Symmetry and nonlinearity of spin wave resonance excited by focused surface acoustic waves

Abbass Hamadeh; Andrew Franson; Derek A. Bas; Mathias Weiler; Michael Newburger; Michael R. Page; Michael Wolf; Philipp Pirro; Piyush J. Shah

arxiv: 2305.06259 · v1 · submitted 2023-05-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.app-ph

Symmetry and nonlinearity of spin wave resonance excited by focused surface acoustic waves

Piyush J. Shah , Derek A. Bas , Abbass Hamadeh , Michael Wolf , Andrew Franson , Michael Newburger , Philipp Pirro , Mathias Weiler

show 1 more author

Michael R. Page

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 08:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph

keywords focused surface acoustic wavesmagnon-phonon couplingspin wave resonancenonlinearitymagneto-acoustic interactionLandau-Lifshitz-Gilbertmicromagnetic simulation

0 comments

The pith

Focused surface acoustic waves enhance magnon-phonon coupling compared to unidirectional waves and exhibit nonlinear transmission dependence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that focused surface acoustic waves, generated with interdigitated transducers, significantly strengthen the coupling between magnons and phonons in ferromagnetic systems relative to standard unidirectional waves. Symmetry of the magneto-acoustic interaction is tuned by the transducer design through added strain components, which enables access to the nonlinear regime at modest input powers. Experiments reveal nonlinear dependence of transmission on input power, and this matches both analytical simulations from modified Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert theory and micromagnetic modeling with mumax3. The work supports improved design of acoustic devices for studying acoustically driven spin wave resonance.

Core claim

Focused surface acoustic waves significantly enhance the magnon-phonon coupling behavior compared to standard unidirectional waves, with symmetry tuned by interdigitated transducer design introducing additional strain components, and with observed nonlinear input power dependence of transmission supported by modified Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert analytical simulations and mumax3 micromagnetic simulations.

What carries the argument

Focused surface acoustic waves generated via interdigitated transducers that introduce additional strain components to tune the symmetry of the magneto-acoustic interaction.

If this is right

The enhanced coupling allows access to the high-power nonlinear regime of acoustically driven spin wave resonance with modest equipment.
Nonlinear input power dependence of device transmission is directly observed and reproduced in micromagnetic simulations.
Symmetry tuning via transducer design provides a controllable route to stronger magneto-acoustic interactions.
These findings support the design of acoustic wave devices optimized for exploration of spin wave resonance physics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar focused-wave approaches could be tested in other magnetic materials to check whether the enhancement generalizes beyond the studied system.
The nonlinear transmission effect might be leveraged for acoustic signal processing elements that respond differently at low and high powers.
Device geometries that combine focused waves with additional symmetry-breaking elements could be explored to further control the interaction.

Load-bearing premise

Interdigitated transducer design introduces additional strain components that tune the symmetry of the magneto-acoustic interaction in the manner required to produce the reported enhancement.

What would settle it

An experiment that finds no measurable increase in magnon-phonon coupling strength when switching from unidirectional to focused surface acoustic waves, or that shows linear rather than nonlinear dependence of transmission on input power.

read the original abstract

The use of a complex ferromagnetic system to manipulate GHz surface acoustic waves is a rich current topic under investigation, but the high-power nonlinear regime is under-explored. We introduce focused surface acoustic waves, which provide a way to access this regime with modest equipment. Symmetry of the magneto-acoustic interaction can be tuned by interdigitated transducer design which can introduce additional strain components. Here, we compare the impact of focused acoustic waves versus standard unidirectional acoustic waves in significantly enhancing the magnon-phonon coupling behavior. Analytical simulation results based on modified Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert theory show good agreement with experimental findings. We also report nonlinear input power dependence of the transmission through the device. This experimental observation is supported by the micromagnetic simulation using mumax3 to model the nonlinear dependence. These results pave the way for extending the understanding and design of acoustic wave devices for exploration of acoustically driven spin wave resonance physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Focused SAWs reach the nonlinear magnetoacoustic regime with IDT-tuned symmetry, but the paper needs to show explicitly that symmetry change, not just amplitude concentration, drives the reported enhancement.

read the letter

The paper's core result is that focused surface acoustic waves, generated with interdigitated transducers, let experimenters access nonlinear spin-wave resonance at modest powers while adjusting the magnetoelastic symmetry. They demonstrate this by comparing focused versus unidirectional waves, report nonlinear transmission versus input power, and back the observations with both modified LLG analytics and mumax3 micromagnetic runs that track the same power dependence. That agreement between two simulation methods and the experiment is the strongest part of the work and gives the nonlinear claim real weight. The practical angle—reaching nonlinearity without heroic equipment—is useful for the magnetoacoustics community. The symmetry-tuning claim via IDT design is presented as the distinguishing feature, but the abstract and stress-test note leave open whether the paper supplies the explicit strain-tensor calculation or energy-term comparison that would separate symmetry effects from simple focusing gain. If that derivation is only sketched or missing, the causal story weakens and the enhancement could be explained by local amplitude alone. The methods appear reproducible enough that the nonlinear observation itself stands, yet the symmetry mechanism would benefit from a clearer side-by-side tensor breakdown. This is a subfield paper for groups already working on SAW-driven magnonics or acoustic spin-wave devices. Readers who need a concrete experimental route into the nonlinear regime will find value; those looking for a fully derived symmetry model may want the supplemental detail first. It is worth sending to referees because the experimental-simulation match on nonlinearity is solid and the focused-SAW approach is a straightforward extension that others can test.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces focused surface acoustic waves (SAW) generated via interdigitated transducer (IDT) design as a means to access the high-power nonlinear regime of magnon-phonon coupling in ferromagnetic thin films. It claims that the focused geometry, by introducing additional strain components, tunes the symmetry of the magneto-acoustic interaction and thereby significantly enhances coupling strength relative to standard unidirectional SAW. Modified Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) analytics are reported to agree with experimental transmission data, while mumax3 micromagnetic simulations reproduce the observed nonlinear dependence of transmission on input power.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work provides a practical route to nonlinear acoustically driven spin-wave resonance using modest equipment, with potential implications for hybrid magnon-phonon device design. A clear strength is the use of two independent modeling approaches (modified LLG analytics and mumax3 simulations) that both align with the experimental nonlinear power dependence.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and transducer-design section] Abstract and transducer-design section: the central claim that focused IDT geometry tunes magneto-acoustic symmetry via additional strain components (and thereby drives the reported enhancement) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit calculation of the strain tensor components (longitudinal, shear, etc.) for the focused versus unidirectional case, nor a direct comparison of the resulting magnetoelastic energy terms. Without this step it remains possible that the observed enhancement arises from amplitude concentration alone.
[Modified LLG analytical section] Modified LLG analytical section: while agreement between the modified LLG model and experiment is asserted, the manuscript does not specify how the focused-SAW strain tensor is mapped into the effective field or damping terms of the LLG equation, preventing verification that the model isolates a symmetry-tuned interaction rather than a generic amplitude effect.

minor comments (1)

[Figures and methods] Figure captions and methods: several captions and the experimental-methods paragraph would benefit from explicit statements of the IDT finger geometry parameters and the precise definition of 'focused' versus 'unidirectional' drive amplitudes used in the comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback. The comments identify opportunities to strengthen the manuscript by providing more explicit details on the strain calculations and their mapping into the LLG model. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and transducer-design section] Abstract and transducer-design section: the central claim that focused IDT geometry tunes magneto-acoustic symmetry via additional strain components (and thereby drives the reported enhancement) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit calculation of the strain tensor components (longitudinal, shear, etc.) for the focused versus unidirectional case, nor a direct comparison of the resulting magnetoelastic energy terms. Without this step it remains possible that the observed enhancement arises from amplitude concentration alone.

Authors: We agree that an explicit calculation of the strain tensor components would strengthen the central claim and help rule out a purely amplitude-based explanation. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection to the transducer-design section that derives the full strain tensor (longitudinal, shear, and out-of-plane components) for both the focused and unidirectional IDT geometries using the standard Rayleigh-wave displacement fields. We will then compute and compare the resulting magnetoelastic energy densities, showing that the focused geometry introduces additional shear-strain terms that alter the symmetry of the magneto-acoustic interaction beyond simple amplitude concentration. This addition will directly address the referee’s concern. revision: yes
Referee: [Modified LLG analytical section] Modified LLG analytical section: while agreement between the modified LLG model and experiment is asserted, the manuscript does not specify how the focused-SAW strain tensor is mapped into the effective field or damping terms of the LLG equation, preventing verification that the model isolates a symmetry-tuned interaction rather than a generic amplitude effect.

Authors: We acknowledge that the mapping from the strain tensor to the LLG effective field was not presented with sufficient detail. In the revision we will expand the modified LLG analytical section to include the explicit expressions that convert each strain-tensor component into the magnetoelastic effective field (via the magnetoelastic coupling constants) and any associated modifications to the effective damping. We will also demonstrate that the additional shear components unique to the focused geometry produce a symmetry-dependent torque term that cannot be reproduced by a simple rescaling of the unidirectional amplitude. This will allow independent verification that the model isolates the symmetry-tuned interaction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; claims rest on independent experimental-simulation agreement

full rationale

The paper reports experimental observations of enhanced magnon-phonon coupling and nonlinear transmission under focused SAW, validated by agreement with modified LLG analytics and mumax3 micromagnetic simulations. No load-bearing step reduces a prediction to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or definitional equivalence; the simulations are standard external tools whose outputs are compared to data rather than constructed from the target result. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms beyond standard LLG theory, or invented entities; assessment limited by lack of full text.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Modified Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation accurately describes the magneto-acoustic interaction under focused SAW excitation
Invoked to produce analytical simulation results that agree with experiment

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5718 in / 1058 out tokens · 30103 ms · 2026-05-24T08:52:56.080285+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

[1]

Magnetic straintronics: Manipulating the magnetization of magnetostrictive nanomagnets with strain for energy-efficient applications,

S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Atulasimha, and A. Barman, “Magnetic straintronics: Manipulating the magnetization of magnetostrictive nanomagnets with strain for energy-efficient applications,” Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 041323, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0062993

work page doi:10.1063/5.0062993 2021
[2]

Acoustic control of magnetism toward energy-efficient applications,

W.-G. Yang and H. Schmidt, “Acoustic control of magnetism toward energy-efficient applications,” Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 021304, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0042138

work page doi:10.1063/5.0042138 2021
[3]

Excitation of Spin Waves in a Ferromagnet by a Uniform rf Field,

C. Kittel, “Excitation of Spin Waves in a Ferromagnet by a Uniform rf Field,” Phys. Rev., vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 1295–1297, Jun. 1958, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.110.1295

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.110.1295 1958
[4]

Elastically Driven Ferromagnetic Resonance in Nickel Thin Films,

M. Weiler et al., “Elastically Driven Ferromagnetic Resonance in Nickel Thin Films,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, no. 11, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.117601

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.117601 2011
[5]

Angle-dependent spin-wave resonance spectroscopy of (Ga,Mn)As films,

L. Dreher et al., “Angle-dependent spin-wave resonance spectroscopy of (Ga,Mn)As films,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 87, no. 22, p. 224422, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.224422

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.224422 2013
[7]

Magnon-phonon interactions in magnon spintronics (Review article),

D. A. Bozhko, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. V. Chumak, and A. A. Serga, “Magnon-phonon interactions in magnon spintronics (Review article),” Low Temperature Physics, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 383–399, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1063/10.0000872

work page doi:10.1063/10.0000872 2020
[8]

Interaction between surface acoustic waves and spin waves in a ferromagnetic thin film,

K. Yamamoto, M. Xu, J. Puebla, Y. Otani, and S. Maekawa, “Interaction between surface acoustic waves and spin waves in a ferromagnetic thin film,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 545, p. 168672, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168672

work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168672 2022
[9]

Symmetry of the Magnetoelastic Interaction of Rayleigh and Shear Horizontal Magnetoacoustic Waves in Nickel Thin Films on LiTaO3,

M. Küß et al., “Symmetry of the Magnetoelastic Interaction of Rayleigh and Shear Horizontal Magnetoacoustic Waves in Nickel Thin Films on LiTaO3,” Phys. Rev. Applied, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 034046, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.034046

work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.034046 2021
[10]

Inverse Edelstein effect induced by magnon-phonon coupling,

M. Xu, J. Puebla, F. Auvray, B. Rana, K. Kondou, and Y. Otani, “Inverse Edelstein effect induced by magnon-phonon coupling,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 97, no. 18, p. 180301, May 2018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.180301

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.180301 2018
[11]

Einstein--de Haas phase shifts in surface acoustic waves,

S. Tateno, Y. Kurimune, M. Matsuo, K. Yamanoi, and Y. Nozaki, “Einstein--de Haas phase shifts in surface acoustic waves,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 104, no. 2, p. L020404, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.L020404

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.l020404 2021
[12]

Magnetoelastic eﬀect with Surface Acoustic Waves in Nickel,

M. Rovirola Metcalfe, “Magnetoelastic eﬀect with Surface Acoustic Waves in Nickel,” Jul. 2021, Accessed: Oct. 17, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/180906

work page 2021
[13]

Spin wave generation by surface acoustic waves,

X. Li, D. Labanowski, S. Salahuddin, and C. S. Lynch, “Spin wave generation by surface acoustic waves,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 122, no. 4, p. 043904, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1063/1.4996102

work page doi:10.1063/1.4996102 2017
[14]

Acoustically Driven Ferromagnetic Resonance in Diverse Ferromagnetic Thin Films,

D. A. Bas et al., “Acoustically Driven Ferromagnetic Resonance in Diverse Ferromagnetic Thin Films,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 1–5, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2020.3019214

work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2020.3019214 2021
[15]

Giant nonreciprocity of surface acoustic waves enabled by the magnetoelastic interaction,

P. J. Shah, D. A. Bas, I. Lisenkov, A. Matyushov, N. X. Sun, and M. R. Page, “Giant nonreciprocity of surface acoustic waves enabled by the magnetoelastic interaction,” Science Advances, vol. 6, no. 49, p. eabc5648, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc5648

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc5648 2020
[16]

Phase Nonreciprocity of Microwave-Frequency Surface Acoustic Waves in Hybrid Heterostructures with Magnetoelastic Coupling,

R. Verba, E. N. Bankowski, T. J. Meitzler, V. Tiberkevich, and A. Slavin, “Phase Nonreciprocity of Microwave-Frequency Surface Acoustic Waves in Hybrid Heterostructures with Magnetoelastic Coupling,” Advanced Electronic Materials, vol. 7, no. 8, p. 2100263, 2021, doi: 10.1002/aelm.202100263

work page doi:10.1002/aelm.202100263 2021
[17]

Nonreciprocity of Phase Accumulation and Propagation Losses of Surface Acoustic Waves in Hybrid Magnetoelastic Heterostructures,

D. A. Bas et al., “Nonreciprocity of Phase Accumulation and Propagation Losses of Surface Acoustic Waves in Hybrid Magnetoelastic Heterostructures,” Phys. Rev. Applied, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 044003, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.044003

work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.044003 2022
[18]

Fully resonant magneto-elastic spin-wave excitation by surface acoustic waves under conservation of energy and linear momentum,

M. Geilen et al., “Fully resonant magneto-elastic spin-wave excitation by surface acoustic waves under conservation of energy and linear momentum,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 120, no. 24, p. 242404, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1063/5.0088924

work page doi:10.1063/5.0088924 2022
[19]

Nonreciprocal Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya Magnetoacoustic Waves,

M. Küß et al., “Nonreciprocal Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya Magnetoacoustic Waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 125, no. 21, p. 217203, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.217203

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.217203 2020
[20]

Nonreciprocal Magnetoacoustic Waves in Dipolar-Coupled Ferromagnetic Bilayers,

M. Küß et al., “Nonreciprocal Magnetoacoustic Waves in Dipolar-Coupled Ferromagnetic Bilayers,” Phys. Rev. Applied, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 034060, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.034060

work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.034060 2021
[21]

Surface acoustic wave microfluidics,

X. Ding et al., “Surface acoustic wave microfluidics,” Lab Chip, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 3626, 2013, doi: 10.1039/c3lc50361e

work page doi:10.1039/c3lc50361e 2013
[22]

Surface acoustic wave actuated cell sorting (SAWACS),

T. Franke, S. Braunmüller, L. Schmid, A. Wixforth, and D. A. Weitz, “Surface acoustic wave actuated cell sorting (SAWACS),” Lab Chip, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 789, 2010, doi: 10.1039/b915522h

work page doi:10.1039/b915522h 2010
[23]

Continuous micro-vortex-based nanoparticle manipulation via focused surface acoustic waves,

D. J. Collins, Z. Ma, J. Han, and Y. Ai, “Continuous micro-vortex-based nanoparticle manipulation via focused surface acoustic waves,” Lab Chip, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 91–103, 2017, doi: 10.1039/C6LC01142J

work page doi:10.1039/c6lc01142j 2017
[24]

Standing Surface Acoustic Wave (SSAW)‐Based Fluorescence‐Activated Cell Sorter,

L. Ren et al., “Standing Surface Acoustic Wave (SSAW)‐Based Fluorescence‐Activated Cell Sorter,” Small, vol. 14, no. 40, p. 1801996, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1002/smll.201801996

work page doi:10.1002/smll.201801996 2018
[25]

Submicron separation of microspheres via travelling surface acoustic waves,

G. Destgeer, B. H. Ha, J. H. Jung, and H. J. Sung, “Submicron separation of microspheres via travelling surface acoustic waves,” Lab Chip, vol. 14, no. 24, pp. 4665–4672, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1039/C4LC00868E

work page doi:10.1039/c4lc00868e 2014
[26]

Highly focused high-frequency travelling surface acoustic waves (SAW) for rapid single-particle sorting,

D. J. Collins, A. Neild, and Y. Ai, “Highly focused high-frequency travelling surface acoustic waves (SAW) for rapid single-particle sorting,” Lab Chip, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 471–479, 2016, doi: 10.1039/C5LC01335F

work page doi:10.1039/c5lc01335f 2016
[27]

Writing magnetic patterns with surface acoustic waves,

W. Li, B. Buford, A. Jander, and P. Dhagat, “Writing magnetic patterns with surface acoustic waves,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 115, no. 17, p. 17E307, May 2014, doi: 10.1063/1.4863170

work page doi:10.1063/1.4863170 2014
[28]

Optimization of acoustically-driven ferromagnetic resonance devices,

D. A. Bas, P. J. Shah, M. E. McConney, and M. R. Page, “Optimization of acoustically-driven ferromagnetic resonance devices,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 126, no. 11, p. 114501, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5111846

work page doi:10.1063/1.5111846 2019
[29]

Power absorption in acoustically driven ferromagnetic resonance,

D. Labanowski, A. Jung, and S. Salahuddin, “Power absorption in acoustically driven ferromagnetic resonance,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 108, no. 2, p. 022905, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1063/1.4939914

work page doi:10.1063/1.4939914 2016
[30]

Surface acoustic wave driven ferromagnetic resonance in nickel thin films: Theory and experiment,

L. Dreher et al., “Surface acoustic wave driven ferromagnetic resonance in nickel thin films: Theory and experiment,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 86, no. 13, p. 134415, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.134415

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.134415 2012
[31]

Slowness curve surface acoustic wave transducers for optimized acoustic streaming,

R. O’Rorke, A. Winkler, D. Collins, and Y. Ai, “Slowness curve surface acoustic wave transducers for optimized acoustic streaming,” RSC Adv., vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 11582–11589, 2020, doi: 10.1039/C9RA10452F

work page doi:10.1039/c9ra10452f 2020
[32]

The design and verification of MuMax3,

A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, “The design and verification of MuMax3,” AIP Advances, vol. 4, no. 10, p. 107133, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1063/1.4899186

work page doi:10.1063/1.4899186 2014
[33]

Aithericon

“Aithericon.” https://aithericon.com/ (accessed Sep. 13, 2022). Supplemental Material Experiment For polar ADSWR measurements like those in Figs. 2 and S1, a signal generator (Keysight N5171B) delivers pulsed RF to the ADSWR device, and the output is measured using a spectrum analyzer (Keysight N9000A). For the power dependence study, we discretely vary t...

work page 2022

[1] [1]

Magnetic straintronics: Manipulating the magnetization of magnetostrictive nanomagnets with strain for energy-efficient applications,

S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Atulasimha, and A. Barman, “Magnetic straintronics: Manipulating the magnetization of magnetostrictive nanomagnets with strain for energy-efficient applications,” Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 041323, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0062993

work page doi:10.1063/5.0062993 2021

[2] [2]

Acoustic control of magnetism toward energy-efficient applications,

W.-G. Yang and H. Schmidt, “Acoustic control of magnetism toward energy-efficient applications,” Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 021304, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0042138

work page doi:10.1063/5.0042138 2021

[3] [3]

Excitation of Spin Waves in a Ferromagnet by a Uniform rf Field,

C. Kittel, “Excitation of Spin Waves in a Ferromagnet by a Uniform rf Field,” Phys. Rev., vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 1295–1297, Jun. 1958, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.110.1295

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.110.1295 1958

[4] [4]

Elastically Driven Ferromagnetic Resonance in Nickel Thin Films,

M. Weiler et al., “Elastically Driven Ferromagnetic Resonance in Nickel Thin Films,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, no. 11, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.117601

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.117601 2011

[5] [5]

Angle-dependent spin-wave resonance spectroscopy of (Ga,Mn)As films,

L. Dreher et al., “Angle-dependent spin-wave resonance spectroscopy of (Ga,Mn)As films,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 87, no. 22, p. 224422, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.224422

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.224422 2013

[6] [7]

Magnon-phonon interactions in magnon spintronics (Review article),

D. A. Bozhko, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. V. Chumak, and A. A. Serga, “Magnon-phonon interactions in magnon spintronics (Review article),” Low Temperature Physics, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 383–399, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1063/10.0000872

work page doi:10.1063/10.0000872 2020

[7] [8]

Interaction between surface acoustic waves and spin waves in a ferromagnetic thin film,

K. Yamamoto, M. Xu, J. Puebla, Y. Otani, and S. Maekawa, “Interaction between surface acoustic waves and spin waves in a ferromagnetic thin film,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 545, p. 168672, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168672

work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168672 2022

[8] [9]

Symmetry of the Magnetoelastic Interaction of Rayleigh and Shear Horizontal Magnetoacoustic Waves in Nickel Thin Films on LiTaO3,

M. Küß et al., “Symmetry of the Magnetoelastic Interaction of Rayleigh and Shear Horizontal Magnetoacoustic Waves in Nickel Thin Films on LiTaO3,” Phys. Rev. Applied, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 034046, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.034046

work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.034046 2021

[9] [10]

Inverse Edelstein effect induced by magnon-phonon coupling,

M. Xu, J. Puebla, F. Auvray, B. Rana, K. Kondou, and Y. Otani, “Inverse Edelstein effect induced by magnon-phonon coupling,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 97, no. 18, p. 180301, May 2018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.180301

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.180301 2018

[10] [11]

Einstein--de Haas phase shifts in surface acoustic waves,

S. Tateno, Y. Kurimune, M. Matsuo, K. Yamanoi, and Y. Nozaki, “Einstein--de Haas phase shifts in surface acoustic waves,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 104, no. 2, p. L020404, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.L020404

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.l020404 2021

[11] [12]

Magnetoelastic eﬀect with Surface Acoustic Waves in Nickel,

M. Rovirola Metcalfe, “Magnetoelastic eﬀect with Surface Acoustic Waves in Nickel,” Jul. 2021, Accessed: Oct. 17, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/180906

work page 2021

[12] [13]

Spin wave generation by surface acoustic waves,

X. Li, D. Labanowski, S. Salahuddin, and C. S. Lynch, “Spin wave generation by surface acoustic waves,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 122, no. 4, p. 043904, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1063/1.4996102

work page doi:10.1063/1.4996102 2017

[13] [14]

Acoustically Driven Ferromagnetic Resonance in Diverse Ferromagnetic Thin Films,

D. A. Bas et al., “Acoustically Driven Ferromagnetic Resonance in Diverse Ferromagnetic Thin Films,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 1–5, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2020.3019214

work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2020.3019214 2021

[14] [15]

Giant nonreciprocity of surface acoustic waves enabled by the magnetoelastic interaction,

P. J. Shah, D. A. Bas, I. Lisenkov, A. Matyushov, N. X. Sun, and M. R. Page, “Giant nonreciprocity of surface acoustic waves enabled by the magnetoelastic interaction,” Science Advances, vol. 6, no. 49, p. eabc5648, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc5648

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc5648 2020

[15] [16]

Phase Nonreciprocity of Microwave-Frequency Surface Acoustic Waves in Hybrid Heterostructures with Magnetoelastic Coupling,

R. Verba, E. N. Bankowski, T. J. Meitzler, V. Tiberkevich, and A. Slavin, “Phase Nonreciprocity of Microwave-Frequency Surface Acoustic Waves in Hybrid Heterostructures with Magnetoelastic Coupling,” Advanced Electronic Materials, vol. 7, no. 8, p. 2100263, 2021, doi: 10.1002/aelm.202100263

work page doi:10.1002/aelm.202100263 2021

[16] [17]

Nonreciprocity of Phase Accumulation and Propagation Losses of Surface Acoustic Waves in Hybrid Magnetoelastic Heterostructures,

D. A. Bas et al., “Nonreciprocity of Phase Accumulation and Propagation Losses of Surface Acoustic Waves in Hybrid Magnetoelastic Heterostructures,” Phys. Rev. Applied, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 044003, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.044003

work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.044003 2022

[17] [18]

Fully resonant magneto-elastic spin-wave excitation by surface acoustic waves under conservation of energy and linear momentum,

M. Geilen et al., “Fully resonant magneto-elastic spin-wave excitation by surface acoustic waves under conservation of energy and linear momentum,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 120, no. 24, p. 242404, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1063/5.0088924

work page doi:10.1063/5.0088924 2022

[18] [19]

Nonreciprocal Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya Magnetoacoustic Waves,

M. Küß et al., “Nonreciprocal Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya Magnetoacoustic Waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 125, no. 21, p. 217203, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.217203

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.217203 2020

[19] [20]

Nonreciprocal Magnetoacoustic Waves in Dipolar-Coupled Ferromagnetic Bilayers,

M. Küß et al., “Nonreciprocal Magnetoacoustic Waves in Dipolar-Coupled Ferromagnetic Bilayers,” Phys. Rev. Applied, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 034060, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.034060

work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.034060 2021

[20] [21]

Surface acoustic wave microfluidics,

X. Ding et al., “Surface acoustic wave microfluidics,” Lab Chip, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 3626, 2013, doi: 10.1039/c3lc50361e

work page doi:10.1039/c3lc50361e 2013

[21] [22]

Surface acoustic wave actuated cell sorting (SAWACS),

T. Franke, S. Braunmüller, L. Schmid, A. Wixforth, and D. A. Weitz, “Surface acoustic wave actuated cell sorting (SAWACS),” Lab Chip, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 789, 2010, doi: 10.1039/b915522h

work page doi:10.1039/b915522h 2010

[22] [23]

Continuous micro-vortex-based nanoparticle manipulation via focused surface acoustic waves,

D. J. Collins, Z. Ma, J. Han, and Y. Ai, “Continuous micro-vortex-based nanoparticle manipulation via focused surface acoustic waves,” Lab Chip, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 91–103, 2017, doi: 10.1039/C6LC01142J

work page doi:10.1039/c6lc01142j 2017

[23] [24]

Standing Surface Acoustic Wave (SSAW)‐Based Fluorescence‐Activated Cell Sorter,

L. Ren et al., “Standing Surface Acoustic Wave (SSAW)‐Based Fluorescence‐Activated Cell Sorter,” Small, vol. 14, no. 40, p. 1801996, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1002/smll.201801996

work page doi:10.1002/smll.201801996 2018

[24] [25]

Submicron separation of microspheres via travelling surface acoustic waves,

G. Destgeer, B. H. Ha, J. H. Jung, and H. J. Sung, “Submicron separation of microspheres via travelling surface acoustic waves,” Lab Chip, vol. 14, no. 24, pp. 4665–4672, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1039/C4LC00868E

work page doi:10.1039/c4lc00868e 2014

[25] [26]

Highly focused high-frequency travelling surface acoustic waves (SAW) for rapid single-particle sorting,

D. J. Collins, A. Neild, and Y. Ai, “Highly focused high-frequency travelling surface acoustic waves (SAW) for rapid single-particle sorting,” Lab Chip, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 471–479, 2016, doi: 10.1039/C5LC01335F

work page doi:10.1039/c5lc01335f 2016

[26] [27]

Writing magnetic patterns with surface acoustic waves,

W. Li, B. Buford, A. Jander, and P. Dhagat, “Writing magnetic patterns with surface acoustic waves,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 115, no. 17, p. 17E307, May 2014, doi: 10.1063/1.4863170

work page doi:10.1063/1.4863170 2014

[27] [28]

Optimization of acoustically-driven ferromagnetic resonance devices,

D. A. Bas, P. J. Shah, M. E. McConney, and M. R. Page, “Optimization of acoustically-driven ferromagnetic resonance devices,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 126, no. 11, p. 114501, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5111846

work page doi:10.1063/1.5111846 2019

[28] [29]

Power absorption in acoustically driven ferromagnetic resonance,

D. Labanowski, A. Jung, and S. Salahuddin, “Power absorption in acoustically driven ferromagnetic resonance,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 108, no. 2, p. 022905, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1063/1.4939914

work page doi:10.1063/1.4939914 2016

[29] [30]

Surface acoustic wave driven ferromagnetic resonance in nickel thin films: Theory and experiment,

L. Dreher et al., “Surface acoustic wave driven ferromagnetic resonance in nickel thin films: Theory and experiment,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 86, no. 13, p. 134415, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.134415

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.134415 2012

[30] [31]

Slowness curve surface acoustic wave transducers for optimized acoustic streaming,

R. O’Rorke, A. Winkler, D. Collins, and Y. Ai, “Slowness curve surface acoustic wave transducers for optimized acoustic streaming,” RSC Adv., vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 11582–11589, 2020, doi: 10.1039/C9RA10452F

work page doi:10.1039/c9ra10452f 2020

[31] [32]

The design and verification of MuMax3,

A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, “The design and verification of MuMax3,” AIP Advances, vol. 4, no. 10, p. 107133, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1063/1.4899186

work page doi:10.1063/1.4899186 2014

[32] [33]

Aithericon

“Aithericon.” https://aithericon.com/ (accessed Sep. 13, 2022). Supplemental Material Experiment For polar ADSWR measurements like those in Figs. 2 and S1, a signal generator (Keysight N5171B) delivers pulsed RF to the ADSWR device, and the output is measured using a spectrum analyzer (Keysight N9000A). For the power dependence study, we discretely vary t...

work page 2022