pith. sign in

arxiv: 2306.03459 · v4 · submitted 2023-06-06 · 🧮 math.NT · math.CO

On the Frobenius Number and Genus of a Collection of Semigroups Generalizing Repunit Numerical Semigroups

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 08:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NT math.CO
keywords numerical semigroupsFrobenius numbergenusrepunit semigroupsMersenne semigroupsThabit semigroupsProth semigroupscoprime generators
0
0 comments X

The pith

For a parametrized family of generators generalizing repunits, closed formulas for the Frobenius number and genus hold once the first generator meets a lower bound involving the other parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper considers numerical semigroups generated by sequences A of the specific form (a, ba + d, b²a + ((b²-1)/(b-1))d, … , b^k a + ((b^k-1)/(b-1))d) where d may be negative. It derives explicit expressions for both the Frobenius number F(A), the largest integer outside the semigroup, and the genus g(A), the count of positive integers outside it, provided the generators are coprime and a satisfies a ≥ k-1 - (d-1)/(b-1). These expressions recover earlier results on repunit, Mersenne, and Thabit semigroups and give a partial answer to an open question on Proth semigroups.

Core claim

When A takes the stated geometric form in the parameters a, b, d, and k, the Frobenius number F(A) and genus g(A) admit closed formulas whenever the generators are relatively prime and the inequality a ≥ k-1 - (d-1)/(b-1) is satisfied.

What carries the argument

The specific generator sequence A = (a, ba + d, b²a + ((b²-1)/(b-1))d, … , b^k a + ((b^k-1)/(b-1))d), whose linear structure in powers of b permits direct counting of semigroup gaps.

If this is right

  • The formulas give immediate values of F(A) and g(A) for every member of the family that satisfies the bound.
  • Specialization to d=1 recovers and extends results on repunit semigroups.
  • The same formulas cover the Mersenne and Thabit cases as direct substitutions.
  • A portion of the open problem on Proth numerical semigroups receives an explicit solution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same parametrization technique could be tested on generators obeying other linear recurrences beyond powers of a fixed base b.
  • Allowing negative d suggests that similar closed forms might exist for semigroups whose generators straddle multiples of a modulus in both directions.
  • The bound on a may be sharp; testing the boundary case a exactly equal to the threshold could reveal whether the formulas remain valid or require adjustment.

Load-bearing premise

The generators must remain relatively prime and the first generator a must meet or exceed the bound k-1 minus (d-1) divided by (b-1).

What would settle it

Pick concrete integers a, b>1, d, k>1 satisfying the inequality and gcd condition, compute the actual Frobenius number by enumeration of the semigroup, and check whether it equals the paper's claimed formula.

read the original abstract

Let $A=(a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n)$ be a sequence of relative prime positive integers with $a_i\geq 2$. The Frobenius number $F(A)$ is the largest integer not belonging to the numerical semigroup $\langle A\rangle$ generated by $A$. The genus $g(A)$ is the number of positive integer elements not in $\langle A\rangle$. The Frobenius problem is to determine $F(A)$ and $g(A)$ for a given sequence $A$. In this paper, we study the Frobenius problem of $A=\left(a,h_1a+b_1d,h_2a+b_2d,\ldots,h_ka+b_kd\right)$ with some restrictions. An innovation is that $d$ can be a negative integer. In particular, when $A=\left(a,ba+d,b^2a+\frac{b^2-1}{b-1}d,\ldots,b^ka+\frac{b^k-1}{b-1}d\right)$, we obtain formulas for $F(A)$ and $g(A)$ when $a\geq k-1-\frac{d-1}{b-1}$. Our formulas simplify further for some special cases, such as Mersenne, Thabit, and repunit numerical semigroups. Finally, we partially solve an open problem for the Proth numerical semigroup.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims to study the Frobenius problem for sequences A=(a, h1 a + b1 d, …, hk a + bk d) with restrictions on the coefficients, allowing d to be negative. In particular, for the specific form A=(a, ba+d, b²a+((b²-1)/(b-1))d, …, b^k a + ((b^k-1)/(b-1))d) it obtains explicit formulas for the Frobenius number F(A) and genus g(A) whenever the generators are relatively prime and a ≥ k-1 - (d-1)/(b-1). The formulas are shown to simplify in special cases (Mersenne, Thabit, repunit) and the work partially resolves an open question on the Proth numerical semigroup.

Significance. If the claimed closed forms are rigorously derived and hold under the stated restrictions, the results would constitute a concrete advance in the Frobenius problem by supplying explicit, computable expressions for an infinite parameterized family that properly generalizes repunit semigroups. The extension to negative d and the partial resolution of the Proth case are additional points of interest.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and main claims: the manuscript asserts that formulas for F(A) and g(A) are obtained under the listed restrictions, yet the provided text contains no derivation steps, intermediate lemmas, error bounds, or concrete verification examples that would allow independent checking of the algebraic manipulations. This absence is load-bearing for the central claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying the need for greater transparency in the derivations. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and main claims: the manuscript asserts that formulas for F(A) and g(A) are obtained under the listed restrictions, yet the provided text contains no derivation steps, intermediate lemmas, error bounds, or concrete verification examples that would allow independent checking of the algebraic manipulations. This absence is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript version presents the closed-form expressions for F(A) and g(A) with insufficient intermediate steps visible to the reader. While the proofs exist in outline form within the body, they lack the expanded lemmas, explicit algebraic manipulations, error bounds, and numerical verification examples needed for independent checking. We will revise the manuscript by inserting a dedicated section with these details, including step-by-step derivations of the formulas under the stated condition a ≥ k-1 - (d-1)/(b-1), together with concrete examples for the Mersenne, Thabit, and repunit cases. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper derives explicit formulas for F(A) and g(A) directly from the arithmetic structure of the given generators A = (a, ba + d, b²a + ((b²-1)/(b-1))d, …) under the stated inequality a ≥ k-1 - (d-1)/(b-1) and coprimality. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported via self-citation, and the boundary condition is presented as an explicit restriction rather than derived from the result itself. The derivation is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on the standard definition of numerical semigroups generated by relatively prime integers; no new free parameters are introduced beyond the input sequence A, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A consists of relatively prime positive integers each at least 2, so that the generated semigroup is cofinite.
    Invoked in the opening paragraph to guarantee that F(A) and g(A) are finite.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5801 in / 1466 out tokens · 26693 ms · 2026-05-24T08:52:02.323817+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Adamaszek and M

    A. Adamaszek and M. Adamaszek, Combinatorics of the change-making problem , European. J. Comb. 31 (2010), 47–63

  2. [2]

    A. Assi, M. D’Anna, and P. A. Garc´ ıa-S´ anchez,Numerical Semigroups and Applications, Second Edition. Vol.3, RSMS Springer, Cham (2020)

  3. [3]

    M. B. Branco, I. Colaco, and I. Ojeda, The Frobenius problem for generalized repunit numerical semigroups, Mediterr. J. Math. 20 (2023), Article 16

  4. [4]

    Brauer, On a problem of partitions , Amer

    A. Brauer, On a problem of partitions , Amer. J. Math. 64 (1942), 299–312

  5. [5]

    Brauer and J

    A. Brauer and J. E. Shockley, On a problem of Frobenius , J. Reine Angew. Math. 211 (1962), 215–220

  6. [6]

    L. J. Cowen, R. Cowen, and A. Steinberg, Totally greedy coin sets and greedy obstructions , Electron. J. Comb. 15 (2008), #R90

  7. [7]

    Curtis, On formulas for the Frobenius number of a numerical semigroup , Math

    F. Curtis, On formulas for the Frobenius number of a numerical semigroup , Math. Scand. 67 (1990), 190–192. 22 FEIHU LIU 1, GUOCE XIN 2,∗, SUTING YE 3 AND JINGJING YIN 4

  8. [8]

    numericalsgps

    M. Delgado, P. A. Garc´ ıa-S´ anchez, and J. Morais, “numericalsgps”: a gap package on numerical semigroups , Version 1.2.0 dev (2019), (Refereed GAP package), http://gap- packages.github.io/numericalsgps

  9. [9]

    Gu and X

    Z. Gu and X. Tang, The Frobenius problem for a class of numerical semigroups , Int. J. Number Theory. 13 (2017), 1335–1347

  10. [10]

    Gu, On the numerical semigroup generated by {bn+1+i + bn+i−1 b−1 | i ∈ N}, Discrete Math

    Z. Gu, On the numerical semigroup generated by {bn+1+i + bn+i−1 b−1 | i ∈ N}, Discrete Math. Appl. 30(4) (2020), 257–264

  11. [11]

    T. C. Hu and M. L. Lenard, Optimality of a Heuristic solution for a class of Knapsack problems , Operations Research. 24(1) (1976), 193–196

  12. [12]

    Lepilov, J

    M. Lepilov, J. O’Rourke, and I. Swanson, Frobenius numbers of numerical semigroups generated by three consecutive squares or cubes , Semigroup Forum. 91 (2015), 238–259

  13. [13]

    On Frobenius Numbers of Shifted Power Sequences

    F. Liu and G. Xin, On Frobenius formulas of power sequences , arXiv:2210.02722, (2022)

  14. [14]

    Liu and G

    F. Liu and G. Xin, A combinatorial approach to Frobenius numbers of some special sequences , Adv. Appl. Math. 158 (2024), 102719

  15. [15]

    F. Liu, G. Xin, S. Ye, and J. Yin, A note on generalized repunit numerical semigroups , arXiv:2306.10738. (2023)

  16. [16]

    M. J. Magazine, G. L. Nemhauser, and L. E. Trotter Jr, When the greedy solution solves a class of Knapsack problems , Operations Research. 23(2) (1975), 207–217

  17. [17]

    J. M. Mar´ ın, J. L. Ram´ ırez Alfons´ ın, and M. P. Revuelta,On the Frobenius number of Fibonacci numerical semigroups, Integers. 7 (2007), A14

  18. [18]

    D. C. Ong and V. Ponomarenko, The Frobenius number of geometric sequences , Integers. 8 (2008), A33

  19. [19]

    J. L. Ram´ ırez Alfons´ ın,The Diophantine Frobenius Problem , Oxford Lecture Series in Mathe- matics and Its Applications, vol. 30, Oxford University Press. (2005)

  20. [20]

    J. B. Roberts, Note on linear forms , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (1956), 465–469

  21. [21]

    A. M. Robles-P´ erez and J. C. Rosales, The Frobenius number for sequences of triangular and tetrahedral numbers, J. Number Theory. 186 (2018), 473–492

  22. [22]

    ¨O. J. R¨ odseth,On a linear diophantine problem of Frobenius II , J. Reine Angew Math. 307/308 (1979), 431–440

  23. [23]

    J. C. Rosales and M. B. Branco, Numerical semigroups that can be expressed as an intersection of symmetric numerical semigroups , J. Pure Appl. Algebra. 171 (2002), 303–314

  24. [24]

    J. C. Rosales, M. B. Branco, and D. Torr˜ ao, The Frobenius problem for Thabit numerical semi- groups, J. Number Theory. 155 (2015), 85–99

  25. [25]

    J. C. Rosales, M. B. Branco, and D. Torr˜ ao,The Frobenius problem for repunit numerical semi- groups, Ramanujan J. 40 (2016), 323–334

  26. [26]

    J. C. Rosales, M. B. Branco, and D. Torr˜ ao, The Frobenius problem for Mersenne numerical semigroups, Math. Z. 286 (2017), 1–9

  27. [27]

    J. C. Rosales and P. A. Garc´ ıa-S´ anchez,Numerical Semigroups, Developments in Mathematics. Vol.20, Springer, New York (2009)

  28. [28]

    E. S. Selmer, On the linear Diophantine problem of Frobenius , J. Reine Angew. Math. 293/294 (1977), 1–17

  29. [29]

    Korean Math

    Kyunghwan Song, The Frobenius problem for numerical semigroups generated by the Thabit numbers of the first, second kind base b and the Cunningham numbers , Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 57 (2020), 623–647

  30. [30]

    21 (2021), A17

    Kyunghwan Song, The Frobenius problem for extended Thabit numerical semigroups , Integers. 21 (2021), A17

  31. [31]

    Srivastava and D

    P. Srivastava and D. Thakkar, The Frobenius problem for the Proth numbers , Algorithms and Discrete Applied Mathematics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 14508. Springer, Cham. (2024). FROBENIUS NUMBER AND GENUS 23

  32. [32]

    J. J. Sylvester, On sub-invariants, i.e., semi-invariants to binary quantities of an unlimited order , Amer. J. Math. 5 (1882), 119–136

  33. [33]

    Tripathi, On the Frobenius problem for {a, ha+ d, ha+ bd, ha+ b2d,

    A. Tripathi, On the Frobenius problem for {a, ha+ d, ha+ bd, ha+ b2d, . . . , ha+ bkd}, J. Number Theory. 162 (2016), 212–223

  34. [34]

    Tripathi, Formulate for the Frobenius number in three variables , J

    A. Tripathi, Formulate for the Frobenius number in three variables , J. Number Theory. 170 (2017), 368–389

  35. [35]

    Ugolini, On numerical semigroups closed with respect to the action of affine maps, Publ

    S. Ugolini, On numerical semigroups closed with respect to the action of affine maps, Publ. Math. Debrecen. 90 (2017), 149–167. 1,2,3,4School of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, PR China Email address : 1liufeihu7476@163.com & 2guoce xin@163.com & 3yesuting0203@163.com & 4yinjingj@163.com