{"as_of":"2026-08-08T05:48:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:74ff817d0a35a27a513b84173fa8f886b4da681ffac5c01c95c6f25bb0dfbaff","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":7,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":7,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":7,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":7,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:35:37.600795Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":1,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[{"count":1,"observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","source":"pith"}],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","last_updated":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T23:36:21.422946Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","title":"A Comparative Study of DSL Code Generation: Fine-Tuning vs. Optimized Retrieval Augmentation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2407.02742","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:35:37.600795Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.24189","last_updated":"2025-07-16T21:38:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:28:09.814528Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-30T03:59:35Z","title":"Fine-Tune an SLM or Prompt an LLM? The Case of Generating Low-Code Workflows","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:35:37.600795Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.02742","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.24189"},"observation_digest":"sha256:089dacc9edeafe6da041b0f53069f6656c21878bac76659ccbba4ba084a17d51","observation_id":"c2e14a16-a46b-41d1-b68f-2a773e2a5e3e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:35:37.600795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","last_updated":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T23:36:21.422946Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","title":"A Comparative Study of DSL Code Generation: Fine-Tuning vs. Optimized Retrieval Augmentation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2407.02742","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T18:54:14.444846Z","title":"Calling adjust_camera_angle({valid_angle}):","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.13943","last_updated":"2025-08-19T15:31:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T02:26:47.941151Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-19T15:31:37Z","title":"LLM-Powered Virtual Patient Agents for Interactive Clinical Skills Training with Automated Feedback","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T18:54:14.444846Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.02742","citing_paper":"/paper/2508.13943"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c06bca6a7b39eda39e3cb526a2f60b3b7292ba046abcf10c719f043fb027cea3","observation_id":"f1d07790-e32f-4a73-900b-b7613cf9191c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T18:54:14.444846Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","last_updated":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T23:36:21.422946Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","title":"A Comparative Study of DSL Code Generation: Fine-Tuning vs. Optimized Retrieval Augmentation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.02742","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2407.02742","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"and Methani, C","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"79db3efc-c134-4098-8b4f-ae3d5f2383de","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.09952","last_updated":"2026-04-10T23:11:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-10T23:11:57Z","title":"SLM Finetuning for Natural Language to Domain Specific Code Generation in Production","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-05-10T16:38:30.184565Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.02742","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.09952"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ff12cc3d549d8d7c59c00da4e0ed47587bd2a06e0a3d6ad84360cb9813897f18","observation_id":"27f4937f-fe3c-4172-8364-7d698dbc1392","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-11T08:26:00.903250Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","last_updated":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T23:36:21.422946Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","title":"A Comparative Study of DSL Code Generation: Fine-Tuning vs. Optimized Retrieval Augmentation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.02742","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2407.02742","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"and Methani, C","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"79db3efc-c134-4098-8b4f-ae3d5f2383de","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.21765","last_updated":"2026-04-23T15:18:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T23:08:19.446684Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-23T15:18:50Z","title":"PrismaDV: Automated Task-Aware Data Unit Test Generation","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-09T22:14:30.829159Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.02742","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.21765"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1a60d0b9231d801e5d0b0ddbe5c024ec46e5fd3a209cdeb89aa0e5c39f546c5a","observation_id":"2beb5e87-4bb2-4ce7-aa02-4868c2eeaf9b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-09T22:49:16.097885Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","last_updated":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T23:36:21.422946Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","title":"A Comparative Study of DSL Code Generation: Fine-Tuning vs. Optimized Retrieval Augmentation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.02742","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2407.02742","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"and Methani, C","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"79db3efc-c134-4098-8b4f-ae3d5f2383de","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.24678","last_updated":"2026-04-27T16:38:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T23:10:38.548416Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-27T16:38:01Z","title":"Leveraging LLMs for Multi-File DSL Code Generation: An Industrial Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-08T02:49:14.533263Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.02742","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.24678"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9f79063b1ee40aae7175cf1b44a5675cbdfc26c12fb74b6006a4155476538583","observation_id":"80489853-5810-4483-ba11-ee446e92e459","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-11T22:26:13.531344Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","last_updated":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T23:36:21.422946Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","title":"A Comparative Study of DSL Code Generation: Fine-Tuning vs. Optimized Retrieval Augmentation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.02742","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2407.02742","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"and Methani, C","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"79db3efc-c134-4098-8b4f-ae3d5f2383de","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.25193","last_updated":"2026-06-23T21:36:42Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T14:09:09.655563Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-23T21:36:42Z","title":"LLM4MTLs: Automated Generation and Empirical Evaluation of Model Transformation Languages","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-06-25T22:38:37.806421Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.02742","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.25193"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e2130cd91e986106a4b4df7fe319c83fcf8a48a915d25bad0341e7587c4a177e","observation_id":"b236c893-6821-44e6-b36a-fbe90664d0e7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-27T01:50:22.089771Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","last_updated":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T23:36:21.422946Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","title":"A Comparative Study of DSL Code Generation: Fine-Tuning vs. Optimized Retrieval Augmentation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.02742","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2407.02742","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"and Methani, C","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"79db3efc-c134-4098-8b4f-ae3d5f2383de","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08740","last_updated":"2026-07-09T17:40:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T00:22:06.208835Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T17:40:46Z","title":"Workflow as Knowledge: Semantic Persistence for LLM-Mediated Workflows","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T02:15:50.014951Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.02742","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08740"},"observation_digest":"sha256:11787e27bd18d33cc820bfb075117297eb454cbf340309d5679f06617d33c233","observation_id":"3c93e56d-062d-48bf-8f9a-917e8e31a09e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T02:16:42.458285Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2407.02742/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2407.02742/integrity","json":"/paper/2407.02742/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2407.02742"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.02742","last_updated":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T23:36:21.422946Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T01:28:51Z","title":"A Comparative Study of DSL Code Generation: Fine-Tuning vs. Optimized Retrieval Augmentation"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 7 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2407.02742."}