{"as_of":"2026-08-22T18:44:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:e219ccfc4ecede9afc9ef679c6b2d318c908d0c40c0107174e36171fdaa27b2a","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:12:47.356051Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:00:14.081999Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.10899","last_updated":"2024-07-15T16:49:26Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:34:04.253151Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-15T16:49:26Z","title":"Leveraging LLM-Respondents for Item Evaluation: a Psychometric Analysis","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2407.10899","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:12:47.356051Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.15560","last_updated":"2024-11-26T09:25:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T18:19:23.713156Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-23T13:34:50Z","title":"Do LLMs Agree on the Creativity Evaluation of Alternative Uses?","version":2},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:12:47.356051Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.10899","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.15560"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9e49e5f0bea68a77f3be6de7e83849c3a5d6445b4e8654575109c4e9f5fd8abe","observation_id":"ce6b503f-0aac-46c0-850f-e51a38e4e244","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:12:47.356051Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.10899","last_updated":"2024-07-15T16:49:26Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:34:04.253151Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-15T16:49:26Z","title":"Leveraging LLM-Respondents for Item Evaluation: a Psychometric Analysis","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2407.10899","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2407.10899","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:00:14.081999Z","title":"Leveraging LLM-Respondents for Item Evaluation: a Psychometric Analysis","venue":"cs.CY","work_id":"4f94ae1f-c6c7-492e-9c1e-c8bc15949a9a","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.01048","last_updated":"2025-06-21T03:39:58Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:42:06.024205Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-01T15:14:58Z","title":"IRT-Router: Effective and Interpretable Multi-LLM Routing via Item Response Theory","version":2},"reference_index":34,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:00:11.639482Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.10899","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.01048"},"observation_digest":"sha256:15080868c25f70be96f399be8ae167b7b7ffa12de0f4a783608aaa932b9bd3d7","observation_id":"8313269f-d9ee-4046-b888-c613120811fa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:00:14.115467Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2407.10899/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2407.10899/integrity","json":"/paper/2407.10899/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2407.10899"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.10899","last_updated":"2024-07-15T16:49:26Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CY","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:34:04.253151Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-15T16:49:26Z","title":"Leveraging LLM-Respondents for Item Evaluation: a Psychometric Analysis"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 22 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2407.10899."}