pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.13197 · v1 · submitted 2024-03-19 · 📊 stat.ME

Robust inference of cooperative behaviour of multiple ion channels in voltage-clamp recordings

Robin Requadt , Manuel Fink , Patrick Kubica , Claudia Steinem , Axel Munk , Housen Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 03:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📊 stat.ME
keywords ion channel cooperativityvoltage-clamp recordingsminimum distance estimatorcoupled Markov modelsidealisationdiscretisationgramicidin D
0
0 comments X

The pith

The IDC method uses idealisation, discretisation and a minimum-distance estimator to infer cooperative behaviour among ion channels from superimposed voltage-clamp recordings alone.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces IDC as a three-stage pipeline that first idealises and discretises the observed current trace, then fits coupled Markov models to the resulting sequence. In the final stage a minimum-distance estimator is applied to the discretised data and shown to be asymptotically consistent for the coupling parameters. The authors apply the procedure to gramicidin D recordings and conclude that the channels behave independently across the tested voltages. The approach is designed to work when only the summed current from an unknown number of channels is measurable.

Core claim

IDC recovers the parameters of a coupled Markov model from discretised idealised voltage-clamp traces by means of a minimum-distance estimator whose asymptotic consistency is established; application to gramicidin D data yields no evidence of cooperativity.

What carries the argument

The minimum-distance estimator applied in the cooperativity-inference stage of IDC to the output of the idealisation and discretisation steps.

If this is right

  • If the estimator is consistent, the coupling parameters of any finite-state coupled Markov model can be recovered from ensemble recordings without resolving individual channels.
  • The same pipeline can be applied to any voltage-clamp experiment in which the number of channels is unknown but the superimposed current is recorded.
  • Absence of detected cooperativity in gramicidin D implies that independent-channel models remain adequate for these data across the tested voltages.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the consistency result extends to moderate model misspecification, the method could be used to test for weak cooperativity that is invisible to simpler independence tests.
  • The three-stage structure separates the idealisation error from the parameter estimation error, which may allow future work to quantify how much idealisation accuracy is required for reliable cooperativity detection.

Load-bearing premise

The idealisation and discretisation steps produce state sequences whose statistical properties remain close enough to those of the true hidden Markov chain for the consistency proof to carry over.

What would settle it

A simulation in which the idealised and discretised sequence deviates from the true Markov chain by a fixed amount and the minimum-distance estimator fails to converge to the true coupling parameters as sample size grows.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2403.13197 by Axel Munk, Claudia Steinem, Housen Li, Manuel Fink, Patrick Kubica, Robin Requadt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of IDC (idealisation, discretisation and cooperativity inference) on simulated data. From left to right are three scenarios of positive cooperativity, independence and negative cooperativity, respectively. The top panel plots the simulated ion channel recordings. The middle (second to fourth) panels present the results of IDC for each step. A positive (or negative) cooperativity is inferred if… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Workflow of the proposed IDC procedure. 4.1 Idealisation As a first step, we pre-process the ion channel recordings in (1) by idealising the total conductance profile f, to separate the inference of cooperativity from the deconvolution problem. Recall that we make as little assumption as possible on the noise component in Section 3.1 for the sake of permitting various types of noises, outliers, and baselin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the proposed IDC and the HMM [38] on two zero cooperative channels. Three panels differ 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the proposed IDC and the HMM [38] on two positively cooperative channels. Three panels dif 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the proposed IDC and the HMM [38] on two negatively cooperative channels. Three panels 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Histogram of the estimated number of channels over 300 repetitions. From left to right panels are zero, positively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Histogram of the estimated values of the ratios in Definition 2, over 300 repetitions. The true ratios are equal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Histogram of dwell times of state 1 for the gramicidin data (left) and the simulated data (right). The curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Gramicidin data (grey) and idealisation (red) by MUSCLE. The estimated number of channels is 3, see Figure 10. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Histogram of the idealised conductance levels with the centres of the groups marked by vertical dashed lines. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Gramicidin data (grey) and idealisation (red) by MUSCLE. From top to bottom, the first panel shows the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Histogram of the idealised conductance levels for channel recordings at 50 mV applied voltage with the centres [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Histogram of the idealised conductance levels for channel recordings at 100 mV applied voltage with the centres [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Histogram of the idealised conductance levels for channel recordings at 150 mV applied voltage with the centres [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Histogram of the idealised conductance levels for channel recordings at 200 mV applied voltage with the centres [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent experimental studies have shed light on the intriguing possibility that ion channels exhibit cooperative behaviour. However, a comprehensive understanding of such cooperativity remains elusive, primarily due to limitations in measuring separately the response of each channel. Rather, only the superimposed channel response can be observed, challenging existing data analysis methods. To address this gap, we propose IDC (Idealisation, Discretisation, and Cooperativity inference), a robust statistical data analysis methodology that requires only voltage-clamp current recordings of an ensemble of ion channels. The framework of IDC enables us to integrate recent advancements in idealisation techniques and coupled Markov models. Further, in the cooperativity inference phase of IDC, we introduce a minimum distance estimator and establish its statistical guarantee in the form of asymptotic consistency. We demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of IDC through extensive simulation studies. As an application, we investigate gramicidin D channels. Our findings reveal that these channels act independently, even at varying applied voltages during voltage-clamp experiments. An implementation of IDC is available from GitLab.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes the IDC framework (Idealisation, Discretisation, and Cooperativity inference) for inferring cooperative behaviour among multiple ion channels from superimposed voltage-clamp recordings. It combines existing idealisation methods with coupled Markov models and introduces a minimum-distance estimator whose asymptotic consistency is claimed to be established; the approach is illustrated on simulations and applied to gramicidin D data, where the channels are found to act independently.

Significance. If the consistency result holds for the composite pipeline, the work supplies a statistically justified pipeline for extracting cooperativity parameters from ensemble recordings that cannot be resolved channel-by-channel, an advance with direct relevance to biophysics and hidden-Markov modelling of ion-channel kinetics. The public GitLab implementation and the real-data application constitute concrete strengths that enhance reproducibility and practical utility.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / cooperativity inference phase] Abstract / cooperativity-inference phase: the stated asymptotic consistency of the minimum-distance estimator is formulated for sequences generated exactly by the parametric coupled Markov family. No argument is supplied showing that the estimator remains consistent (or even that the population distance is continuous) when its input is the output of the preceding idealisation and discretisation stages, whose total-variation or transition-probability errors need not vanish with sample size. Because this composite robustness is load-bearing for the central IDC guarantee, the gap must be closed.
minor comments (2)
  1. Simulation studies are invoked to demonstrate robustness, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative description of how idealisation error was injected or how the resulting bias in the minimum-distance estimator was measured.
  2. The gramicidin-D conclusion of independence would be strengthened by an explicit comparison of the fitted distance under the independent model versus a range of weak-coupling alternatives.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. Below we respond point-by-point to the major comment and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / cooperativity inference phase] Abstract / cooperativity-inference phase: the stated asymptotic consistency of the minimum-distance estimator is formulated for sequences generated exactly by the parametric coupled Markov family. No argument is supplied showing that the estimator remains consistent (or even that the population distance is continuous) when its input is the output of the preceding idealisation and discretisation stages, whose total-variation or transition-probability errors need not vanish with sample size. Because this composite robustness is load-bearing for the central IDC guarantee, the gap must be closed.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the asymptotic consistency result for the minimum-distance estimator is formulated under the assumption that the input sequence is generated exactly by the parametric coupled Markov family. The manuscript does not supply an argument establishing that the estimator remains consistent when the input comes from the idealisation and discretisation stages, nor does it address the continuity of the population distance under the approximation errors from those stages. We agree this is a gap that needs to be addressed for the composite pipeline. In the revision, we will add a discussion noting that if the idealisation and discretisation errors converge to zero (which holds for consistent idealisation methods as the length of the voltage-clamp recording tends to infinity with the number of channels fixed), then by the continuity of the distance and standard arguments for minimum distance estimators, the consistency carries over. We will include this clarification in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper introduces a minimum-distance estimator for the cooperativity inference phase and states that it establishes asymptotic consistency as a new statistical guarantee. No quoted equations or text in the abstract or description reduce the consistency result to a fitted input, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The estimator and its consistency claim are presented as independent of the preceding idealisation/discretisation steps by construction. This is a standard case of an independent derivation with no reduction to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms or invented entities are described. The consistency proof presumably relies on standard assumptions of ergodicity and identifiability for Markov models, but these are not stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5718 in / 1139 out tokens · 24095 ms · 2026-05-24T03:42:59.158467+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    F. G. Ball and J. A. Rice. Stochastic models for ion channels: introduction and bibliography. Mathematical Biosciences, 112(2):189–206, 1992

    work page 1992

  2. [2]

    K. W. Chan. Optimal difference-based variance estimators in time series: a general framework. The Annals of Statistics, 50(3):1376–1400, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Chung and R

    S.-H. Chung and R. A. Kennedy. Coupled Markov chain model: Characterization of membrane channel cur- rents with multiple conductance sublevels as partially coupled elementary pores. Mathematical Biosciences, 133(2):111–137, 1996

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    Clatot, M

    J. Clatot, M. Hoshi, X. Wan, H. Liu, A. Jain, K. Shinlapawittayatorn, C. Marionneau, E. Ficker, T. Ha, and I. Deschˆ enes. Voltage-gated sodium channels assemble and gate as dimers. Nature communications, 8(1):2077, 2017

    work page 2077

  5. [5]

    Dahlhaus

    R. Dahlhaus. Graphical interaction models for multivariate time series. Metrika, 51(2):157–172, 2000

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    M. M. de Gunst, H. K¨ unsch, and J. Schouten. Statistical analysis of ion channel data using hidden Markov models with correlated state-dependent noise and filtering. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 96(455):805–815, 2001

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Diehn, A

    M. Diehn, A. Munk, and D. Rudolf. Maximum likelihood estimation in hidden Markov models with inhomoge- neous noise. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics , 23:492–523, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    R. E. Dixon, M. F. Navedo, M. D. Binder, and L. F. Santana. Mechanisms and physiological implications of cooperative gating of clustered ion channels. Physiological Reviews, 102(3):1159–1210, 2022

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Fuli´ nski, Z

    A. Fuli´ nski, Z. Grzywna, I. Mellor, Z. Siwy, and P. Usherwood. Non-Markovian character of ionic current fluctuations in membrane channels. Physical Review E, 58(1):919–924, 1998

    work page 1998

  10. [10]

    Gnanasambandam, M

    R. Gnanasambandam, M. S. Nielsen, C. Nicolai, F. Sachs, J. P. Hofgaard, and J. K. Dreyer. Unsupervised idealization of ion channel recordings by minimum description length: application to human PIEZO1-channels. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 11:31, 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Heinemann and F

    S. Heinemann and F. Sigworth. Open channel noise. VI. Analysis of amplitude histograms to determine rapid kinetic parameters. Biophysical Journal, 60(3):577–587, 1991

    work page 1991

  12. [12]

    T. Hotz, O. M. Sch¨ utte, H. Sieling, T. Polupanow, U. Diederichsen, C. Steinem, and A. Munk. Idealizing ion channel recordings by a jump segmentation multiresolution filter. IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience , 12(4):376–386, 2013

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    P. C. Jordan. Fifty years of progress in ion channel research. IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience , 4(1):3–9, 2005

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    O. V. Kondrashov, T. R. Galimzyanov, K. V. Pavlov, E. A. Kotova, Y. N. Antonenko, and S. A. Akimov. Mem- brane elastic deformations modulate gramicidin a transbilayer dimerization and lateral clustering. Biophysical Journal, 115(3):478–493, 2018

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    O. V. Kondrashov, T. I. Rokitskaya, O. V. Batishchev, E. A. Kotova, Y. N. Antonenko, and S. A. Akimov. Peptide-induced membrane elastic deformations decelerate gramicidin dimer-monomer equilibration. Biophysical Journal, 120(23):5309–5321, 2021. 17

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    K. Lange. Numerical Analysis for Statisticians . Springer, 2001

    work page 2001

  17. [17]

    H. Li, Q. Guo, and A. Munk. Multiscale change-point segmentation: beyond step functions. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 13(2):3254–3296, 2019

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Liu and H

    Z. Liu and H. Li. Multiscale quantile regression with local error control. arXiv preprint, 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    M. L. Molina, A. M. Giudici, J. A. Poveda, G. Fern´ andez-Ballester, E. Montoya, M. L. Renart, A. M. Fern´ andez, J. A. Encinar, G. Riquelme, A. Morales, and J. M. Gonz´ alez-Ros. Competing lipid-protein and protein-protein in- teractions determine clustering and gating patterns in the potassium channel from streptomyces lividans (KcsA). Journal of Biolog...

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    C. M. Moreno, R. E. Dixon, S. Tajada, C. Yuan, X. Opitz-Araya, M. D. Binder, and L. F. Santana. Ca 2+ entry into neurons is facilitated by cooperative gating of clustered Ca V1.3 channels. eLife, 5:e15744, 2016

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Quick Adaptive Ternary Segmentation: An Efficient Decoding Procedure For Hidden Markov Models

    A. M¨ osching, H. Li, and A. Munk. Quick adaptive ternary segmentation: An efficient decoding procedure for hidden Markov models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18578 , 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    G. Navarro. Wavelet trees for all. Journal of Discrete Algorithms , 25:2–20, 2014

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Neher and B

    E. Neher and B. Sakmann. Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres. Nature, 260(5554):799–802, 1976

    work page 1976

  24. [24]

    Nocedal and S

    J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright. Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2e edition, 2006

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    J. R. Norris. Markov Chains . Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1997

    work page 1997

  26. [26]

    W. C. Parr and W. R. Schucany. Minimum distance and robust estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75(371):616–624, 1980

    work page 1980

  27. [27]

    F. Pein, A. Bartsch, C. Steinem, and A. Munk. Heterogeneous idealization of ion channel recordings - open channel noise. IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience , PP:1–1, 10 2020

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    F. Pein, I. Tecuapetla-G´ omez, O. M. Sch¨ utte, C. Steinem, and A. Munk. Fully automatic multiresolution idealization for filtered ion channel recordings: flickering event detection.IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience, 17(3):300–320, 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Pfeiffer, A

    P. Pfeiffer, A. V. Egorov, F. Lorenz, J.-H. Schleimer, A. Draguhn, and S. Schreiber. Clusters of cooperative ion channels enable a membrane-potential-based mechanism for short-term memory. eLife, 9:e49974, 2020

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    F. Qin, A. Auerbach, and F. Sachs. Hidden Markov modeling for single channel kinetics with filtering and correlated noise. Biophysical Journal, 79(4):1928–1944, 2000

    work page 1928

  31. [31]

    Sakmann and E

    B. Sakmann and E. Neher, editors. Single-Channel Recording. Springer, Boston, MA, New York, second edition, 1995

    work page 1995

  32. [32]

    Schroeder

    I. Schroeder. How to resolve microsecond current fluctuations in single ion channels: The power of beta distri- butions. Channels, 9(5):262–280, 2015

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Siekmann, L

    I. Siekmann, L. E. Wagner, D. Yule, C. Fox, D. Bryant, E. J. Crampin, and J. Sneyd. MCMC estimation of Markov models for ion channels. Biophysical Journal, 100(8):1919–1929, 2011

    work page 1919

  34. [34]

    G. A. Spedicato. Discrete time Markov chains with R. The R Journal , 9(2):84–104, 07 2017

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Tecuapetla-G´ omez and A

    I. Tecuapetla-G´ omez and A. Munk. Autocovariance estimation in regression with a discontinuous signal and m-dependent errors: a difference-based approach. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. Theory and Applications , 44(2):346–368, 2017

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Van der Vaart

    A. Van der Vaart. Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cam- bridge University Press, 1998

    work page 1998

  37. [37]

    VanDongen

    A. VanDongen. A new algorithm for idealizing single ion channel data containing multiple unknown conductance levels. Biophysical Journal, 70(3):1303–1315, 1996

    work page 1996

  38. [38]

    L. J. Vanegas, B. Eltzner, D. Rudolf, M. Dura, S. E. Lehnart, and A. Munk. Analyzing cross-talk be- tween superimposed signals: Vector norm dependent hidden Markov models and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.06071, Ann. Appl. Stat., to appear , 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Venkataramanan, R

    L. Venkataramanan, R. Kuc, and F. J. Sigworth. Identification of hidden Markov models for ion channel currents. II. State-dependent excess noise. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , 46(7):1916–1929, 1998

    work page 1916

  40. [40]

    Venkataramanan, R

    L. Venkataramanan, R. Kuc, and F. J. Sigworth. Identification of hidden markov models for ion channel currents. III. Bandlimited, sampled data. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , 48(2):376–385, 2000. 18

    work page 2000

  41. [41]

    Venkataramanan, J

    L. Venkataramanan, J. L. Walsh, R. Kuc, and F. J. Sigworth. Identification of hidden Markov models for ion channel currents. I. Colored background noise. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 46(7):1901–1915, 1998

    work page 1901

  42. [42]

    Wang and M

    H. Wang and M. Song. Ckmeans.1d.dp: Optimal k-means clustering in one dimension by dynamic programming. The R journal , 3(2):29–33, 2011

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    W. A. Woodward, W. C. Parr, W. R. Schucany, and H. Lindsey. A comparison of minimum distance and maxi- mum likelihood estimation of a mixture proportion.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387):590– 598, 1984

    work page 1984

  44. [44]

    G. Yellen. Ionic permeation and blockade in Ca 2+-activated K+ channels of bovine chromaffin cells. The Journal of general physiology, 84(2):157–186, 1984. 19

    work page 1984