{"as_of":"2026-08-08T04:01:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:6571df528bfd211ceb81231624c83f93bab888db7e388d74a82831b401d7011b","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:52:39.447013Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:52:40.282635Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2408.09834","last_updated":"2024-08-30T13:54:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T19:02:20.097267Z","submitted_at":"2024-08-19T09:29:31Z","title":"Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2408.09834","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2408.09834","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:52:40.282635Z","title":"Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness","venue":"cs.AI","work_id":"7d96f37c-93f9-4faa-a3ef-6b665746114a","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.12725","last_updated":"2025-06-15T05:32:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:41:19.883045Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-15T05:32:07Z","title":"Rethinking DPO: The Role of Rejected Responses in Preference Misalignment","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:52:39.447013Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2408.09834","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.12725"},"observation_digest":"sha256:94019790350fa3dc427ba5bc865d610c477efd33587d13ccca6147a074d8615c","observation_id":"e31260c0-e133-4221-9f08-b385be1d2d8f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:52:40.355270Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2408.09834/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2408.09834/integrity","json":"/paper/2408.09834/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2408.09834"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2408.09834","last_updated":"2024-08-30T13:54:36Z","latest_version":3,"primary_category":"cs.AI","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T19:02:20.097267Z","submitted_at":"2024-08-19T09:29:31Z","title":"Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2408.09834."}