{"as_of":"2026-08-11T07:16:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:5bd7cb1aedeb82c9b95223e23cd8acf28df384f15371fcafb2616240dbbabbb6","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":3,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":3,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":3,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":3,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T14:14:14.219951Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-07-04T06:49:37.443896Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.01794","last_updated":"2025-08-20T17:12:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:50:43.525873Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-03T21:21:17Z","title":"It Takes Two: A Peer-Prediction Solution for Blockchain Verifier's Dilemma","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2406.01794","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2406.01794","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-04T06:49:37.443896Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.01794(2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"cf6b30d3-9f5c-4b26-b601-60f53a5dd8d1","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.09005","last_updated":"2026-05-04T06:38:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T17:59:46.583076Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-13T13:18:40Z","title":"Proof-of-Learning with Incentive Security","version":8},"reference_index":71,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-24T02:24:17.188754Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.01794","citing_paper":"/paper/2404.09005"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3d8e7afd964143f9d1d15b4a17ccfbd261497e8060683f59489f70b3df758790","observation_id":"4b04a244-337b-4dd5-a15a-19d1cbe90da3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-24T02:25:55.501052Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.01794","last_updated":"2025-08-20T17:12:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:50:43.525873Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-03T21:21:17Z","title":"It Takes Two: A Peer-Prediction Solution for Blockchain Verifier's Dilemma","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2406.01794","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2406.01794","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-04T06:49:37.443896Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.01794(2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"cf6b30d3-9f5c-4b26-b601-60f53a5dd8d1","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2512.21794","last_updated":"2026-04-20T21:23:04Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-30T15:00:42.108767Z","submitted_at":"2025-12-25T21:59:51Z","title":"Multi-agent Adaptive Mechanism Design","version":4},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-16T19:35:07.729497Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.01794","citing_paper":"/paper/2512.21794"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cda8eb41c068f63f0d95b516f35fe62d3e4fb75546160d3d12e796b8a3924374","observation_id":"5c3a3247-a465-49e4-b613-b6dff6b5c48c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-16T19:38:21.010695Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.01794","last_updated":"2025-08-20T17:12:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:50:43.525873Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-03T21:21:17Z","title":"It Takes Two: A Peer-Prediction Solution for Blockchain Verifier's Dilemma","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2406.01794","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2406.01794","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-04T06:49:37.443896Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.01794(2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"cf6b30d3-9f5c-4b26-b601-60f53a5dd8d1","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.21045","last_updated":"2026-06-19T02:22:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:34:52.342190Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-19T02:22:28Z","title":"OVIG: Optimistic Verification of AI Training Integrity via Gradient Signals","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T14:14:14.219951Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.01794","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.21045"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d00db25bebaaae34a6201600a85ac40c3543b2d763005a15cb0a7d0e9fb0038a","observation_id":"03cf669e-e72c-45d1-bd95-2d11bfb9d2ab","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-04T06:49:37.445746Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2406.01794/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2406.01794/integrity","json":"/paper/2406.01794/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2406.01794"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.01794","last_updated":"2025-08-20T17:12:12Z","latest_version":5,"primary_category":"cs.CR","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:50:43.525873Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-03T21:21:17Z","title":"It Takes Two: A Peer-Prediction Solution for Blockchain Verifier's Dilemma"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 11 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 3 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2406.01794."}