{"as_of":"2026-08-16T02:41:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:cbf85563aa5606082b892c9a53a201a350dc6496b61ce392cc5a8247a0648ba7","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T14:04:26.191704Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T18:16:15.004306Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2311.00681","last_updated":"2023-11-01T17:42:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:34:47.988524Z","submitted_at":"2023-11-01T17:42:45Z","title":"Are Large Language Models Reliable Judges? A Study on the Factuality Evaluation Capabilities of LLMs","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2311.00681","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.00681","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2311.00681","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T18:16:15.004306Z","title":"Are Large Language Models Reliable Judges? A Study on the Factuality Evaluation Capabilities of LLMs","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"cf4260fc-8c07-4f71-a0f2-e3c344e4dc30","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.12509","last_updated":"2025-02-18T15:24:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T09:16:39.557680Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-17T03:37:31Z","title":"Can You Trust LLM Judgments? Reliability of LLM-as-a-Judge","version":2},"reference_index":26,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T14:04:26.191704Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2311.00681","citing_paper":"/paper/2412.12509"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6ebfde77594c5ea3aa5982131afb067cb5f620cbe0413761a58f8c2ff0ef9298","observation_id":"87bf65d0-6130-4589-9d76-bef9543a5f93","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T14:04:27.283261Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2311.00681/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2311.00681/integrity","json":"/paper/2311.00681/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2311.00681"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2311.00681","last_updated":"2023-11-01T17:42:45Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:34:47.988524Z","submitted_at":"2023-11-01T17:42:45Z","title":"Are Large Language Models Reliable Judges? A Study on the Factuality Evaluation Capabilities of LLMs"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2311.00681."}