{"as_of":"2026-08-10T11:03:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:cccee77b417fed094b3910ac22e0bf3a798fb859b945892aad99215969a8bdce","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":4,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":4,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:25:55.605482Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-07-11T00:37:43.083887Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2405.11966","last_updated":"2024-06-26T07:16:42Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:16:42.428308Z","submitted_at":"2024-05-20T11:47:13Z","title":"Multiple-Choice Questions are Efficient and Robust LLM Evaluators","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2405.11966","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:25:55.605482Z","title":"Zhang, Z","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.03120","last_updated":"2025-07-03T18:57:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T13:48:48.934149Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-03T18:57:43Z","title":"How Overconfidence in Initial Choices and Underconfidence Under Criticism Modulate Change of Mind in Large Language Models","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:25:55.605482Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2405.11966","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.03120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a533289eab00aa9680ef2ec56e2802c921bd466a2a25eca558a6b58653970467","observation_id":"9cd09aa1-07ac-4a8b-97e1-54a882256b8d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:25:55.605482Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2405.11966","last_updated":"2024-06-26T07:16:42Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:16:42.428308Z","submitted_at":"2024-05-20T11:47:13Z","title":"Multiple-Choice Questions are Efficient and Robust LLM Evaluators","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2405.11966","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2405.11966","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-11T00:37:43.083887Z","title":"Zhang, Z","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"b29d4349-c0a1-49f4-8a76-7ce603a9d018","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.20189","last_updated":"2026-03-23T07:18:02Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T19:18:00.278267Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-23T07:18:02Z","title":"SOLAR: A Self-Optimizing Open-Ended Autonomous Agent for Lifelong Learning and Continual Adaptation","version":1},"reference_index":70,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-21T11:21:30.867480Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2405.11966","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.20189"},"observation_digest":"sha256:90d4687e483bc79dc5b5464846ebe8e291e4e382820d98c80e9415c6febdf340","observation_id":"f3681a94-48cc-4364-9f78-cb169a8efb25","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-21T11:24:08.725299Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2405.11966","last_updated":"2024-06-26T07:16:42Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:16:42.428308Z","submitted_at":"2024-05-20T11:47:13Z","title":"Multiple-Choice Questions are Efficient and Robust LLM Evaluators","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2405.11966","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2405.11966","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-11T00:37:43.083887Z","title":"Zhang, Z","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"b29d4349-c0a1-49f4-8a76-7ce603a9d018","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.06648","last_updated":"2026-07-07T16:09:44Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T05:01:17.390224Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-07T16:09:44Z","title":"Final Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Analyzing Latent Reasoning Faithfulness Along Training Trajectories","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-07-11T00:27:52.555374Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2405.11966","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.06648"},"observation_digest":"sha256:deaf18f3d268749a3a86425beb784fb66fe225a1e6b4265c613ef6a8816acd3a","observation_id":"faa683af-a1b4-4266-8f93-c83df83b90b5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-11T00:37:43.109438Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2405.11966","last_updated":"2024-06-26T07:16:42Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:16:42.428308Z","submitted_at":"2024-05-20T11:47:13Z","title":"Multiple-Choice Questions are Efficient and Robust LLM Evaluators","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2405.11966","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T00:57:40.656207Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.25996","last_updated":"2026-07-28T17:12:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:45:03.380671Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-28T17:12:41Z","title":"RepoReasoner: Evaluating Repository-Level Code Reasoning Ability of Long-Context Language Models","version":1},"reference_index":63,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T00:57:40.656207Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2405.11966","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.25996"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b1e8fa29fd6eb3382b9ca0a6b3ca81fbfa9e6f7b00f3f1d12abf91d39b15c85a","observation_id":"e1e7d8bc-0e67-4f80-ae6c-aa7c80360e4a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T00:57:40.656207Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2405.11966/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2405.11966/integrity","json":"/paper/2405.11966/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2405.11966"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2405.11966","last_updated":"2024-06-26T07:16:42Z","latest_version":4,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:16:42.428308Z","submitted_at":"2024-05-20T11:47:13Z","title":"Multiple-Choice Questions are Efficient and Robust LLM Evaluators"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 4 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2405.11966."}