{"as_of":"2026-08-10T15:27:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:ba6a627da2c050bf1e990de0ade6d88d90c6ef6a924f537cd41de09d8f4941da","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":4,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":4,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T21:45:07.304009Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-10T23:25:53.828114Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2401.16788","last_updated":"2024-01-30T07:03:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T17:22:19.869691Z","submitted_at":"2024-01-30T07:03:32Z","title":"Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debate","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2401.16788","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T21:45:07.304009Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.23520","last_updated":"2025-07-01T08:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:36:42.843542Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-30T05:11:19Z","title":"ChemActor: Enhancing Automated Extraction of Chemical Synthesis Actions with LLM-Generated Data","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T21:45:07.304009Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2401.16788","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.23520"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a002a1c1bddee4e088710e1dc958b93e38854cd6e80389ef895beb5818bd47fa","observation_id":"fd5030dc-b7ad-4f50-91ec-f625b2d85ee4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T21:45:07.304009Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2401.16788","last_updated":"2024-01-30T07:03:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T17:22:19.869691Z","submitted_at":"2024-01-30T07:03:32Z","title":"Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debate","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2401.16788","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:11:10.537701Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.03928","last_updated":"2025-07-05T07:23:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T22:22:02.122649Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-05T07:23:15Z","title":"CortexDebate: Debating Sparsely and Equally for Multi-Agent Debate","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:11:10.537701Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2401.16788","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.03928"},"observation_digest":"sha256:97fd5fe0c66c2a5377a8492cc7ff370c63739bb78c5c7190b16fe058a9eb1722","observation_id":"cd6a15b7-77aa-44f1-8b53-a9df7295ca61","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:11:10.537701Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2401.16788","last_updated":"2024-01-30T07:03:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T17:22:19.869691Z","submitted_at":"2024-01-30T07:03:32Z","title":"Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debate","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2401.16788","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:56:20.064068Z","title":", author Chern, E","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.06591","last_updated":"2025-08-08T10:41:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:55:44.725352Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-08T10:41:03Z","title":"Generative Artificial Intelligence Extracts Structure-Function Relationships from Plants for New Materials","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:56:20.064068Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2401.16788","citing_paper":"/paper/2508.06591"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b353201d6899a0bda777a86ddaa32b26a019f0bf09f1424817277e0949831a63","observation_id":"e6ee4100-cff8-4116-ad67-63afce0e9c73","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:56:20.064068Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2401.16788","last_updated":"2024-01-30T07:03:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T17:22:19.869691Z","submitted_at":"2024-01-30T07:03:32Z","title":"Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debate","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2401.16788","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2401.16788","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"Can large language models be trusted for evaluation? scalable meta-evaluation of llms as evaluators via agent debate","venue":null,"work_id":"a264f38a-d4f3-4dfe-a238-1c6f2f227cfd","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.06452","last_updated":"2026-04-07T20:47:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:22:07.566013Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-07T20:47:40Z","title":"Learning to Interrupt in Language-based Multi-agent Communication","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-05-10T19:08:45.818851Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2401.16788","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.06452"},"observation_digest":"sha256:055d76ea1d0d9a15e445e63d0314b1a75349b10c85bdc839d890a02d53142270","observation_id":"93a1ffad-dabd-437f-8aa7-8d98a91b72ca","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-10T23:25:53.830634Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2401.16788/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2401.16788/integrity","json":"/paper/2401.16788/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2401.16788"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2401.16788","last_updated":"2024-01-30T07:03:32Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T17:22:19.869691Z","submitted_at":"2024-01-30T07:03:32Z","title":"Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debate"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 4 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2401.16788."}