pith. sign in

arxiv: 2408.05273 · v2 · pith:XM6O4UFInew · submitted 2024-08-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

The AURORA Survey: The Nebular Attenuation Curve of a Galaxy at z=4.41 from Ultraviolet to Near-Infrared Wavelengths

Ryan L. Sanders , Alice E. Shapley , Michael W. Topping , Naveen A. Reddy , Danielle A. Berg , Rychard J. Bouwens , Gabriel Brammer , Adam C. Carnall
show 23 more authors
Fergus Cullen Romeel Dav\'e James S. Dunlop Richard S. Ellis N. M. F\"orster Schreiber Steven R. Furlanetto Karl Glazebrook Garth D. Illingworth Tucker Jones Mariska Kriek Derek J. McLeod Ross J. McLure Desika Narayanan Pascal A. Oesch Anthony J. Pahl Max Pettini Daniel Schaerer Daniel P. Stark Charles C. Steidel Mengtao Tang Leonardo Clarke Callum T. Donnan Emily Kehoe
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 21:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords nebular attenuation curvehigh-redshift galaxydust attenuationJWST/NIRSpecrecombination linesultraviolet continuumstar-forming galaxyz=4.41
0
0 comments X

The pith

A galaxy at z=4.41 has a nebular attenuation curve that deviates from Milky Way, SMC, and Calzetti models from UV to near-IR.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures the attenuation curve of a star-forming galaxy at redshift 4.41 by combining ratios of eleven hydrogen recombination lines observed with JWST/NIRSpec to cover optical through near-infrared wavelengths. It extends the curve into the ultraviolet by using a high-signal detection of the rest-frame UV continuum, justified by the galaxy's very young stellar population. The resulting curve from 1400 to 9550 Å is steeper than standard curves at wavelengths longer than 5000 Å, similar in the blue-optical range, and shallower in the UV with no 2175 Å bump. This shows that the most commonly used dust curves do not apply to every high-redshift galaxy. Accurate physical properties derived from emission lines therefore require curves measured for individual sources rather than assumed templates.

Core claim

We use 11 unblended HI recombination lines to derive the nebular attenuation curve spanning 3751-9550 Å for GOODSN-17940 at z=4.41. We then combine this with a high-S/N rest-frame UV continuum detection and photometry to extend the curve down to 1400 Å, under the condition that the young stellar population causes the UV stellar light to experience the same attenuation as the nebular lines. The combined curve has a steeper slope at λ>5000 Å, a similar slope at λ=3750-5000 Å, and a shallower slope in the UV with no significant 2175 Å bump relative to the Milky Way, SMC, and Calzetti curves.

What carries the argument

The nebular attenuation curve derived from ratios of unblended HI recombination lines across optical to near-IR wavelengths and extended to the UV via stellar continuum measurements.

If this is right

  • Commonly assumed dust curves are not appropriate for all high-redshift galaxies.
  • Physical properties inferred from nebular emission lines in high-redshift sources require case-by-case attenuation corrections.
  • Deep JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy can derive nebular attenuation curves for individual high-redshift galaxies.
  • Standard curves may introduce systematic errors in star-formation rate and dust estimates at high redshift.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Dust grain size distributions or spatial geometries may differ systematically in some high-redshift star-forming galaxies compared with local templates.
  • A larger sample of individually measured curves would reveal whether this shape is common or rare at z>4.
  • Galaxy evolution models may need to allow for a wider range of attenuation laws when predicting observed emission-line strengths.

Load-bearing premise

The rest-frame ultraviolet stellar continuum experiences the same attenuation as the nebular emission lines because the galaxy is dominated by an extremely young stellar population less than 10 Myr old.

What would settle it

A direct measurement showing the stellar population age exceeds 10 Myr or that the attenuation affecting the UV continuum differs from that affecting the recombination lines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2408.05273 by Adam C. Carnall, Alice E. Shapley, Anthony J. Pahl, Callum T. Donnan, Charles C. Steidel, Danielle A. Berg, Daniel P. Stark, Daniel Schaerer, Derek J. McLeod, Desika Narayanan, Emily Kehoe, Fergus Cullen, Gabriel Brammer, Garth D. Illingworth, James S. Dunlop, Karl Glazebrook, Leonardo Clarke, Mariska Kriek, Max Pettini, Mengtao Tang, Michael W. Topping, Naveen A. Reddy, N. M. F\"orster Schreiber, Pascal A. Oesch, Richard S. Ellis, Romeel Dav\'e, Ross J. McLure, Ryan L. Sanders, Rychard J. Bouwens, Steven R. Furlanetto, Tucker Jones.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Detected H i emission lines in the spectrum of GOODSN-17940. In each panel, the 2D spectrum is shown at the top and the 1D science spectrum is displayed at the bottom. Emission lines detected with S/N ≥ 5 are labeled. Two detected H i lines, H8 and Hϵ, are blended with nearby emission lines due to the instrumental resolution. Pa8 is partially blended with [S iii]λ9533 due to the intrinsic line widths of GO… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: A ′ (λ) vs. 1/λ. The black squares show the values of A ′ calculated from the measured H i flux ratios relative to Hβ using equation 3. The dotted red line displays a fit assuming a functional form that is linear in λ −1 , which fails to match the data. The solid red line shows the best-fit cubic-in-λ −1 function that we use for this analysis. The light red shaded region shows the 1σ bounds on the be… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top Left: Rest-frame ultraviolet continuum of GOODSN-17940. The NIRSpec G140M spectrum is shown in black, with masked emission and absorption lines displayed in gray. The photometric measurements from JWST and HST imaging are presented as orange circles. The best-fit power laws to the photometry (orange lines) and spectrum (red line) yield a UV slope of β ∼ −1.6, suggesting a significant amount of dust red… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The nebular attenuation curve of GOODSN-17940 from 1400 ˚A to 9550 ˚A (red line). The Milky Way, SMC, Calzetti et al. (2000), and Reddy et al. (2020) curves are shown for comparison. All curves are normalized to unity at 9550 ˚A. GOODSN-17940, Paα falls at 10.1 µm in the Channel 2 Long band for MIRI medium resolution spectroscopy. It is thus possible to robustly establish the attenuation curve normalizatio… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: E(B − V )gas derived from the measured flux ra￾tio of H i lines relative to Hβ as a function of the rest-frame wavelength of each H i transition. Black squares show the resulting values when the newly derived attenuation curve of GOODSN-17940 is used, while green circles display the results when the Cardelli et al. (1989) Milky Way curve is assumed. The E(B − V )gas values calculated by simultane￾ously fit… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We use JWST/NIRSpec observations from the Assembly of Ultradeep Rest-optical Observations Revealing Astrophysics (AURORA) survey to constrain the shape of the nebular attenuation curve of a star-forming galaxy at z=4.41, GOODSN-17940. We utilize 11 unblended HI recombination lines to derive the attenuation curve spanning optical to near-infrared wavelengths (3751-9550 \r{A}). We then leverage a high-S/N spectroscopic detection of the rest-frame ultraviolet continuum in combination with rest-UV photometric measurements to constrain the shape of the curve at ultraviolet wavelengths. While this UV constraint is predominantly based on stellar emission, the large measured equivalent widths of H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ indicate that GOODSN-17940 is dominated by an extremely young stellar population <10 Myr in age such that the UV stellar continuum experiences the same attenuation as the nebular emission. The resulting combined nebular attenuation curve spans 1400-9550 \r{A} and has a shape that deviates significantly from commonly assumed dust curves in high-redshift studies. Relative to the Milky Way, SMC, and Calzetti curves, the new curve has a steeper slope at long wavelengths ($\lambda>5000$ \r{A}) while displaying a similar slope across blue-optical wavelengths ($\lambda=3750-5000$ \r{A}). In the ultraviolet, the new curve is shallower than the SMC and Calzetti curves and displays no significant 2175 \r{A} bump. This work demonstrates that the most commonly assumed dust curves are not appropriate for all high-redshift galaxies. These results highlight the ability to derive nebular attenuation curves for individual high-redshift sources with deep JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy, thereby improving the accuracy of physical properties inferred from nebular emission lines.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives the nebular attenuation curve for galaxy GOODSN-17940 at z=4.41 from JWST/NIRSpec data. It uses 11 unblended HI recombination lines to constrain the curve from 3751-9550 Å and extends the measurement to 1400 Å via the rest-UV stellar continuum, justified by large Hα and Hβ equivalent widths implying a stellar population younger than 10 Myr so that stellar and nebular attenuation are equivalent. The resulting curve (1400-9550 Å) is reported to have a steeper long-wavelength slope than the Milky Way, SMC, and Calzetti curves, a comparable blue-optical slope, and a shallower UV slope with no significant 2175 Å bump, implying that standard curves are inappropriate for all high-redshift galaxies.

Significance. If the central measurement holds, the work supplies a rare direct, multi-wavelength nebular attenuation curve for a single high-redshift source and demonstrates that JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy can yield such constraints. This is significant for improving the accuracy of physical parameters inferred from nebular lines at z>4, where the choice of attenuation curve affects derived star-formation rates and other quantities. The optical-NIR segment rests on a standard application of Case B ratios to clean lines, which is a strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [abstract and the section describing the UV constraint] Abstract and the section describing the UV constraint: the equivalence between UV stellar-continuum attenuation and nebular-line attenuation is asserted solely on the basis of large Hα and Hβ EWs implying an age <10 Myr. No quantitative test (e.g., comparison of line ratios with continuum slope under alternative geometries, or resolved kinematic data) is supplied to show that dust geometry effects are negligible. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed UV slope and absence of the 2175 Å bump.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We respond to the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [abstract and the section describing the UV constraint] Abstract and the section describing the UV constraint: the equivalence between UV stellar-continuum attenuation and nebular-line attenuation is asserted solely on the basis of large Hα and Hβ EWs implying an age <10 Myr. No quantitative test (e.g., comparison of line ratios with continuum slope under alternative geometries, or resolved kinematic data) is supplied to show that dust geometry effects are negligible. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed UV slope and absence of the 2175 Å bump.

    Authors: We agree that the equivalence between stellar-continuum and nebular attenuation at UV wavelengths is a key assumption, justified in the manuscript by the large measured Hα and Hβ EWs that imply a stellar population age <10 Myr. In such extremely young systems the massive stars and ionized gas are expected to be co-located, reducing the impact of differential dust geometry. This is a standard inference in the literature for high-EW sources. We acknowledge, however, that the manuscript does not include additional quantitative tests (e.g., geometry modeling or kinematic comparisons) to demonstrate that geometry effects are negligible. The current data do not permit resolved kinematic analysis. We will therefore revise the abstract and relevant section to state the assumption more explicitly, reference supporting literature on young star-forming galaxies, and add a caveat regarding the UV slope and 2175 Å bump result. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is data-driven from line ratios and continuum with independent age justification

full rationale

The paper derives the nebular attenuation curve directly from observed-to-intrinsic ratios of 11 HI recombination lines (optical-NIR) and rest-UV continuum slope. The key linking assumption—that UV stellar continuum shares the same attenuation as nebular lines—is justified by independently measured equivalent widths of Hα and Hβ implying a <10 Myr population, not by any equation that defines the curve in terms of itself or by fitting a parameter and relabeling it a prediction. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work are invoked as load-bearing steps in the provided text. The result does not reduce to its inputs by construction under any of the enumerated patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The measurement relies on standard atomic-physics line ratios and the young stellar population assumption; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the usual normalization of the curve.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Case B recombination line ratios hold for the observed conditions
    Used to predict intrinsic HI line ratios from which observed ratios yield the attenuation curve.
  • domain assumption Stellar and nebular light experience identical attenuation when the stellar population is <10 Myr old
    Invoked to combine the UV continuum constraint with the nebular line curve.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6048 in / 1670 out tokens · 36169 ms · 2026-05-23T21:48:18.289043+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The AURORA Survey: High-Redshift Empirical Metallicity Calibrations from Electron Temperature Measurements at z=2-10

    astro-ph.GA 2025-08 accept novelty 6.0

    New empirical calibrations between 19 emission-line ratios and oxygen abundance are derived from direct electron-temperature measurements in 139 star-forming galaxies at z=1.4-10.6.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Z., Berg , D

    Arellano-C´ ordova, K. Z., Berg, D. A., Chisholm, J., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ab2

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ab2 2022

  2. [2]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 11372, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3902

    Asada, Y., Sawicki, M., Abraham, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 11372, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3902

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3902 2024

  3. [3]

    M., & Grevesse , N

    Asplund, M., Amarsi, A. M., & Grevesse, N. 2021, A&A, 653, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 2021

  4. [4]

    J., Bagley, M

    Battisti, A. J., Bagley, M. B., Baronchelli, I., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 4431, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1052

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1052 2022

  5. [5]

    A., Pogge, R

    Berg, D. A., Pogge, R. W., Skillman, E. D., et al. 2020, ApJ, 893, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7eab

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7eab 2020

  6. [6]

    J., & Dopita , M

    Bian, F., Kewley, L. J., & Dopita, M. A. 2018, ApJ, 859, 175, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabd74

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabd74 2018

  7. [7]

    2022, A&A, 663, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142537

    Boquien, M., Buat, V., Burgarella, D., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142537

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142537 2022

  8. [8]

    J., Aravena, M., Decarli, R., et al

    Bouwens, R. J., Aravena, M., Decarli, R., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 72, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/72 20 Sanders et al

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/72 2016

  9. [9]

    2022, ApJL, 940, L52, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9f17

    Boyett, K., Mascia, S., Pentericci, L., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L52, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9f17

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9f17 2022

  10. [10]

    2012, A&A, 545, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219405

    Buat, V., Noll, S., Burgarella, D., et al. 2012, A&A, 545, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219405

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219405 2012

  11. [11]

    J., Conroy, C., & Johnson, B

    Byler, N., Dalcanton, J. J., Conroy, C., & Johnson, B. D. 2017, ApJ, 840, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c66 Calabr` o, A., Castellano, M., Pentericci, L., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A39, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039244

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c66 2017

  12. [12]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  13. [13]

    L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T

    Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582, doi: 10.1086/174346

    work page doi:10.1086/174346 1994

  14. [14]

    J., Katz, H., Rey, M

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Rey, M. P., & Saxena, A. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3516, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1579

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1579 2023

  15. [15]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900

    work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989

  16. [16]

    2003, , 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  17. [17]

    E., Sanders, R

    Clarke, L., Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.05178, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.05178

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.05178 2024

  18. [18]

    E., & White , M

    Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 486, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/1/486 2009

  19. [19]

    E., McLure , R

    Cullen, F., Shapley, A. E., McLure, R. J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 903, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1340

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1340 2021

  20. [20]

    J., McLure, R

    Cullen, F., McLeod, D. J., McLure, R. J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 997, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1211

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1211 2024

  21. [21]

    2023, , 518, 425, 10.1093/mnras/stac2737

    Curti, M., D’Eugenio, F., Carniani, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 425, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2737 D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., Carniani, S., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.09908, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.09908

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2737 2023

  22. [22]

    J., Stanway , E

    Eldridge, J. J., Stanway, E. R., Xiao, L., et al. 2017, PASA, 34, e058, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2017.51

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1017/pasa.2017.51 2017

  23. [23]

    R., et al

    Emami, N., Siana, B., Weisz, D. R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 881, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab211a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab211a 2019

  24. [24]

    P., Chevallard, J., & Charlot, S

    Endsley, R., Stark, D. P., Chevallard, J., & Charlot, S. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 5229, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3370

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3370 2021

  25. [25]

    P., Whitler, L., et al

    Endsley, R., Stark, D. P., Whitler, L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 2312, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1919 —. 2024, MNRAS, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1857

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1919 2023

  26. [26]

    J., Chatzikos, M., Guzm´ an, F., et al

    Ferland, G. J., Chatzikos, M., Guzm´ an, F., et al. 2017, RMxAA, 53, 385, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1705.10877

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.10877 2017

  27. [27]

    L., & Massa, D

    Fitzpatrick, E. L., & Massa, D. 1986, ApJ, 307, 286, doi: 10.1086/164415

    work page doi:10.1086/164415 1986

  28. [28]

    D., Clayton , G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., Landolt, A. U., & Wolff, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 594, 279, doi: 10.1086/376774

    work page doi:10.1086/376774 2003

  29. [29]

    A., Kocevski, D

    Grogin, N. A., Kocevski, D. D., Faber, S. M., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 35, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35 2011

  30. [30]

    M., et al

    Guo, Y., Rafelski, M., Faber, S. M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/37

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/37 2016

  31. [31]

    E., Brammer, G

    Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G. B., Watson, D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.02211, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.02211

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.02211 2024

  32. [32]

    1986, PASP, 98, 609, doi: 10.1086/131801

    Horne, K. 1986, PASP, 98, 609, doi: 10.1086/131801

    work page doi:10.1086/131801 1986

  33. [33]

    2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142663 2022

  34. [34]

    1992, ApJL, 393, L79, doi: 10.1086/186456

    Joblin, C., Leger, A., & Martin, P. 1992, ApJL, 393, L79, doi: 10.1086/186456

    work page doi:10.1086/186456 1992

  35. [35]

    2023, ApJL, 951, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd938

    Jones, T., Sanders, R., Chen, Y., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd938

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd938 2023

  36. [36]

    D., Rodighiero, G., et al

    Kashino, D., Silverman, J. D., Rodighiero, G., et al. 2013, ApJL, 777, L8, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/777/1/L8

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/777/1/l8 2013

  37. [37]

    J., Silverman, J

    Kashino, D., Lilly, S. J., Silverman, J. D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 909, 213, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abdf62

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abdf62 2021

  38. [38]

    2013, ApJL, 775, L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16

    Kriek, M., & Conroy, C. 2013, ApJL, 775, L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/l16 2013

  39. [39]

    G., Labb \'e , I., et al

    Kriek, M., van Dokkum, P. G., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 221, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/221

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/1/221 2009

  40. [40]

    E., Reddy, N

    Kriek, M., Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., et al. 2015, ApJS, 218, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/15

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/15 2015

  41. [41]

    H., Maseda, M

    Laseter, I. H., Maseda, M. V., Curti, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347133

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347133 2024

  42. [42]

    2014, ApJS, 212, 14, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/14

    Leitherer, C., Ekstr¨ om, S., Meynet, G., et al. 2014, ApJS, 212, 14, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/14

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/14 2014

  43. [43]

    D., et al

    Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3, doi: 10.1086/313233

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/313233 1999

  44. [44]

    Li, A., & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 554, 778, doi: 10.1086/323147

    work page doi:10.1086/323147 2001

  45. [45]

    Luridiana, V., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323152 2015

  46. [46]

    2023, A&A, 679, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346723

    Markov, V., Gallerani, S., Pallottini, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346723

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346723 2023

  47. [47]

    J., Dunlop, J

    McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., Cullen, F., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 3991, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty522

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty522 2018

  48. [48]

    2023, ApJS, 269, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., Isobe, Y., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acd556 2023

  49. [49]

    D., et al

    Narayanan, D., Dav´ e, R., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1718, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2860

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2860 2018

  50. [50]

    Popping, G., Puglisi, A., & Norman, C. A. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 2315, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2202

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2202 2017

  51. [51]

    Rauscher, B. J. 2024, PASP, 136, 015001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ad1b36

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad1b36 2024

  52. [52]

    Shapley, A. E. 2010, ApJ, 712, 1070, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1070

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/2/1070 2010

  53. [53]

    A., Topping, M

    Reddy, N. A., Topping, M. W., Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., & Brammer, G. 2023, ApJ, 948, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc869 Nebular Attenuation Curve at z = 4.41 21

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc869 2023

  54. [54]

    A., Kriek, M., Shapley, A

    Reddy, N. A., Kriek, M., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 259, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/259

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/2/259 2015

  55. [55]

    A., Oesch, P

    Reddy, N. A., Oesch, P. A., Bouwens, R. J., et al. 2018a, ApJ, 853, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3e7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3e7

  56. [56]

    A., Shapley, A

    Reddy, N. A., Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., et al. 2018b, ApJ, 869, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaed1e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaed1e

  57. [57]

    A., Shapley , A

    Reddy, N. A., Shapley, A. E., Kriek, M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 902, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb674

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb674 2020

  58. [58]

    E., Nidever, D

    Reines, A. E., Nidever, D. L., Whelan, D. G., & Johnson, K. E. 2010, ApJ, 708, 26, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/26

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/26 2010

  59. [59]

    2021, MNRAS, 506, 3588, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1885

    Rezaee, S., Reddy, N., Shivaei, I., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 3588, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1885

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1885 2021

  60. [60]

    A., Topping, M

    Rezaee, S., Reddy, N. A., Topping, M. W., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 1512, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2842

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2842 2023

  61. [61]

    Rogers, N. S. J., Strom, A. L., Rudie, G. C., et al. 2024, ApJL, 964, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2f37

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad2f37 2024

  62. [62]

    Salim, S., Boquien, M., & Lee, J. C. 2018, ApJ, 859, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf3c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabf3c 2018

  63. [63]

    2020, ARA&A, 58, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021933

    Salim, S., & Narayanan, D. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021933

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021933 2020

  64. [64]

    2016, ApJ, 827, 20, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/20

    Salmon, B., Papovich, C., Long, J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 827, 20, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/20

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/827/1/20 2016

  65. [65]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Topping, M. W., Reddy, N. A., & Brammer, G. B. 2024, ApJ, 962, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad15fc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad15fc 2024

  66. [66]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Zhang, K., & Yan, R. 2017, ApJ, 850, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa93e4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa93e4 2017

  67. [67]

    2016 a , , 816, 23, 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/23

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Kriek, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 816, 23, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/23

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/816/1/23 2016

  68. [68]

    L., Shapley , A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 1427, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3032

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3032 2020

  69. [69]

    2015, ApJ, 800, 108, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/108

    Scoville, N., Faisst, A., Capak, P., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 108, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/108

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/800/2/108 2015

  70. [70]

    P., et al

    Senchyna, P., Plat, A., Stark, D. P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad235e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad235e 2024

  71. [71]

    E., Sanders, R

    Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., Reddy, N. A., et al. 2017, ApJL, 846, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8815

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa8815 2017

  72. [72]

    E., Sanders , R

    Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., Shao, P., et al. 2019, ApJL, 881, L35, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab385a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab385a 2019

  73. [73]

    E., Sanders, R

    Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., Topping, M. W., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.00157. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00157

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    2020a, ApJL, 903, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abc1ef

    Shivaei, I., Darvish, B., Sattari, Z., et al. 2020a, ApJL, 903, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abc1ef

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abc1ef 2041

  75. [75]

    A., Shapley, A

    Shivaei, I., Reddy, N. A., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 98, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/98

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/2/98 2015

  76. [76]

    A., et al

    Shivaei, I., Kriek, M., Reddy, N. A., et al. 2016, ApJL, 820, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/820/2/L23

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/820/2/l23 2016

  77. [77]

    2020b, ApJ, 899, 117, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba35e

    Shivaei, I., Reddy, N., Rieke, G., et al. 2020b, ApJ, 899, 117, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba35e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba35e

  78. [78]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 1886, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1313

    Shivaei, I., Boogaard, L., D´ ıaz-Santos, T., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 1886, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1313

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1313 2022

  79. [79]

    E., Whitaker , K

    Skelton, R. E., Whitaker, K. E., Momcheva, I. G., et al. 2014, ApJS, 214, 24, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/24

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/24 2014

  80. [80]

    Silverman, J. D. 2014, ApJS, 214, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15 2014

Showing first 80 references.