{"as_of":"2026-08-04T09:55:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:c701135eda9d7486a371a365d71092c4a972419e6a7f7702479fc37a59d2b3ce","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:34:03.388597+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-06-30T08:20:23.645840Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-06-30T08:24:26.428269Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.19683","last_updated":"2024-07-29T03:55:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:54:25.453743Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-29T03:55:52Z","title":"Revisiting the robustness of post-hoc interpretability methods","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2407.19683","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2407.19683","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-30T08:24:26.428269Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.19683 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":"f4abd3a8-024c-4beb-835f-b0c17ef9424f","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.29346","last_updated":"2026-06-28T11:29:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-07T00:03:21.717191Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-28T11:29:15Z","title":"Reliability, Faithfulness, and the Limits of Post-hoc Explanations of Opaque Scientific Models","version":1},"reference_index":141,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-06-30T08:20:23.645840Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.19683","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.29346"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d0c140758c0701a47c7f0cfbc43de74200a24cc1b6f777c4ed0ca07f9769c9b6","observation_id":"c3b76152-f138-4896-ac52-90788049f5bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-30T08:24:26.429596Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-04T06:34:03.388597+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:34:03.388597+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:33:57.428241+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2407.19683/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2407.19683/integrity","json":"/paper/2407.19683/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2407.19683"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.19683","last_updated":"2024-07-29T03:55:52Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:54:25.453743Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-29T03:55:52Z","title":"Revisiting the robustness of post-hoc interpretability methods"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:34:03.388597+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:33:57.428241+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 4 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2407.19683."}