types via a new benchmark, finding that language foundation quality reduces co-occurrence errors, visual encoder strength reduces similarity e...

  17. Dual-Pathway Geometry-Aware MLLM for Spatial Intelligence

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    GAMSI is a dual-pathway Geometry-Aware MLLM using Metric-Structure Decoupled Queries and Expert-Guided Visual Grounding on RGB inputs alone, trained on a new 152k-sample MTS dataset to reach SOTA on seven spatial benchmarks.

  18. Beyond Binary Edits Robust Multimodal Knowledge Editing with Adversarial Subspace Alignment

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Introduces Latent Adversarial Robustification and Rank-Constrained Subspace Learning to enable robust generalization in multimodal knowledge editing through adversarial subspace alignment.

  19. From Plans to Pixels: Learning to Plan and Orchestrate for Open-Ended Image Editing

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A planner-orchestrator system learns long-horizon image editing by maximizing outcome-based rewards from a vision-language judge and refining plans from successful trajectories.

  20. DistractMIA: Black-Box Membership Inference on Vision-Language Models via Semantic Distraction

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    DistractMIA performs output-only black-box membership inference on vision-language models by inserting semantic distractors and measuring shifts in generated text responses.

  21. Chronicles-OCR: A Cross-Temporal Perception Benchmark for the Evolutionary Trajectory of Chinese Characters

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Chronicles-OCR is the first benchmark with 2,800 images across the complete evolutionary trajectory of Chinese characters, defining four tasks to evaluate VLLMs' cross-temporal visual perception.

  22. OZ-TAL: Online Zero-Shot Temporal Action Localization

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Defines OZ-TAL task and presents a training-free VLM-based method that outperforms prior approaches for online and offline zero-shot temporal action localization on THUMOS14 and ActivityNet-1.3.

  23. CREST: Curvature-Regulated Event-Centric Sampling for Efficient Long-Video Understanding

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    CREST uses local curvature of query-frame relevance over time to select informative frames, outperforming a lightweight baseline and approaching a costly pipeline at far lower preprocessing cost on long-video benchmarks.

  24. UniShield: Unified Face Attack Detection via KG-Informed Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    UniShield introduces a knowledge-graph-informed multimodal framework that improves unified detection of physical and digital face attacks through instruction tuning and consistency-optimized reasoning.

  25. PolarVLM: Bridging the Semantic-Physical Gap in Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    PolarVLM is the first VLM framework to integrate polarimetric physical parameters via dual-stream architecture and progressive training, delivering 25.4% gains over RGB baselines on reflection and transparency tasks w...

  26. Masks Can Talk: Extracting Structured Text Information from Single-Modal Images for Remote Sensing Change Detection

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    S2M extracts structured text quadruples from change masks to provide noise-free multimodal supervision, achieving 17.80% Sek and 66.14% F_scd on the new Gaza-Change-v2 dataset and outperforming LLM-based multimodal methods.

  27. ICU-Bench:Benchmarking Continual Unlearning in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    ICU-Bench is a new continual unlearning benchmark for MLLMs using 1000 privacy profiles, 9500 images, and 100 forget tasks, showing existing methods fail to balance forgetting, utility, and scalability.

  28. Chain of Evidence: Pixel-Level Visual Attribution for Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    CoE applies vision-language models directly to document screenshots to deliver pixel-level bounding-box attribution for evidence in iterative retrieval-augmented generation, outperforming text baselines on visual-layo...

  29. SLQ: Bridging Modalities via Shared Latent Queries for Retrieval with Frozen MLLMs

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    SLQ turns frozen MLLMs into retrievers via shared latent queries appended to inputs, outperforming fine-tuning on COCO and Flickr30K while introducing KARR-Bench for knowledge-aware evaluation.

  30. Skill-Conditioned Visual Geolocation for Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    GeoSkill uses an evolving Skill-Graph initialized from expert trajectories and grown via autonomous analysis of successful and failed reasoning rollouts to boost geolocation accuracy, faithfulness, and generalization ...

  31. Understanding the Role of Hallucination in Reinforcement Post-Training of Multimodal Reasoning Models

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    RL post-training on hallucination-forced multimodal data improves reasoning performance and can outperform standard training.

  32. Topo-R1: Detecting Topological Anomalies via Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Topo-R1 fine-tunes a vision-language model using a topology-aware reward and GRPO to detect anomalies such as broken or spurious connections in tubular segmentation masks, outperforming standard VLMs.

  33. SpatialMosaic: A Multiview VLM Dataset for Partial Visibility

    cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    SpatialMosaic introduces a 2M-pair multi-view QA dataset and 1M-pair benchmark for MLLMs on spatial reasoning under partial visibility, plus a hybrid baseline that integrates 3D reconstruction models as geometry encoders.

  34. See, Hear, and Understand: Benchmarking Audiovisual Human Speech Understanding in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    AV-SpeakerBench is a new speaker-centered benchmark showing that top multimodal models still struggle with fine-grained audiovisual speech understanding, with Gemini 2.5 Pro leading but open models lagging on fusion.

  35. VOPE: Revisiting Hallucination of Vision-Language Models in Voluntary Imagination Task

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A recheck-based evaluation shows LVLMs often fail to correctly judge the presence of objects they themselves generated, and current mitigation methods do not fix this.

  36. DeFacto: Counterfactual Thinking with Images for Enforcing Evidence-Grounded and Faithful Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    DeFacto trains multimodal models with counterfactual image variants and GRPO reinforcement learning to enforce that correct answers are supported by correct visual evidence.

  37. V-SEAM: Visual Semantic Editing and Attention Modulating for Causal Interpretability of Vision-Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    V-SEAM combines concept-level visual semantic editing with attention head modulation to identify positive and negative contributors across object, attribute, and relationship levels, then uses this to improve VLM perf...

  38. MITS: A Large-Scale Multimodal Benchmark Dataset for Intelligent Traffic Surveillance

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new 170K-image, 5M-QA traffic surveillance benchmark improves LMM test scores by 27-83% after fine-tuning, but the gains are measured on the same pipeline that created the data.

  39. Sample-efficient Integration of New Modalities into Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A hypernetwork trained on image, audio, and video adapts a shared projector to new, low-resource modalities from as few as 32 examples.

  40. Unveiling the Response of Large Vision-Language Models to Visually Absent Tokens

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Feed-forward neurons in LVLMs encode whether a text token is visually grounded, and a detector built on these neurons can reduce hallucination by overriding or replacing ungrounded tokens.

  41. Continual Learning for VLMs: A Survey and Taxonomy Beyond Forgetting

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper offers a comprehensive survey and proposes a new taxonomy for continual learning strategies in VLMs and MLLMs to combat catastrophic forgetting beyond traditional methods.

  42. AVA-Bench: Atomic Visual Ability Benchmark for Vision Foundation Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    AVA-Bench evaluates vision foundation models by disentangling 14 atomic visual abilities with aligned training-test distributions to reveal precise ability fingerprints.

  43. Synthetic Visual Genome

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A GPT-4V/GPT-4o pipeline for completing and refining scene graph annotations yields a dense synthetic dataset that, after instruction tuning, gives a 3B model strong relationship understanding and grounding results.

  44. VideoMathQA: Benchmarking Mathematical Reasoning via Multimodal Understanding in Videos

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new dataset of 420 math video-question pairs with step-by-step reasoning annotations shows that current multimodal AI models, including the best proprietary system, answer fewer than half of the multi-binary questio...

  45. Open CaptchaWorld: A Comprehensive Web-based Platform for Testing and Benchmarking Multimodal LLM Agents

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new CAPTCHA benchmark with a reasoning-depth metric shows multimodal LLM agents solve at most 40% of interactive puzzles, far short of the 93% human success rate.

  46. DisTime: Distribution-based Time Representation for Video Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A single learnable time token, decoded into a probability distribution over time bins, improves temporal grounding in Video-LLMs and is trained partly on a new 1.25M-event pseudo-labeled dataset.

  47. Video-Holmes: Can MLLM Think Like Holmes for Complex Video Reasoning?

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Video-Holmes benchmark shows top MLLMs achieve at most 45% accuracy on tasks needing integration of multiple clues from suspense films, unlike existing perception-focused tests.

  48. TaskGalaxy: Scaling Multi-modal Instruction Fine-tuning with Tens of Thousands Vision Task Types

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors release TaskGalaxy, a 413k-sample multimodal instruction dataset with 19,227 hierarchically organized task types, and report consistent benchmark gains when it is added to LLaVA-v1.5 and InternVL-Chat-v1.0.

  49. WorldSense: Evaluating Real-world Omnimodal Understanding for Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CV 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    WorldSense provides the first benchmark requiring synergistic audio-video-text understanding on 1,662 real-world videos and 3,172 QA pairs, where the best current multimodal LLM reaches only 65.1% accuracy.

  50. Mirage in the Eyes: Hallucination Attack on Multi-modal Large Language Models with Only Attention Sink

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Adversarial images optimized to induce attention sink behavior increase hallucination rates in multiple MLLMs, including commercial APIs, without visibly degrading response quality.

  51. Jailbreaking Multimodal Large Language Models via Shuffle Inconsistency

    cs.CR 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Shuffling words and image patches in harmful prompts bypasses safety mechanisms of several commercial and open-source multimodal models, and a black-box search over shuffles raises attack success rates substantially.

  52. GPT4Scene: Understand 3D Scenes from Videos with Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Consistent object IDs across video frames and a reconstructed bird's-eye view let large VLMs, and a fine-tuned 7B model, reach state-of-the-art results on ScanNet 3D question answering, captioning, and grounding.

  53. HumanVBench: Probing Human-Centric Video Understanding in MLLMs with Automatically Synthesized Benchmarks

    cs.CV 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    HumanVBench provides a 16-task benchmark for human-centric video understanding in MLLMs, created through automated annotation and distractor synthesis pipelines, and shows top models lag human performance on emotion p...

  54. Friends-MMC: A Dataset for Multi-modal Multi-party Conversation Understanding

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Friends-MMC is a multi-modal multi-party conversation dataset from the TV show Friends with face and speaker annotations, and baselines show that speaker identification benefits from combining visual and textual cues.

  55. Reverse Region-to-Entity Annotation for Pixel-Level Visual Entity Linking

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Introduces PL-VEL, a pixel-mask-based visual entity linking task, and MaskOVEN-Wiki, a 5.2M-annotation dataset built via reverse annotation, plus a semantic tokenization method that yields a 5-point accuracy gain.

  56. Leveraging Large Vision-Language Model as User Intent-aware Encoder for Composed Image Retrieval

    cs.IR 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    CIR-LVLM fine-tunes Qwen-VL-Chat with LoRA and hybrid task and instance-specific prompts to produce query and target embeddings, achieving new state-of-the-art recall on Fashion-IQ, Shoes, and CIRR.

  57. FDM-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Additive Manufacturing Tasks

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    FDM-Bench is a new benchmark dataset for evaluating LLMs on FDM tasks including user queries and G-code anomaly detection, with expert-assessed results showing closed-source models outperforming on anomaly detection a...

  58. AIpparel: A Multimodal Foundation Model for Digital Garments

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    AIpparel fine-tunes a large multimodal model to generate and edit sewing patterns from text and images, outperforming prior single-modality methods.

  59. AdvDreamer Unveils: Are Vision-Language Models Truly Ready for Real-World 3D Variations?

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A single-image pipeline generates adversarial 3D pose variations that degrade vision-language model accuracy by up to 80%, and a new benchmark, MM3DTBench, quantifies this vulnerability.

  60. AV-Odyssey Bench: Can Your Multimodal LLMs Really Understand Audio-Visual Information?

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new audio-visual benchmark shows current multimodal LLMs perform barely above random guessing, with audio perception errors as the dominant failure mode.

See all 772 Pith citations

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 772 Pith papers (see all)

  1. [1]

    Language models are few-shot learners

    Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems , 33:1877–1901,

    work page 1901

  2. [2]

    Video chatcaptioner: Towards enriched spatiotemporal descriptions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04227, 2023

    Jun Chen, Deyao Zhu, Kilichbek Haydarov, Xiang Li, and Mohamed Elhoseiny. Video chatcaptioner: Towards the enriched spatiotemporal descriptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04227,

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways

    URL https: //vicuna.lmsys.org. Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, et al. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02311,

    work page Pith review arXiv

  4. [4]

    Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models

    Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, Shayne Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Eric Li, Xuezhi Wang, Mostafa Dehghani, Siddhartha Brahma, et al. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11416,

    work page Pith review arXiv

  5. [5]

    Lazy Prices

    Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805,

    work page Pith review arXiv

  6. [6]

    PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model

    Danny Driess, Fei Xia, Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Corey Lynch, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Brian Ichter, Ayzaan Wahid, Jonathan Tompson, Quan Vuong, Tianhe Yu, et al. Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03378,

    work page Pith review arXiv

  7. [7]

    EVA: Exploring the Limits of Masked Visual Representation Learning at Scale

    Yuxin Fang, Wen Wang, Binhui Xie, Quan Sun, Ledell Wu, Xinggang Wang, Tiejun Huang, Xinlong Wang, and Yue Cao. Eva: Exploring the limits of masked visual representation learning at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.07636,

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [8]

    Towards efficient and reliable artificial intelligence through neuromorphic principles

    Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, et al. Training compute-optimal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15556,

    work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 25 references
  1. [9]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685,

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Language is not all you need: Aligning perception with language models

    Shaohan Huang, Li Dong, Wenhui Wang, Yaru Hao, Saksham Singhal, Shuming Ma, Tengchao Lv, Lei Cui, Owais Khan Mohammed, Qiang Liu, et al. Language is not all you need: Aligning perception with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.14045,

  3. [11]

    Referitgame: Referring to objects in photographs of natural scenes

    Sahar Kazemzadeh, Vicente Ordonez, Mark Matten, and Tamara Berg. Referitgame: Referring to objects in photographs of natural scenes. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) , pp. 787–798,

    2014

  4. [12]

    Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre- training with frozen image encoders and large language models

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven Hoi. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre- training with frozen image encoders and large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12597,

  5. [13]

    Connecting vision and language with localized narratives

    Jordi Pont-Tuset, Jasper Uijlings, Soravit Changpinyo, Radu Soricut, and Vittorio Ferrari. Connecting vision and language with localized narratives. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part V 16 , pp. 647–664. Springer,

    2020

  6. [14]

    Object hallucination in image captioning

    Anna Rohrbach, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Kaylee Burns, Trevor Darrell, and Kate Saenko. Object hallucination in image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.02156,

  7. [15]

    Bloom: A 176b- parameter open-access multilingual language model

    Teven Le Scao, Angela Fan, Christopher Akiki, Ellie Pavlick, Suzana Ili´c, Daniel Hesslow, Roman Castagn´e, Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Fran c ¸ois Yvon, Matthias Gall ´e, et al. Bloom: A 176b- parameter open-access multilingual language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.05100, 2...

  8. [16]

    Using deepspeed and megatron to train megatron-turing nlg 530b, a large-scale generative language model

    Shaden Smith, Mostofa Patwary, Brandon Norick, Patrick LeGresley, Samyam Rajbhandari, Jared Casper, Zhun Liu, Shrimai Prabhumoye, George Zerveas, Vijay Korthikanti, et al. Using deepspeed and megatron to train megatron-turing nlg 530b, a large-scale generative language model. ...

  9. [17]

    Vipergpt: Visual inference via python execution for reasoning

    D´ıdac Sur´ıs, Sachit Menon, and Carl V ondrick. Vipergpt: Visual inference via python execution for reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08128,

  10. [18]

    Plug-and- play vqa: Zero-shot vqa by conjoining large pretrained models with zero training

    Anthony Meng Huat Tiong, Junnan Li, Boyang Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven CH Hoi. Plug-and- play vqa: Zero-shot vqa by conjoining large pretrained models with zero training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.08773,

  11. [19]

    Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models

    Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timoth´ee Lacroix, Baptiste Rozi `ere, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971,

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=yzkSU5zdwD

    ISSN 2835-8856. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=yzkSU5zdwD. Survey Certification. Chenfei Wu, Shengming Yin, Weizhen Qi, Xiaodong Wang, Zecheng Tang, and Nan Duan. Vi- sual chatgpt: Talking, drawing and editing with visual foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04671,

  13. [21]

    Zero-shot video question answering via frozen bidirectional language models

    Antoine Yang, Antoine Miech, Josef Sivic, Ivan Laptev, and Cordelia Schmid. Zero-shot video question answering via frozen bidirectional language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08155,

  14. [22]

    Opt: Open pre-trained transformer language models

    Susan Zhang, Stephen Roller, Naman Goyal, Mikel Artetxe, Moya Chen, Shuohui Chen, Christopher Dewan, Mona Diab, Xian Li, Xi Victoria Lin, et al. Opt: Open pre-trained transformer language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01068,

  15. [23]

    Chatgpt asks, blip-2 answers: Automatic questioning towards enriched visual descriptions

    Deyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Kilichbek Haydarov, Xiaoqian Shen, Wenxuan Zhang, and Mohamed Elho- seiny. Chatgpt asks, blip-2 answers: Automatic questioning towards enriched visual descriptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06594,

  16. [24]

    mondayjustmonday,

    12 Preprint A A PPENDIX A.1 M ORE QUALITATIVE RESULTS Explain why this meme is funny. Thismemeisfunnybecauseitshowsadoglayingonthefloorwithitsheadrestingonitspaws,asifitistiredorsleepy.Thecaption,"mondayjustmonday,"addstothehumorbysuggestingthatthedogisfeelingthesamewayasmanyp...

    1969

  17. [25]

    Additionally, to showcase the potential of MiniGPT-4 with traditional benchmarks, we conduct a straightforward ablation study

    and GQA (Hudson & Manning, 2019). Additionally, to showcase the potential of MiniGPT-4 with traditional benchmarks, we conduct a straightforward ablation study. Here, we simply unfreeze the LLM using LoRA (Hu et al.,

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.