{"as_of":"2026-08-18T17:02:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:0ff18222a6faa6ce6b682c65483e6cfc2c877990e1d920c0bc4fbe57f9ede508","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:18:20.543502Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-19T11:32:17.394428Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.15050","last_updated":"2024-10-19T09:38:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:07:49.166408Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-19T09:38:55Z","title":"Are LLMs Good Zero-Shot Fallacy Classifiers?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2410.15050","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:18:20.543502Z","title":"Are LLMs good zero-shot fallacy classifiers?","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.13054","last_updated":"2025-04-17T16:09:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T08:19:22.720404Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-17T16:09:57Z","title":"Aspect-Based Summarization with Self-Aspect Retrieval Enhanced Generation","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:18:20.543502Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.15050","citing_paper":"/paper/2504.13054"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2dbc57fe0d4188eb3455455fc7c9b27aa5075ee20c6710b1d17107a98fae79c2","observation_id":"fe6880b4-a974-49f3-94c2-6645e3f3be19","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:18:20.543502Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.15050","last_updated":"2024-10-19T09:38:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:07:49.166408Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-19T09:38:55Z","title":"Are LLMs Good Zero-Shot Fallacy Classifiers?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2410.15050","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2410.15050","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"Are llms good zero-shot fallacy classifiers?","venue":null,"work_id":"ad51a5c3-c91b-44e8-bc30-1f8c8e0327bc","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.02546","last_updated":"2026-04-14T05:32:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T01:30:06.203819Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-03T07:32:57Z","title":"To trust or not to trust: Attention-based Trust Management for LLM Multi-Agent Systems","version":2},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-19T11:30:47.877793Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.15050","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.02546"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c1708c62921914ad9322406042fef71650576d20b0fd9eae01097d60a17a1eb3","observation_id":"6a17fbd4-fe60-41c9-b1c6-3bb5bbae6e62","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-19T11:32:17.397155Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2410.15050/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2410.15050/integrity","json":"/paper/2410.15050/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2410.15050"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.15050","last_updated":"2024-10-19T09:38:55Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:07:49.166408Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-19T09:38:55Z","title":"Are LLMs Good Zero-Shot Fallacy Classifiers?"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 18 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2410.15050."}