{"as_of":"2026-08-11T09:35:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:d60cadd4c5178075d6301d39c700c1af2b9b7a5a3498f46aee7b12a4330ed5fe","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T21:47:44.393006Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:16:28.215867Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.13489","last_updated":"2025-09-02T07:57:35Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T04:22:03.770703Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-17T12:34:02Z","title":"Breaking Bad: How Compilers Break Constant-Time Implementations","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2410.13489","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T21:47:44.393006Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.04183","last_updated":"2026-07-13T06:10:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T01:35:56.085371Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-07T23:29:01Z","title":"Decompiling for Constant-Time Analysis","version":4},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T21:47:44.393006Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.13489","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.04183"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d07d9ee45a33c3665335d75018e3574ec5f75f11234f38c3d20dd38305f3bbc8","observation_id":"c203fb96-30b7-4833-954e-834c95631833","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T21:47:44.393006Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.13489","last_updated":"2025-09-02T07:57:35Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T04:22:03.770703Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-17T12:34:02Z","title":"Breaking Bad: How Compilers Break Constant-Time Implementations","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2410.13489","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2410.13489","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:16:28.215867Z","title":"Breaking Bad: How Compilers Break Constant-Time Implementations","venue":"cs.CR","work_id":"40d4b1c1-9546-4b6c-b2b5-1c8a79071504","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.06112","last_updated":"2025-07-08T15:52:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T08:45:56.321406Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-08T15:52:17Z","title":"Fun with flags: How Compilers Break and Fix Constant-Time Code","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:16:27.379645Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.13489","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.06112"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ded6caf0062c03c2a62dcc086f8a13c19101ea8ef7d1921284cde0798a7baabe","observation_id":"1d851552-e248-43e9-ba69-c91222341217","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:16:28.221270Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2410.13489/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2410.13489/integrity","json":"/paper/2410.13489/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2410.13489"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.13489","last_updated":"2025-09-02T07:57:35Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CR","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T04:22:03.770703Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-17T12:34:02Z","title":"Breaking Bad: How Compilers Break Constant-Time Implementations"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 11 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2410.13489."}