pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.20681 · v2 · submitted 2024-10-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Influence of neutrino-electron scattering and neutrino-pair annihilation on hypermassive neutron star

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 19:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords neutrino-electron scatteringhypermassive neutron starGRMHD simulationsejecta massdisc massneutrino luminositybaryon pollutionjet launching
0
0 comments X

The pith

Inelastic neutrino-electron scattering raises hypermassive neutron star disc mass by 75% and ejecta by 18%

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the effects of inelastic neutrino microphysics on general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamics simulations of a hypermassive neutron star. It adds species- and energy-group coupled neutrino-electron scattering kernels and electron-positron annihilation kernels and evolves the system for up to 50 milliseconds. With the scattering kernels active, the disc mass increases 75 percent and the ejected mass increases 18 percent, both with only modest shifts in average composition, producing stronger baryon pollution that makes jet launching less favorable. Neutrino luminosities rise by roughly 50, 40, and 30 percent for electron neutrinos, electron antineutrinos, and heavy-lepton neutrinos. Electron-positron annihilation produces no measurable change in any of these quantities.

Core claim

Simulations that include species- and energy-group coupled neutrino-electron inelastic scattering kernels predict a 75 percent higher disc mass, 18 percent more ejected mass, stronger baryon pollution that creates less favorable jet-launching conditions, and neutrino luminosities elevated by approximately 50 percent, 40 percent, and 30 percent for electron neutrinos, electron antineutrinos, and heavy-lepton neutrinos, respectively; electron-positron annihilation kernels produce no significant changes.

What carries the argument

Species- and energy-group coupled inelastic neutrino-electron scattering kernels that enable direct energy exchange between neutrinos and matter inside the GRMHD evolution.

If this is right

  • Higher disc and ejecta masses increase baryon pollution around the remnant.
  • Jet launching conditions become less favorable because of the added baryon loading.
  • Neutrino luminosities rise across all three neutrino species.
  • Mass-averaged compositions of the disc and the ejecta distributions stay similar.
  • Electron-positron annihilation kernels leave all of these quantities essentially unchanged.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Earlier simulations that omitted inelastic scattering may have systematically underestimated ejecta masses in post-merger remnants.
  • Models of kilonova emission or jet propagation may need to incorporate the higher baryon content produced by these kernels.
  • Future neutrino-transport implementations for merger simulations can safely de-emphasize pair-annihilation kernels relative to scattering kernels.

Load-bearing premise

The reported changes in disc mass, ejecta mass, and luminosities arise from the accurate implementation of the coupled neutrino-electron scattering kernels rather than from numerical resolution or initial-condition differences.

What would settle it

A higher-resolution run or a run with altered initial conditions that eliminates the 75 percent disc-mass increase and the luminosity rises would show that the kernels are not the cause.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2410.20681 by Arthur Offermans, Francois Foucart, Harry Ho-Yin Ng, Matthew D. Duez, Nishad Muhammed, Patrick Chi-Kit Cheong, Pavan Chawhan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Evolutions of the maximum value of the rest [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of the radial profiles of several quantities at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Ratios of the fluid frame neutrino energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The time evolutions of internal energy ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Out-of-equilibrium chemical potential ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Profiles of rest-mass density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The total ejected rest-mass ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The time evolutions of rest-mass ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. 1-D histograms of the ejecta that leaves the extraction cylinder ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The time evolutions of the Lorentz factor Γ with different neutrino interaction sets ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Time evolution of far-field averaged neutrino energies ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Comparison of the neutrino opacities at a hydrodynamical point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Energy-integrated effective neutrino opacities of inelastic neutrino-electron scattering ¯κ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The total rest-mass, mass-averaged electron fraction, temperature of the disc as functions of time with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. The total rest-mass and its ejection rate, mass-averaged electron fraction, temperature, entropy, and asymptotic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Time evolution of far-field averaged neutrino energies ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the influence of inelastic neutrino microphysics in general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamics simulations of a hypermassive neutron star. In particular, we include species/energy groups coupled neutrino-matter interactions, such as inelastic neutrino-electron scattering and electron-positron annihilation kernels, into simulations up to 50 ms. Neutrino-electron inelastic scattering is known to have effective neutrino-matter energy exchange. We show that, with neutrino-electron inelastic scattering, simulations predict 75% higher disc mass with slightly different mass-averaged compositions, and 18% more ejected mass with similar distributions. The enhancement of the mass of the disc and the ejecta results in stronger baryon pollution, leading to less favourable jet launching environments. Furthermore, neutrino luminosities are about 50, 40, and 30% higher for electron neutrino, electron anti-neutrino, and heavy-lepton neutrinos. In contrast, we do not see any significant impacts due to electron-positron annihilation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports GRMHD simulations of a hypermassive neutron star remnant including species- and energy-group-coupled inelastic neutrino-electron scattering and electron-positron annihilation up to 50 ms. It claims that neutrino-electron scattering produces a 75% increase in disc mass, an 18% increase in ejected mass, 30-50% higher neutrino luminosities across flavors, and stronger baryon pollution that disfavors jet launching, while annihilation produces no significant changes. Results are obtained by direct differencing of otherwise identical runs.

Significance. If the reported differences are robust to numerical choices, the work would demonstrate the sensitivity of post-merger disc mass, ejecta, and neutrino emission to inelastic neutrino-electron scattering, with implications for kilonova light curves and jet formation in neutron-star mergers. The direct comparison of runs differing only in the included kernels is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The headline quantitative results (75% higher disc mass, 18% more ejecta, 30-50% higher luminosities) are obtained solely by differencing two runs; no resolution-convergence tests, initial-data perturbation checks, or code-verification tests for the coupled scattering kernels are reported. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the percentage differences are physical or numerical artifacts.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that neutrino-electron scattering produces the stated mass and luminosity changes rests on the unverified premise that the species/energy-group coupled kernels are accurately implemented and produce the expected energy exchange; no test of the microphysics module (e.g., comparison against analytic limits or known benchmarks) is described.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states simulation duration as 'up to 50 ms' but does not clarify whether all reported quantities are evaluated at the same post-merger time or averaged over an interval.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting these important points regarding numerical robustness and microphysics verification. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline quantitative results (75% higher disc mass, 18% more ejecta, 30-50% higher luminosities) are obtained solely by differencing two runs; no resolution-convergence tests, initial-data perturbation checks, or code-verification tests for the coupled scattering kernels are reported. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the percentage differences are physical or numerical artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that the reported percentage differences are obtained by direct subtraction of otherwise identical runs that differ only in the included neutrino-electron scattering kernels. This controlled comparison is the standard approach for isolating the effect of a specific microphysical process. However, the manuscript does not report resolution-convergence tests, initial-data perturbations, or dedicated code-verification tests for the kernels. Performing additional simulations at varied resolutions is computationally prohibitive given the cost of long-term GRMHD runs with multi-species, multi-group neutrino transport. We will revise the manuscript to add an explicit discussion of this limitation, the rationale for the direct-differencing methodology, and the numerical setup in the methods section. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that neutrino-electron scattering produces the stated mass and luminosity changes rests on the unverified premise that the species/energy-group coupled kernels are accurately implemented and produce the expected energy exchange; no test of the microphysics module (e.g., comparison against analytic limits or known benchmarks) is described.

    Authors: The inelastic scattering and pair-annihilation kernels follow standard formulations from the neutrino-transport literature (e.g., the energy-exchange terms for neutrino-electron scattering as implemented in established codes). The underlying neutrino module has been exercised in previous studies with the same framework. That said, the present manuscript does not describe dedicated verification tests against analytic limits or benchmarks for the coupled kernels. We will add a concise verification subsection to the methods that references the kernel implementation details and any available internal checks against known limits. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct numerical differences from simulation comparisons.

full rationale

The paper's central claims (75% higher disc mass, 18% more ejecta, 30-50% higher luminosities) are obtained by differencing two GRMHD runs that differ solely by inclusion of the neutrino-electron scattering kernels. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are invoked to derive these percentages; they are reported simulation outputs. The derivation chain consists of numerical experiments rather than any self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation reduction. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks in the form of controlled run comparisons.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract does not introduce or specify any free parameters, additional axioms, or new invented entities; it builds on standard general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamics and known neutrino interaction processes from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5722 in / 1468 out tokens · 40400 ms · 2026-05-23T19:08:07.994678+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    JETSET: Launching, prop- agation and emission of relativistic jets from binary mergers and across mass scales

    (0, 0, Bpolr sin θ) , (1) where we set r0 = 10 km and Bpol = 1015 G. The general-relativistic neutrino magnetohydrody- namics code Gmunu [31, 37–40] is used to perform our simulations. The code solves the general-relativistic mag- netohydrodynamics equations via staggered-meshed con- strained transport [41]. The Einstein field equations are solved in the ...

  2. [2]

    As a comparison, this approximation is shown to have about 10% level deviations in neutrino signals in the context of core-collapse supernovae [69]

    However, as shown in figure 16, the approximation overestimates the neutrino luminosity for νx for about 25%. As a comparison, this approximation is shown to have about 10% level deviations in neutrino signals in the context of core-collapse supernovae [69]. Neverthe- less, despite larger impacts in the neutrino signal for νx, these differences do not alt...

  3. [3]

    Li and B

    L.-X. Li and B. Paczy´ nski, Transient Events from Neu- tron Star Mergers, ApJ 507, L59 (1998), arXiv:astro- ph/9807272 [astro-ph]

  4. [4]

    B. D. Metzger, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, S. Darbha, E. Quataert, A. Arcones, D. Kasen, R. Thomas, P. Nu- gent, I. V. Panov, and N. T. Zinner, Electromagnetic counterparts of compact object mergers powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei, MNRAS 406, 2650 12 0 10 20 30 [MeV] e 0 10 20 30 e SSSG SSMG MSMG SSSG SSMG MSMG 0 10 20 30 x 0 20 40 t [ms] 0...

  5. [5]

    Kilonova/Macronova Emission from Compact Binary Mergers

    M. Tanaka, Kilonova/Macronova Emission from Com- pact Binary Mergers, Advances in Astronomy 2016, 634197 (2016), arXiv:1605.07235 [astro-ph.HE]

  6. [6]

    B. D. Metzger, Kilonovae, Living Reviews in Relativity 23, 1 (2019), arXiv:1910.01617 [astro-ph.HE]

  7. [7]

    B. D. Metzger, Welcome to the Multi-Messenger Era! Lessons from a Neutron Star Merger and the Land- scape Ahead, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1710.05931 (2017), arXiv:1710.05931 [astro-ph.HE]

  8. [8]

    Rezzolla, P

    L. Rezzolla, P. Pizzochero, D. I. Jones, N. Rea, and I. Vida˜ na, The Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars, Astrophysics and Space Science Library 457, 10.1007/978-3-319-97616-7 (2018)

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, and T. Adams, GW170817: Ob- servation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, 14 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Meje [10 3 M ] 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 Ye eje 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 T eje [MeV] Kernel-based method Approximated method Kernel-based method Approximated method 0 10 20 30 40 50 t [ms] 0 2 4 6 Meje [10 3 M s 1] 0 10 20 30 40 50 t [ms] 20 40 60 80 100 s eje [kB/baryon] 0 10 20 30 40 5...

  11. [11]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, and T. Adams, Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger, ApJ848, L12 (2017), arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE]

  12. [12]

    Effect of a High Opacity on the Light Curves of Radioactively Powered Transients from Compact Object Mergers

    J. Barnes and D. Kasen, Effect of a High Opacity on the Light Curves of Radioactively Powered Transients from Compact Object Mergers, ApJ 775, 18 (2013), arXiv:1303.5787 [astro-ph.HE]

  13. [13]

    Production of all the r-process nuclides in the dynamical ejecta of neutron star mergers

    S. Wanajo, Y. Sekiguchi, N. Nishimura, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, and M. Shibata, Production of All the r- process Nuclides in the Dynamical Ejecta of Neutron Star Mergers, ApJ 789, L39 (2014), arXiv:1402.7317 [astro- ph.SR]

  14. [14]

    The dynamical mass ejection from binary neutron star mergers: Radiation-hydrodynamics study in general relativity

    Y. Sekiguchi, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, and M. Shibata, Dynamical mass ejection from binary neutron star merg- ers: Radiation-hydrodynamics study in general relativ- ity, Phys. Rev. D 91, 064059 (2015), arXiv:1502.06660 [astro-ph.HE]. 15

  15. [15]

    Post-merger evolution of a neutron star-black hole binary with neutrino transport

    F. Foucart, E. O’Connor, L. Roberts, M. D. Duez, R. Haas, L. E. Kidder, C. D. Ott, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, and B. Szilagyi, Post-merger evolution of a neu- tron star-black hole binary with neutrino transport, Phys. Rev. D 91, 124021 (2015), arXiv:1502.04146 [astro- ph.HE]

  16. [16]

    Impact of an improved neutrino energy estimate on outflows in neutron star merger simulations

    F. Foucart, E. O’Connor, L. Roberts, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, Impact of an improved neutrino energy estimate on outflows in neutron star merger simulations, Phys. Rev. D 94, 123016 (2016), arXiv:1607.07450 [astro-ph.HE]

  17. [17]

    Monte-Carlo closure for moment-based transport schemes in general relativistic radiation hydrodynamics simulations

    F. Foucart, Monte Carlo closure for moment-based transport schemes in general relativistic radiation hy- drodynamic simulations, MNRAS 475, 4186 (2018), arXiv:1708.08452 [astro-ph.HE]

  18. [18]

    Radice, S

    D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, A. Perego, and R. Haas, A new moment-based general-relativistic neutrino- radiation transport code: Methods and first applica- tions to neutron star mergers, MNRAS 512, 1499 (2022), arXiv:2111.14858 [astro-ph.HE]

  19. [19]

    L. Sun, M. Ruiz, S. L. Shapiro, and A. Tsokaros, Jet launching from binary neutron star mergers: Incorporat- ing neutrino transport and magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 105, 104028 (2022), arXiv:2202.12901 [astro-ph.HE]

  20. [20]

    Schianchi, H

    F. Schianchi, H. Gieg, V. Nedora, A. Neuweiler, M. Uje- vic, M. Bulla, and T. Dietrich, M 1 neutrino trans- port within the numerical-relativistic code BAM with application to low mass binary neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044012 (2024), arXiv:2307.04572 [gr- qc]

  21. [21]

    M. R. Izquierdo, F. Abalos, and C. Palenzuela, Guided moments formalism: A new efficient full-neutrino treat- ment for astrophysical simulations, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043044 (2024), arXiv:2312.09275 [astro-ph.HE]

  22. [22]

    Musolino and L

    C. Musolino and L. Rezzolla, A practical guide to a mo- ment approach for neutrino transport in numerical rela- tivity, MNRAS 528, 5952 (2024), arXiv:2304.09168 [gr- qc]

  23. [23]

    Foucart, M

    F. Foucart, M. D. Duez, F. Hebert, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, Monte-Carlo Neutrino Trans- port in Neutron Star Merger Simulations, ApJ 902, L27 (2020), arXiv:2008.08089 [astro-ph.HE]

  24. [24]

    Foucart, C.-K

    F. Foucart, C.-K. P. Cheong, M. D. Duez, L. E. Kid- der, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, Robustness of neutron star merger simulations to changes in neu- trino transport and neutrino-matter interactions, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2407.15989 (2024), arXiv:2407.15989 [astro-ph.HE]

  25. [25]

    C.-K. P. Cheong, F. Foucart, M. D. Duez, A. Of- fermans, N. Muhammed, and P. Chawhan, Energy- dependent and energy-integrated two-moment general- relativistic neutrino transport simulations of hypermas- sive neutron star, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2407.16017 (2024), arXiv:2407.16017 [astro-ph.HE]

  26. [26]

    Monte Carlo Neutrino Transport Through Remnant Disks from Neutron Star Mergers

    S. Richers, D. Kasen, E. O’Connor, R. Fern´ andez, and C. D. Ott, Monte Carlo Neutrino Transport through Remnant Disks from Neutron Star Mergers, ApJ 813, 38 (2015), arXiv:1507.03606 [astro-ph.HE]

  27. [27]

    Neutrino pair annihilation above merger remnants: implications of a long-lived massive neutron star

    A. Perego, H. Yasin, and A. Arcones, Neutrino pair anni- hilation above merger remnants: implications of a long- lived massive neutron star, Journal of Physics G Nu- clear Physics 44, 084007 (2017), arXiv:1701.02017 [astro- ph.HE]

  28. [28]

    Properties of Neutrino-driven Ejecta from the Remnant of Binary Neutron Star Merger : Purely Radiation Hydrodynamics Case

    S. Fujibayashi, Y. Sekiguchi, K. Kiuchi, and M. Shibata, Properties of Neutrino-driven Ejecta from the Remnant of a Binary Neutron Star Merger: Pure Radiation Hydro- dynamics Case, ApJ 846, 114 (2017), arXiv:1703.10191 [astro-ph.HE]

  29. [29]

    O. Just, M. Obergaulinger, H. T. Janka, A. Bauswein, and N. Schwarz, Neutron-star Merger Ejecta as Obstacles to Neutrino-powered Jets of Gamma-Ray Bursts, ApJ 816, L30 (2016), arXiv:1510.04288 [astro-ph.HE]

  30. [30]

    O. Just, V. Vijayan, Z. Xiong, S. Goriely, T. Soultanis, A. Bauswein, J. Guilet, H. T. Janka, and G. Mart´ ınez- Pinedo, End-to-end Kilonova Models of Neutron Star Mergers with Delayed Black Hole Formation, ApJ 951, L12 (2023), arXiv:2302.10928 [astro-ph.HE]

  31. [31]

    J. M. Miller, T. M. Sprouse, C. L. Fryer, B. R. Ryan, J. C. Dolence, M. R. Mumpower, and R. Surman, Full Transport General Relativistic Radiation Magnetohydro- dynamics for Nucleosynthesis in Collapsars, ApJ 902, 66 (2020), arXiv:1912.03378 [astro-ph.HE]

  32. [32]

    Foucart, Neutrino transport in general relativistic neu- tron star merger simulations, Living Reviews in Com- putational Astrophysics 9, 1 (2023), arXiv:2209.02538 [astro-ph.HE]

    F. Foucart, Neutrino transport in general relativistic neu- tron star merger simulations, Living Reviews in Com- putational Astrophysics 9, 1 (2023), arXiv:2209.02538 [astro-ph.HE]

  33. [33]

    H. H.-Y. Ng, P. C.-K. Cheong, A. T.-L. Lam, and T. G. F. Li, General-relativistic Radiation Transport Scheme in Gmunu. II. Implementation of Novel Microphysical Li- brary for Neutrino Radiation—Weakhub, ApJS 272, 9 (2024), arXiv:2309.03526 [astro-ph.HE]

  34. [34]

    Mezzacappa and S

    A. Mezzacappa and S. W. Bruenn, Stellar Core Collapse: A Boltzmann Treatment of Neutrino-Electron Scattering, ApJ 410, 740 (1993)

  35. [35]

    Kawaguchi, S

    K. Kawaguchi, S. Fujibayashi, and M. Shibata, Long- term Monte Carlo based neutrino-radiation viscous- hydrodynamics simulations for a merger remnant black hole-torus system, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.02380 (2024), arXiv:2410.02380 [astro-ph.HE]

  36. [36]

    P. C.-K. Cheong, N. Muhammed, P. Chawhan, M. D. Duez, F. Foucart, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, High angular momentum hot differentially rotat- ing equilibrium star evolutions in conformally flat space- time, Phys. Rev. D110, 043015 (2024), arXiv:2402.18529 [astro-ph.HE]

  37. [37]

    Statistical Model for a Complete Supernova Equation of State

    M. Hempel and J. Schaffner-Bielich, A statistical model for a complete supernova equation of state, Nucl. Phys. A 837, 210 (2010), arXiv:0911.4073 [nucl-th]

  38. [38]

    Ury¯ u, S

    K. Ury¯ u, S. Yoshida, E. Gourgoulhon, C. Markakis, K. Fujisawa, A. Tsokaros, K. Taniguchi, and Y. Eriguchi, New code for equilibriums and quasiequilibrium ini- tial data of compact objects. IV. Rotating relativistic stars with mixed poloidal and toroidal magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 100, 123019 (2019), arXiv:1906.10393 [gr- qc]

  39. [39]

    P. C.-K. Cheong, L.-M. Lin, and T. G. F. Li, Gmunu: toward multigrid based Einstein field equa- tions solver for general-relativistic hydrodynamics sim- ulations, Classical and Quantum Gravity 37, 145015 (2020), arXiv:2001.05723 [gr-qc]

  40. [40]

    P. C.-K. Cheong, A. T.-L. Lam, H. H.-Y. Ng, and T. G. F. Li, Gmunu: paralleled, grid-adaptive, general- relativistic magnetohydrodynamics in curvilinear ge- ometries in dynamical space-times, MNRAS 508, 2279 (2021), arXiv:2012.07322 [astro-ph.IM]

  41. [41]

    P. C.-K. Cheong, D. Y. T. Pong, A. K. L. Yip, and T. G. F. Li, An Extension of Gmunu: General-relativistic Resistive Magnetohydrodynamics Based on Staggered- 16 meshed Constrained Transport with Elliptic Cleaning, ApJS 261, 22 (2022), arXiv:2110.03732 [astro-ph.IM]

  42. [42]

    P. C.-K. Cheong, H. H.-Y. Ng, A. T.-L. Lam, and T. G. F. Li, General-relativistic Radiation Transport Scheme in Gmunu. I. Implementation of Two-moment-based Multi- frequency Radiative Transfer and Code Tests, ApJS267, 38 (2023), arXiv:2303.03261 [astro-ph.IM]

  43. [43]

    C. R. Evans and J. F. Hawley, Simulation of Magneto- hydrodynamic Flows: A Constrained Transport Model, ApJ 332, 659 (1988)

  44. [44]

    Harten, P

    A. Harten, P. Lax, and B. Leer, On upstream differencing and godunov-type schemes for hyper- bolic conservation laws, SIAM Review 25, 35 (1983), https://doi.org/10.1137/1025002

  45. [45]

    Colella and P

    P. Colella and P. R. Woodward, The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for Gas-Dynamical Simulations, Journal of Computational Physics 54, 174 (1984)

  46. [46]

    Cavaglieri and T

    D. Cavaglieri and T. Bewley, Low-storage im- plicit/explicit Runge-Kutta schemes for the simulation of stiff high-dimensional ODE systems, Journal of Computational Physics 286, 172 (2015)

  47. [47]

    G. N. Minerbo, Maximum entropy Eddington factors., J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf. 20, 541 (1978)

  48. [48]

    An Open-Source Neutrino Radiation Hydrodynamics Code for Core-Collapse Supernovae

    E. O’Connor, An Open-source Neutrino Radiation Hy- drodynamics Code for Core-collapse Supernovae, ApJS 219, 24 (2015), arXiv:1411.7058 [astro-ph.HE]

  49. [49]

    C. J. Horowitz, Weak magnetism for antineutrinos in su- pernovae, Phys. Rev. D 65, 043001 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0109209 [astro-ph]

  50. [50]

    Neutrino Opacities in Nuclear Matter

    A. Burrows, S. Reddy, and T. A. Thompson, Neutrino opacities in nuclear matter, Nucl. Phys. A 777, 356 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0404432 [astro-ph]

  51. [51]

    S. W. Bruenn, Stellar core collapse - Numerical model and infall epoch, ApJS 58, 771 (1985)

  52. [52]

    C. J. Horowitz, Neutrino trapping in a supernova and the screening of weak neutral currents, Phys. Rev. D 55, 4577 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9603138 [astro-ph]

  53. [53]

    Hammond, I

    P. Hammond, I. Hawke, and N. Andersson, Thermal as- pects of neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D 104, 103006 (2021), arXiv:2108.08649 [astro-ph.HE]

  54. [54]

    L. F. Longo Micchi, D. Radice, and C. Chirenti, Mul- timessenger emission from the accretion-induced col- lapse of white dwarfs, MNRAS 525, 6359 (2023), arXiv:2306.04711 [astro-ph.HE]

  55. [55]

    P. L. Espino, P. Hammond, D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, R. Gamba, F. Zappa, L. F. L. Micchi, and A. Perego, Neutrino Trapping and Out-of-Equilibrium Effects in Bi- nary Neutron-Star Merger Remnants, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 211001 (2024), arXiv:2311.00031 [astro-ph.HE]

  56. [56]

    Perego, S

    A. Perego, S. Bernuzzi, and D. Radice, Thermodynamics conditions of matter in neutron star mergers, European Physical Journal A 55, 124 (2019), arXiv:1903.07898 [gr- qc]

  57. [57]

    A New Multi-Energy Neutrino Radiation-Hydrodynamics Code in Full General Relativity and Its Application to Gravitational Collapse of Massive Stars

    T. Kuroda, T. Takiwaki, and K. Kotake, A New Multi- energy Neutrino Radiation-Hydrodynamics Code in Full General Relativity and Its Application to the Gravita- tional Collapse of Massive Stars, ApJS 222, 20 (2016), arXiv:1501.06330 [astro-ph.HE]

  58. [58]

    Fischer, G

    T. Fischer, G. Guo, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, M. Liebend¨ orfer, and A. Mezzacappa, Muonization of supernova matter, Phys. Rev. D 102, 123001 (2020), arXiv:2008.13628 [astro-ph.HE]

  59. [59]

    S. W. Bruenn and W. C. Haxton, Neutrino-Nucleus In- teractions in Core-Collapse Supernovae, ApJ 376, 678 (1991)

  60. [60]

    Mezzacappa, E

    A. Mezzacappa, E. Endeve, O. E. B. Messer, and S. W. Bruenn, Physical, numerical, and computational chal- lenges of modeling neutrino transport in core-collapse su- pernovae, Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics 6, 4 (2020), arXiv:2010.09013 [astro-ph.HE]

  61. [61]

    T. J. Boerner, S. Deems, T. R. Furlani, S. L. Knuth, and J. Towns, Access: Advancing innovation: Nsf’s advanced cyberinfrastructure coordination ecosystem: Services & support, in Practice and Experience in Advanced Re- search Computing, PEARC ’23 (Association for Comput- ing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2023) p. 173–176

  62. [62]

    G. B. Cook, S. L. Shapiro, and S. A. Teukolsky, Rapidly Rotating Polytropes in General Relativity, ApJ 422, 227 (1994)

  63. [63]

    Muhammed, M

    N. Muhammed, M. D. Duez, P. Chawhan, N. Ghadiri, L. T. Buchman, F. Foucart, P. Chi-Kit Cheong, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, Stability of hy- permassive neutron stars with realistic rotation and en- tropy profiles, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2403.05642 (2024), arXiv:2403.05642 [gr-qc]

  64. [64]

    M. J. Turk, B. D. Smith, J. S. Oishi, S. Skory, S. W. Skillman, T. Abel, and M. L. Norman, yt: A Multi-code Analysis Toolkit for Astrophysical Simulation Data, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 192, 9 (2011), arXiv:1011.3514 [astro-ph.IM]

  65. [65]

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gom- mers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Tay- lor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith, R. Kern, M. Picus, S. Hoyer, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Brett, A. Haldane, J. F. del R´ ıo, M. Wiebe, P. Peterson, P. G´ erard-Marchant, K. Shep- pard, T. Reddy, W. Weckesser, H. Abbasi, C. Gohlke, and T. E. Oliphant, Array ...

  66. [66]

    pandas development team, pandas-dev/pandas: Pan- das (2020)

    T. pandas development team, pandas-dev/pandas: Pan- das (2020)

  67. [67]

    Wes McKinney, Data Structures for Statistical Comput- ing in Python, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, edited by St´ efan van der Walt and Jarrod Millman (2010) pp. 56 – 61

  68. [68]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haber- land, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Pe- terson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, ˙I. Po- lat, Y. Feng, E. W. Moore, J. VanderPlas, D. Laxalde, J. Perktold, R. Cimrman, I. Henr...

  69. [69]

    J. D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, Computing in Science and Engineering 9, 90 (2007)

  70. [70]

    T. A. Caswell, A. Lee, E. S. de Andrade, M. Droet- tboom, T. Hoffmann, J. Klymak, J. Hunter, E. Fir- ing, D. Stansby, N. Varoquaux, J. H. Nielsen, B. Root, R. May, O. Gustafsson, P. Elson, J. K. Sepp¨ anen, J.-J. Lee, D. Dale, hannah, D. McDougall, A. Straw, P. Hob- son, K. Sunden, G. Lucas, C. Gohlke, A. F. Vincent, T. S. Yu, E. Ma, S. Silvester, and C. ...

  71. [71]

    Betranhandy and E

    A. Betranhandy and E. O’Connor, Impact of neu- trino pair-production rates in core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 102, 123015 (2020), arXiv:2010.02261 17 [astro-ph.HE]