pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.16065 · v2 · submitted 2024-03-24 · 🪐 quant-ph

Markovian dynamics for a quantum/classical system and quantum trajectories

Alberto Barchielli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 02:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum trajectorieshybrid quantum-classical systemsMarkovian dynamicsstochastic differential equationsdynamical semigroupsdissipative dynamicsopen quantum systemsquantum-classical interaction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two coupled stochastic differential equations describe the Markovian dynamics of interacting quantum and classical components.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an approach to the dynamics of quantum/classical hybrid systems by extending quantum trajectory methods. It uses two coupled stochastic differential equations to capture the intrinsic dynamics of each component and their mutual interactions. A rigorous mathematical construction is provided when the joint dynamics is Markovian and only bounded operators are involved for the quantum part. If the interaction permits information to flow from the quantum to the classical component, the dynamics must be dissipative. This construction is linked to a hybrid dynamical semigroup that encompasses both quantum and classical limits.

Core claim

By using two coupled stochastic differential equations, a classical component and a quantum one can be described which have their own intrinsic dynamics and which interact with each other. A mathematically rigorous construction is given under the restriction of Markovian joint dynamics and bounded operators on the quantum Hilbert space. If the interaction allows a flow of information from the quantum component to the classical one, the dynamics is necessarily dissipative. The theory connects to a suitable hybrid dynamical semigroup, which reduces to a quantum dynamical semigroup in the purely quantum case and includes Liouville and Kolmogorov-Fokker-Planck equations in the purely classical 0

What carries the argument

two coupled stochastic differential equations that generate the joint Markovian evolution of the hybrid system

If this is right

  • The dynamics becomes dissipative whenever information flows from the quantum component to the classical one.
  • The associated hybrid dynamical semigroup reduces to standard quantum dynamical semigroups when the classical component is removed.
  • The same semigroup recovers Liouville and Kolmogorov-Fokker-Planck equations in the purely classical limit.
  • The stochastic construction permits direct comparison with other proposals based on hybrid master equations.
  • Simple models can exhibit a range of behaviors, including cases with hidden entanglement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same coupled-equation structure may support numerical trajectory simulations of hybrid systems that extend the original quantum-trajectory methods for open-system monitoring.
  • The dissipation requirement could limit the class of consistent hybrid master equations when quantum information reaches a classical observer.
  • The hidden-entanglement example suggests possible signatures of quantum correlations that appear only through their effect on classical observables.

Load-bearing premise

The joint dynamics must be Markovian and involve only bounded operators on the Hilbert space of the quantum component.

What would settle it

An explicit example of Markovian hybrid dynamics that permits quantum-to-classical information flow yet remains non-dissipative would falsify the necessity of dissipation.

read the original abstract

Quantum trajectory techniques have been used in the theory of open systems as a starting point for numerical computations and to describe the monitoring of a quantum system in continuous time. Here we extend this technique and use it to develop a general approach to the dynamics of quantum/classical hybrid systems. By using two coupled stochastic differential equations, we can describe a classical component and a quantum one which have their own intrinsic dynamics and which interact with each other. A mathematically rigorous construction is given, under the restriction of having a Markovian joint dynamics and of involving only bounded operators on the Hilbert space of the quantum component. An important feature is that, if the interaction allows for a flow of information from the quantum component to the classical one, necessarily the dynamics is dissipative. We show also how this theory is connected to a suitable hybrid dynamical semigroup, which reduces to a quantum dynamical semigroup in the purely quantum case and includes Liouville and Kolmogorov-Fokker-Plank equations in the purely classical case. Moreover, this semigroup allows to compare the proposed stochastic dynamics with various other proposals based on hybrid master equations. Some simple examples are constructed in order to show the variety of physical behaviours which can be described; in particular, a model presenting hidden entanglement is introduced.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a general framework for the Markovian dynamics of quantum/classical hybrid systems by means of two coupled stochastic differential equations, one for each component. The construction is mathematically rigorous under the explicit restrictions of Markovian joint evolution and bounded operators on the quantum Hilbert space. It derives that information flow from the quantum to the classical component necessarily induces dissipativity, connects the stochastic dynamics to a hybrid dynamical semigroup (recovering quantum dynamical semigroups and classical Liouville/Kolmogorov-Fokker-Planck equations in the respective limits), compares the approach with other hybrid master-equation proposals, and illustrates the framework with simple examples, including a model exhibiting hidden entanglement.

Significance. If the construction is correct, the work supplies a unified, trajectory-based description of hybrid systems that is directly comparable to existing semigroup and master-equation approaches. The explicit derivation of dissipativity from the information-flow condition and the clean reduction to the pure quantum and pure classical cases are useful features. The restriction to bounded operators and Markovian dynamics is clearly stated, so the result is well-scoped.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (construction of the coupled SDEs): the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the pair of SDEs is asserted under the bounded-operator assumption, but the proof sketch does not explicitly verify that the Lipschitz or linear-growth conditions remain satisfied after the quantum-to-classical coupling term is introduced; this step is load-bearing for the claim of a mathematically rigorous construction.
  2. [§4] §4 (hybrid dynamical semigroup): the generator of the semigroup is stated to reduce to the standard quantum dynamical semigroup when the classical component is absent, yet the explicit form of the generator (Eq. (27) or equivalent) is not shown to coincide with the Lindblad form without additional assumptions on the coupling; a direct verification would strengthen the reduction claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the classical stochastic process (e.g., the symbol for the classical state variable) is introduced inconsistently between the SDE section and the semigroup section; a single consistent symbol would improve readability.
  2. Figure 1 (schematic of the hybrid trajectory) lacks axis labels on the classical coordinate; this is a minor clarity issue but does not affect the argument.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. The two major comments identify places where the presentation can be strengthened by additional explicit verifications. We address each point below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (construction of the coupled SDEs): the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the pair of SDEs is asserted under the bounded-operator assumption, but the proof sketch does not explicitly verify that the Lipschitz or linear-growth conditions remain satisfied after the quantum-to-classical coupling term is introduced; this step is load-bearing for the claim of a mathematically rigorous construction.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the Lipschitz and linear-growth conditions after introducing the coupling term would make the argument fully self-contained. Under the standing assumption of bounded operators on the quantum Hilbert space, these conditions are preserved, but the manuscript presents only a sketch. In the revised version we will expand the argument in §3 to include the direct verification requested. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (hybrid dynamical semigroup): the generator of the semigroup is stated to reduce to the standard quantum dynamical semigroup when the classical component is absent, yet the explicit form of the generator (Eq. (27) or equivalent) is not shown to coincide with the Lindblad form without additional assumptions on the coupling; a direct verification would strengthen the reduction claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a direct, line-by-line comparison of the hybrid generator with the Lindblad form (when the classical sector is removed) would strengthen the reduction claim. The reduction is obtained by setting the classical variables constant and the coupling to zero, but the manuscript does not spell out the algebraic steps. We will add this explicit verification in the revised §4. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper presents a direct mathematical construction of coupled SDEs for Markovian hybrid quantum/classical dynamics, explicitly conditioned on bounded operators and Markovian joint evolution. The hybrid semigroup is derived from the stochastic equations, and reductions to pure quantum or classical limits follow from the general framework without self-referential definitions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. All results are stated as consequences of the stated restrictions rather than presupposed by them.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters or invented entities identified. The Markovian restriction is treated as a domain assumption.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Joint dynamics is Markovian
    Stated as a restriction enabling the rigorous construction.
  • domain assumption Only bounded operators on the quantum Hilbert space
    Restriction for the mathematical construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5740 in / 1148 out tokens · 26420 ms · 2026-05-24T02:45:31.994665+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Di´ osi, N

    L. Di´ osi, N. Gisin, W .T. Strunz, Quantum approach to coupling classical and quantum dynamic s, Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000) 022108

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Di´ osi,Hybrid quantum-classical master equations , Phys

    L. Di´ osi,Hybrid quantum-classical master equations , Phys. Scr. T163 (2014) 014004

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Di´ osi,Hybrid completely positive Markovian quantum-classical d ynamics, Phys

    L. Di´ osi,Hybrid completely positive Markovian quantum-classical d ynamics, Phys. Rev. A 107 (2023) 062206; Erratum, Phys. Rev. A 108 (2023) 059902(E)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Oppenheim, C

    J. Oppenheim, C. Sparaciari, B. ˇSoda, Z. Weller-Davies, The two classes of hybrid classical-quantum dynamics , arXiv:2203.01332 [quant-ph] (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Layton, J

    I. Layton, J. Oppenheim, Z. Weller-Davies, A healthier semi-classical dynamics , arXiv:2208.11722 [quant-ph] (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Oppenheim, C

    J. Oppenheim, C. Sparaciari, B. ˇSoda, Z. Weller-Davies, Objective trajectories in hybrid classical-quantum dy- namics, Quantum 7 (2023) 891

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Dammeier, R.F

    L. Dammeier, R.F. Werner, Quantum-classical hybrid systems and their quasifree tran sformations, Quantum 7 (2023) 1068

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Sergi, D

    A. Sergi, D. Lamberto, A. Migliore, A. Messina, Quantum–classical hybrid systems and Ehrenfest’s Theorem , Entropy 25 (2023) 602

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Manfredi, A

    G. Manfredi, A. Rittaud, C. Tronci, Hybrid quantum-classical dynamics of pure-dephasing syst ems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56 (2023) 154002

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Bauer, P

    W . Bauer, P . Bergold, F. Gay-Balmaz, C. Tronci, Koopmon trajectories in nonadiabatic quantum-classical d y- namics, arXiv:2312.13878[quant-ph] (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Alonso, C

    J.L. Alonso, C. Bouthelier-Madre, J. Clemente-Gallar do, D. Mart´ ınez-Crespo, J. Pomar, Effective nonlinear Ehrenfest hybrid quantum-classical dynamics , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138 (2023) 649

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Brizuela, S.F

    D. Brizuela, S.F. Uria, Hybrid classical-quantum systems in terms of moments, Phys. Rev. A 109 (2024) 032209

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Barchielli, R

    A. Barchielli, R. Werner, Hybrid quantum-classical systems: Quasi-free Markovian d ynamics, Int. J. Quantum Inf. (2024) DOI: 10.1142/S021974992440002 1

    work page doi:10.1142/s021974992440002 2024

  14. [14]

    Barchielli, Markovian master equations for quantum-classical hybrid s ystems, Phys

    A. Barchielli, Markovian master equations for quantum-classical hybrid s ystems, Phys. Lett. A 492 (2023) 129230

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Barchielli, Measurement theory and stochastic differential equations in quantum mechanics , Phys

    A. Barchielli, Measurement theory and stochastic differential equations in quantum mechanics , Phys. Rev. A 34 (1986) 1642–1649

    work page 1986

  16. [16]

    Belavkin, Nondemolition measurements, nonlinear filtering and dynam ic programming of quantum stochastic processes

    V .P . Belavkin, Nondemolition measurements, nonlinear filtering and dynam ic programming of quantum stochastic processes . In A. Blaqui` ere (ed.), Modelling and Control of Systems , Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 121 (Springer, Berlin, 1988) pp. 245–265

    work page 1988

  17. [17]

    Belavkin, A new wave equation for a continuous nondemolition measurem ent, Phys

    V .P . Belavkin, A new wave equation for a continuous nondemolition measurem ent, Phys. Lett. A 140 (1989) 355-358

    work page 1989

  18. [18]

    Barchielli, V .P

    A. Barchielli, V .P . Belavkin, Measurements continuous in time and a posteriori states in q uantum mechanics , J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 24 (1991) 1495–1514

    work page 1991

  19. [19]

    Barchielli, On the quantum theory of measurements continuous in time , Rep

    A. Barchielli, On the quantum theory of measurements continuous in time , Rep. Math. Phys. 33 (1993) 21–34

    work page 1993

  20. [20]

    Zoller and C.W

    P . Zoller and C.W . Gardiner, Quantum noise in quantum optics: the stochastic Schr¨ oding er equation . In S. Reynaud, E. Giacobino & J. Zinn-Justin eds., Fluctuations quantiques, (Les Houches 1995) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1997) pp. 79–136. 23

    work page 1995

  21. [21]

    Barchielli, A.M

    A. Barchielli, A.M. Paganoni, F. Zucca, On stochastic differential equations and semigroups of pro bability oper- ators in quantum probability , Stoch. Proc. Appl. 73 (1998). 69–86

    work page 1998

  22. [22]

    Holevo, Statistical Structure of Quantum Theory , Lecture Notes in Physics m 67 (Springer, Berlin, 2001)

    A.S. Holevo, Statistical Structure of Quantum Theory , Lecture Notes in Physics m 67 (Springer, Berlin, 2001)

    work page 2001

  23. [23]

    Barchielli, M

    A. Barchielli, M. Gregoratti, Quantum Trajectories and Measurements in Continuous Time: The Diffusive Case, Lect. Notes Phys. 782 (Springer, Berlin & Heidelberg, 2009)

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    Wiseman and G.J

    H.M. Wiseman and G.J. Milburn, Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    Barchielli, Continual Measurements in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum St ochastic Calculus

    A. Barchielli, Continual Measurements in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum St ochastic Calculus. In S. Attal, A. Joye, C.-A. Pillet (eds.), Open Quantum Systems III , Lect. Notes Math. 1882 (Springer, Berlin, 2006), pp. 207–291

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    Bouten, M

    L. Bouten, M. Gut ¸˘ a, H. Maassen,Stochastic Schr¨ odinger equations, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 (2004) 3189

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    Maassen, Continuous observation of quantum systems, Int

    H. Maassen, Continuous observation of quantum systems, Int. J. Quantum Inf. (2024) DOI: 10.1142/S02197499244001 12

    work page doi:10.1142/s02197499244001 2024

  28. [28]

    Tilloy, General quantum-classical dynamics as measurement based f eedback, arXiv:2403.19748 [quant-ph] (2024)

    A. Tilloy, General quantum-classical dynamics as measurement based f eedback, arXiv:2403.19748 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Mimona, M.H

    M.A. Mimona, M.H. Mobarak, E. Ahmed, F. Kamal, M. Hasan, Nanowires: Exponential speedup in quantum computing, Heliyon 10 (2024) e31940

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Oppenheim, Z

    J. Oppenheim, Z. Weller-Davies, The constraints of post-quantum classical gravity , J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 80 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Layton, J

    I. Layton, J. Oppenheim, A. Russo, Z. Weller-Davies, The weak field limit of quantum matter back-reacting on classical spacetime, J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 163 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Prosperi, M

    G.M. Prosperi, M. Baldicchi, Interpretation of Quantum Theory and Cosmology , arXiv:2304.07095 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    M.J.W . Hall, M. Reginatto, On two recent proposals for witnessing nonclassical gravit y, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 (2018) 085303

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Lo Franco, G

    R. Lo Franco, G. Compagno, Overview on the phenomenon of two-qubit entanglement reviv als in classical environments, in F. Fernandes Fanchini, D. de Oliveira Soares Pinto, G. Ad esso, Lectures on General Quantum Correlations and their Applications (Springer, Cham, 2017) pp. 367–391

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Barchielli, M

    A. Barchielli, M. Gregoratti, Entanglement protection and generation under continuous m onitoring, in L. Ac- cardi, F. Fagnola, Quantum Probability and Related T opics , QP-PQ: Quantum Probability and White Noise Analysis, V ol. 29, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2013) pp. 17–42

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Barchielli, A.S

    A. Barchielli, A.S. Holevo, Constructing quantum measurement processes via classical stochastic calculus , Stoch. Proc. Appl. 58 (1995) 293–317

    work page 1995

  37. [37]

    Barchielli, M

    A. Barchielli, M. Gregoratti, Quantum measurements in continuous time, non-Markovian ev olutions and feed- back, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370 no. 1979 (2012) 5364–5385

    work page 1979

  38. [38]

    M´ etivier,Semimartingales, a Course on Stochastic Processes (W

    M. M´ etivier,Semimartingales, a Course on Stochastic Processes (W . de Gruyter, Berlin, 1982)

    work page 1982

  39. [39]

    Ikeda, S

    N. Ikeda, S. Watanabe, Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion Processe s, Second Edition (North- Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1989)

    work page 1989

  40. [40]

    Liptser, A.N

    R.Sh. Liptser, A.N. Shiryayev, Theory of Martingales , (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1986)

    work page 1986

  41. [41]

    Da Prato, J

    G. Da Prato, J. Zabczyk, Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dimensions , II Edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Protter, Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations, II Edition (Springer, Berlin, 2004) 24

    P .E. Protter, Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations, II Edition (Springer, Berlin, 2004) 24

    work page 2004

  43. [43]

    Ethier, T.G

    S.N. Ethier, T.G. Kurtz, Markov Processes — Characterization and Convergence (Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2005)

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    Applebaum, L´evy Processes and Stochastic Calculus , Second Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    D. Applebaum, L´evy Processes and Stochastic Calculus , Second Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    work page 2009

  45. [45]

    Sato, L´evy processes and infinitely divisible distributions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    K. Sato, L´evy processes and infinitely divisible distributions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    work page 1999

  46. [46]

    Holevo, A noncommutative generalization of conditionally positiv e definite func- tions, in L

    A.S. Holevo, A noncommutative generalization of conditionally positiv e definite func- tions, in L. Accardi, W . von Waldenfels (eds.), Quantum Probability and Applications III . Lecture Notes in Mathematics, V ol. 1303 (Springer, Berlin, 1988), pp. 128–148

    work page 1988

  47. [47]

    D’Arrigo, R

    A. D’Arrigo, R. Lo Franco, G. Benenti, E. Paladino, G. Fa lci, Recovering entanglement by local operations , Ann. Phys. 350 (2014) 211–224

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Barchielli, G

    A. Barchielli, G. Lupieri, Information gain in quantum continual measurements , in V .P . Belavkin and M. Gut ¸ˇ a, Quantum Stochastic and Information (World Scientific, Singapore, 2008) pp. 325–345

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    Xiong, An Introduction to Stochastic Filtering Theory , vol

    J. Xiong, An Introduction to Stochastic Filtering Theory , vol. 18, OUP Oxford, 2008

    work page 2008

  50. [50]

    Holevo, Quantum Systems, Channels, Information (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2012)

    A.S. Holevo, Quantum Systems, Channels, Information (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    Holevo, Conditionally positive definite functions in quantum proba bility, Proc

    A.S. Holevo, Conditionally positive definite functions in quantum proba bility, Proc. Int. Cong. Math. 1011-1020 (1986) Berkeley

    work page 1986

  52. [52]

    Holevo, Limit theorems for repeated measurements and continuous me asurement pro- cesses, in L

    A.S. Holevo, Limit theorems for repeated measurements and continuous me asurement pro- cesses, in L. Accardi, W . von Waldenfels (eds.), Quantum Probability and Applications IV , Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1396 (Springer, Berlin, 1989) pp. 229–257

    work page 1989

  53. [53]

    Barchielli, Probability operators and convolution semigroups of instr uments in quantum probability , Probab

    A. Barchielli, Probability operators and convolution semigroups of instr uments in quantum probability , Probab. Theory Rel. Fields 82 (1989) 1–8

    work page 1989

  54. [54]

    Barchielli, G

    A. Barchielli, G. Lupieri, A quantum analogue of Hunt’s representation theorem for the generator of convolution semigroups on Lie groups , Probab. Theory Rel. Fields 88 (1991) 167–194

    work page 1991

  55. [55]

    Barchielli, A.S

    A. Barchielli, A.S. Holevo, G. Lupieri, An analogue of Hunt’s representation theorem in quantum pro bability, J. Theor. Probab. 6 (1993) 231–265

    work page 1993

  56. [56]

    Barchielli, A.M

    A. Barchielli, A.M. Paganoni, A note on a formula of L´ evy–Khinchin type in quantum probabi lity, Nagoya Math. J. 141 (1996) 29–43

    work page 1996

  57. [57]

    Demoen, P

    B. Demoen, P . V anheuverzwijn, A. V erbeure, Completely positive quasi-free maps of the CCR-algebra , Rep. Math. Phys. 15 (1979) 27–39

    work page 1979

  58. [58]

    Jacobs, Quantum Measurement Theory and its Applications (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    K. Jacobs, Quantum Measurement Theory and its Applications (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    V ogelsberger, D

    S. V ogelsberger, D. Spehner, Average entanglement for Markovian quantum trajectories , Phys. Rev. A 82 (2010) 052327

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    Viviescas, I

    C. Viviescas, I. Guevara, A.R.R. Carvalho, M. Busse, A. Buchleitner, Entanglement dynamics in open two-qubit systems via diffusive quantum trajectories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 210502

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    Mascarenhas, D

    E. Mascarenhas, D. Cavalcanti, V . V edral, M. Franc ¸a Santos, Physically realizable entanglement by local con- tinuous measurements, Phys. Rev. A 83 (2011) 022311

    work page 2011

  62. [62]

    Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubit s, Phys

    W .K. Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubit s, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 2245-2248

    work page 1998

  63. [63]

    Benoist, C

    T. Benoist, C. Pellegrini, F. Ticozzi, Exponential stability of subspaces for quantum stochastic master equations, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e 18 (2017) 2045–2074

    work page 2017

  64. [64]

    Liang, K

    W . Liang, K. Ohki, F. Ticozzi, On the Robustness of Stability for Quantum Stochastic Syste ms, 62nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (2023), p p. 7202-7207. 25

    work page 2023