pith. sign in

arxiv: 2311.04206 · v2 · submitted 2023-11-07 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ph· nucl-th

Elastic and resonance structures of the nucleon from hadronic tensor in lattice QCD: implications for neutrino-nucleon scattering and hadron physics

Jian Liang , Raza Sabbir Sufian , Bigeng Wang , Terrence Draper , Tanjib Khan , Keh-Fei Liu , Yi-Bo Yang , Christian Zimmermann This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 05:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-phnucl-th
keywords lattice QCDhadronic tensornucleon form factorsRoper resonanceinclusive scatteringBayesian reconstructionneutrino-nucleon
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hadronic tensor from lattice four-point functions yields nucleon Sachs electric form factor and resonance structures

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper computes the Euclidean hadronic tensor from charge density operators on the lattice and analyzes four-point correlators with exponential fits plus Bayesian reconstruction to isolate elastic and resonance contributions. The elastic peak determines the nucleon's Sachs electric form factor, which matches results from the standard three-point function method. A structure 0.5-0.7 GeV above the nucleon mass appears in the spectral density and is interpreted as a mixture of the Roper resonance and other positive- and negative-parity states. Under the assumption that J^P=1/2± states dominate this structure, the transition electric form factor G_E^* and helicity amplitude S_{1/2} are extracted and compared with CLAS data. The same approach permits calculation of total inclusive lepton-nucleon scattering cross sections within chosen energy bins.

Core claim

The hadronic tensor is extracted from four-point functions built with charge density operators; exponential fits isolate the elastic contribution to give the Sachs electric form factor in agreement with conventional three-point results, while Bayesian reconstruction of the spectral density reveals an additional peak 0.5-0.7 GeV above the nucleon mass. Interpreting this peak as dominated by J^P=1/2± states allows extraction of the transition form factor G_E^*(Q^2) and the longitudinal helicity amplitude S_{1/2}(Q^2), which are compared with CLAS nucleon-to-Roper data; the method also supplies inclusive cross sections in energy bins without resolving individual resonances.

What carries the argument

Euclidean hadronic tensor from charge density operators, obtained via exponential fits to four-point correlators and Bayesian spectral-density reconstruction

If this is right

  • Sachs electric form factor from the hadronic tensor matches the conventional three-point result
  • Transition form factors G_E^* and S_{1/2} can be compared directly with CLAS experimental data
  • Total inclusive lepton-nucleon scattering cross sections become computable in chosen energy bins
  • The formalism provides a route to inclusive N to X contributions without isolating single resonances

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same tensor could be applied to neutrino-nucleon scattering cross sections at similar kinematics
  • Improved reconstruction algorithms might eventually separate individual resonance contributions
  • The method supplies a lattice bridge between elastic form factors and resonance production in the low-energy spectrum
  • Multi-hadron states in the same mass window could be quantified by varying the operator basis

Load-bearing premise

The structure 0.5-0.7 GeV above the nucleon mass is dominated by J^P=1/2± states rather than other resonances or multi-hadron contributions.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the extracted G_E^*(Q^2) and S_{1/2}(Q^2) differ substantially from CLAS values for the nucleon-to-Roper transition at the same Q^2 would falsify the dominance assumption.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2311.04206 by Bigeng Wang, Christian Zimmermann, Jian Liang, Keh-Fei Liu, Raza Sabbir Sufian, Tanjib Khan, Terrence Draper, Yi-Bo Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Topologically distinct diagrams in the Euclidean-path integral formulation of the nucleon hadronic tensor. The flavors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The spectral weights obtained from the 4pt/2pt ratio using the Bayesian Reconstruction method for up and down [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Investigation of excited-state contamination as a function of nucleon source to first current temporal separation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Extraction of spectral weights [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Examples of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Examples of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Determination of the nucleon Sachs electric form factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Determination of the nucleon to its finite-volume first radial excitation transition electric form factor in the momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Comparison of the longitudinal helicity amplitude, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We compute the Euclidean hadronic tensor from charge density operators and extract elastic and resonance structures by employing exponential fits to the four-point correlator, as well as a Bayesian reconstruction inverse algorithm to obtain the corresponding spectral density for qualitative comparison. We present the determination of the nucleon's Sachs electric form factor using the hadronic tensor formalism and verify that it is consistent with that from the conventional three-point function calculation. Beyond the elastic peak, we observe a structure located approximately $0.5-0.7$ GeV above the nucleon mass in the Bayesian reconstruction. The structure is interpreted as a mixture of the Roper resonance $(N(1440))$, and states with both positive and negative parities in this mass region, as well as multi-hadron states. Assuming the observed structure is dominated by $J^P=1/2^{\pm}$ states, we extract the transition electric form factor $G_E^{*}(Q^2)$ and the corresponding longitudinal helicity amplitude $S_{1/2}(Q^2)$, and compare them with those determined from the CLAS experimental data of nucleon-to-Roper transition. Although fitting to the four-point correlation function or using the inverse algorithm does not resolve individual resonances, it nevertheless enables the determination of total inclusive lepton-nucleon scattering cross sections in appropriate energy bins. This lattice QCD calculation presents the first major step toward studying the inclusive $N \to X$ contributions with the hadronic tensor formalism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper computes the Euclidean hadronic tensor from charge density operators in lattice QCD. It extracts the nucleon's Sachs electric form factor via this formalism and verifies consistency with the conventional three-point function approach. Beyond the elastic peak, exponential fits to four-point correlators and a Bayesian reconstruction of the spectral density reveal a structure 0.5-0.7 GeV above the nucleon mass, interpreted as a mixture of the Roper, other parity states, and multi-hadron contributions. Under the assumption that this structure is dominated by J^P=1/2± states, the authors extract the transition form factor G_E^*(Q^2) and helicity amplitude S_{1/2}(Q^2) for comparison with CLAS data. The work is presented as an initial demonstration toward inclusive N→X lepton-nucleon scattering cross sections in energy bins.

Significance. If the elastic consistency result holds, the hadronic tensor approach offers a viable alternative route to nucleon form factors that could extend naturally to inclusive processes relevant for neutrino scattering. The reported agreement between the new formalism and the standard three-point method is a concrete strength that supports further development of the technique. The resonance extraction and experimental comparison, however, depend on an interpretive assumption whose validity is not independently verified in the calculation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and resonance-interpretation paragraph: the extraction of G_E^*(Q^2) and S_{1/2}(Q^2) and the subsequent comparison to CLAS data rest on the assumption that the observed 0.5-0.7 GeV structure is dominated by J^P=1/2± states. The text itself describes the structure as a mixture of Roper, positive/negative parity states, and multi-hadron contributions, yet provides no quantitative test or bound on the dominance fraction; this assumption is load-bearing for the resonance claim.
  2. [Bayesian reconstruction] Bayesian reconstruction section: the resolution limits and regularization dependence of the inverse algorithm are not quantified, so the qualitative identification of the 0.5-0.7 GeV peak and its use for form-factor extraction lack a stated uncertainty or sensitivity analysis that would be needed to support the transition-form-factor results.
minor comments (1)
  1. The description of how the four-point correlator fits translate into binned inclusive cross sections could be expanded with an explicit formula or example to clarify the procedure that does not require resolving individual resonances.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing the strongest honest defense of the presented work while acknowledging where revisions are warranted.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and resonance-interpretation paragraph: the extraction of G_E^*(Q^2) and S_{1/2}(Q^2) and the subsequent comparison to CLAS data rest on the assumption that the observed 0.5-0.7 GeV structure is dominated by J^P=1/2± states. The text itself describes the structure as a mixture of Roper, positive/negative parity states, and multi-hadron contributions, yet provides no quantitative test or bound on the dominance fraction; this assumption is load-bearing for the resonance claim.

    Authors: The manuscript explicitly frames the extraction of G_E^*(Q^2) and S_{1/2}(Q^2) under the assumption that the structure is dominated by J^P=1/2± states, while also stating that the structure is a mixture and that the approach does not resolve individual resonances. The primary objective is to demonstrate the hadronic tensor method for computing inclusive N→X cross sections in energy bins, with the resonance comparison serving as an initial illustrative application rather than a definitive resonance decomposition. We will revise the abstract and discussion to more prominently qualify the assumption and its implications for the comparison with CLAS data. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Bayesian reconstruction] Bayesian reconstruction section: the resolution limits and regularization dependence of the inverse algorithm are not quantified, so the qualitative identification of the 0.5-0.7 GeV peak and its use for form-factor extraction lack a stated uncertainty or sensitivity analysis that would be needed to support the transition-form-factor results.

    Authors: The Bayesian reconstruction is employed strictly for qualitative identification of spectral structures, consistent with the manuscript's statement that fitting or inversion does not resolve individual resonances. We agree that an explicit quantification of resolution limits, regularization dependence, and sensitivity would improve the robustness of the presentation. We will incorporate a sensitivity analysis in the revised version, including variations in regularization parameters and estimates of uncertainty on the identified peak position. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation computes the Euclidean hadronic tensor directly from lattice four-point correlators of charge density operators, extracts the Sachs electric form factor via exponential fits, and verifies consistency against an independent conventional three-point function calculation on the same ensembles. The resonance structure at 0.5-0.7 GeV is obtained via Bayesian reconstruction (explicitly labeled qualitative) and interpreted under a stated assumption of J^P=1/2± dominance for comparison to CLAS; this interpretive step does not redefine or fit the lattice observables themselves. No load-bearing equation reduces by construction to a prior self-citation, fitted input renamed as prediction, or ansatz imported from the authors' earlier work. The central results remain grounded in the lattice correlators rather than being equivalent to their inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; ledger entries inferred from stated methods. Lattice QCD relies on standard discretization and volume assumptions not detailed here. Bayesian reconstruction introduces regularization choices. Resonance interpretation assumes dominance by specific J^P states without independent verification in the provided text.

free parameters (1)
  • Bayesian reconstruction regularization parameter
    Required for inverse algorithm to obtain spectral density; value not stated in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Exponential fits to four-point correlator isolate elastic and resonance contributions
    Invoked in the extraction procedure described in the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper Observed structure is dominated by J^P=1/2± states
    Explicit assumption used to extract transition form factors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5833 in / 1355 out tokens · 25961 ms · 2026-05-24T05:35:46.335070+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages · 60 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    (10), as the spectral weights are linked to the square of the G∗ E(Q2) form factor

    This can be understood from Eq. (10), as the spectral weights are linked to the square of the G∗ E(Q2) form factor. In the next section, we present the results of the nucleon elastic and transition form factors based on these fit parameters of Wn and ∆En. C. Elastic form factor Various components of the hadronic tensor, when computed on the lattice, provi...

    work page

  2. [2]

    We note that for ⃗ q= (0, 0, 1) and (0 , 1, 1) the four-momentum transfers Q2 determined from ∆ En are negative

    Aside from not being able to resolve states 2 and 3, in a three-state fit, the highest state result is not reliable because of the contamination from much higher states. We note that for ⃗ q= (0, 0, 1) and (0 , 1, 1) the four-momentum transfers Q2 determined from ∆ En are negative. In 14 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Q 2 (GeV2) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 G u, d E (Q 2) G u ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    This effect can be regarded as a systematic uncertainty arising from our inability to differentiate between states 2 and 3 in the context of the three exponential fits. VI. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS In this paper, we present the results of a lattice QCD investigation into the determination of the nucleon’s elastic and resonance structure through a singl...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Origin of Difference between $\overline{d}$ and $\overline{u}$ Partons in the Nucleon

    K.-F. Liu and S.-J. Dong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1790 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9306299

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  5. [5]

    Parton Degrees of Freedom from the Path-Integral Formalism

    K.-F. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 62, 074501 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9910306

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    A. S. Kronfeld, D. G. Richards, W. Detmold, R. Gupta, H.-W. Lin, K.-F. Liu, A. S. Meyer, R. Sufian, and S. Syritsyn (USQCD), Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 196 (2019), arXiv:1904.09931 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    L. A. Ruso et al. , (2022), arXiv:2203.09030 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Abi et al

    B. Abi et al. (DUNE), JINST 15, T08008 (2020), arXiv:2002.02967 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report

    K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande), (2018), arXiv:1805.04163 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    J. A. Formaggio and G. P. Zeller, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1307 (2012), arXiv:1305.7513 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    NuSTEC White Paper: Status and Challenges of Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering

    L. Alvarez-Ruso et al. (NuSTEC), Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 100, 1 (2018), arXiv:1706.03621 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    R. S. Sufian, K.-F. Liu, and D. G. Richards, JHEP 01, 136 (2020), arXiv:1809.03509 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    R. S. Sufian, Y.-B. Yang, A. Alexandru, T. Draper, J. Liang, and K.-F. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 042001 (2017), arXiv:1606.07075 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    R. S. Sufian, Y.-B. Yang, J. Liang, T. Draper, and K.-F. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 96, 114504 (2017), arXiv:1705.05849 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    R. S. Sufian, Phys. Rev. D 96, 093007 (2017), arXiv:1611.07031 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Quark spins and Anomalous Ward Identity

    J. Liang, Y.-B. Yang, T. Draper, M. Gong, and K.-F. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074505 (2018), arXiv:1806.08366 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE), Phys. Rev. D 82, 092005 (2010), arXiv:1007.4730 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  18. [18]

    A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE), Phys. Rev. D 91, 012004 (2015), arXiv:1309.7257 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    Lattice calculation of hadronic tensor of the nucleon

    J. Liang, K.-F. Liu, and Y.-B. Yang, EPJ Web Conf. 175, 14014 (2018), arXiv:1710.11145 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    A. S. Meyer, A. Walker-Loud, and C. Wilkinson, (2022), 10.1146/annurev-nucl-010622-120608, arXiv:2201.01839 [hep- lat]

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-010622-120608 2022

  21. [21]

    V. D. Burkert, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 55, 108 (2005)

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    I. G. Aznauryan et al. , Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 22, 1330015 (2013), arXiv:1212.4891 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    Detmold, R

    W. Detmold, R. G. Edwards, J. J. Dudek, M. Engelhardt, H.-W. Lin, S. Meinel, K. Orginos, and P. Shanahan (USQCD), Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 193 (2019), arXiv:1904.09512 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    I. G. Aznauryan and V. D. Burkert, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67, 1 (2012), arXiv:1109.1720 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    C. E. Carlson and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 032004 (2008), arXiv:0710.0835 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  26. [26]

    Empirical transverse charge densities in the nucleon-to-P11(1440) transition

    L. Tiator and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Lett. B 672, 344 (2009), arXiv:0811.2285 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  27. [27]

    V. M. Braun, A. Vladimirov, and J.-H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014013 (2019), arXiv:1810.00048 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Parton Physics on Euclidean Lattice

    X. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 262002 (2013), arXiv:1305.1539 [hep-ph]. 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    X. Ji, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 57, 1407 (2014), arXiv:1404.6680 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    A. J. Chambers, R. Horsley, Y. Nakamura, H. Perlt, P. E. L. Rakow, G. Schierholz, A. Schiller, K. Somfleth, R. D. Young, and J. M. Zanotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 242001 (2017), arXiv:1703.01153 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034025 (2017), arXiv:1705.01488 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Exploring hadrons' partonic structure using ab initio lattice QCD calculations

    Y.-Q. Ma and J.-W. Qiu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 022003 (2018), arXiv:1709.03018 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Liu, Phys

    K.-F. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074502 (2020), arXiv:2007.15075 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    K. F. Liu, S. J. Dong, T. Draper, D. Leinweber, J. H. Sloan, W. Wilcox, and R. M. Woloshyn, Phys. Rev. D 59, 112001 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9806491

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  35. [35]

    Gottfried, Phys

    K. Gottfried, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 1174 (1967)

    work page 1967

  36. [36]

    T.-J. Hou, M. Yan, J. Liang, K.-F. Liu, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 106, 096008 (2022), arXiv:2206.02431 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Batelaan et al

    M. Batelaan et al. (QCDSF/UKQCD/CSSM, CSSM, UKQCD, QCDSF), Phys. Rev. D 107, 054503 (2023), arXiv:2209.04141 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Liang and K.-F

    J. Liang and K.-F. Liu ( χQCD), PoS LATTICE2019, 046 (2020), arXiv:2008.12389 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    Perturbative Renormalization of quasi-PDFs

    M. Constantinou and H. Panagopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 96, 054506 (2017), arXiv:1705.11193 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    J.-W. Chen, T. Ishikawa, L. Jin, H.-W. Lin, Y.-B. Yang, J.-H. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 97, 014505 (2018), arXiv:1706.01295 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    X. Ji, Y. Liu, A. Sch¨ afer, W. Wang, Y.-B. Yang, J.-H. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, Nucl. Phys. B 964, 115311 (2021), arXiv:2008.03886 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Huo et al

    Y.-K. Huo et al. (Lattice Parton Collaboration (LPC)), Nucl. Phys. B 969, 115443 (2021), arXiv:2103.02965 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Deep-inelastic scattering and the operator product expansion in lattice QCD

    W. Detmold and C. J. D. Lin, Phys. Rev. D 73, 014501 (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0507007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  44. [44]

    Exclusive processes in position space and the pion distribution amplitude

    V. Braun and D. M¨ uller, Eur. Phys. J. C55, 349 (2008), arXiv:0709.1348 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [45]

    Extracting Parton Distribution Functions from Lattice QCD Calculations

    Y.-Q. Ma and J.-W. Qiu, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074021 (2018), arXiv:1404.6860 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    G. S. Bali, V. M. Braun, B. Gl¨ aßle, M. G¨ ockeler, M. Gruber, F. Hutzler, P. Korcyl, A. Sch¨ afer, P. Wein, and J.-H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094507 (2018), arXiv:1807.06671 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    R. S. Sufian, J. Karpie, C. Egerer, K. Orginos, J.-W. Qiu, and D. G. Richards, Phys. Rev. D 99, 074507 (2019), arXiv:1901.03921 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    R. S. Sufian, C. Egerer, J. Karpie, R. G. Edwards, B. Jo´ o, Y.-Q. Ma, K. Orginos, J.-W. Qiu, and D. G. Richards, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054508 (2020), arXiv:2001.04960 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    K. U. Can et al. , Phys. Rev. D 102, 114505 (2020), arXiv:2007.01523 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    A guide to light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD: an overview of approaches, techniques and results

    K. Cichy and M. Constantinou, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2019, 3036904 (2019), arXiv:1811.07248 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Constantinou et al

    M. Constantinou et al. , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 121, 103908 (2021), arXiv:2006.08636 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Ji, Y.-S

    X. Ji, Y.-S. Liu, Y. Liu, J.-H. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035005 (2021), arXiv:2004.03543 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Constantinou et al

    M. Constantinou et al. , (2022), arXiv:2202.07193 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Parton Distribution Function from the Hadronic Tensor on the Lattice

    K.-F. Liu, PoS LATTICE2015, 115 (2016), arXiv:1603.07352 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [55]

    H. J. Weber, Phys. Rev. C 41, 2783 (1990)

    work page 1990

  56. [56]

    I. G. Aznauryan, V. D. Burkert, and T. S. H. Lee, (2008), arXiv:0810.0997 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  57. [57]

    Liang, T

    J. Liang, T. Draper, K.-F. Liu, A. Rothkopf, and Y.-B. Yang (XQCD), Phys. Rev. D101, 114503 (2020), arXiv:1906.05312 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Domain wall QCD with physical quark masses

    T. Blum et al. (RBC, UKQCD), Phys. Rev. D 93, 074505 (2016), arXiv:1411.7017 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    C. Lee, T. Draper, J. Hua, J. Liang, K.-F. Liu, J. Shi, N. Wang, and Y.-b. Yang, (2023), arXiv:2310.02179 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    A novel Bayesian approach to spectral function reconstruction

    Y. Burnier and A. Rothkopf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 182003 (2013), arXiv:1307.6106 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  61. [61]

    Backus and F

    G. Backus and F. Gilbert, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 266 (1970), doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1970.0005

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.1970.0005 1970

  62. [62]

    M. T. Hansen, H. B. Meyer, and D. Robaina, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094513 (2017), arXiv:1704.08993 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    Maximum Entropy Analysis of the Spectral Functions in Lattice QCD

    M. Asakawa, T. Hatsuda, and Y. Nakahara, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 46, 459 (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0011040

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  64. [64]

    Bailas, S

    G. Bailas, S. Hashimoto, and T. Ishikawa, PTEP 2020, 043B07 (2020), arXiv:2001.11779 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Alexandrou et al

    C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration (ETMC)), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 241901 (2023), arXiv:2212.08467 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Rothkopf, Front

    A. Rothkopf, Front. Phys. 10, 1028995 (2022), arXiv:2208.13590 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Strange nucleon electromagnetic form factors from lattice QCD

    C. Alexandrou, M. Constantinou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, C. Kallidonis, G. Koutsou, and A. Vaquero Avil´ es- Casco, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094504 (2018), arXiv:1801.09581 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    Alexandrou, S

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, M. Constantinou, J. Finkenrath, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, G. Koutsou, and A. Vaquero Aviles-Casco, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014509 (2019), arXiv:1812.10311 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    Djukanovic, G

    D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, M. Salg, and H. Wittig, (2023), arXiv:2309.06590 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    G. Wang, J. Liang, T. Draper, K.-F. Liu, and Y.-B. Yang (chiQCD), Phys. Rev. D 104, 074502 (2021), arXiv:2006.05431 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    S. Park, R. Gupta, B. Yoon, S. Mondal, T. Bhattacharya, Y.-C. Jang, B. Jo´ o, and F. Winter (Nucleon Matrix Elements (NME)), Phys. Rev. D 105, 054505 (2022), arXiv:2103.05599 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    H.-W. Lin, S. D. Cohen, R. G. Edwards, and D. G. Richards, Phys. Rev. D 78, 114508 (2008), arXiv:0803.3020 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  74. [74]

    V. I. Mokeev, P. Achenbach, V. D. Burkert, D. S. Carman, R. W. Gothe, A. N. Hiller Blin, E. L. Isupov, K. Joo, K. Neupane, and A. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. C 108, 025204 (2023), arXiv:2306.13777 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    D. J. Wilson, I. C. Cloet, L. Chang, and C. D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. C 85, 025205 (2012), arXiv:1112.2212 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  76. [76]

    V. D. Burkert and C. D. Roberts, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 011003 (2019), arXiv:1710.02549 [nucl-ex]. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  77. [77]

    Completing the picture of the Roper resonance

    J. Segovia, B. El-Bennich, E. Rojas, I. C. Cloet, C. D. Roberts, S.-S. Xu, and H.-S. Zong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 171801 (2015), arXiv:1504.04386 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  78. [78]

    E. L. Isupov et al. (CLAS), Phys. Rev. C 96, 025209 (2017), arXiv:1705.01901 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  79. [79]

    I. G. Aznauryan, Phys. Rev. C 67, 015209 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0206033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  80. [80]

    Chen, Mod

    Y. Chen, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 22, 583 (2007)

    work page 2007

Showing first 80 references.