{"as_of":"2026-08-22T21:42:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:f80ef685231e13852747eda8e8dc4bb33f3cdb2095245a61be215df832c28bb4","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:43:04.922619Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-06-30T14:14:45.791749Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2403.16630","last_updated":"2024-03-25T11:20:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T14:06:44.659293Z","submitted_at":"2024-03-25T11:20:23Z","title":"A comparative analysis of embedding models for patent similarity","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2403.16630","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:43:04.922619Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.14845","last_updated":"2025-04-21T03:56:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T05:19:22.475901Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-21T03:56:56Z","title":"Enhancing the Patent Matching Capability of Large Language Models via the Memory Graph","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:43:04.922619Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2403.16630","citing_paper":"/paper/2504.14845"},"observation_digest":"sha256:87d6b431a798ac64023d85c5248eeffba5e837ef081835228062bb9384c9332d","observation_id":"e4655936-a91f-4dbb-98ac-cd22833ea964","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T11:43:04.922619Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2403.16630","last_updated":"2024-03-25T11:20:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T14:06:44.659293Z","submitted_at":"2024-03-25T11:20:23Z","title":"A comparative analysis of embedding models for patent similarity","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2403.16630","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2403.16630","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-30T14:14:45.791749Z","title":"Homaira Huda Shomee, Zhu Wang, Sathya N","venue":null,"work_id":"a43a9cbb-b1d0-4fb6-908b-6c908191adeb","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.24297","last_updated":"2026-05-26T04:08:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T01:37:18.930107Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-22T23:51:13Z","title":"Benchmarking Patent Embeddings: A Multi-Task Evaluation of 22 Models Across Retrieval, Classification, and Clustering","version":2},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-30T14:06:57.864207Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2403.16630","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.24297"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7ca5fa3623e5e7ad11cdd72a747b5d3bed35f731e28bd59402b8fb5aa3c65475","observation_id":"9a49312b-b303-4be6-bcdd-1ec6f4c41156","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-30T14:14:45.794759Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2403.16630/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2403.16630/integrity","json":"/paper/2403.16630/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2403.16630"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2403.16630","last_updated":"2024-03-25T11:20:23Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T14:06:44.659293Z","submitted_at":"2024-03-25T11:20:23Z","title":"A comparative analysis of embedding models for patent similarity"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 22 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2403.16630."}