Inert shell coating for enhanced laser refrigeration of nanoparticles: application in levitated optomechanics

Cyril Laplane; Peng Ren; Reece P. Roberts; Thomas Volz; Yiqing Lu

arxiv: 2307.02240 · v2 · submitted 2023-07-05 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.mes-hall· quant-ph

Inert shell coating for enhanced laser refrigeration of nanoparticles: application in levitated optomechanics

Cyril Laplane , Peng Ren , Reece P. Roberts , Yiqing Lu , Thomas Volz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 08:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph

keywords laser refrigerationcore-shell nanoparticleslevitated optomechanicslanthanide-doped nanocrystalsoptical levitationnanoparticle coolingunderdamped regime

0 comments

The pith

Core-shell nanoparticles with an inert shell coating achieve better laser refrigeration than bare nanocrystals in levitated setups.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether adding an inert shell to lanthanide-doped nanocrystals can improve their ability to be refrigerated by laser light when optically levitated. A sympathetic reader would care because lower temperatures in such systems could enable new experiments in force sensing and testing quantum mechanics with larger objects. The study compares the performance of coated and uncoated particles across different pressures and finds that the coated ones perform better overall. Specifically, a significant fraction of the core-shell particles cool noticeably while almost none of the bare ones do, with one reaching 147 K.

Core claim

The core-shell design shows an improvement in the minimum final temperature: a fourth of the core-shell nanoparticles showed a significant cooling compared to almost none of the bare nanoparticles. Furthermore, we measured a core-shell nanoparticle cooling down to a temperature of 147 K at 26 mbar in the underdamped regime. This is presented as a first step towards engineering nanoparticles suitable for achieving absolute cooling in levitation.

What carries the argument

The inert shell coating on lanthanide-doped nanocrystals, which is intended to enhance laser refrigeration efficiency in optical levitation.

Load-bearing premise

The observed difference in cooling performance between the two types of nanoparticles is due to the inert shell coating and not to variations in particle size, doping, or surface properties.

What would settle it

If future experiments with matched particle batches show no improvement in cooling for core-shell over bare nanoparticles, the benefit of the shell would be called into question.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2307.02240 by Cyril Laplane, Peng Ren, Reece P. Roberts, Thomas Volz, Yiqing Lu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Photoluminescence spectra of a core-shell levitated particle at two different pressure. We estimate the temperature at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Temperature dependence with pressure for different designs of nanocrystals. The different colours denote different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. PL spectra of a core nanoparticle at 6.5K. The purple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. TEM of both nanocrystals. a) core and b) core-shell. Scale bar is 200 nm. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We report on a study exploring the design of nanoparticles that can enhance their laser refrigeration efficiency for applications in levitated optomechanics. In particular, we developed lanthanide-doped nanocrystals with an inert shell coating and compared their performance with bare nanocrystals. While optically levitated, we studied the refrigeration of both types of nanoparticles while varying the pressure. We found that the core-shell design shows an improvement in the minimum final temperature: a fourth of the core-shell nanoparticles showed a significant cooling compared to almost none of the bare nanoparticles. Furthermore, we measured a core-shell nanoparticle cooling down to a temperature of 147 K at 26 mbar in the underdamped regime. Our study is a first step towards engineering nanoparticles that are suitable for achieving absolute (centre-of-mass and internal temperature) cooling in levitation, opening new avenues for force sensing and the realization of macroscopic quantum superpositions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Core-shell particles appear to cool better than bare ones in levitation, but the comparison doesn't rule out batch differences in the cores.

read the letter

The main thing here is that the authors coated lanthanide-doped nanocrystals with an inert shell and saw better laser refrigeration when optically levitated compared to bare particles. One core-shell particle got down to 147 K at 26 mbar, and about a quarter of them showed significant cooling while almost none of the bare ones did. This is new in the sense that it takes the core-shell architecture, which has been used elsewhere, and tests it specifically for levitated optomechanics in the underdamped regime. The paper does a decent job of showing the practical outcome for this application, with the temperature and pressure numbers. The soft spot is the comparison itself. The stress-test note points out that the batches aren't shown to be matched on size, doping concentration, or surface properties. If those varied between the core-shell and bare samples, that could explain the difference without the shell doing anything. The abstract doesn't mention any such controls or characterizations, so the claim that the shell is what improves things rests on an assumption that may not hold. Also, no error bars, sample sizes, or statistical details are given, which makes it hard to assess how solid the 'fourth vs almost none' split really is. The work is aimed at people working on levitated nanoparticles for sensing or quantum experiments who want lower temperatures. A reader in that area might get some ideas from the design, but would need the full methods to try reproducing it. Overall, the paper shows clear thinking on the materials side but the experimental comparison has a load-bearing weakness in the controls. I would send it to peer review so referees can ask for the missing characterization data and stats, rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the development and experimental testing of lanthanide-doped nanocrystals with an inert shell coating for laser refrigeration in optically levitated optomechanics. It compares their performance to bare nanocrystals, claiming that the core-shell design yields an improvement: roughly one-quarter of core-shell particles exhibit significant cooling versus almost none of the bare particles, with one core-shell particle reaching a temperature of 147 K at 26 mbar in the underdamped regime. The work positions this as a step toward absolute cooling of levitated particles.

Significance. If the central experimental comparison holds after addressing controls and statistics, the result would be moderately significant for the field of levitated optomechanics. It provides an initial demonstration that shell coatings can enhance refrigeration efficiency, potentially enabling applications in force sensing and macroscopic quantum superpositions by achieving lower internal temperatures. The specific temperature of 147 K is a concrete benchmark, though the absence of matched controls limits immediate impact.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and results paragraph on comparison] Abstract and results paragraph on comparison: the headline claim that the core-shell design improves cooling (1/4 of core-shell particles cool significantly vs. almost none of the bare particles) rests on an uncontrolled batch comparison. No data are provided on matched size distributions, doping concentrations, or surface termination between the two sample batches, so the observed difference could arise from uncontrolled variations in core properties rather than the inert shell.
[Abstract] Abstract: the comparative cooling statistics and the specific 147 K temperature are reported without error bars, sample sizes, number of particles tested, or any statistical tests/controls for confounding variables. This absence directly undermines the reliability of the performance improvement claim and the minimum-temperature result.

minor comments (1)

The methods and data availability sections should be expanded to include full details on particle characterization (e.g., TEM size histograms, doping quantification) and raw cooling trajectories so that the comparison can be independently verified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important issues regarding experimental controls and statistical reporting that we will address through revisions. Below we respond point-by-point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and results paragraph on comparison] Abstract and results paragraph on comparison: the headline claim that the core-shell design improves cooling (1/4 of core-shell particles cool significantly vs. almost none of the bare particles) rests on an uncontrolled batch comparison. No data are provided on matched size distributions, doping concentrations, or surface termination between the two sample batches, so the observed difference could arise from uncontrolled variations in core properties rather than the inert shell.

Authors: We agree that a direct batch comparison without matched characterization leaves open the possibility that differences in core properties contribute to the observed cooling statistics. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated characterization section (or expanded supplementary information) reporting TEM size distributions, estimated doping levels (via synthesis parameters and any available elemental analysis), and surface termination details for both the bare and core-shell batches. We will explicitly discuss any measured differences and provide a quantitative argument, based on the inert-shell design principle, for why the shell coating remains the dominant factor. If the new data reveal significant mismatches, we will qualify the claim accordingly. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the comparative cooling statistics and the specific 147 K temperature are reported without error bars, sample sizes, number of particles tested, or any statistical tests/controls for confounding variables. This absence directly undermines the reliability of the performance improvement claim and the minimum-temperature result.

Authors: We accept that the abstract and main text must include these quantitative details. The revised version will report the total number of particles tested for each type, the fraction that exhibited significant cooling together with binomial confidence intervals or standard errors, and the measurement uncertainty on the 147 K value (derived from the calibration and fitting procedure). We will also add a brief description of the criteria used to classify “significant cooling” and any controls applied for pressure, laser power, and particle size. These additions will be placed in both the abstract (concise form) and the results section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental comparison of particle batches

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of laser refrigeration in levitated nanoparticles, comparing core-shell vs bare samples. No equations, derivations, or fitted parameters are presented that reduce a claimed prediction or result to the same data by construction. The central claims (fraction of particles showing cooling, minimum temperature of 147 K) are observational outcomes from pressure-dependent levitation experiments, not outputs of a self-referential model. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for any derivation chain. This is a standard experimental report with no mathematical circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental comparison study; no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented entities are introduced or required by the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5700 in / 1101 out tokens · 47964 ms · 2026-05-24T08:06:35.354811+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

in the trap which could affect its gas thermalization rate [27]. B. Thermometry From the photoluminescence (PL) spectra we choose to evaluate the temperature of the NC through ratiometric thermometry [14, 17, 28]. The ratio of PL intensities at two different wavelengths depends on the difference in populations between the energy levels involved. We can th...

work page
[2]

Gonzalez-Ballestero, M

C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, M. Aspelmeyer, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, and O. Romero-Isart, Levitodynamics: Lev- itation and control of microscopic objects in vacuum, Sci- ence 374, eabg3027 (2021)

work page 2021
[3]

Arita, S

Y. Arita, S. H. Simpson, P. Zem´ anek, and K. Dholakia, Coherent oscillations of a levitated birefringent micro- sphere in vacuum driven by nonconservative rotation- translation coupling, Science Advances 6, 1 (2020)

work page 2020
[4]

Pontin, N

A. Pontin, N. P. Bullier, M. Toroˇ s, and P. F. Barker, An ultra-narrow line width levitated nano-oscillator for test- ing dissipative wavefunction collapse, Physical Review Research 023349, 1 (2019)

work page 2019
[5]

Piotrowski, D

J. Piotrowski, D. Windey, J. Vijayan, C. Gonzalez- Ballestero, A. de los R´ ıos Sommer, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, O. Romero-Isart, R. Reimann, and L. Novotny, Simulta- neous ground-state cooling of two mechanical modes of a levitated nanoparticle, Nat. Phys. , 1 (2023), publisher: 6 Nature Publishing Group

work page 2023
[6]

Tebbenjohanns, M

F. Tebbenjohanns, M. L. Mattana, M. Rossi, M. Frim- mer, and L. Novotny, Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space, Nature 595, 378 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

Magrini, P

L. Magrini, P. Rosenzweig, C. Bach, A. Deutschmann- Olek, S. G. Hofer, S. Hong, N. Kiesel, A. Kugi, and M. Aspelmeyer, Real-time optimal quantum control of mechanical motion at room temperature, Nature 595, 373 (2021)

work page 2021
[8]

Ranfagni, P

A. Ranfagni, P. Vezio, M. Calamai, A. Chowdhury, F. Marino, and F. Marin, Vectorial polaritons in the quantum motion of a levitated nanosphere, Na- ture Physics 10.1038/s41567-021-01307-y (2021), arXiv: 2012.15265 Publisher: Springer US

work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01307-y 2021
[9]

Near-field interferometry of a free-falling nanoparticle from a point-like source

J. Bateman, S. Nimmrichter, K. Hornberger, and H. Ul- bricht, Near-field interferometry of a free-falling nanopar- ticle from a point-like source, Nature Communications 5, 1 (2014), arXiv: 1312.0500 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[10]

D. E. Chang, C. A. Regal, S. B. Papp, D. J. Wilson, J. Ye, O. Painter, H. J. Kimble, and P. Zoller, Cavity opto-mechanics using an optically levitated nanosphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 1005 (2010)

work page 2010
[11]

C. Wan, M. Scala, G. W. Morley, A. A. T. M. Rahman, H. Ulbricht, J. Bateman, P. F. Barker, S. Bose, and M. S. Kim, Free Nano-Object Ramsey Interferometry for Large Quantum Superpositions, Physical Review Letters 117, 1 (2016), arXiv: 1511.02738

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[12]

S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroˇ s, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. Kim, and G. Milburn, Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240401 (2017), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2017
[13]

A. C. Frangeskou, A. T. M. A. Rahman, L. Gines, S. Mandal, O. A. Williams, P. F. Barker, and G. W. Morley, Pure nanodiamonds for levitated optomechanics in vacuum, New J. Phys. 20, 043016 (2018), publisher: IOP Publishing

work page 2018
[14]

Nanoscale temperature measurements using non-equilibrium Brownian dynamics of a levitated nanosphere

J. Millen, T. Deesuwan, P. F. Barker, and J. An- ders, Nanoscale temperature measurements using non-equilibrium Brownian dynamics of a levitated nanosphere, Nature Nanotechnology 9, 425 (2014), arXiv: 1309.3990 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group ISBN: doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.82

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.82 2014
[15]

A. A. T. M. Rahman and P. F. Barker, A laser cooled nanocryostat: Refrigeration, alignment and rotation of levitated Yb$ˆ{+3}$:YLF nanocrystals, Nature Photon- ics 11, 1 (2017), arXiv: 1703.07155 Publisher: Springer US

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[16]

G. P. Conangla, R. A. Rica, and R. Quidant, Extend- ing Vacuum Trapping to Absorbing Objects with Hybrid Paul-Optical Traps, Nano Lett. 20, 6018 (2020)

work page 2020
[17]

S. D. Melgaard, A. R. Albrecht, M. P. Hehlen, and M. Sheik-Bahae, Solid-state optical refrigeration to sub- 100 Kelvin regime., Scientific reports 6, 20380 (2016), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2016
[18]

P. B. Roder, B. E. Smith, X. Zhou, M. J. Crane, and P. J. Pauzauskie, Laser refrigeration of hy- drothermal nanocrystals in physiological media - Sup- plementary Information, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 15024 (2015), iSBN: 1091-6490 (Electronic)\r0027-8424 (Linking)

work page 2015
[19]

X. Zhou, B. E. Smith, P. B. Roder, and P. J. Pauzauskie, Laser Refrigeration of Ytterbium-Doped Sodium–Yttrium–Fluoride Nanowires - Supplementary Information, Advanced Materials 28, 8658 (2016), iSBN: 0935-9648

work page 2016
[20]

Ortiz-Rivero, K

E. Ortiz-Rivero, K. Prorok, I. R. Mart´ ın, R. Lisiecki, P. Haro-Gonz´ alez, A. Bednarkiewicz, and D. Jaque, Laser Refrigeration by an Ytterbium-Doped NaYF4 Microspin- ner, Small 17, 10.1002/smll.202103122 (2021)

work page doi:10.1002/smll.202103122 2021
[21]

D. R. Luntz-Martin, R. G. Felsted, S. Dadras, P. J. Pauzauskie, and A. N. Vamivakas, Laser refrigeration of optically levitated sodium yttrium fluoride nanocrystals, Optics Letters 46, 3797 (2021)

work page 2021
[22]

B. d. Rosal and D. Jaque, Upconversion nanoparticles for in vivo applications: limitations and future perspec- tives, Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 7, 022001 (2019), pub- lisher: IOP Publishing

work page 2019
[23]

Vovrosh, M

J. Vovrosh, M. Rashid, D. Hempston, J. Bateman, M. Pa- ternostro, and H. Ulbricht, Parametric feedback cooling of levitated optomechanics in a parabolic mirror trap, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 34, 1421 (2017)

work page 2017
[24]

Rashid, M

M. Rashid, M. Toroˇ s, and H. Ulbricht, Wigner Function Reconstruction in Levitated Optomechanics, Quantum Meas. Quantum Metrol. , 17 (2017)

work page 2017
[25]

I. C. D. Lenton, T. A. Nieminen, V. L. Y. Loke, A. B. Stil- goe, Y. Hu, G. Kn¨ oner, A. M. Bra´ nczyk, N. R. Hecken- berg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Optical tweezers tool- box, https://github.com/ilent2/ott (2020)

work page 2020
[26]

Rademacher, J

M. Rademacher, J. Gosling, A. Pontin, M. Toroˇ s, J. T. Mulder, A. J. Houtepen, and P. F. Barker, Measurement of single nanoparticle anisotropy by laser induced optical alignment and Rayleigh scattering for determining par- ticle morphology, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 221102 (2022), publisher: American Institute of Physics

work page 2022
[27]

Rashid, M

M. Rashid, M. Toroˇ s, A. Setter, and H. Ulbricht, Preces- sion Motion in Levitated Optomechanics, Physical Re- view Letters 121, 1 (2018)

work page 2018
[28]

Millen and J

J. Millen and J. Gieseler, Single Particle Thermodynam- ics with Levitated Nanoparticles , Vol. 195 (Springer In- ternational Publishing, 2018) arXiv: 2007.08632 Pub- lication Title: Fundamental Theories of Physics ISSN: 23656425

work page arXiv 2018
[29]

W. M. Patterson, D. V. Seletskiy, R. I. Epstein, and M. P. Hehlen, Measurement of solid-state optical refrig- eration by two-band differential luminescence thermome- try, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 27, 611 (2010)

work page 2010
[30]

L. M. Wiesholler, F. Frenzel, B. Grauel, C. W¨ urth, U. Resch-Genger, and T. Hirsch, Yb,Nd,Er-doped upcon- version nanoparticles: 980 nm versus 808 nm excitation, Nanoscale 11, 13440 (2019), publisher: The Royal Soci- ety of Chemistry

work page 2019
[31]

P. Ren, X. Zheng, J. Zhang, S. D. Camillis, J. Jia, H. Wang, X. Liao, J. A. Piper, and Y. Lu, Quantify- ing the Influence of Inert Shell Coating on Luminescence Brightness of Lanthanide Upconversion Nanoparticles, ACS Photonics 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01695 (2021)

work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01695 2021
[32]

J. T. Mulder, M. S. Meijer, J. J. van Blaaderen, I. du Foss´ e, K. Jenkinson, S. Bals, L. Manna, and A. J. Houtepen, Understanding and Preventing Photolumines- cence Quenching to Achieve Unity Photoluminescence Quantum Yield in Yb:YLF Nanocrystals, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10.1021/acsami.2c17888 (2023), pub- 7 lisher: American Chemical Society

work page doi:10.1021/acsami.2c17888 2023
[33]

W. Jin, C. Guo, M. Orenstein, and S. Fan, Adap- tive four-level modeling of laser cooling of solids, Applied Physics Letters 119, 10.1063/5.0070422 (2021), 181107, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0070422/13761507/181107 1 online.pdf

work page doi:10.1063/5.0070422 2021
[34]

F. Liu, K. Daun, D. Snelling, and G. Smallwood, Heat conduction from a spherical nano-particle: status of mod- eling heat conduction in laser-induced incandescence, Appl. Phys. B 83, 355 (2006)

work page 2006
[35]

R. T. Brundage and W. M. Yen, Low-temperature ho- mogeneous linewidths of ${\mathrm{Yb}}ˆ{3+}$ in in- organic glasses, Phys. Rev. B 33, 4436 (1986), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 1986
[36]

G. Lei, J. E. Anderson, M. I. Buchwald, B. C. Edwards, and R. I. Epstein, Determination of spectral linewidths by Voigt profiles in ${\mathrm{Yb}}ˆ{3+}$-doped flu- orozirconate glasses, Phys. Rev. B 57, 7673 (1998), pub- lisher: American Physical Society. APPENDICES A. Thermodynamics Here are the value used for the simulated thermody- namic performance (s...

work page 1998

[1] [1]

in the trap which could affect its gas thermalization rate [27]. B. Thermometry From the photoluminescence (PL) spectra we choose to evaluate the temperature of the NC through ratiometric thermometry [14, 17, 28]. The ratio of PL intensities at two different wavelengths depends on the difference in populations between the energy levels involved. We can th...

work page

[2] [2]

Gonzalez-Ballestero, M

C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, M. Aspelmeyer, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, and O. Romero-Isart, Levitodynamics: Lev- itation and control of microscopic objects in vacuum, Sci- ence 374, eabg3027 (2021)

work page 2021

[3] [3]

Arita, S

Y. Arita, S. H. Simpson, P. Zem´ anek, and K. Dholakia, Coherent oscillations of a levitated birefringent micro- sphere in vacuum driven by nonconservative rotation- translation coupling, Science Advances 6, 1 (2020)

work page 2020

[4] [4]

Pontin, N

A. Pontin, N. P. Bullier, M. Toroˇ s, and P. F. Barker, An ultra-narrow line width levitated nano-oscillator for test- ing dissipative wavefunction collapse, Physical Review Research 023349, 1 (2019)

work page 2019

[5] [5]

Piotrowski, D

J. Piotrowski, D. Windey, J. Vijayan, C. Gonzalez- Ballestero, A. de los R´ ıos Sommer, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, O. Romero-Isart, R. Reimann, and L. Novotny, Simulta- neous ground-state cooling of two mechanical modes of a levitated nanoparticle, Nat. Phys. , 1 (2023), publisher: 6 Nature Publishing Group

work page 2023

[6] [6]

Tebbenjohanns, M

F. Tebbenjohanns, M. L. Mattana, M. Rossi, M. Frim- mer, and L. Novotny, Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space, Nature 595, 378 (2021)

work page 2021

[7] [7]

Magrini, P

L. Magrini, P. Rosenzweig, C. Bach, A. Deutschmann- Olek, S. G. Hofer, S. Hong, N. Kiesel, A. Kugi, and M. Aspelmeyer, Real-time optimal quantum control of mechanical motion at room temperature, Nature 595, 373 (2021)

work page 2021

[8] [8]

Ranfagni, P

A. Ranfagni, P. Vezio, M. Calamai, A. Chowdhury, F. Marino, and F. Marin, Vectorial polaritons in the quantum motion of a levitated nanosphere, Na- ture Physics 10.1038/s41567-021-01307-y (2021), arXiv: 2012.15265 Publisher: Springer US

work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01307-y 2021

[9] [9]

Near-field interferometry of a free-falling nanoparticle from a point-like source

J. Bateman, S. Nimmrichter, K. Hornberger, and H. Ul- bricht, Near-field interferometry of a free-falling nanopar- ticle from a point-like source, Nature Communications 5, 1 (2014), arXiv: 1312.0500 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[10] [10]

D. E. Chang, C. A. Regal, S. B. Papp, D. J. Wilson, J. Ye, O. Painter, H. J. Kimble, and P. Zoller, Cavity opto-mechanics using an optically levitated nanosphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 1005 (2010)

work page 2010

[11] [11]

C. Wan, M. Scala, G. W. Morley, A. A. T. M. Rahman, H. Ulbricht, J. Bateman, P. F. Barker, S. Bose, and M. S. Kim, Free Nano-Object Ramsey Interferometry for Large Quantum Superpositions, Physical Review Letters 117, 1 (2016), arXiv: 1511.02738

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[12] [12]

S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroˇ s, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. Kim, and G. Milburn, Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240401 (2017), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2017

[13] [13]

A. C. Frangeskou, A. T. M. A. Rahman, L. Gines, S. Mandal, O. A. Williams, P. F. Barker, and G. W. Morley, Pure nanodiamonds for levitated optomechanics in vacuum, New J. Phys. 20, 043016 (2018), publisher: IOP Publishing

work page 2018

[14] [14]

Nanoscale temperature measurements using non-equilibrium Brownian dynamics of a levitated nanosphere

J. Millen, T. Deesuwan, P. F. Barker, and J. An- ders, Nanoscale temperature measurements using non-equilibrium Brownian dynamics of a levitated nanosphere, Nature Nanotechnology 9, 425 (2014), arXiv: 1309.3990 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group ISBN: doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.82

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.82 2014

[15] [15]

A. A. T. M. Rahman and P. F. Barker, A laser cooled nanocryostat: Refrigeration, alignment and rotation of levitated Yb$ˆ{+3}$:YLF nanocrystals, Nature Photon- ics 11, 1 (2017), arXiv: 1703.07155 Publisher: Springer US

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[16] [16]

G. P. Conangla, R. A. Rica, and R. Quidant, Extend- ing Vacuum Trapping to Absorbing Objects with Hybrid Paul-Optical Traps, Nano Lett. 20, 6018 (2020)

work page 2020

[17] [17]

S. D. Melgaard, A. R. Albrecht, M. P. Hehlen, and M. Sheik-Bahae, Solid-state optical refrigeration to sub- 100 Kelvin regime., Scientific reports 6, 20380 (2016), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2016

[18] [18]

P. B. Roder, B. E. Smith, X. Zhou, M. J. Crane, and P. J. Pauzauskie, Laser refrigeration of hy- drothermal nanocrystals in physiological media - Sup- plementary Information, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 15024 (2015), iSBN: 1091-6490 (Electronic)\r0027-8424 (Linking)

work page 2015

[19] [19]

X. Zhou, B. E. Smith, P. B. Roder, and P. J. Pauzauskie, Laser Refrigeration of Ytterbium-Doped Sodium–Yttrium–Fluoride Nanowires - Supplementary Information, Advanced Materials 28, 8658 (2016), iSBN: 0935-9648

work page 2016

[20] [20]

Ortiz-Rivero, K

E. Ortiz-Rivero, K. Prorok, I. R. Mart´ ın, R. Lisiecki, P. Haro-Gonz´ alez, A. Bednarkiewicz, and D. Jaque, Laser Refrigeration by an Ytterbium-Doped NaYF4 Microspin- ner, Small 17, 10.1002/smll.202103122 (2021)

work page doi:10.1002/smll.202103122 2021

[21] [21]

D. R. Luntz-Martin, R. G. Felsted, S. Dadras, P. J. Pauzauskie, and A. N. Vamivakas, Laser refrigeration of optically levitated sodium yttrium fluoride nanocrystals, Optics Letters 46, 3797 (2021)

work page 2021

[22] [22]

B. d. Rosal and D. Jaque, Upconversion nanoparticles for in vivo applications: limitations and future perspec- tives, Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 7, 022001 (2019), pub- lisher: IOP Publishing

work page 2019

[23] [23]

Vovrosh, M

J. Vovrosh, M. Rashid, D. Hempston, J. Bateman, M. Pa- ternostro, and H. Ulbricht, Parametric feedback cooling of levitated optomechanics in a parabolic mirror trap, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 34, 1421 (2017)

work page 2017

[24] [24]

Rashid, M

M. Rashid, M. Toroˇ s, and H. Ulbricht, Wigner Function Reconstruction in Levitated Optomechanics, Quantum Meas. Quantum Metrol. , 17 (2017)

work page 2017

[25] [25]

I. C. D. Lenton, T. A. Nieminen, V. L. Y. Loke, A. B. Stil- goe, Y. Hu, G. Kn¨ oner, A. M. Bra´ nczyk, N. R. Hecken- berg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Optical tweezers tool- box, https://github.com/ilent2/ott (2020)

work page 2020

[26] [26]

Rademacher, J

M. Rademacher, J. Gosling, A. Pontin, M. Toroˇ s, J. T. Mulder, A. J. Houtepen, and P. F. Barker, Measurement of single nanoparticle anisotropy by laser induced optical alignment and Rayleigh scattering for determining par- ticle morphology, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 221102 (2022), publisher: American Institute of Physics

work page 2022

[27] [27]

Rashid, M

M. Rashid, M. Toroˇ s, A. Setter, and H. Ulbricht, Preces- sion Motion in Levitated Optomechanics, Physical Re- view Letters 121, 1 (2018)

work page 2018

[28] [28]

Millen and J

J. Millen and J. Gieseler, Single Particle Thermodynam- ics with Levitated Nanoparticles , Vol. 195 (Springer In- ternational Publishing, 2018) arXiv: 2007.08632 Pub- lication Title: Fundamental Theories of Physics ISSN: 23656425

work page arXiv 2018

[29] [29]

W. M. Patterson, D. V. Seletskiy, R. I. Epstein, and M. P. Hehlen, Measurement of solid-state optical refrig- eration by two-band differential luminescence thermome- try, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 27, 611 (2010)

work page 2010

[30] [30]

L. M. Wiesholler, F. Frenzel, B. Grauel, C. W¨ urth, U. Resch-Genger, and T. Hirsch, Yb,Nd,Er-doped upcon- version nanoparticles: 980 nm versus 808 nm excitation, Nanoscale 11, 13440 (2019), publisher: The Royal Soci- ety of Chemistry

work page 2019

[31] [31]

P. Ren, X. Zheng, J. Zhang, S. D. Camillis, J. Jia, H. Wang, X. Liao, J. A. Piper, and Y. Lu, Quantify- ing the Influence of Inert Shell Coating on Luminescence Brightness of Lanthanide Upconversion Nanoparticles, ACS Photonics 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01695 (2021)

work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01695 2021

[32] [32]

J. T. Mulder, M. S. Meijer, J. J. van Blaaderen, I. du Foss´ e, K. Jenkinson, S. Bals, L. Manna, and A. J. Houtepen, Understanding and Preventing Photolumines- cence Quenching to Achieve Unity Photoluminescence Quantum Yield in Yb:YLF Nanocrystals, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10.1021/acsami.2c17888 (2023), pub- 7 lisher: American Chemical Society

work page doi:10.1021/acsami.2c17888 2023

[33] [33]

W. Jin, C. Guo, M. Orenstein, and S. Fan, Adap- tive four-level modeling of laser cooling of solids, Applied Physics Letters 119, 10.1063/5.0070422 (2021), 181107, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0070422/13761507/181107 1 online.pdf

work page doi:10.1063/5.0070422 2021

[34] [34]

F. Liu, K. Daun, D. Snelling, and G. Smallwood, Heat conduction from a spherical nano-particle: status of mod- eling heat conduction in laser-induced incandescence, Appl. Phys. B 83, 355 (2006)

work page 2006

[35] [35]

R. T. Brundage and W. M. Yen, Low-temperature ho- mogeneous linewidths of ${\mathrm{Yb}}ˆ{3+}$ in in- organic glasses, Phys. Rev. B 33, 4436 (1986), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 1986

[36] [36]

G. Lei, J. E. Anderson, M. I. Buchwald, B. C. Edwards, and R. I. Epstein, Determination of spectral linewidths by Voigt profiles in ${\mathrm{Yb}}ˆ{3+}$-doped flu- orozirconate glasses, Phys. Rev. B 57, 7673 (1998), pub- lisher: American Physical Society. APPENDICES A. Thermodynamics Here are the value used for the simulated thermody- namic performance (s...

work page 1998