{"as_of":"2026-08-08T13:09:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:7ac87b192fdb40fdc199aeb2ad2a19c022e5c9d4217782b61feb534a8ae12353","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":14,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":14,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":14,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":14,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:01:28.938242Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-07-04T10:09:44.100926Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:01:28.938242Z","title":"Xu, R., Qi, Z., Guo, Z., Wang, C., Wang, H., Zhang, Y ., and Xu, W","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08059","last_updated":"2025-02-12T01:54:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T10:56:07.367846Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T01:54:21Z","title":"On Mechanistic Circuits for Extractive Question-Answering","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:01:28.938242Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08059"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3ae424a7adcb1d8d7ace2bb298cd95e7ca9f353de726ff3ad6525e9fa93f0b68","observation_id":"69c24aeb-0820-4b64-8237-b98e902084a4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:01:28.938242Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:30:33.323727Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05167","last_updated":"2025-06-06T07:57:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T05:05:40.728281Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T15:43:49Z","title":"ECoRAG: Evidentiality-guided Compression for Long Context RAG","version":2},"reference_index":45,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:30:33.323727Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05167"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a0b6424ba694565a686469bc382f60a510a6110057f37af6b79d6ed24743880f","observation_id":"7668e47d-3839-4d48-8846-ffee944c9e48","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:30:33.323727Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T15:38:55.183547Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.19689","last_updated":"2025-08-27T08:52:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T07:48:25.655053Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-27T08:52:47Z","title":"Building Task Bots with Self-learning for Enhanced Adaptability, Extensibility, and Factuality","version":1},"reference_index":193,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T15:38:55.183547Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2508.19689"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5049404429a6435abf7c4df7af31bce32bce494dc16bec3a2cf15e1abd50e5ae","observation_id":"466429bb-5d8b-47e4-ab7a-90ee3dd8ac48","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T15:38:55.183547Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T12:11:34.268788Z","title":"How faithful are rag models? quantifying the tug-of-war between rag and llms’ internal prior","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2509.04499","last_updated":"2025-09-02T00:32:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T03:42:39.829426Z","submitted_at":"2025-09-02T00:32:38Z","title":"DeepTRACE: Auditing Deep Research AI Systems for Tracking Reliability Across Citations and Evidence","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T12:11:34.268788Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2509.04499"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0947de4e02f07fab38af254ae5ecf4012091787001a72c9218993c134109f749","observation_id":"0b060272-c084-446e-b192-9712ed71c677","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T12:11:34.268788Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T22:55:16.868259Z","title":"ClashEval : Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM 's internal prior and external evidence, February 2025 b","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2509.06902","last_updated":"2025-09-08T17:20:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T06:34:08.530615Z","submitted_at":"2025-09-08T17:20:16Z","title":"Proof-Carrying Numbers (PCN): A Protocol for Trustworthy Numeric Answers from LLMs via Claim Verification","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T22:55:16.868259Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2509.06902"},"observation_digest":"sha256:63f027f9a591d80889c8f4eea1500eba769ffeaa51650029b7725e8a654bc555","observation_id":"14143efc-35e6-44ef-a564-35a3f2b77a4a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T22:55:16.868259Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-04T10:09:44.100926Z","title":"ClashE- val: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM’s internal prior and external evidence","venue":null,"work_id":"3dd1ac28-9cce-40ed-958d-932d3d45afca","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.25313","last_updated":"2026-04-29T17:00:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T01:32:14.049278Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-28T07:21:46Z","title":"Faithfulness-QA: A Counterfactual Entity Substitution Dataset for Training Context-Faithful RAG Models","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-07T16:40:54.825257Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.25313"},"observation_digest":"sha256:84dc036dfe7bce5968ec3418654461d651a2712055fb4bfda3ac8b7cc302c330","observation_id":"fee3ea08-3205-4200-a5ff-ba3587a88225","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-11T23:36:26.627449Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-04T10:09:44.100926Z","title":"ClashE- val: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM’s internal prior and external evidence","venue":null,"work_id":"3dd1ac28-9cce-40ed-958d-932d3d45afca","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.14473","last_updated":"2026-07-19T02:26:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T14:06:25.310847Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T07:14:19Z","title":"Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflict","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-15T02:03:23.662430Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.14473"},"observation_digest":"sha256:15d9fba31a494e2092a90bdaeebb894d9e8d51543783a0590fd4109265574405","observation_id":"be832624-ac75-466c-8f3f-0d02c5b028b8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-15T02:03:28.762905Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-04T10:09:44.100926Z","title":"ClashE- val: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM’s internal prior and external evidence","venue":null,"work_id":"3dd1ac28-9cce-40ed-958d-932d3d45afca","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.14473","last_updated":"2026-07-19T02:26:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T14:06:25.310847Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T07:14:19Z","title":"Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflict","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-19T16:38:32.946287Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.14473"},"observation_digest":"sha256:907438b0bc0a750135c8ef903858fa8cf3ae9154784e56a781de08d4f2d6e4f0","observation_id":"13548d26-5811-4191-803f-7aaed09999b6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-19T16:42:39.910126Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-04T10:09:44.100926Z","title":"ClashE- val: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM’s internal prior and external evidence","venue":null,"work_id":"3dd1ac28-9cce-40ed-958d-932d3d45afca","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.18310","last_updated":"2026-06-16T09:17:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T18:50:01.682045Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-16T09:17:56Z","title":"Conflict-Aware Retriever Editing for Knowledge Injection Attacks on LLM-Based RAG Systems","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-27T00:29:09.121399Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.18310"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3a85f0a38fd0c019d3eb125a039b203626cea22d99937c0795d92dab02360b50","observation_id":"3f7ef5af-b924-45f5-9bd9-1f3d76224b1e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-03T21:28:59.083732Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-04T10:09:44.100926Z","title":"ClashE- val: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM’s internal prior and external evidence","venue":null,"work_id":"3dd1ac28-9cce-40ed-958d-932d3d45afca","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22728","last_updated":"2026-06-22T00:08:00Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T10:58:14.814746Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-22T00:08:00Z","title":"When Confidence Takes the Wrong Path: Diagnosing Retrieval-State Lock-In in RAG","version":1},"reference_index":68,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:10:58.722292Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22728"},"observation_digest":"sha256:49aae3ccd5f7c937c74307493f87bcb7dcf62123fdf0ff364a9d0c2854905021","observation_id":"b147d524-acdc-4b8c-8243-cc25d35a8583","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-04T10:09:44.102417Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T07:36:43.499258Z","title":"Clasheval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM’s internal prior and external evidence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10198,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.11020","last_updated":"2026-07-14T05:59:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T22:32:33.467630Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-13T02:39:38Z","title":"Can a Language Model Learn Facts Continually in Its Weights?","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T07:36:43.499258Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.11020"},"observation_digest":"sha256:efb9183175028c2a7cceec2faaff7f22524cb598d057ef217e0748b5a3fec165","observation_id":"1e2eba84-5b9d-4d3d-9b69-c18548195b0a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T07:36:43.499258Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T14:44:03.386535Z","title":"doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.10198 , abstract =","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.18673","last_updated":"2026-08-03T23:44:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:09:34.423169Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-21T03:43:50Z","title":"MissingBench-Verified: Probing Vision-Language Models' Inability to Detect Missing Object Parts","version":2},"reference_index":20,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T14:44:03.386535Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.18673"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b2a3b3dbfd18a04c083e6223f479bc6294a6020f2403fea22c3a0ba98c6f8ef2","observation_id":"d8e570cf-2f22-4297-ae7f-1fa1469dd6c3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T14:44:03.386535Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T13:26:27.120009Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM’s internal prior and external evidence, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.19355","last_updated":"2026-05-22T12:13:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:44:05.596114Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-22T12:13:16Z","title":"Information Discernment in Large Language Models","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T13:26:27.120009Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.19355"},"observation_digest":"sha256:17dba08710b76893fa103309701763338527021638457d34a3bac0e514c1baa1","observation_id":"0c3c4960-c756-4576-b6ec-4b9e55d6d82a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T13:26:27.120009Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.10198","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T07:56:28.653902Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10198 , year =","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28421","last_updated":"2026-07-30T16:01:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T01:00:23.448415Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T16:01:17Z","title":"When Derived Measurements Mislead: Quantifying and Mitigating LLM Over-Trust with Privileged-Modality Reliability Evidence","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T07:56:28.653902Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.10198","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28421"},"observation_digest":"sha256:30723aa2ddb420882110c5e35ae5e98490319176460a8002f6ca887fe19bdf95","observation_id":"71529258-6971-4ee7-8a0d-335d55e991a8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T07:56:28.653902Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2404.10198/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2404.10198/integrity","json":"/paper/2404.10198/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2404.10198"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.10198","last_updated":"2025-02-07T05:11:18Z","latest_version":3,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:08:45.905396Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-16T00:43:03Z","title":"ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 14 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2404.10198."}