pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.19125 · v4 · submitted 2024-06-27 · ✦ hep-th

Entanglement Harvesting and Quantum Discord of Alpha Vacua in de Sitter Space

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 00:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords alpha-vacuade Sitter spaceUnruh-DeWitt detectorsentanglement harvestingquantum discordsudden deathsuperhorizon suppression
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum entanglement from alpha-vacua in de Sitter space suddenly dies for time-like detector separations but grows for space-like ones.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines alpha-vacua of a scalar field in de Sitter space by coupling pairs of static Unruh-DeWitt detectors to the field. The detectors sit at either time-like zero separation or space-like antipodal separation and interact through monopole or dipole terms. The reduced detector state is derived in closed form, from which entanglement harvesting and quantum discord are computed. The calculations reveal opposite behaviors: entanglement vanishes abruptly in the time-like case as time or the alpha parameter grows, yet increases in the space-like case. Quantum discord shows no abrupt vanishing but is suppressed on superhorizon scales.

Core claim

The central claim is that entanglement gravitated by de Sitter gravity behaves differently for time-like and space-like separations of the detectors. For time-like zero separation, entanglement undergoes sudden death as measuring time or alpha increases. For space-like antipodal separation, entanglement grows with the same parameters. Quantum discord exhibits no sudden death but experiences superhorizon suppression, which accounts for decoherence in the inflationary scenario. These contrasting dependencies demonstrate the nonlocal character of quantum correlations in alpha-vacua.

What carries the argument

Analytical reduced final state of two static Unruh-DeWitt detectors coupled to the scalar field in an alpha-vacuum, from which concurrence and quantum discord are extracted for monopole or dipole interactions.

If this is right

  • Entanglement harvesting distinguishes time-like from space-like separations through opposite dependence on measuring time and alpha.
  • Quantum discord persists without sudden death, providing a continuous measure of correlation even after entanglement vanishes.
  • Superhorizon suppression of discord supplies a mechanism for the decoherence observed in inflationary cosmology.
  • The spectral gap and alpha parameter control the strength of the harvested quantities, offering tunable diagnostics of the vacuum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The separation-dependent entanglement could produce distinct signatures in cosmological observables when alpha differs from the Bunch-Davies value.
  • The same detector protocol might be applied to other maximally symmetric spacetimes to map how vacuum choice affects harvested correlations.
  • Dynamical rather than static detectors could test whether the sudden-death versus growth contrast survives in an expanding background.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation of the reduced detector state assumes perturbative coupling so that higher-order corrections can be neglected when evaluating entanglement and discord.

What would settle it

Numerical evaluation of the concurrence for time-like detector pairs at successively larger values of alpha or interaction time, checking whether it drops discontinuously to zero at a finite threshold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2406.19125 by Feng-Li Lin, Sayid Mondal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The concurrence C of two monopole-coupling UDW identical detectors in Euclidean vacuum as a function of Ω for different values of T = 3 (solid-blue), T = 5 (green-dashed) and T = 7 (red-dot-dashed) with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. Note that “sudden death” occurs for (a), not for (b). 0.01 0.05 0.10 0.50 1 5 10 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 T  g - 2 (a) 0.01 0.05 0.10 0.50 1 5 1… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The concurrence C of two monopole-coupling identical UDW detectors in Euclidean vacuum as a function of T for different values of Ω = .1 (solid-blue), Ω = .25 (green-dashed) and Ω = .5 (red-dot-dashed) with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. Note that “sudden death” occurs for (a), not for (b). Moreover, in (b), C grows over time, sharply contrasted with decaying behavior for the other cases… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The density plots of the concurrence C of two monopole-coupling identical UDW detectors in Euclidean vacuum as a function of Ω and T with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. In (a), the “sudden death” is indicated more precisely by a solid white curve. Note that the silent and active regions of entanglement harvesting, with zero and high concurrence, are located quite differently in (a) and (… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The density plots of the concurrence C of two dipole-coupling identical UDW detectors in Euclidean vacuum as a function of Ω and T with antipodal separation. In contrast, the concurrence is exactly zero for the zero separation, thus there is no need to show. Compared to fig. 3b of monopole-coupling, the active region of entanglement harvesting to higher T and Ω part with large value by a factor of 100. 4.2… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The concurrence C of two identical monopole-coupling UDW detectors in the α-vacua as a function of α for T = 1.0 and different values of Ω = .1 (solid-blue), Ω = .25 (green-dashed) and Ω = .5 (red-dot-dashed) with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. The “sudden death” occurs for (a) but not (b). 0. 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 (a) 0. 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The density plots of the concurrence C of two monopole-coupling identical UDW detectors in α-vacua with T=1 and β = 0 as a function of α and Ω with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. The plot implies that the α-vacua prefer long-range entanglement harvesting. From the previous discussions, it is clear that concurrence exhibits interesting behavior as a function of the detector energy gap, me… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The density plots of the concurrence C of two monopole-coupling identical UDW detectors in α-vacua with Ω = 0.1 and β = 0 as a function of α and T with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. The plot again implies that the α-vacua prefer long-range entanglement harvesting. 0. 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 (a) 0. 0.1 0.2 0.3 (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The density plots of the concurrence C of two monopole-coupling identical UDW detectors in (α, β)- vacua with Ω = 0.5 and T = 1.0 as a function of α and β with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. In (b), the novel phenomena of “sudden death and revival” of the entanglement appear when tuning β for the antipodal separation. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The density plots of the concurrence C of two dipole-coupling identical UDW detectors with antipodal separation in α-vacua as a function of (a) Ω and T for α = 0.05 and β = 0, (b) α and Ω for T = 1.0 and β = 0, (c) α and T for Ω = 0.1 and β = 0, and in (α, β)-vacua as a function of (d) α and β for T = 1.0 and Ω = 0.5. They show similar features to their monopole-coupling counterparts, as shown respectively… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Quantum discord D of two monopole-coupling UDW detectors in Euclidean vacuum as a function of the energy gap difference δ for ΩB = 0.5 and T = 1 (solid-blue), T = 2.5 (green-dashed) and T = 5 (red￾dot-dashed) with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. This implies that quantum correlations are suppressed for incompatible detectors. 0.5 1 5 10 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 T D g - 2 (a) 0… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Quantum discord D of two of two monopole-coupling UDW detectors in Euclidean vacuum as a function of T for ΩB = 0.5 and δ = .1 (solid-blue), δ = .15 (green-dashed) and δ = .2 (red-dot-dashed) with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. The results imply the difficulty in maintaining the coherence of long-time quantum correlations and that the short-range quantum correlations are more vibrant th… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The density plots of quantum discord D of two monopole-coupling UDW detectors in Euclidean vacuum as a function of δ and T given ΩB = 0.5 with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. In (b), the superhorizon-scale quantum correlations are suppressed. 0. 0.0025 0.0050 0.0075 0.0100 0.0125 (a) 0. 0.00005 0.00010 0.00015 (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The density plots of quantum discord D of two dipole-coupling UDW detectors in Euclidean vacuum as a function of r and T given ΩB = 0.5 with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. For (b), the novel feature is that the active region of D is located at the part of large spectral incompatibility. 5.1.2 Dipole coupling in Euclidean vacuum To compare with the monopole-coupling counterparts illustra… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The density plots of the quantum discord D of two monopole-coupling identical UDW detectors in α-vacua as a function of δ and T given ΩB = 0.5 and α = 0.1 with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. The second set of density plots is shown in fig. 15a and fig. 15b for zero and antipodal sep￾arations, which exhibits the interplay between the α and δ dependence of D. We observe that increasing th… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The density plots of the quantum discord D of two monopole-coupling identical UDW detectors in α-vacua as a function of α and δ given ΩB = 0.5 and T = 1.5 with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. The third set of density plots is presented in fig. 16a and fig. 16b for zero and antipodal separations, which exhibits the interplay between the α and T dependence of D. We again see that increasin… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The density plots of the quantum discord D of two monopole-coupling identical UDW detectors in α-vacua as a function of α and T given ΩB = .5 and δ = 0.1 with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The density plots of the quantum discord D of two dipole-coupling identical UDW detectors in α￾vacua as a function of δ and T given ΩB = 0.5 and α = 0.1 with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. 0. 0.1 0.2 0.3 (a) 0. 2. × 10.-10 4. × 10.-10 6. × 10.-10 (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The density plots of the quantum discord D of two dipole-coupling identical UDW detectors in α-vacua as a function of α and δ given ΩB = 0.5, T = 1.5 with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. The first set of density plots is shown in fig. 17a and fig. 17b for zero and antipodal separations, to exhibit the δ and T dependence of D. Its difference from its monopole-coupling counterpart of fig. … view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The density plots of the quantum discord D of two dipole-coupling identical UDW detectors in α-vacua as a function of δ and T given ΩB = 0.5, δ = 0.1 with (a) zero separation and (b) antipodal separation. 6 Conclusion De Sitter space is the most simple dynamical spacetime and plays an important role in the infla￾tionary universe scenario for initiating the primordial curvature perturbations from the fluct… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The CPT invariant vacuum states of a scalar field in de Sitter space, called $\alpha$-vacua, are not unique. We explore the $\alpha$-vacua from the quantum information perspective by a pair of static Unruh-DeWitt (UDW) detectors coupled to a scalar field with either monopole or dipole coupling, which are in time-like zero separation or space-like antipodal separation. The analytical form of the reduced final state of the UDW detector is derived. We study the entanglement harvesting and quantum discord of the reduced state, which characterize the quantum entanglement and quantum correlation of the underlying $\alpha$-vacua, respectively. Our results imply that the quantum entanglement gravitated by de Sitter gravity behaves quite differently for time-like and space-like separations. It experiences ``sudden death" for the former and grows for the latter as the measuring time or the value of $\alpha$ increases. This demonstrates the nonlocal nature of quantum entanglement. For the quantum discord, we find no ``sudden death" behavior, and it experiences superhorizon suppression, which explains the superhorizon decoherence in the inflationary universe scenario. Overall, the time-like or space-like quantum entanglement and correlation behave differently on their dependence of $\alpha$, measuring time and spectral gaps, with details discussed in this work.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores the quantum information properties of α-vacua in de Sitter space using pairs of static Unruh-DeWitt detectors with monopole or dipole coupling. It derives analytical forms for the reduced detector states for time-like (zero separation) and space-like (antipodal) separations and analyzes entanglement harvesting (via concurrence/negativity) and quantum discord, reporting sudden death of entanglement for time-like separations and growth for space-like as measuring time or |α| increases, along with superhorizon suppression of discord.

Significance. If the perturbative results hold in the reported regimes, the work provides analytical insight into how α-vacua modify quantum correlations in curved spacetime, with potential implications for superhorizon decoherence in inflation. The explicit analytical expressions for the reduced state (rather than purely numerical) are a strength, enabling direct study of parameter dependence.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; derivation of reduced final state (Dyson expansion)] The reduced density matrix is obtained from the second-order Dyson expansion of the UDW interaction (monopole or dipole). The central claims of sudden death (time-like) and growth (space-like) are reported for increasing measuring time T or |α|, yet no estimate is given for the radius of validity of the O(λ²) truncation (e.g., condition on λ²T ≪ 1). Higher-order terms could modify the eigenvalues of the partial transpose and thus the location or existence of sudden death.
  2. [Quantum discord section] The superhorizon suppression of quantum discord is presented as explaining decoherence in inflation, but the manuscript does not quantify the difference relative to the Bunch-Davies vacuum (α = 0) or provide an explicit scaling with the spectral gap that would make the suppression falsifiable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods/UDW setup] The switching functions for the detectors are not specified in sufficient detail to allow independent reproduction of the integrals over the α-vacuum Wightman function.
  2. [Introduction] Standard references for α-vacua (e.g., the original construction by Allen or Mottola) should be cited when introducing the CPT-invariant states.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, agreeing to make revisions where they strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract; derivation of reduced final state (Dyson expansion)] The reduced density matrix is obtained from the second-order Dyson expansion of the UDW interaction (monopole or dipole). The central claims of sudden death (time-like) and growth (space-like) are reported for increasing measuring time T or |α|, yet no estimate is given for the radius of validity of the O(λ²) truncation (e.g., condition on λ²T ≪ 1). Higher-order terms could modify the eigenvalues of the partial transpose and thus the location or existence of sudden death.

    Authors: We agree that the validity regime of the perturbative truncation should be stated explicitly. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (likely in Section II or III) specifying the condition λ²T ≪ 1 (in units where the detector gap and curvature scale are order one) under which the O(λ²) results remain reliable, together with a brief justification that the qualitative features—sudden death for timelike separations and growth for spacelike separations—persist within this regime. This addition will reference the standard UDW literature and confirm that the parameter values used in our figures satisfy the bound. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Quantum discord section] The superhorizon suppression of quantum discord is presented as explaining decoherence in inflation, but the manuscript does not quantify the difference relative to the Bunch-Davies vacuum (α = 0) or provide an explicit scaling with the spectral gap that would make the suppression falsifiable.

    Authors: We accept that a quantitative comparison to the α = 0 case and an explicit scaling with the spectral gap would make the inflationary implication more precise. Using the closed-form expressions already derived for the reduced state, the revised version will include additional analytic or numerical results (new figure or subsection) that (i) plot the discord difference ΔD = D(α) − D(α=0) versus |α| and (ii) extract the leading scaling with the gap parameter Ω. This will render the superhorizon suppression directly falsifiable against inflationary observables. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses independent QFT inputs and standard perturbation

full rationale

The paper computes the reduced detector state via the second-order Dyson series applied to the UDW interaction Hamiltonian and the independently defined α-vacuum Wightman function of de Sitter space. Entanglement and discord measures are then obtained directly from the resulting density-matrix elements (integrals over switching functions and the two-point function). No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, no self-definitional loops appear, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatze are imported via self-citation. The central claims follow from explicit evaluation of these standard expressions rather than reducing to the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work builds on standard assumptions in quantum field theory on de Sitter space without introducing new free parameters or entities beyond the established alpha-vacua framework.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard quantum field theory in curved spacetime, including the definition of alpha-vacua as CPT invariant states.
    The paper relies on the established framework of QFT in dS for the vacuum states and detector couplings.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5761 in / 1194 out tokens · 22778 ms · 2026-05-24T00:11:54.462347+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gibbons, S

    G. Gibbons, S. Hawking and S. Siklos, The Very Early Universe: Proceedings of the Nuffield Workshop, Cambridge 21 June to 9 July, 1982 , . 2

  2. [2]

    Mottola, Particle Creation in de Sitter Space , Phys

    E. Mottola, Particle Creation in de Sitter Space , Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 754. 2, 11

  3. [3]

    Allen, Vacuum states in de sitter space , Phys

    B. Allen, Vacuum states in de sitter space , Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 3136. 2, 8, 9, 11

  4. [4]

    Higuchi and K

    A. Higuchi and K. Yamamoto, Vacuum state in de sitter spacetime with static charts , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 065014. 2, 9

  5. [5]

    Bousso, A

    R. Bousso, A. Maloney and A. Strominger, Conformal vacua and entropy in de sitter space , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 104039. 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14

  6. [6]

    Entropy and Area

    M. Srednicki, Entropy and area, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 666 [ hep-th/9303048]. 2

  7. [7]

    On Geometric Entropy

    C.G. Callan, Jr. and F. Wilczek, On geometric entropy, Phys. Lett. B 333 (1994) 55 [hep-th/9401072]. 2 29

  8. [8]

    Geometric and Renormalized Entropy in Conformal Field Theory

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek, Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 424 (1994) 443 [ hep-th/9403108]. 2

  9. [9]

    Schlieder, Some remarks about the localization of states in a quantum field theory , Communications in Mathematical Physics 1 (1965) 265

    S. Schlieder, Some remarks about the localization of states in a quantum field theory , Communications in Mathematical Physics 1 (1965) 265. 2

  10. [10]

    Notes on Some Entanglement Properties of Quantum Field Theory

    E. Witten, APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory , Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 045003 [1803.04993]. 2

  11. [11]

    On the Reeh-Schlieder Property in Curved Spacetime

    K. Sanders, On the Reeh-Schlieder Property in Curved Spacetime , Commun. Math. Phys. 288 (2009) 271 [ 0801.4676]. 2

  12. [12]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [ hep-th/9711200]. 2

  13. [13]

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [ hep-th/0603001]. 3

  14. [14]

    B. Chen, B. Czech and Z.-z. Wang, Quantum information in holographic duality , Rept. Prog. Phys. 85 (2022) 046001 [ 2108.09188]. 3

  15. [15]

    Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation , Phys

    W.G. Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation , Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 870. 3, 4, 5

  16. [16]

    DeWitt, Quantum gravity: The new synthesis , in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, pp

    B.S. DeWitt, Quantum gravity: The new synthesis , in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, pp. 680–745 (1980). 3, 4

  17. [17]

    Summers and R

    S.J. Summers and R. Werner, The vacuum violates bell’s inequalities , Physics Letters A 110 (1985) 257. 3

  18. [18]

    Summers and R

    S.J. Summers and R. Werner, Maximal Violation of Bell’s Inequalities Is Generic in Quantum Field Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 110 (1987) 247. 3

  19. [19]

    Valentini, Non-local correlations in quantum electrodynamics, Physics Letters A 153 (1991) 321

    A. Valentini, Non-local correlations in quantum electrodynamics, Physics Letters A 153 (1991) 321. 3

  20. [20]

    Reznik, Entanglement from the vacuum , Found

    B. Reznik, Entanglement from the vacuum , Found. Phys. 33 (2003) 167 [quant-ph/0212044]. 3

  21. [21]

    Reznik, A

    B. Reznik, A. Retzker and J. Silman, Violating bell’s inequalities in vacuum , Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 042104. 3

  22. [22]

    Wilson-Gerow, A

    J. Wilson-Gerow, A. Dugad and Y. Chen, Decoherence by warm horizons, 2405.00804. 3, 6

  23. [23]

    Danielson, G

    D.L. Danielson, G. Satishchandran and R.M. Wald, Gravitationally mediated entanglement: Newtonian field versus gravitons , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 086001 [ 2112.10798]. 3

  24. [24]

    Danielson, G

    D.L. Danielson, G. Satishchandran and R.M. Wald, Killing horizons decohere quantum superpositions, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 025007 [ 2301.00026]. 3

  25. [25]

    Danielson, G

    D.L. Danielson, G. Satishchandran and R.M. Wald, Black holes decohere quantum superpositions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31 (2022) 2241003 [ 2205.06279]. 3

  26. [26]

    Dhanuka and K

    A. Dhanuka and K. Lochan, Unruh DeWitt probe of late time revival of quantum correlations in Friedmann spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 125006 [ 2210.11186]. 3

  27. [27]

    Gralla and H

    S.E. Gralla and H. Wei, Decoherence from horizons: General formulation and rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 065031 [ 2311.11461]. 3

  28. [28]

    Acceleration-assisted entanglement harvesting and rangefinding

    G. Salton, R.B. Mann and N.C. Menicucci, Acceleration-assisted entanglement harvesting and rangefinding, New J. Phys. 17 (2015) 035001 [ 1408.1395]. 3, 6 30

  29. [29]

    Precise space-time positioning for entanglement harvesting

    E. Martin-Martinez and B.C. Sanders, Precise space–time positioning for entanglement harvesting, New J. Phys. 18 (2016) 043031 [ 1508.01209]. 3, 5, 6

  30. [30]

    Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, A.R.H

    E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, A.R.H. Smith and D.R. Terno,Spacetime structure and vacuum entanglement, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 044001. 3, 5, 6

  31. [31]

    Harvesting Entanglement from the Black Hole Vacuum

    L.J. Henderson, R.A. Hennigar, R.B. Mann, A.R.H. Smith and J. Zhang, Harvesting Entanglement from the Black Hole Vacuum , Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 21LT02 [1712.10018]. 3, 5, 6, 17

  32. [32]

    Harvesting large scale entanglement in de Sitter space with multiple detectors

    S. Kukita and Y. Nambu, Harvesting large scale entanglement in de Sitter space with multiple detectors, Entropy 19 (2017) 449 [ 1708.01359]. 3, 6

  33. [33]

    J.-i. Koga, K. Maeda and G. Kimura, Entanglement extracted from vacuum into accelerated Unruh-DeWitt detectors and energy conservation , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 065013 [1906.02843]. 3

  34. [34]

    Perche, B

    T.R. Perche, B. Ragula and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez,Harvesting entanglement from the gravitational vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 085025 [ 2210.14921]. 3, 6, 15

  35. [35]

    Mendez-Avalos, L.J

    D. Mendez-Avalos, L.J. Henderson, K. Gallock-Yoshimura and R.B. Mann, Entanglement harvesting of three Unruh-DeWitt detectors , Gen. Rel. Grav. 54 (2022) 87 [2206.11902]. 3, 6

  36. [36]

    Introducing Quantum Discord

    H. Ollivier and W.H. Zurek, Introducing quantum discord, arXiv preprint quant-ph/0105072 (2001) . 3, 6, 7

  37. [37]

    Classical, quantum and total correlations

    L. Henderson and V. Vedral, Classical, quantum and total correlations , J. Phys. A 34 (2001) 6899 [quant-ph/0105028]. 3, 6

  38. [38]

    Barman, D

    S. Barman, D. Barman and B.R. Majhi, Entanglement harvesting from conformal vacuums between two Unruh-DeWitt detectors moving along null paths , JHEP 09 (2022) 106 [2112.01308]. 3

  39. [39]

    Barman, S

    D. Barman, S. Barman and B.R. Majhi, Role of thermal field in entanglement harvesting between two accelerated Unruh-DeWitt detectors, JHEP 07 (2021) 124 [ 2104.11269]. 3

  40. [40]

    Barman, S

    D. Barman, S. Barman and B.R. Majhi, Entanglement harvesting between two inertial Unruh-DeWitt detectors from nonvacuum quantum fluctuations , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 045005 [2205.08505]. 3

  41. [41]

    Evolution from Entanglement to Decoherence of Bipartite Mixed "X" States

    T. Yu and J. Eberly, Evolution from entanglement to decoherence of bipartite mixed” x” states, arXiv preprint quant-ph/0503089 (2005) . 5

  42. [42]

    Rau, Algebraic characterization of x-states in quantum information , Journal of physics a: Mathematical and theoretical 42 (2009) 412002

    A. Rau, Algebraic characterization of x-states in quantum information , Journal of physics a: Mathematical and theoretical 42 (2009) 412002. 5

  43. [43]

    Werner, Quantum states with einstein-podolsky-rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model, Phys

    R.F. Werner, Quantum states with einstein-podolsky-rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model, Phys. Rev. A 40 (1989) 4277. 5

  44. [44]

    M. Ali, A. Rau and G. Alber, Quantum discord for two-qubit x states , Physical Review A 81 (2010) 042105. 5, 7

  45. [45]

    J.-I. Koga, G. Kimura and K. Maeda, Quantum teleportation in vacuum using only Unruh-DeWitt detectors, Phys. Rev. A 97 (2018) 062338 [ 1804.01183]. 5

  46. [46]

    Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits , Phys

    W.K. Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 2245. 6

  47. [47]

    Q. Chen, C. Zhang, S. Yu, X. Yi and C. Oh, Quantum discord of two-qubit x states , Physical Review A 84 (2011) 042313. 7 31

  48. [48]

    Huang, Quantum discord for two-qubit x states: Analytical formula with very small worst-case error, Phys

    Y. Huang, Quantum discord for two-qubit x states: Analytical formula with very small worst-case error, Phys. Rev. A 88 (2013) 014302. 7

  49. [49]

    Yurischev, On the quantum discord of general x states , Quantum Information Processing 14 (2015) 3399

    M.A. Yurischev, On the quantum discord of general x states , Quantum Information Processing 14 (2015) 3399. 7, 22

  50. [50]

    Chernikov and E.A

    N.A. Chernikov and E.A. Tagirov, Quantum theory of scalar fields in de Sitter space-time , Ann. Inst. H. Poincare A Phys. Theor. 9 (1968) 109. 9

  51. [51]

    Niermann and L.C

    L. Niermann and L.C. Barbado, Particle detectors in superposition in de Sitter spacetime , 2403.02087. 13

  52. [52]

    Entangling detectors in anti-de Sitter space

    L.J. Henderson, R.A. Hennigar, R.B. Mann, A.R.H. Smith and J. Zhang, Entangling detectors in anti-de Sitter space , JHEP 05 (2019) 178 [ 1809.06862]. 15

  53. [53]

    Maeso-Garc´ ıa, J

    H. Maeso-Garc´ ıa, J. Polo-G´ omez and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez,How measuring a quantum field affects entanglement harvesting , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 045011 [ 2210.05692]. 15 32