pith. sign in

arxiv: 2305.18981 · v3 · pith:XMNG4TRWnew · submitted 2023-05-30 · 🧮 math.AP · math.OC· math.PR

Convergence of infinitesimal generators and stability of convex monotone semigroups

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 08:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP math.OCmath.PR
keywords convex monotone semigroupsinfinitesimal generatorsmixed topologystabilitycomparison principleΓ-generatorLipschitz functionsHamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Convergence of infinitesimal generators in the mixed topology implies stability of convex monotone semigroups.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that convergence of the infinitesimal generators of convex monotone semigroups in the mixed topology yields convergence of the semigroups themselves. This holds for strongly continuous semigroups acting on spaces of continuous functions. The proof relies on a comparison principle that uses the Γ-generator restricted to the Lipschitz set to uniquely determine each semigroup, avoiding viscosity solution techniques. The same framework covers both time and space discretizations and directly yields stability statements for several classes of approximations. A reader would care because the result transfers generator-level information to the full semigroup dynamics in settings that include optimal control and nonlinear PDEs.

Core claim

Based on the convergence of their infinitesimal generators in the mixed topology, the paper provides a stability result for strongly continuous convex monotone semigroups on spaces of continuous functions. The result relies on a comparison principle that uniquely determines the semigroup via its Γ-generator on the Lipschitz set, resembling the classical linear analogue.

What carries the argument

The Γ-generator defined on the Lipschitz set, which with the comparison principle uniquely identifies the semigroup and transfers generator convergence to semigroup convergence.

If this is right

  • Stability holds for Euler schemes and Yosida-type approximations of upper envelopes of linear semigroups.
  • Finite-difference schemes for convex HJB equations inherit stability from generator convergence.
  • Freidlin-Wentzell-type large-deviation results and Markov chain approximations are stable for a class of stochastic optimal control problems.
  • Continuous-time Markov processes with uncertain transition probabilities admit stability statements under the same generator condition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The generator-convergence approach could extend to other classes of nonlinear semigroups once an analogous comparison principle is available.
  • In applications, verifying mixed-topology convergence of generators for concrete discretizations would directly certify the corresponding semigroup approximations.
  • The method may connect to monotone-operator theory by treating the Γ-generator as a nonlinear analogue of the classical generator.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison principle must hold so that the Γ-generator on the Lipschitz set uniquely determines the semigroup.

What would settle it

A pair of distinct convex monotone semigroups whose generators converge in the mixed topology but whose semigroups themselves fail to converge would falsify the stability claim.

read the original abstract

Based on the convergence of their infinitesimal generators in the mixed topology, we provide a stability result for strongly continuous convex monotone semigroups on spaces of continuous functions. In contrast to previous results, we do not rely on the theory of viscosity solutions but use a recent comparison principle which uniquely determines the semigroup via its $\Gamma$-generator defined on the Lipschitz set and therefore resembles the classical analogue from the linear case. The framework also allows for discretizations both in time and space and covers a variety of applications. This includes Euler schemes and Yosida-type approximations for upper envelopes of families of linear semigroups, stability results and finite-difference schemes for convex HJB equations, Freidlin-Wentzell-type results and Markov chain approximations for a class of stochastic optimal control problems and continuous-time Markov processes with uncertain transition probabilities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper establishes a stability result for strongly continuous convex monotone semigroups on spaces of continuous functions, obtained from convergence of their infinitesimal generators (specifically Γ-generators) in the mixed topology. It replaces viscosity solution theory with a recent comparison principle that uniquely determines the semigroup from its Γ-generator on the Lipschitz set, thereby mirroring the classical linear case more directly. The framework is shown to accommodate time and space discretizations and is applied to Euler schemes, Yosida approximations for upper envelopes of linear semigroups, finite-difference schemes for convex HJB equations, Freidlin-Wentzell-type results, and Markov chain approximations for stochastic optimal control and processes with uncertain transitions.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the result supplies a direct, comparison-principle-based route to semigroup stability that parallels the linear theory and avoids the technical overhead of viscosity solutions. The explicit coverage of both continuous and discrete approximations, together with concrete applications to HJB equations and stochastic control, indicates that the framework can support numerical analysis and approximation theory in nonlinear settings. The parameter-free character of the comparison principle (as described) and the absence of ad-hoc fitting strengthen the result's generality.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract and introduction should explicitly recall the definition of the mixed topology and the precise domain of the Γ-generator (Lipschitz set) to make the comparison with the linear case immediate for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. [Applications] In the applications section, each discretization (Euler, Yosida, finite-difference, Markov chain) should contain a one-sentence pointer back to the precise hypothesis of the main stability theorem that is being verified.
  3. [Preliminaries] Notation for the space of continuous functions (e.g., whether bounded or unbounded, topology) should be fixed at first use and used consistently thereafter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments appear in the report, so we have no point-by-point responses to provide. We remain available to incorporate any minor editorial changes the editor may request.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; stability follows from external comparison principle

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from convergence of infinitesimal generators in the mixed topology to semigroup stability. The key uniqueness device is an external recent comparison principle that pins down the semigroup via its Γ-generator on the Lipschitz set; this is invoked as an independent input rather than derived or fitted inside the paper. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear. The abstract and structure treat the comparison principle as a black-box external fact analogous to the linear case, leaving the generator-convergence step as the novel contribution with independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper operates in the standard setting of strongly continuous semigroups on continuous functions and invokes a recent comparison principle; no free parameters or invented entities are indicated in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Semigroups under consideration are strongly continuous, convex, and monotone on spaces of continuous functions.
    This defines the class of objects for which the stability result is claimed.
  • domain assumption A recent comparison principle uniquely determines the semigroup via its Γ-generator on the Lipschitz set.
    This is the key tool replacing viscosity solutions and is invoked to establish uniqueness and stability.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5668 in / 1246 out tokens · 22416 ms · 2026-05-24T08:30:18.140570+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. An optimal transport foundation for a class of dynamically consistent risk measures

    q-fin.MF 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dynamically consistent risk measures are constructed via optimal transport penalizations of transition laws, yielding generators that are first-order convex Hamiltonians on gradients under linear scaling or second-ord...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Barles and E

    G. Barles and E. R. Jakobsen. Error bounds for monotone ap proximation schemes for Hamilton- Jacobi-Bellman equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. , 43(2):540–558, 2005

  2. [2]

    Barles and E

    G. Barles and E. R. Jakobsen. Error bounds for monotone ap proximation schemes for parabolic Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. Math. Comp. , 76(260):1861–1893, 2007

  3. [3]

    Barles and P

    G. Barles and P. E. Souganidis. Convergence of approxima tion schemes for fully nonlinear second order equations. Asymptotic Anal. , 4(3):271–283, 1991

  4. [4]

    E. N. Barron and R. Jensen. Semicontinuous viscosity sol utions for Hamilton-Jacobi equations with convex Hamiltonians. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 15(12):1713–1742, 1990

  5. [5]

    E. N. Barron and R. Jensen. Optimal control and semiconti nuous viscosity solutions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 113(2):397–402, 1991

  6. [6]

    Bartl, P

    D. Bartl, P. Cheridito, and M. Kupper. Robust expected ut ility maximization with medial limits. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 471(1-2):752–775, 2019

  7. [7]

    Bartl, S

    D. Bartl, S. Drapeau, J. Obłój, and J. Wiesel. Sensitivit y analysis of Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization problems. Proc. R. Soc. A. , 477(2256):Paper No. 20210176, 19, 2021

  8. [8]

    Bartl, S

    D. Bartl, S. Eckstein, and M. Kupper. Limits of random wal ks with distributionally robust tran- sition probabilities. Electron. Commun. Probab. , 26:Paper No. 28, 13, 2021

  9. [9]

    Blanchet and K

    J. Blanchet and K. Murthy. Quantifying distributional m odel risk via optimal transport. Math. Oper. Res., 44(2):565–600, 2019

  10. [10]

    Blessing, R

    J. Blessing, R. Denk, M. Kupper, and M. Nendel. Convex mo notone semigroups and their gener- ators with respect to Γ-convergence. Preprint arXiv:2202.08653, 2022

  11. [11]

    Blessing and M

    J. Blessing and M. Kupper. Nonlinear semigroups and lim it theorems for convex expectations. Preprint arXiv:2210.14096, 2022

  12. [12]

    Blessing and M

    J. Blessing and M. Kupper. Nonlinear semigroups built o n generating families and their Lipschitz sets. To appear in Potential Analysis , 2022+. 50 STABILITY OF CONVEX MONOTONE SEMIGROUPS

  13. [13]

    J. F. Bonnans and H. Zidani. Consistency of generalized finite difference schemes for the stochastic HJB equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. , 41(3):1008–1021, 2003

  14. [14]

    Brézis and A

    H. Brézis and A. Pazy. Convergence and approximation of semigroups of nonlinear operators in Banach spaces. J. Functional Analysis , 9:63–74, 1972

  15. [15]

    Briand, B

    P. Briand, B. Delyon, and J. Mémin. On the robustness of b ackward stochastic differential equa- tions. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 97(2):229–253, 2002

  16. [16]

    Briani, F

    A. Briani, F. Camilli, and H. Zidani. Approximation sch emes for monotone systems of nonlinear second order partial differential equations: convergence r esult and error estimate. Differ. Equ. Appl., 4(2):297–317, 2012

  17. [17]

    Budde and B

    C. Budde and B. Farkas. Intermediate and extrapolated s paces for bi-continuous semigroups. Journal of Evolution Equations , pages 321–359, 2019

  18. [18]

    L. A. Caffarelli and P. E. Souganidis. A rate of convergen ce for monotone finite difference ap- proximations to fully nonlinear, uniformly elliptic PDEs. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 61(1):1–17, 2008

  19. [19]

    S. Cerrai. A Hille-Yosida theorem for weakly continuou s semigroups. Semigroup Forum, 49(3):349– 367, 1994

  20. [20]

    Chen and J

    Z. Chen and J. Xiong. Large deviation principle for diffu sion processes under a sublinear expecta- tion. Sci. China Math. , 55(11):2205–2216, 2012

  21. [21]

    Cheridito, H

    P. Cheridito, H. M. Soner, N. Touzi, and N. Victoir. Seco nd-order backward stochastic differential equations and fully nonlinear parabolic PDEs. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 60(7):1081–1110, 2007

  22. [22]

    P. R. Chernoff. Note on product formulas for operator sem igroups. J. Functional Analysis , 2:238– 242, 1968

  23. [23]

    P. R. Chernoff. Product formulas, nonlinear semigroups, and addition of un bounded operators, volume 140. American Mathematical Soc., 1974

  24. [24]

    Coquet, Y

    F. Coquet, Y. Hu, J. Mémin, and S. Peng. Filtration-cons istent nonlinear expectations and related g-expectations. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 123(1):1–27, 2002

  25. [25]

    M. G. Crandall, H. Ishii, and P.-L. Lions. User’s guide t o viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) , 27(1):1–67, 1992

  26. [26]

    M. G. Crandall and T. M. Liggett. Generation of semi-gro ups of nonlinear transformations on general Banach spaces. Amer. J. Math. , 93:265–298, 1971

  27. [27]

    M. G. Crandall and P.-L. Lions. Viscosity solutions of H amilton-Jacobi equations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 277(1):1–42, 1983

  28. [28]

    Criens and L

    D. Criens and L. Niemann. Nonlinear continuous semimar tingales. Preprint arXiv:2204.07823 , 2022

  29. [29]

    Dembo and O

    A. Dembo and O. Zeitouni. Large deviations techniques and applications , volume 38 of Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010. Corrected reprint of the s econd (1998) edition

  30. [30]

    R. Denk, M. Kupper, and M. Nendel. A semigroup approach t o nonlinear Lévy processes. Stochastic Process. Appl., 130:1616–1642, 2020

  31. [31]

    R. Denk, M. Kupper, and M. Nendel. Convex semigroups on l attices of continuous functions. To appear in Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. , 2021+

  32. [32]

    Dupuis and R

    P. Dupuis and R. S. Ellis. A weak convergence approach to the theory of large deviation s. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics: Probability and Stat istics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1997. A Wiley-Interscience Publication

  33. [33]

    Dupuis and H

    P. Dupuis and H. J. Kushner. Numerical methods for stochastic control problems in conti nuous time, volume 24 of Applications of Mathematics (New York) . Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 2001. Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probabili ty

  34. [34]

    El Karoui, S

    N. El Karoui, S. Peng, and M. C. Quenez. Backward stochas tic differential equations in finance. Math. Finance, 7(1):1–71, 1997

  35. [35]

    S. N. Ethier and T. G. Kurtz. Markov processes: Characterization and convergence . Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability a nd Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1986

  36. [36]

    L. C. Evans. Nonlinear semigroup theory and viscosity s olutions of Hamilton-Jacobi PDE. In Non- linear semigroups, partial differential equations and attr actors (Washington, D.C., 1985) , volume 1248 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 63–77. Springer, Berlin, 1987

  37. [37]

    Fadina, A

    T. Fadina, A. Neufeld, and T. Schmidt. Affine processes un der parameter uncertainty. Probab. Uncertain. Quant. Risk , 4:Paper No. 1, 35, 2019. STABILITY OF CONVEX MONOTONE SEMIGROUPS 51

  38. [38]

    J. Feng. Large deviation for diffusions and Hamilton-Ja cobi equation in Hilbert spaces. Ann. Probab., 34(1):321–385, 2006

  39. [39]

    Feng, J.-P

    J. Feng, J.-P. Fouque, and R. Kumar. Small-time asympto tics for fast mean-reverting stochastic volatility models. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 22(4):1541–1575, 2012

  40. [40]

    Feng and T

    J. Feng and T. G. Kurtz. Large deviations for stochastic processes , volume 131 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006

  41. [41]

    W. H. Fleming and H. M. Soner. Controlled Markov processes and viscosity solutions , volume 25 of Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability . Springer, New York, second edition, 2006

  42. [42]

    Frankowska

    H. Frankowska. Lower semicontinuous solutions of Hami lton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. SIAM J. Control Optim. , 31(1):257–272, 1993

  43. [43]

    M. I. Freidlin and A. D. Wentzell. Random perturbations of dynamical systems , volume 260 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamen tal Principles of Mathematical Sci- ences]. Springer, Heidelberg, third edition, 2012. Translated fr om the 1979 Russian original by Joseph Szücs

  44. [44]

    D. H. Fremlin, D. J. H. Garling, and R. G. Haydon. Bounded measures on topological spaces. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) , 25:115–136, 1972

  45. [45]

    Fuhrmann, M

    S. Fuhrmann, M. Kupper, and M. Nendel. Wasserstein pert urbations of Markovian transition semigroups. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. , 59(2):904–932, 2023

  46. [46]

    Gao and H

    F. Gao and H. Jiang. Large deviations for stochastic diff erential equations driven by G-Brownian motion. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 120(11):2212–2240, 2010

  47. [47]

    Geiss, C

    C. Geiss, C. Labart, and A. Luoto. Random walk approxima tion of BSDEs with Hölder continuous terminal condition. Bernoulli, 26(1):159–190, 2020

  48. [48]

    X. Geng, Z. Qian, and D. Yang. G-Brownian motion as rough paths and differential equations driven by G-Brownian motion. In Séminaire de Probabilités XL VI , volume 2123 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 125–193. Springer, Cham, 2014

  49. [49]

    Goldys, M

    B. Goldys, M. Nendel, and M. Röckner. Operator semigrou ps in the mixed topology and the infinitesimal description of Markov processes. Preprint arXiv:2204.07484, 2022

  50. [50]

    M. Hu, X. Ji, and G. Liu. On the strong Markov property for stochastic differential equations driven by G-Brownian motion. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 131:417–453, 2021

  51. [51]

    Hu and S

    M. Hu and S. Peng. G-Lévy processes under sublinear expectations. Probab. Uncertain. Quant. Risk, 6(1):1–22, 2021

  52. [52]

    Hu and S

    Y. Hu and S. Peng. A stability theorem of backward stocha stic differential equations and its application. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. , 324(9):1059–1064, 1997

  53. [53]

    E. R. Jakobsen, A. Picarelli, and C. Reisinger. Improve d order 1/4 convergence for piecewise con- stant policy approximation of stochastic control problems . Electron. Commun. Probab. , 24:Paper No. 59, 10, 2019

  54. [54]

    Kazi-Tani, D

    N. Kazi-Tani, D. Possamaï, and C. Zhou. Second order BSD Es with jumps: existence and proba- bilistic representation for fully-nonlinear PIDEs. Electron. J. Probab. , 20:1–31, 2015

  55. [55]

    R. P. Kertz. Perturbed semigroup limit theorems with ap plications to discontinuous random evo- lutions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 199:29–53, 1974

  56. [56]

    R. P. Kertz. Limit theorems for semigroups with perturb ed generators, with applications to mul- tiscaled random evolutions. J. Functional Analysis , 27(2):215–233, 1978

  57. [57]

    R. C. Kraaij. Gamma convergence on path-spaces via conv ergence of viscosity solutions of Hamilton–Jacobi equations. Preprint arXiv: 1905.08785 , 2019

  58. [58]

    R. C. Kraaij. A general convergence result for viscosit y solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi equations and non-linear semigroups. J. Funct. Anal. , 282(5):Paper No. 109346, 55, 2022

  59. [59]

    T. Krak, J. De Bock, and A. Siebes. Imprecise continuous -time Markov chains. Internat. J. Approx. Reason., 88:452–528, 2017

  60. [60]

    N. V. Krylov. Approximating value functions for contro lled degenerate diffusion processes by using piece-wise constant policies. Electron. J. Probab. , 4:no. 2, 19, 1999

  61. [61]

    N. V. Krylov. On the rate of convergence of finite-differe nce approximations for Bellman’s equations with variable coefficients. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 117(1):1–16, 2000

  62. [62]

    N. V. Krylov. The rate of convergence of finite-differenc e approximations for Bellman equations with Lipschitz coefficients. Appl. Math. Optim. , 52(3):365–399, 2005

  63. [63]

    F. Kühn. Viscosity solutions to Hamilton-Jacobi-Bell man equations associated with sublinear Lévy(-type) processes. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. , 16(1):531–559, 2019

  64. [64]

    Kühnemund

    F. Kühnemund. A Hille-Yosida theorem for bi-continuou s semigroups. Semigroup Forum , 67(2):205–225, 2003. 52 STABILITY OF CONVEX MONOTONE SEMIGROUPS

  65. [65]

    M. Kunze. Continuity and equicontinuity of semigroups on norming dual pairs. Semigroup Forum, 79(3):540–560, 2009

  66. [66]

    T. G. Kurtz. A general theorem on the convergence of oper ator semigroups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 148:23–32, 1970

  67. [67]

    T. G. Kurtz. Convergence of sequences of semigroups of n onlinear operators with an application to gas kinetics. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 186:259–272 (1974), 1973

  68. [68]

    T. G. Kurtz. Semigroups of conditioned shifts and appro ximation of Markov processes. Ann. Probability, 3(4):618–642, 1975

  69. [69]

    Mohajerin Esfahani and D

    P. Mohajerin Esfahani and D. Kuhn. Data-driven distrib utionally robust optimization using the Wasserstein metric: performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Program., 171(1- 2, Ser. A):115–166, 2018

  70. [70]

    M. Nendel. Lower semicontinuity of monotone functiona ls in the mixed topology on Cb. Preprint arXiv:2210.09133, 2022

  71. [71]

    Nendel and M

    M. Nendel and M. Röckner. Upper envelopes of families of Feller semigroups and viscosity solutions to a class of nonlinear Cauchy problems. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization , 59(6):4400– 4428, 2021

  72. [72]

    Neufeld and M

    A. Neufeld and M. Nutz. Nonlinear Lévy processes and the ir characteristics. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 369(1):69–95, 2017

  73. [73]

    M. Nisio. On a non-linear semi-group attached to stocha stic optimal control. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., 12(2):513–537, 1976/77

  74. [74]

    Papapantoleon, D

    A. Papapantoleon, D. Possamaï, and A. Saplaouras. Stab ility of backward stochastic differential equations: the general Lipschitz case. Electron. J. Probab. , 28:Paper No. 51, 56, 2023

  75. [75]

    A. Pazy. Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations, volume 44 of Applied Mathematical Sciences . Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983

  76. [76]

    S. Peng. Multi-dimensional G-Brownian motion and related stochastic calculus under G- expectation. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 118(12):2223–2253, 2008

  77. [77]

    S. Peng. Nonlinear expectations and stochastic calculus under unce rtainty, volume 95 of Probabil- ity Theory and Stochastic Modelling . Springer, Berlin, 2019. With robust CLT and G-Brownian motion

  78. [78]

    L. Popovic. Large deviations of Markov chains with mult iple time-scales. Stochastic Process. Appl., 129(9):3319–3359, 2019

  79. [79]

    F. D. Sentilles. Bounded continuous functions on a comp letely regular space. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 168:311–336, 1972

  80. [80]

    H. M. Soner, N. Touzi, and J. Zhang. Wellposedness of sec ond order backward SDEs. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 153(1-2):149–190, 2012

Showing first 80 references.