{"as_of":"2026-08-09T00:49:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:7d28fed143d09765216a7776a86061b015de05d3935d7e40770ddac2f344fc02","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:42:32.051262Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-11T20:06:10.240626Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.04044","last_updated":"2024-04-09T17:56:48Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T17:56:06.438303Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-05T11:55:52Z","title":"A Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Generative IR","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.04044","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:42:32.051262Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.02139","last_updated":"2025-07-02T20:53:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:34:34.324037Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T20:53:51Z","title":"When LLMs Disagree: Diagnosing Relevance Filtering Bias and Retrieval Divergence in SDG Search","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:42:32.051262Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.04044","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.02139"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0532b85aa07e868019764385fa6ce102b9e3c771faea43840adb0438b0df32c3","observation_id":"bca3573b-db1a-4101-8758-e14116f54ee3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:42:32.051262Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.04044","last_updated":"2024-04-09T17:56:48Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T17:56:06.438303Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-05T11:55:52Z","title":"A Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Generative IR","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2404.04044","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2404.04044","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"8776f22e-38dc-4a43-b612-f175a2326ab3","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.22661","last_updated":"2026-04-24T15:36:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T01:04:19.885169Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-24T15:36:40Z","title":"Can QPP Choose the Right Query Variant? Evaluating Query Variant Selection for RAG Pipelines","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-08T10:18:59.759192Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.04044","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.22661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bbcbeb71eb9de743d0cc581b4c2c41e9e12285cbbd8185f354c2ba52fcd6a12d","observation_id":"03999d8e-e593-40f4-9716-64d97605f004","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-11T20:06:10.314156Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2404.04044/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2404.04044/integrity","json":"/paper/2404.04044/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2404.04044"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.04044","last_updated":"2024-04-09T17:56:48Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.IR","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T17:56:06.438303Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-05T11:55:52Z","title":"A Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Generative IR"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2404.04044."}