{"as_of":"2026-08-20T04:44:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:0672aefcf20ed243542d1109023035a9ec160698ba0c48800db19088ac988269","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T05:52:50.565643Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T21:35:23.287441Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.08801","last_updated":"2024-10-11T13:36:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T02:28:12.194154Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-11T13:36:13Z","title":"A Methodology for Evaluating RAG Systems: A Case Study On Configuration Dependency Validation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2410.08801","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2410.08801","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T21:35:23.287441Z","title":"A Methodology for Evaluating RAG Systems: A Case Study On Configuration Dependency Validation","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"1fc5e21c-14b8-4c82-a6d5-38d7a225f5d3","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.08574","last_updated":"2025-04-08T11:57:02Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T17:04:13.952883Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-13T12:44:41Z","title":"Themes of Building LLM-based Applications for Production: A Practitioner's View","version":2},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T21:35:23.147641Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.08801","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.08574"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a430fac1f1c36d9478c30456ae47bd9698838b3d008dc4689db78e0cf31c6b9e","observation_id":"4f0c90cc-18e8-4acf-8332-f21be4d840b1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T21:35:23.294044Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.08801","last_updated":"2024-10-11T13:36:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T02:28:12.194154Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-11T13:36:13Z","title":"A Methodology for Evaluating RAG Systems: A Case Study On Configuration Dependency Validation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2410.08801","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T05:52:50.565643Z","title":"A method ology for evaluating RAG systems: A case study on configuration depend ency validation","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.20119","last_updated":"2025-05-01T13:03:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T19:46:38.442290Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-28T08:22:19Z","title":"Can LLMs Be Trusted for Evaluating RAG Systems? A Survey of Methods and Datasets","version":2},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T05:52:50.565643Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.08801","citing_paper":"/paper/2504.20119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a499fcf191d2ce667d90b0b572af8cc4b746043b51644ae500abc51ce1c3eeb4","observation_id":"3810b43b-48e0-4066-9eb7-f71c72fc9a47","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T05:52:50.565643Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2410.08801/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2410.08801/integrity","json":"/paper/2410.08801/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2410.08801"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.08801","last_updated":"2024-10-11T13:36:13Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T02:28:12.194154Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-11T13:36:13Z","title":"A Methodology for Evaluating RAG Systems: A Case Study On Configuration Dependency Validation"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 20 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2410.08801."}