pith. sign in

arxiv: 2405.15648 · v3 · submitted 2024-05-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · hep-th· math-ph· math.MP· math.QA

Self-G-ality in 1+1 dimensions

Takamasa Ando This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 00:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el hep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.QA
keywords self-G-alitytopological manipulationsfusion category symmetriesLSM-type constraintsone-dimensional systemsdual symmetrylattice modelscritical theories
0
0 comments X

The pith

Self-G-ality conditions from invariant topological manipulations impose LSM-type constraints on ground states of 1D many-body systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines topological manipulations in one spatial dimension that map a system with global symmetry to another with dual symmetry. It defines self-G-alities as the enhancement of fusion category symmetries when the actions of these manipulations remain invariant. From the resulting self-G-ality conditions, LSM-type constraints follow for the possible ground states of Hamiltonians. The work also maps how separate enhanced symmetries interact and combine, and checks the structures against explicit lattice models whose infrared limits are critical theories.

Core claim

Topological manipulations in one spatial dimension, defined for a system with a global symmetry and mapping the system to another one with a dual symmetry, can enhance fusion category symmetries through invariance of their actions; these enhanced structures are called self-G-alities. The self-G-ality conditions then supply LSM-type constraints on the ground states of many-body Hamiltonians. Relationships between different enhanced symmetries are clarified, including how they further enhance when they meet, and concrete lattice models are identified in which the self-G-ality structures match the infrared critical theories.

What carries the argument

self-G-ality, the enhancement of fusion category symmetries arising when the actions of topological manipulations remain invariant under those symmetries.

If this is right

  • Ground states of Hamiltonians satisfying self-G-ality conditions must obey LSM-type constraints.
  • Enhanced symmetries relate to one another and can combine into further enhancements.
  • Concrete lattice models can be built whose self-G-ality structures align with specific infrared critical theories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The constraints may restrict allowed phases in 1D systems protected by categorical symmetries beyond ordinary group symmetries.
  • The same invariance logic could be tested in time-periodic or dissipative 1D chains to see whether the constraints survive.
  • Matching lattice models to infrared theories suggests a route to classify critical points by their self-G-ality data.

Load-bearing premise

The actions of topological manipulations remain invariant under the enhanced fusion category symmetries.

What would settle it

A lattice Hamiltonian obeying self-G-ality whose ground state violates the derived LSM-type constraint, or whose infrared critical theory fails to match the self-G-ality structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2405.15648 by Takamasa Ando.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The phase diagram of the Hamiltonian ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The relation between the XXZ model and the Ashkin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Three gapped phases with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explore topological manipulations in one spatial dimension, which are defined for a system with a global symmetry and map the system to another one with a dual symmetry. In particular, we discuss fusion category symmetries enhanced by the invariance of the actions of topological manipulations, i.e., self-$G$-alities for topological manipulations. Based on the self-$G$-ality conditions, we provide LSM-type constraints on the ground states of many-body Hamiltonians. We clarify the relationship between different enhanced symmetries and how they are further enhanced when they meet. We explore concrete lattice models for such self-$G$-alities and identify how the self-$G$-ality structures match the IR critical theories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores topological manipulations in one spatial dimension for systems with global symmetry, which map the system to one with a dual symmetry. It introduces self-G-alities arising from fusion category symmetries enhanced by the invariance of the actions of these topological manipulations. Based on the self-G-ality conditions, it provides LSM-type constraints on the ground states of many-body Hamiltonians. The work clarifies relationships between different enhanced symmetries and how they are further enhanced, and examines concrete lattice models to identify how the self-G-ality structures match the IR critical theories.

Significance. If the results hold, the framework of self-G-alities could provide new LSM-type constraints on ground states in 1D symmetric systems and link lattice realizations to IR theories via enhanced fusion category symmetries. This would contribute to understanding dualities and topological manipulations in condensed matter systems. The abstract mentions concrete lattice models and IR matching, which if substantiated could strengthen the claims.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: the central claims that self-G-ality conditions yield LSM-type constraints and that lattice models match IR critical theories cannot be evaluated, as the provided text contains no definitions of self-G-ality, no derivations, no explicit checks, and no equations or sections to inspect.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [—] Abstract: the central claims that self-G-ality conditions yield LSM-type constraints and that lattice models match IR critical theories cannot be evaluated, as the provided text contains no definitions of self-G-ality, no derivations, no explicit checks, and no equations or sections to inspect.

    Authors: We note that abstracts are concise summaries and do not typically include detailed definitions, derivations, equations, or section references, as these would violate length constraints. The full manuscript (available on arXiv) defines self-G-ality for fusion category symmetries in the main text, derives the LSM-type constraints from the self-G-ality conditions, and provides explicit lattice model examples with IR critical theory matching, including checks. The referee's concern appears to stem from reviewing only the abstract rather than the complete paper. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; abstract provides no derivations or equations

full rationale

The provided document consists solely of the paper's abstract, which describes the exploration of topological manipulations, self-G-ality conditions, and LSM-type constraints without presenting any equations, definitions, or derivation steps. No load-bearing claims, self-citations, fitted parameters, or ansatzes are visible that could be inspected for reduction to inputs by construction. Per the analysis rules, circularity requires explicit quotation of a paper equation or step that reduces to itself; none exists here, so the finding is no significant circularity with score 0 and empty steps list. The derivation chain cannot be walked due to absence of technical content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; specific free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be extracted or enumerated from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5613 in / 909 out tokens · 16211 ms · 2026-05-24T00:28:02.815977+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Symmetry Spans and Enforced Gaplessness

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Symmetry spans enforce gaplessness when a symmetry E embedded into two larger symmetries C and D has no compatible gapped phase that restricts from both.

  2. Defect Charges, Gapped Boundary Conditions, and the Symmetry TFT

    hep-th 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Defect charges under generalized symmetries correspond one-to-one with gapped boundary conditions of the Symmetry TFT Z(C) on Y = Σ_{d-p+1} × S^{p-1} via dimensional reduction.

  3. Extending fusion rules with finite subgroups: A general construction of $Z_{N}$ extended conformal field theories and their orbifoldings

    hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Constructs Z_N extended fusion rings and modular partition functions for nonanomalous subgroups, extending to multicomponent systems and orbifoldings in CFTs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In the proof of Proposition 2, the point is that we can define SPTs with level 1/k

    Therefore, an SPT with level-1/2 is self-dual under the manipulationf. In the proof of Proposition 2, the point is that we can define SPTs with level 1/k. Such a dividing is not defined for general integersn. Nevertheless, we can use the same duality operation for some SPT pairs. By simple consid- eration, we find that this happens when the difference of ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Tensor-Entanglement-Filtering Renormalization Approach and Symmetry Protected Topological Order

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Tensor-Entanglement-Filtering Renormalization Approach and Symmetry Protected Topological Order, Phys. Rev. B80, 155131 (2009), arXiv:0903.1069 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    Symmetry protection of topological order in one-dimensional quantum spin systems

    F. Pollmann, E. Berg, A. M. Turner, and M. Os- hikawa, Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. B85, 075125 (2012), arXiv:0909.4059 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension

    F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Os- hikawa, Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B81, 064439 (2010), arXiv:0910.1811 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    Classification of Gapped Symmetric Phases in 1D Spin Systems

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B83, 035107 (2011), arXiv:1008.3745 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Classifying quantum phases using Matrix Product States and PEPS

    N. Schuch, D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, and I. Cirac, Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and pro- jected entangled pair states, Phys. Rev. B84, 165139 (2011), arXiv:1010.3732 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group, Phys. Rev. B87, 155114 (2013), arXiv:1106.4772 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases

    M. Levin and Z.-C. Gu, Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. B86, 115109 (2012), arXiv:1202.3120 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality

    A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg, Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality, JHEP04, 001, arXiv:1401.0740 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Wil- lett, Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP02, 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Bhardwaj and Y

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions, JHEP03, 189, arXiv:1704.02330 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin, Topological Defect Lines and Renormaliza- tion Group Flows in Two Dimensions, JHEP01, 026, arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, Fusion category symmetry. Part I. Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases, JHEP04, 132, arXiv:1912.02817 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1912

  14. [14]

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D105, 125016 (2022), arXiv:2111.01139 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, Kramers-Wannier- like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 111601 (2022), arXiv:2111.01141 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, Non-invertible higher-categorical symmetries, SciPost Phys.14, 007 (2023), arXiv:2204.06564 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Delcamp and A

    C. Delcamp and A. Tiwari, Higher categorical symme- tries and gauging in two-dimensional spin systems, Sci- Post Phys.16, 110 (2024), arXiv:2301.01259 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Komargodski, K

    Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, K. Roumpedakis, and S. Seifnashri, Symmetries and strings of adjoint QCD 2, 14 JHEP03, 103, arXiv:2008.07567 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2008

  19. [19]

    Huang, Y.-H

    T.-C. Huang, Y.-H. Lin, and S. Seifnashri, Construction of two-dimensional topological field theories with non- invertible symmetries, JHEP12, 028, arXiv:2110.02958 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Inamura,On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries,JHEP 03(2022) 036, [2110.12882]

    K. Inamura, On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries, JHEP03, 036, arXiv:2110.12882 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, Orbifold groupoids, JHEP02, 132, arXiv:2008.05960 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects, Commun. Math. Phys.404, 1021 (2023), arXiv:2209.11062 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    ¨O. M. Aksoy and C. Mudry, Elementary derivation of the stacking rules of invertible fermionic topological phases in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B106, 035117 (2022), arXiv:2204.10333 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, Non-invertible symmetry webs, SciPost Phys. 15, 160 (2023), arXiv:2212.06842 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Bhardwaj, S

    L. Bhardwaj, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, Unifying constructions of non-invertible symmetries, SciPost Phys. 15, 122 (2023), arXiv:2212.06159 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Zheng, Noninvertible duality transformation between symmetry-protected topological and spontaneous symmetry breaking phases, Phys. Rev. B108, 214429 (2023), arXiv:2301.07899 [cond-mat.str- el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    X. Chen, A. Dua, M. Hermele, D. T. Stephen, N. Tan- tivasadakarn, R. Vanhove, and J.-Y. Zhao, Sequential quantum circuits as maps between gapped phases, Phys. Rev. B109, 075116 (2024), arXiv:2307.01267 [cond- mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Seiberg, S

    N. Seiberg, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, Non-invertible symmetries and LSM-type constraints on a tensor product Hilbert space, SciPost Phys.16, 154 (2024), arXiv:2401.12281 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    X. Chen, Z. C. Gu, and X. G. Wen, Local unitary trans- formation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave func- tion renormalization, and topological order, Phys. Rev. B82, 155138 (2010), arXiv:1004.3835 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  30. [30]

    Ji and X.-G

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, Categorical symmetry and non- invertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topologi- cal phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033417 (2020), arXiv:1912.13492 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    L. Kong, T. Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang, and H. Zheng, Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry – a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043086 (2020), arXiv:2005.14178 [cond- mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Aasen, P

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley, and R. S. K. Mong, Topological De- fects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies, (2020), arXiv:2008.08598 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, Topo- logical symmetry in quantum field theory, (2022), arXiv:2209.07471 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Tambara and S

    D. Tambara and S. Yamagami, Tensor categories with fu- sion rules of self-duality for finite abelian groups, Journal of Algebra209, 692 (1998)

    work page 1998

  35. [35]

    Levin, Constraints on order and disorder parameters in quantum spin chains, Commun

    M. Levin, Constraints on order and disorder parameters in quantum spin chains, Commun. Math. Phys.378, 1081 (2020), arXiv:1903.09028 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, Illustrating the categorical Landau paradigm in lattice models, Phys. Rev. B111, 054432 (2025), arXiv:2405.05302 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Lattice Models for Phases and Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, Lattice Models for Phases and Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries, (2024), arXiv:2405.05964 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Turaev and O

    V. Turaev and O. Viro, State sum invariants of 3- manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols, Topology31, 865 (1992)

    work page 1992

  39. [39]

    J. W. Barrett and B. W. Westbury, Invariants of piece- wise linear three manifolds, Trans. Am. Math. Soc.348, 3997 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9311155

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  40. [40]

    Bicategories for boundary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d TFT

    J. Fuchs, C. Schweigert, and A. Valentino, Bicate- gories for boundary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d TFT, Commun. Math. Phys.321, 543 (2013), arXiv:1203.4568 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  41. [41]

    Roumpedakis, S

    K. Roumpedakis, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects, Com- mun. Math. Phys.401, 3043 (2023), arXiv:2204.02407 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    den Nijs and K

    M. den Nijs and K. Rommelse, Preroughening transitions in crystal surfaces and valence-bond phases in quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B40, 4709 (1989)

    work page 1989

  43. [43]

    Seifnashri and S.-H

    S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao, Cluster State as a Non- invertible Symmetry-Protected Topological Phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 116601 (2024), arXiv:2404.01369 [cond- mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    On the Brauer groups of symmetries of abelian Dijkgraaf-Witten theories

    J. Fuchs, J. Priel, C. Schweigert, and A. Valentino, On the Brauer Groups of Symmetries of Abelian Dijk- graaf–Witten Theories, Commun. Math. Phys.339, 385 (2015), arXiv:1404.6646 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  45. [45]

    Kennedy and H

    T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, Hidden symmetry break- ing and the Haldane phase in S= 1 quantum spin chains, Communications in mathematical physics147, 431 (1992)

    work page 1992

  46. [46]

    Kennedy and H

    T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, HiddenZ 2×Z2 symmetry breaking in Haldane-gap antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 45, 304 (1992)

    work page 1992

  47. [47]

    Oshikawa, Hidden z2*z2 symmetry in quantum spin chains with arbitrary integer spin, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter4, 7469 (1992)

    M. Oshikawa, Hidden z2*z2 symmetry in quantum spin chains with arbitrary integer spin, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter4, 7469 (1992)

    work page 1992

  48. [48]

    D. V. Else, S. D. Bartlett, and A. C. Doherty, Hid- den symmetry-breaking picture of symmetry-protected topological order, Phys. Rev. B88, 085114 (2013), arXiv:1304.0783 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [49]

    From symmetry-protected topological order to Landau order

    K. Duivenvoorden and T. Quella, From symmetry- protected topological order to Landau order, Phys. Rev. B88, 125115 (2013), arXiv:1304.7234 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    Tantivasadakarn, R

    N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, Pivot Hamiltonians as generators of sym- metry and entanglement, SciPost Phys.14, 012 (2023), arXiv:2110.07599 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    D. V. Else and C. Nayak, Classifying symmetry-protected topological phases through the anomalous action of the symmetry on the edge, Phys. Rev. B90, 235137 (2014), arXiv:1409.5436 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    Choi, D.-C

    Y. Choi, D.-C. Lu, and Z. Sun, Self-duality under gauging a non-invertible symmetry, JHEP01, 142, arXiv:2310.19867 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    E. H. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble mod- els of an antiferromagnetic chain, Annals Phys.16, 407 (1961)

    work page 1961

  54. [54]

    Commensurability, excitation gap and topology in quantum many-particle systems on a periodic lattice

    M. Oshikawa, Commensurability, Excitation Gap, and 15 Topology in Quantum Many-Particle Systems on a Periodic Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 1535 (2000), arXiv:cond-mat/9911137

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  55. [55]

    M. B. Hastings, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimen- sions, Phys. Rev. B69, 104431 (2004), arXiv:cond- mat/0305505

    work page arXiv 2004

  56. [56]

    M. B. Hastings, Sufficient conditions for topological order in insulators, Europhysics Letters70, 824 (2005)

    work page 2005

  57. [57]

    Filling constraints for spin-orbit coupled insulators in symmorphic and non-symmorphic crystals

    H. Watanabe, H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and M. Zale- tel, Filling constraints for spin-orbit coupled insulators in symmorphic and nonsymmorphic crystals, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 14551 (2015), arXiv:1505.04193 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    Ogata, Y

    Y. Ogata, Y. Tachikawa, and H. Tasaki, General Lieb–Schultz–Mattis Type Theorems for Quantum Spin Chains, Commun. Math. Phys.385, 79 (2021), arXiv:2004.06458 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    Yao and M

    Y. Yao and M. Oshikawa, Twisted boundary con- dition and Lieb-Schultz-Mattis ingappability for dis- crete symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 217201 (2021), arXiv:2010.09244 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    ¨O. M. Aksoy, A. Tiwari, and C. Mudry, Lieb-Schultz- Mattis type theorems for Majorana models with dis- crete symmetries, Phys. Rev. B104, 075146 (2021), arXiv:2102.08389 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    ¨O. M. Aksoy, C. Mudry, A. Furusaki, and A. Tiwari, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies and web of dualities in- duced by gauging in quantum spin chains, SciPost Phys. 16, 022 (2024), arXiv:2308.00743 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Li and Y

    L. Li and Y. Yao, Duality viewpoint of criticality, Phys. Rev. B106, 224420 (2022), arXiv:2209.13450 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Garre-Rubio, L

    J. Garre-Rubio, L. Lootens, and A. Moln´ ar, Classifying phases protected by matrix product operator symmetries using matrix product states, Quantum7, 927 (2023), arXiv:2203.12563 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Seifnashri, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies as obstruc- tions to gauging (non-on-site) symmetries, SciPost Phys

    S. Seifnashri, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies as obstruc- tions to gauging (non-on-site) symmetries, SciPost Phys. 16, 098 (2024), arXiv:2308.05151 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    J. G. Rubio, A. Molnar, and Y. Ogata, Classifying sym- metric and symmetry-broken spin chain phases with anomalous group actions, (2024), arXiv:2403.18573 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Tachikawa, On gauging finite subgroups, SciPost Phys.8, 015 (2020), arXiv:1712.09542 [hep-th]

    Y. Tachikawa, On gauging finite subgroups, SciPost Phys.8, 015 (2020), arXiv:1712.09542 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Fusion categories and homotopy theory

    P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, V. Ostrik, and w. a. a. b. E. Meir, Fusion categories and homotopy theory, Quantum Topol.1, 209 (2010), 0909.3140 [math.QA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  68. [68]

    Verresen, R

    R. Verresen, R. Thorngren, N. G. Jones, and F. Poll- mann, Gapless Topological Phases and Symmetry- Enriched Quantum Criticality, Phys. Rev. X11, 041059 (2021), arXiv:1905.06969 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Moradi, S

    H. Moradi, S. F. Moosavian, and A. Tiwari, Topo- logical Holography: Towards a Unification of Landau and Beyond-Landau Physics, SciPost Phys. Core6, 066 (2023), arXiv:2207.10712 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Kohmoto and H

    M. Kohmoto and H. Tasaki, Hiddenz 2×z2 symmetry breaking and the haldane phase in the s=1/2 quantum spin chain with bond alternation, Phys. Rev. B46, 3486 (1992)

    work page 1992

  71. [71]

    Luther and I

    A. Luther and I. Peschel, Calculation of critical expo- nents in two-dimensions from quantum field theory in one-dimension, Phys. Rev. B12, 3908 (1975)

    work page 1975

  72. [72]

    F. D. M. Haldane, General relation of correlation expo- nents and spectral properties of one-dimensional fermi systems: Application to the anisotropics= 1 2 heisen- berg chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 1358 (1980)

    work page 1980

  73. [73]

    P. H. Ginsparg, Curiosities at c = 1, Nucl. Phys. B295, 153 (1988)

    work page 1988

  74. [74]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, Fusion category symmetry. Part II. Categoriosities at c = 1 and beyond, JHEP07, 051, arXiv:2106.12577 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  75. [75]

    Kohmoto, M

    M. Kohmoto, M. den Nijs, and L. P. Kadanoff, Hamilto- nian studies of thed= 2 ashkin-teller model, Phys. Rev. B24, 5229 (1981)

    work page 1981

  76. [76]

    F. C. Alcaraz, M. N. Barber, and M. T. Batchelor, Con- formal invariance and the spectrum of the xxz chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 771 (1987)

    work page 1987

  77. [77]

    Shibata and H

    N. Shibata and H. Katsura, Dissipative quantum Ising chain as a non-Hermitian Ashkin-Teller model, Phys. Rev. B99, 224432 (2019), arXiv:1904.12505 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    The phase transitions between $Z_n\times Z_n$ bosonic topological phases in 1+1 D, and a constraint on the central charge for the critical points between bosonic symmetry protected topological phases

    L. Tsui, Y.-T. Huang, H.-C. Jiang, and D.-H. Lee, The phase transitions betweenZ n ×Z n bosonic topological phases in 1 + 1D, and a constraint on the central charge for the critical points between bosonic symmetry pro- tected topological phases, Nucl. Phys. B919, 470 (2017), arXiv:1701.00834 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  79. [79]

    Kawagoe and M

    K. Kawagoe and M. Levin, Anomalies in bosonic symmetry-protected topological edge theories: Connec- tion to F symbols and a method of calculation, Phys. Rev. B104, 115156 (2021), arXiv:2105.02909 [cond-mat.str- el]

    work page arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    Hsin and H

    P.-S. Hsin and H. T. Lam, Discrete theta angles, sym- metries and anomalies, SciPost Phys.10, 032 (2021), arXiv:2007.05915 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.