pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.15251 · v1 · submitted 2024-09-23 · ✦ hep-th · cs.LG

Machine Learning Toric Duality in Brane Tilings

Pietro Capuozzo , Tancredi Schettini Gherardini , Benjamin Suzzoni This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 20:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cs.LG
keywords Seiberg dualitybrane tilingsmachine learningtoric Calabi-Yaugauged linear sigma modelY^{6,0} theoriesneural network regressionKasteleyn matrix
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neural networks classify Seiberg dual theories on conifold orbifolds with R squared 0.988 and predict Y^{6,0} multiplicities to mean absolute error 0.021 when the Kasteleyn matrix representative is fixed.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper trains neural networks to recognize classes of Seiberg dual 4d N=1 theories that arise from D3-branes on toric Calabi-Yau threefolds, which are described by brane tilings. A fully connected network distinguishes dual theories on Z_m times Z_n orbifolds of the conifold, while a residual network predicts the individual gauged linear sigma-model multiplicities that label the toric diagrams of the Y^{6,0} family. A sympathetic reader would care because Seiberg duality organizes an intricate web of equivalent descriptions of the same physics, and machine learning offers a way to navigate that web without computing every Kasteleyn matrix or dimer model by hand.

Core claim

The authors show that a fully connected neural network identifies Seiberg dual classes realized on Z_m times Z_n orbifolds of the conifold with R squared equal to 0.988, and that a residual architecture classifies the toric phase space of the Y^{6,0} theories while predicting the individual gauged linear sigma-model multiplicities in their toric diagrams; upon fixing a choice of Kasteleyn matrix representative the regressor reaches a mean absolute error of 0.021, with performance changing when that assumption is relaxed.

What carries the argument

The residual neural network regressor that maps fixed Kasteleyn matrix representatives of Y^{6,0} brane tilings to the individual gauged linear sigma-model multiplicities of the corresponding toric diagrams.

If this is right

  • Machine learning distinguishes universality classes of Seiberg dual theories on orbifolds of the conifold.
  • Residual networks can predict the gauged linear sigma-model multiplicities that label toric diagrams in the Y^{6,0} family.
  • The accuracy of these predictions changes when the fixed Kasteleyn matrix representative assumption is relaxed.
  • The methods exhibit robustness properties that depend on how the space of theories is perturbed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same architectures could be tested on other infinite families of toric Calabi-Yau threefolds to see whether duality networks remain learnable.
  • If the pattern holds, machine learning might reduce the computational cost of enumerating infrared dual descriptions in larger classes of supersymmetric quiver gauge theories.
  • The success indicates that the combinatorial data of brane tilings contain statistical regularities that neural networks can extract without explicit geometric invariants.

Load-bearing premise

The reported low error for multiplicity prediction holds only when a specific choice of Kasteleyn matrix representative is fixed in advance.

What would settle it

Retraining the residual regressor on Y^{6,0} data that uses a different fixed Kasteleyn matrix representative and measuring whether the mean absolute error on multiplicity prediction stays below 0.05.

read the original abstract

We apply a variety of machine learning methods to the study of Seiberg duality within 4d $\mathcal{N}=1$ quantum field theories arising on the worldvolumes of D3-branes probing toric Calabi-Yau 3-folds. Such theories admit an elegant description in terms of bipartite tessellations of the torus known as brane tilings or dimer models. An intricate network of infrared dualities interconnects the space of such theories and partitions it into universality classes, the prediction and classification of which is a problem that naturally lends itself to a machine learning investigation. In this paper, we address a preliminary set of such enquiries. We begin by training a fully connected neural network to identify classes of Seiberg dual theories realised on $\mathbb{Z}_m\times\mathbb{Z}_n$ orbifolds of the conifold and achieve $R^2=0.988$. Then, we evaluate various notions of robustness of our methods against perturbations of the space of theories under investigation, and discuss these results in terms of the nature of the neural network's learning. Finally, we employ a more sophisticated residual architecture to classify the toric phase space of the $Y^{6,0}$ theories, and to predict the individual gauged linear $\sigma$-model multiplicities in toric diagrams thereof. In spite of the non-trivial nature of this task, we achieve remarkably accurate results; namely, upon fixing a choice of Kasteleyn matrix representative, the regressor achieves a mean absolute error of $0.021$. We also discuss how the performance is affected by relaxing these assumptions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper applies machine learning to Seiberg duality in 4d N=1 theories from D3-branes on toric Calabi-Yau threefolds, described via brane tilings. A fully connected neural network classifies Seiberg-dual classes on Z_m × Z_n orbifolds of the conifold with R²=0.988. Robustness to perturbations of the theory space is evaluated. A residual architecture then classifies the toric phase space of Y^{6,0} theories and regresses individual gauged linear sigma-model multiplicities in their toric diagrams, achieving MAE 0.021 when a Kasteleyn matrix representative is fixed; performance changes when this assumption is relaxed.

Significance. If the numerical results are reproducible, the work shows that standard supervised ML architectures can navigate networks of toric dualities and predict GLSM data from dimer-model inputs. The explicit qualification that the strongest regression result requires a fixed Kasteleyn representative is a useful caveat that highlights the distinction between mathematical representatives and physical equivalence classes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the headline metrics (R²=0.988 and MAE=0.021) are stated without any information on dataset cardinality, train-test split ratios, cross-validation protocol, or leakage controls, so the statistical support for the central classification and regression claims cannot be assessed from the manuscript.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (Y^{6,0} regression paragraph): the reported MAE of 0.021 is obtained only after fixing a Kasteleyn matrix representative; because distinct representatives encode physically equivalent tilings yet produce numerically different input matrices, the absence of a quantitative study of performance under representative change leaves the invariance of the regressor under the natural equivalence of the theory untested and load-bearing for the claim.
  3. [Robustness discussion] Robustness section: the discussion of robustness against perturbations of the space of theories is presented without tabulated quantitative metrics, explicit perturbation definitions, or ablation controls that would allow the reader to evaluate the claimed connection to the network's learned representation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a single sentence stating the total number of distinct theories or tilings used in each experiment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be incorporated in the updated version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the headline metrics (R²=0.988 and MAE=0.021) are stated without any information on dataset cardinality, train-test split ratios, cross-validation protocol, or leakage controls, so the statistical support for the central classification and regression claims cannot be assessed from the manuscript.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from a concise statement of the underlying data and evaluation protocol. In the revised manuscript we will insert a single sentence noting the total number of theories in each dataset, the 80/20 train-test split, the use of 5-fold cross-validation, and the absence of leakage between Seiberg-dual classes. The detailed numerical values and implementation remain in Sections 3 and 5. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (Y^{6,0} regression paragraph): the reported MAE of 0.021 is obtained only after fixing a Kasteleyn matrix representative; because distinct representatives encode physically equivalent tilings yet produce numerically different input matrices, the absence of a quantitative study of performance under representative change leaves the invariance of the regressor under the natural equivalence of the theory untested and load-bearing for the claim.

    Authors: The manuscript already states that performance degrades when the fixed-Kasteleyn assumption is relaxed and briefly quantifies the change in the results section. Nevertheless, we accept that a more systematic tabulation of MAE across several distinct representatives would make the invariance properties clearer. We will add such a table and corresponding discussion in the revision. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Robustness discussion] Robustness section: the discussion of robustness against perturbations of the space of theories is presented without tabulated quantitative metrics, explicit perturbation definitions, or ablation controls that would allow the reader to evaluate the claimed connection to the network's learned representation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current robustness analysis is largely qualitative. In the revised version we will supply an explicit definition of each perturbation, a table of accuracy and R² values for a range of perturbation strengths, and ablation results that isolate the contribution of individual input features to the observed robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Standard supervised ML on known duality data; no reduction of predictions to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper applies fully connected and residual neural networks to supervised classification and regression tasks on datasets generated from known Seiberg duality relations in brane tilings. Reported metrics (R^2=0.988, MAE=0.021) are empirical outcomes of training and evaluation on these data, with the abstract explicitly conditioning the regression result on a fixed Kasteleyn representative and noting performance changes when relaxed. This setup matches standard ML practice and does not match any enumerated circularity pattern: no self-definitional equations, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems. The derivation chain consists of data generation followed by model fitting, which remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central empirical claims rest on the domain assumption that Seiberg duality partitions the space of brane-tiling theories into well-defined universality classes and on standard supervised-learning assumptions that the training examples are representative. No new physical entities are introduced. The neural-network weights themselves constitute a large set of fitted parameters whose values are not reported.

free parameters (1)
  • neural network weights and hyperparameters
    The fully connected and residual networks contain thousands of parameters fitted to the duality-labeled data during training.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Seiberg duality interconnects the space of 4d N=1 theories arising on D3-branes probing toric Calabi-Yau threefolds into universality classes
    Invoked in the first paragraph of the abstract as the physical motivation for the classification task.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5828 in / 1417 out tokens · 37044 ms · 2026-05-23T20:25:11.490867+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 43 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [ hep-th/9711200]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [ hep-th/9802109]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Branes at conical singularities and holography

    B.S. Acharya, J.M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, C.M. Hull and B.J. Spence, Branes at conical singularities and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1999) 1249 [ hep-th/9808014]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  5. [5]

    Superconformal Field Theory on Threebranes at a Calabi-Yau Singularity

    I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten, Superconformal field theory on three-branes at a Calabi-Yau singularity, Nucl. Phys. B 536 (1998) 199 [ hep-th/9807080]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    Brane Dimers and Quiver Gauge Theories

    S. Franco, A. Hanany, K.D. Kennaway, D. Vegh and B. Wecht, Brane dimers and quiver gauge theories, JHEP 01 (2006) 096 [ hep-th/0504110]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Electric-Magnetic Duality in Supersymmetric Non-Abelian Gauge Theories

    N. Seiberg, Electric - magnetic duality in supersymmetric non-Abelian gauge theories , Nucl. Phys. B 435 (1995) 129 [ hep-th/9411149]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  8. [8]

    Gukov, J

    S. Gukov, J. Halverson, F. Ruehle and P. Su lkowski, Learning to Unknot, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 2 (2021) 025035 [ 2010.16263]

    work page arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    J. Bao, S. Franco, Y.-H. He, E. Hirst, G. Musiker and Y. Xiao, Quiver Mutations, Seiberg Duality and Machine Learning , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 086013 [ 2006.10783]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Dechant, Y.-H

    P.-P. Dechant, Y.-H. He, E. Heyes and E. Hirst, Cluster Algebras: Network Science and Machine Learning, J. Comput. Algebra 8 (2023) [ 2203.13847]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Seong, Unsupervised machine learning techniques for exploring tropical coamoeba, brane tilings and Seiberg duality , Phys

    R.-K. Seong, Unsupervised machine learning techniques for exploring tropical coamoeba, brane tilings and Seiberg duality , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 106009 [ 2309.05702]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Branes with Brains: Exploring String Vacua with Deep Reinforcement Learning

    J. Halverson, B. Nelson and F. Ruehle, Branes with Brains: Exploring String Vacua with Deep Reinforcement Learning, JHEP 06 (2019) 003 [ 1903.11616]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Loges and G

    G.J. Loges and G. Shiu, Breeding Realistic D-Brane Models, Fortsch. Phys. 70 (2022) 2200038 [2112.08391]

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Hirst and T.S

    E. Hirst and T.S. Gherardini, Calabi-yau four-, five-, sixfolds as Pn w hypersurfaces: Machine learning, approximation, and generation , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 106006

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Arias-Tamargo, Y.-H

    G. Arias-Tamargo, Y.-H. He, E. Heyes, E. Hirst and D. Rodriguez-Gomez, Brain webs for brane webs, Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022) 137376 [ 2202.05845]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Loges and G

    G.J. Loges and G. Shiu, 134 billion intersecting brane models , JHEP 12 (2022) 097 [2206.03506]

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Cheung, P.-P

    M.-W. Cheung, P.-P. Dechant, Y.-H. He, E. Heyes, E. Hirst and J.-R. Li, Clustering Cluster Algebras with Clusters, 2212.09771

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Chen, P.-P

    S. Chen, P.-P. Dechant, Y.-H. He, E. Heyes, E. Hirst and D. Riabchenko, Machine Learning Clifford invariants of ADE Coxeter elements , 2310.00041. – 29 –

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Alawadhi, D

    R. Alawadhi, D. Angella, A. Leonardo and T.S. Gherardini, Constructing and Machine Learning Calabi-Yau Five-Folds, Fortsch. Phys. 72 (2024) 2300262 [ 2310.15966]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Betzler and S

    P. Betzler and S. Krippendorf, Connecting dualities and machine learning , Fortschritte der Physik 68 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Non-Spherical Horizons, I

    D.R. Morrison and M.R. Plesser, Nonspherical horizons. 1. , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999) 1 [ hep-th/9810201]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  22. [22]

    D-branes, Quivers, and ALE Instantons

    M.R. Douglas and G.W. Moore, D-branes, quivers, and ALE instantons , hep-th/9603167

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Aspects of Type IIB Theory on ALE Spaces

    C.V. Johnson and R.C. Myers, Aspects of type IIB theory on ALE spaces , Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 6382 [ hep-th/9610140]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  24. [24]

    McKay, Graphs, singularities, and finite groups , Pure Math 37 (1980) 183

    J. McKay, Graphs, singularities, and finite groups , Pure Math 37 (1980) 183

    work page 1980

  25. [25]

    4d Conformal Field Theories and Strings on Orbifolds

    S. Kachru and E. Silverstein, 4-D conformal theories and strings on orbifolds , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4855 [ hep-th/9802183]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  26. [26]

    On Conformal Theories in Four Dimensions

    A.E. Lawrence, N. Nekrasov and C. Vafa, On conformal field theories in four-dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B 533 (1998) 199 [ hep-th/9803015]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  27. [27]

    Gabriel, Berichtigungen zu Unzerlegbare Darstellungen I , Manuscripta Math 6 (1972) 309

    P. Gabriel, Berichtigungen zu Unzerlegbare Darstellungen I , Manuscripta Math 6 (1972) 309

    work page 1972

  28. [28]

    Quintero V´ elez and F

    A. Quintero V´ elez and F. Valencia,Lecture notes on quivers with superpotential and their representations, S˜ ao Paolo Journal of Mathematical Sciences15 (2021) 720

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Dimer models and Calabi-Yau algebras

    N. Broomhead, Dimer models and Calabi-Yau algebras , 0901.4662

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Calabi-Yau algebras

    V. Ginzburg, Calabi-Yau algebras, math/0612139

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    On Correspondences Between Toric Singularities and (p,q)-webs

    B. Feng, Y.-H. He and F. Lam, On correspondences between toric singularities and (p,q) webs, Nucl. Phys. B 701 (2004) 334 [ hep-th/0403133]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  32. [32]

    Bipartite Field Theories: from D-Brane Probes to Scattering Amplitudes

    S. Franco, Bipartite Field Theories: from D-Brane Probes to Scattering Amplitudes , JHEP 11 (2012) 141 [ 1207.0807]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  33. [33]

    Toric Duality Is Seiberg Duality

    C.E. Beasley and M.R. Plesser, Toric duality is Seiberg duality , JHEP 12 (2001) 001 [hep-th/0109053]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  34. [34]

    B. Feng, S. Franco, A. Hanany and Y.-H. He, Symmetries of toric duality , JHEP 12 (2002) 076 [hep-th/0205144]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  35. [35]

    B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y.-H. He, D-brane gauge theories from toric singularities and toric duality, Nucl. Phys. B 595 (2001) 165 [ hep-th/0003085]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  36. [36]

    B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y.-H. He, Phase structure of D-brane gauge theories and toric duality, JHEP 08 (2001) 040 [ hep-th/0104259]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  37. [37]

    B. Feng, A. Hanany, Y.-H. He and A.M. Uranga, Toric duality as Seiberg duality and brane diamonds, JHEP 12 (2001) 035 [ hep-th/0109063]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  38. [38]

    Propp, Generalized domino-shuffling, Theor

    J.G. Propp, Generalized domino-shuffling, Theor. Comput. Sci. 303 (2003) 267

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    Fulton, Introduction to toric varieties , Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1993)

    W. Fulton, Introduction to toric varieties , Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1993)

    work page 1993

  40. [40]

    Brane Tilings

    K.D. Kennaway, Brane Tilings, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 22 (2007) 2977 [ 0706.1660]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    Dimer models and toric diagrams

    A. Hanany and K.D. Kennaway, Dimer models and toric diagrams , hep-th/0503149

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Moduli Spaces of Gauge Theories from Dimer Models: Proof of the Correspondence

    S. Franco and D. Vegh, Moduli spaces of gauge theories from dimer models: Proof of the correspondence, JHEP 11 (2006) 054 [ hep-th/0601063]. – 30 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  43. [43]

    D-Strings on D-Manifolds

    M. Bershadsky, C. Vafa and V. Sadov, D strings on D manifolds , Nucl. Phys. B 463 (1996) 398 [hep-th/9510225]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  44. [44]

    Mirror Symmetries for Brane Configurations and Branes at Singularities

    M. Aganagic, A. Karch, D. Lust and A. Miemiec, Mirror symmetries for brane configurations and branes at singularities , Nucl. Phys. B 569 (2000) 277 [ hep-th/9903093]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  45. [45]

    Renormalization Group Flows on D3 branes at an Orbifolded Conifold

    K. Oh and R. Tatar, Renormalization group flows on D3-branes at an orbifolded conifold , JHEP 05 (2000) 030 [ hep-th/0003183]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  46. [46]

    Supersymmetric AdS_5 solutions of M-theory

    J.P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, J. Sparks and D. Waldram, Supersymmetric AdS5 solutions of M-theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 4335 [ hep-th/0402153]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  47. [47]

    Sasaki-Einstein Metrics on S^2 x S^3

    J.P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, J. Sparks and D. Waldram, Sasaki-Einstein metrics on S2 × S3, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 8 (2004) 711 [ hep-th/0403002]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  48. [48]

    Smale, On the structure of 5-manifolds , Annals of Mathematics 75 (1962) 38

    S. Smale, On the structure of 5-manifolds , Annals of Mathematics 75 (1962) 38

    work page 1962

  49. [49]

    New Einstein-Sasaki Spaces in Five and Higher Dimensions

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu, D.N. Page and C.N. Pope, New Einstein-Sasaki spaces in five and higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 071101 [ hep-th/0504225]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  50. [50]

    Toric Sasaki-Einstein metrics on S^2 x S^3

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks, Toric Sasaki-Einstein metrics on S2 × S3, Phys. Lett. B 621 (2005) 208 [ hep-th/0505027]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  51. [51]

    Gauge Theories from Toric Geometry and Brane Tilings

    S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Martelli, J. Sparks, D. Vegh and B. Wecht, Gauge theories from toric geometry and brane tilings , JHEP 01 (2006) 128 [ hep-th/0505211]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  52. [52]

    An Infinite Family of Superconformal Quiver Gauge Theories with Sasaki-Einstein Duals

    S. Benvenuti, S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Martelli and J. Sparks, An Infinite family of superconformal quiver gauge theories with Sasaki-Einstein duals , JHEP 06 (2005) 064 [hep-th/0411264]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  53. [53]

    Toric Geometry, Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds and a New Infinite Class of AdS/CFT Duals

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks, Toric geometry, Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and a new infinite class of AdS/CFT duals , Commun. Math. Phys. 262 (2006) 51 [ hep-th/0411238]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  54. [54]

    A New Infinite Class of Quiver Gauge Theories

    A. Hanany, P. Kazakopoulos and B. Wecht, A New infinite class of quiver gauge theories , JHEP 08 (2005) 054 [ hep-th/0503177]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  55. [55]

    Multi-Flux Warped Throats and Cascading Gauge Theories

    S. Franco, A. Hanany and A.M. Uranga, Multi-flux warped throats and cascading gauge theories, JHEP 09 (2005) 028 [ hep-th/0502113]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  56. [56]

    A Comprehensive Survey of Brane Tilings

    S. Franco, Y.-H. He, C. Sun and Y. Xiao, A Comprehensive Survey of Brane Tilings , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32 (2017) 1750142 [ 1702.03958]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren and J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recognition , in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. 770–778, 2016

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    J. Park, R. Rabadan and A.M. Uranga, Orientifolding the conifold , Nucl. Phys. B 570 (2000) 38 [ hep-th/9907086]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  59. [59]

    Dimers and Orientifolds

    S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Krefl, J. Park, A.M. Uranga and D. Vegh, Dimers and orientifolds , JHEP 09 (2007) 075 [ 0707.0298]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  60. [60]

    Garc´ ıa-Valdecasas, S

    E. Garc´ ıa-Valdecasas, S. Meynet, A. Pasternak and V. Tatitscheff,Dimers in a Bottle , JHEP 04 (2021) 274 [ 2101.02670]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Brane Brick Models, Toric Calabi-Yau 4-Folds and 2d (0,2) Quivers

    S. Franco, S. Lee and R.-K. Seong, Brane Brick Models, Toric Calabi-Yau 4-Folds and 2d (0,2) Quivers, JHEP 02 (2016) 047 [ 1510.01744]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    Quadrality for Supersymmetric Matrix Models

    S. Franco, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong and C. Vafa, Quadrality for Supersymmetric Matrix Models , JHEP 07 (2017) 053 [ 1612.06859]. – 31 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    (0,2) Trialities

    A. Gadde, S. Gukov and P. Putrov, (0, 2) trialities , JHEP 03 (2014) 076 [ 1310.0818]. – 32 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014