pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.11328 · v3 · submitted 2024-11-18 · ✦ hep-ph

Neutrino masses, anomalous magnetic moments and dark matter with vector-like fermions and an inert scalar doublet

Vandana Sahdev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 17:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords neutrino massesanomalous magnetic momentsdark mattervector-like fermionsinert scalar doubletZ2 symmetryradiative generationlepton flavor violation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Z2-symmetric extension with two generations of vector-like fermions and an inert scalar doublet generates neutrino masses radiatively while also explaining electron and muon anomalous magnetic moments and the observed dark matter relic.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a beyond-Standard-Model extension motivated by neutrino masses, magnetic moment anomalies, and dark matter. It adds two generations of vector-like fermions and an inert scalar doublet, all odd under a Z2 symmetry. Neutrino masses and mixings arise from radiative loop diagrams with these fields, while the same loops generate the observed deviations in the electron and muon anomalous magnetic moments. The lightest Z2-odd state serves as dark matter whose thermal relic density matches observations. The construction stays consistent with lepton flavor violation limits, direct detection bounds, big bang nucleosynthesis, and cosmic microwave background data.

Core claim

The central claim is that a single Z2-odd sector consisting of two generations of vector-like fermions and an inert scalar doublet can simultaneously generate the observed neutrino mass spectrum and mixing angles through radiative corrections, produce the measured deviations in the electron and muon anomalous magnetic moments via loop contributions, and yield the correct thermal relic density for dark matter from the annihilation of the lightest Z2-odd state, all while remaining consistent with experimental bounds on lepton flavor violation, direct detection, big bang nucleosynthesis, and cosmic microwave background observations.

What carries the argument

The Z2 symmetry that forbids tree-level neutrino masses and stabilizes the dark matter candidate, together with the one-loop diagrams involving the vector-like fermions and inert doublet that generate both neutrino masses and magnetic moment corrections.

If this is right

  • Radiative neutrino masses are produced at the observed scale without requiring large tree-level Yukawa couplings.
  • The same new particles account for both the electron and muon anomalous magnetic moment deviations through shared loop diagrams.
  • The lightest Z2-odd particle furnishes a dark matter candidate whose annihilation cross section yields the measured relic abundance.
  • Parameter regions exist that avoid conflicts with lepton flavor violation searches and direct detection experiments.
  • Production of the new vector-like states at the LHC can yield testable signatures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The shared loop structure implies that adjustments to neutrino mixing angles could correlate with shifts in the predicted magnetic moment values.
  • Precision measurements at future neutrino experiments could indirectly constrain the dark matter annihilation rate in this setup.
  • Non-observation of vector-like fermions at the LHC would force the dark matter candidate mass into a narrower window testable by direct detection.
  • The radiative origin suggests that certain lepton flavor violating rates remain suppressed but could become accessible at next-generation facilities.

Load-bearing premise

Suitable masses and Yukawa couplings exist for the vector-like fermions and inert doublet such that the same loop diagrams simultaneously reproduce the correct neutrino mass scale, the measured magnetic moment deviations, and the observed dark matter relic density while satisfying all listed bounds.

What would settle it

A measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment that lies outside the narrow range of values allowed by the parameter choices needed to match both the neutrino oscillation data and the dark matter relic density would falsify the simultaneous explanation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11328 by Vandana Sahdev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Running of couplings g1, g2 and g3 and their unification at 2-loop level, in terms of α −1 , in SM (dashed lines) vs the new model (solid lines). Blue, amber and green represent g1, g2 and g3, respectively. It may be noted that, in general, we can consider a variable number of generations for each of the new particles. However, it is observed that a good solution is considering one scalar doublet with two … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Feynman diagrams generating light neutrino masses at the 1-loop level. There are two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Feynman diagrams representing the process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Low energy observables ∆al , Br(lj → liγ) and µ → e conversion rate on Au are presented for 104 randomly generated parameter points (104 points for each observable). The points in red represent (∆ae, ∆aµ), the ones in violet represent (Br(µ → eγ), Br(τ → µγ)) and the ones in blue show µ → e conversion rate on Au. The experimental limit on Br(µ → eγ) is shown by the dashed line. The experimental limits Br(τ… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relic density of the lightest exotic neutral fermion as DM, as a function of mass paramter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cross-section (in pb) for the production of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Decay Cascades at MH1 (me N < me E < µΦ < me L) (top) and MH2 (me N < me L < me E < µΦ) (bottom). The quoted percentages indicate the corresponding branching ratio and include the conjugate process wherever allowed. Different colours are used only for better readability and do not follow any particular colour scheme. Only dominant (solid lines) and subdominant (dashed lines) decay modes have been shown. 7.… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The beyond-the-standard-model scenario in this work is motivated from the observations of neutrino masses, anomalous magnetic moments of electron and muon, and dark matter in the Universe. We explain these observations by extending the standard model with two generations of vector-like fermions and an inert scalar doublet, all odd under a $Z_2$ symmetry. The light neutrino masses and mixings are generated radiatively while maintaining consistency with bounds on lepton flavor violation. Loop diagrams with the very same fields also serve to explain the anomalous magnetic moments. Similarly, the correct dark matter relic abundance is reproduced without coming into conflict with direct detection constraints, or those from big bang nucleosynthesis or the cosmic microwave observations. Finally, prospective signatures at the LHC are discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Z2-symmetric extension of the SM with two generations of vector-like fermions and an inert scalar doublet. It claims that one-loop diagrams involving these fields radiatively generate the observed neutrino masses and mixings while satisfying LFV bounds, that the same loops explain the electron and muon (g-2) anomalies, and that the inert doublet reproduces the observed DM relic density without violating direct detection, BBN, or CMB constraints. LHC signatures are also discussed.

Significance. If the numerical results establish viable overlapping parameter regions, the model would constitute a compact, multi-purpose BSM scenario linking three distinct phenomena through shared fields and loops. The radiative neutrino-mass mechanism and the reuse of the same particles for (g-2) and DM are standard but cleanly implemented features; explicit benchmark points or scans that simultaneously satisfy all observables would strengthen the case for a unified explanation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical results / parameter scan section (presumably §5–6)] The central claim (abstract and §1) is that suitable values of the vector-like fermion masses, Yukawa couplings, and inert-doublet parameters exist such that the same loops simultaneously reproduce the neutrino mass scale, Δa_e, Δa_μ, and Ωh² ≈ 0.12 while obeying all listed bounds. The manuscript must therefore supply explicit benchmark points (or allowed regions from scans) with the numerical values of all relevant masses and couplings, together with the resulting predictions for neutrino masses, (g-2), relic density, and the most constraining observables (e.g., BR(μ→eγ), σ_SI). Without such concrete demonstration, the assertion that the requirements are compatible remains unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model Lagrangian / §2] The quantum numbers and Z2 charges of the vector-like fermions should be stated explicitly in the model-definition section rather than only in a table or appendix.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels in the (g-2) and relic-density plots should indicate which constraints are active in each panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and the clear identification of the key requirement for explicit numerical verification. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim (abstract and §1) is that suitable values of the vector-like fermion masses, Yukawa couplings, and inert-doublet parameters exist such that the same loops simultaneously reproduce the neutrino mass scale, Δa_e, Δa_μ, and Ωh² ≈ 0.12 while obeying all listed bounds. The manuscript must therefore supply explicit benchmark points (or allowed regions from scans) with the numerical values of all relevant masses and couplings, together with the resulting predictions for neutrino masses, (g-2), relic density, and the most constraining observables (e.g., BR(μ→eγ), σ_SI). Without such concrete demonstration, the assertion that the requirements are compatible remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript as submitted does not contain the explicit benchmark points or tabulated scan results needed to verify simultaneous compatibility. In the revised version we will add a new subsection (within the numerical results section) that presents three to four benchmark points. Each point will list the input masses and couplings (vector-like fermion masses, Yukawa matrices, inert-doublet parameters) together with the output values for the neutrino mass matrix, Δa_e, Δa_μ, Ωh², BR(μ→eγ), and spin-independent direct-detection cross section, confirming that all experimental bounds are satisfied. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model accommodates data via viable parameter space

full rationale

The paper constructs a Z2-odd extension and shows that radiative loops from the new fields can generate neutrino masses and (g-2) contributions while the inert doublet can yield the observed DM relic density. These are presented as simultaneous explanations achieved by suitable choice of masses and Yukawa couplings, subject to experimental bounds. No equations are shown to reduce by construction to their inputs (e.g., no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no self-definitional relation, and no load-bearing self-citation chain). The central claim is an existence demonstration for a common parameter set, which is self-contained against external data and does not rely on renaming or smuggling prior results. This is the standard non-circular structure of a BSM phenomenology paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the introduction of new Z2-odd fields whose masses and couplings are adjusted to fit three independent observables; the ledger therefore records the new particles as invented entities and the Z2 symmetry plus loop-level mass generation as domain assumptions, with multiple free parameters required for the simultaneous fits.

free parameters (2)
  • masses and Yukawa couplings of the two generations of vector-like fermions
    These are chosen to produce the correct neutrino mass scale and (g-2) shifts while contributing to the DM annihilation cross section.
  • mass and quartic couplings of the inert scalar doublet
    Adjusted to set the DM relic density and ensure the lightest component is stable under Z2.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Z2 symmetry under which the new fermions and scalar doublet are odd
    Invoked to forbid tree-level neutrino masses and guarantee DM stability; stated in the abstract.
  • standard math Neutrino masses generated radiatively at one-loop level
    Standard quantum-field-theory loop calculation assumed to produce the observed mass-squared differences and mixings.
invented entities (2)
  • two generations of vector-like fermions no independent evidence
    purpose: Generate radiative neutrino masses and contribute to anomalous magnetic moments
    New fermions postulated to mediate the required loops; no independent evidence supplied.
  • inert scalar doublet no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide a stable dark matter candidate and participate in the same loops
    New scalar field introduced to stabilize DM and close the diagrams; no independent evidence supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5648 in / 1930 out tokens · 34730 ms · 2026-05-23T17:34:16.566458+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 135 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. Review of particle physics.Phys. Rev. D, 110(3):030001, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Fukuda et al

    Y. Fukuda et al. Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos.Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:1562– 1567, 1998

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    Q. R. Ahmad et al. Measurement of the rate ofνe + d → p + p + e− interactions produced by 8B solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory.Phys. Rev. Lett., 87:071301, 2001

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Abe et al

    Y. Abe et al. Indication of Reactor¯νe Disappearance in the Double Chooz Experiment.Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:131801, 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    F. P. An et al. Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay.Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:171803, 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    J. K. Ahn et al. Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:191802, 2012

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Ivan Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Alvaro Hernandez-Cabezudo, Michele Maltoni, and Thomas Schwetz. Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations: synergies and tensions in the determination ofθ23, δCP, and the mass ordering.JHEP, 01:106, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Constraint on the matter–antimatter symmetry-violating phase in neutrino oscil- lations. Nature, 580(7803):339–344, 2020. [Erratum: Nature 583, E16 (2020)]

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Matter-antimatter symmetry violated.Nature, 580(7803):323– 324, 2020

    Silvia Pascoli and Jessica Turner. Matter-antimatter symmetry violated.Nature, 580(7803):323– 324, 2020

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Zyla et al

    P.A. Zyla et al. Review of Particle Physics.PTEP, 2020(8):083C01, 2020

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Aker et al

    M. Aker et al. Improved Upper Limit on the Neutrino Mass from a Direct Kinematic Method by KATRIN.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(22):221802, 2019

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter.Phys

    Ernest Ma. Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter.Phys. Rev. D, 73:077301, 2006

    work page 2006

  13. [13]

    Influence of an inert charged Higgs boson on the muon g − 2 and radiative neutrino masses in a scotogenic model.Phys

    Chuan-Hung Chen and Takaaki Nomura. Influence of an inert charged Higgs boson on the muon g − 2 and radiative neutrino masses in a scotogenic model.Phys. Rev. D, 100(1):015024, 2019

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Peter Minkowski.µ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of109 Muon Decays? Phys. Lett. B, 67:421–428, 1977

    work page 1977

  15. [15]

    Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos

    Tsutomu Yanagida. Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos. Conf. Proc. C, 7902131:95–99, 1979

    work page 1979

  16. [16]

    Mohapatra and Goran Senjanovic

    Rabindra N. Mohapatra and Goran Senjanovic. Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Non- conservation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 44:912, 1980

    work page 1980

  17. [17]

    Konetschny and W

    W. Konetschny and W. Kummer. Nonconservation of Total Lepton Number with Scalar Bosons. Phys. Lett. B, 70:433–435, 1977

    work page 1977

  18. [18]

    Revisiting type-II see-saw: present limits and future prospects at LHC.JHEP, 03:195, 2022

    Saiyad Ashanujjaman and Kirtiman Ghosh. Revisiting type-II see-saw: present limits and future prospects at LHC.JHEP, 03:195, 2022. 43

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    T. P. Cheng and Ling-Fong Li. Neutrino Masses, Mixings and Oscillations in SU(2) x U(1) Models of Electroweak Interactions.Phys. Rev. D, 22:2860, 1980

    work page 1980

  20. [20]

    Shafi, and C

    George Lazarides, Q. Shafi, and C. Wetterich. Proton Lifetime and Fermion Masses in an SO(10) Model. Nucl. Phys. B, 181:287–300, 1981

    work page 1981

  21. [21]

    Schechter and J

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle. Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories.Phys. Rev. D, 22:2227, 1980

    work page 1980

  22. [22]

    Magg and C

    M. Magg and C. Wetterich. Neutrino Mass Problem and Gauge Hierarchy. Phys. Lett. B, 94:61–64, 1980

    work page 1980

  23. [23]

    Mohapatra and Goran Senjanovic

    Rabindra N. Mohapatra and Goran Senjanovic. Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation.Phys. Rev. D, 23:165, 1981

    work page 1981

  24. [24]

    Robert Foot, H. Lew, X. G. He, and Girish C. Joshi. Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons.Z. Phys. C, 44:441, 1989

    work page 1989

  25. [25]

    Type-III see-saw: Phenomenological implications of the information lost in decoupling from high-energy to low-energy.Phys

    Saiyad Ashanujjaman and Kirtiman Ghosh. Type-III see-saw: Phenomenological implications of the information lost in decoupling from high-energy to low-energy.Phys. Lett. B, 819:136403, 2021

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Type-III see-saw: Search for triplet fermions in final states with multiple leptons and fat-jets at 13 TeV LHC.Phys

    Saiyad Ashanujjaman and Kirtiman Ghosh. Type-III see-saw: Search for triplet fermions in final states with multiple leptons and fat-jets at 13 TeV LHC.Phys. Lett. B, 825:136889, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Hinshaw, D

    G. Hinshaw, D. Larson, E. Komatsu, D. N. Spergel, C. L. Bennett, J. Dunkley, M. R. Nolta, M. Halpern, R. S. Hill, N. Odegard, L. Page, K. M. Smith, J. L. Weiland, B. Gold, N. Jarosik, A. Kogut, M. Limon, S. S. Meyer, G. S. Tucker, E. Wollack, and E. L. Wright. Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Re- s...

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    P. A. R. Ade et al. Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys., 594:A13, 2016

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Abdo et al

    A.A. Abdo et al. Observations of Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal galaxies with the Fermi-LAT detector and constraints on Dark Matter models.Astrophys. J., 712:147–158, 2010

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    Intema, P

    H.T. Intema, P. Jagannathan, K.P. Mooley, and D.A. Frail. The GMRT 150 MHz All-sky Radio Survey: First Alternative Data Release TGSS ADR1.Astron. Astrophys., 598:A78, 2017

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    J. J. Condon, W. D. Cotton, E. W. Greisen, Q. F. Yin, R. A. Perley, G. B. Taylor, and J. J. Broderick. The NRAO VLA Sky Survey.Astron. J, 115(5):1693–1716, May 1998

    work page 1998

  32. [32]

    Handbookofvectorlike quarks: Mixing and single production.Phys

    J.A.Aguilar-Saavedra, R.Benbrik, S.Heinemeyer, andM.Pérez-Victoria. Handbookofvectorlike quarks: Mixing and single production.Phys. Rev. D, 88(9):094010, 2013

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Ellis, Rohini M

    Sebastian A.R. Ellis, Rohini M. Godbole, Shrihari Gopalakrishna, and James D. Wells. Survey of vector-like fermion extensions of the Standard Model and their phenomenological implications. JHEP, 09:130, 2014

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Junhai Kang, Paul Langacker, and Brent D. Nelson. Theory and Phenomenology of Exotic Isosinglet Quarks and Squarks.Phys. Rev. D, 77:035003, 2008

    work page 2008

  35. [35]

    Unification of gauge couplings in the standard model with extra vectorlike families

    Radovan Dermisek. Unification of gauge couplings in the standard model with extra vectorlike families. Phys. Rev. D, 87(5):055008, 2013. 44

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Unifica- tion with Vector-like fermions and signals at LHC.JHEP, 05:090, 2018

    Biplob Bhattacherjee, Pritibhajan Byakti, Ashwani Kushwaha, and Sudhir K Vempati. Unifica- tion with Vector-like fermions and signals at LHC.JHEP, 05:090, 2018

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Emmanuel-Costa and R

    D. Emmanuel-Costa and R. Gonzalez Felipe. Minimal string-scale unification of gauge couplings. Phys. Lett. B, 623:111–118, 2005

    work page 2005

  38. [38]

    Barger, Jing Jiang, Paul Langacker, and Tianjun Li

    V. Barger, Jing Jiang, Paul Langacker, and Tianjun Li. String scale gauge coupling unification with vector-like exotics and non-canonical U(1)(Y) normalization.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 22:6203– 6218, 2007

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    Light vector-like fermions in a minimal SU(5) setup

    Ilja Dorsner, Svjetlana Fajfer, and Ivana Mustac. Light vector-like fermions in a minimal SU(5) setup. Phys. Rev. D, 89(11):115004, 2014

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    S.Y. Choi, D. Choudhury, A. Freitas, J. Kalinowski, J.M. Kim, and P.M. Zerwas. Dirac Neutrali- nos and Electroweak Scalar Bosons of N=1/N=2 Hybrid Supersymmetry at Colliders.JHEP, 08:025, 2010

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    S.Y. Choi, D. Choudhury, A. Freitas, J. Kalinowski, and P.M. Zerwas. The Extended Higgs System in R-symmetric Supersymmetry Theories.Phys. Lett. B, 697:215–221, 2011. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 698, 457–458 (2011)]

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    Stephen P. Martin. Extra vector-like matter and the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in low- energy supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. D, 81:035004, 2010

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Stephen P. Martin. Raising the Higgs Mass with Yukawa Couplings for Isotriplets in Vector-Like Extensions of Minimal Supersymmetry.Phys. Rev. D, 82:055019, 2010

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    Graham, Ahmed Ismail, Surjeet Rajendran, and Prashant Saraswat

    Peter W. Graham, Ahmed Ismail, Surjeet Rajendran, and Prashant Saraswat. A Little Solution to the Little Hierarchy Problem: A Vector-like Generation.Phys. Rev. D, 81:055016, 2010

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    Yanagida

    Takeo Moroi, Ryosuke Sato, and Tsutomu T. Yanagida. Extra Matters Decree the Relatively Heavy Higgs of Mass about 125 GeV in the Supersymmetric Model.Phys. Lett. B, 709:218–221, 2012

    work page 2012

  46. [46]

    Higgs mass, muon g-2, and LHC prospects in gauge mediation models with vector-like matters.Phys

    Motoi Endo, Koichi Hamaguchi, Sho Iwamoto, and Norimi Yokozaki. Higgs mass, muon g-2, and LHC prospects in gauge mediation models with vector-like matters.Phys. Rev. D, 85:095012, 2012

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Martin and James D

    Stephen P. Martin and James D. Wells. Implications of gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking with vector-like quarks and a ~125 GeV Higgs boson.Phys. Rev. D, 86:035017, 2012

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    Vector-like Fields, Messenger Mixing and the Higgs mass in Gauge Mediation.JHEP, 05:151, 2014

    Willy Fischler and Walter Tangarife. Vector-like Fields, Messenger Mixing and the Higgs mass in Gauge Mediation.JHEP, 05:151, 2014

    work page 2014

  49. [49]

    Babu, Jogesh C

    K.S. Babu, Jogesh C. Pati, and Hanns Stremnitzer. A Simple reason based on supersymmetry for replication of chiral families.Phys. Lett. B, 256:206–214, 1991

    work page 1991

  50. [50]

    Babu, Jogesh C

    K.S. Babu, Jogesh C. Pati, and Hanns Stremnitzer. A Hint from the interfamily mass hierarchy: Two vector - like families in the TeV range.Phys. Rev. D, 51:2451–2462, 1995

    work page 1995

  51. [51]

    Dobrescu and Christopher T

    Bogdan A. Dobrescu and Christopher T. Hill. Electroweak symmetry breaking via top conden- sation seesaw.Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:2634–2637, 1998

    work page 1998

  52. [52]

    Dobrescu, Howard Georgi, and Christopher T

    R.Sekhar Chivukula, Bogdan A. Dobrescu, Howard Georgi, and Christopher T. Hill. Top Quark Seesaw Theory of Electroweak Symmetry Breaking.Phys. Rev. D, 59:075003, 1999. 45

    work page 1999

  53. [53]

    Newtopflavormodelswithseesawmechanism

    Hong-JianHe, TimothyM.P.Tait, andC.P.Yuan. Newtopflavormodelswithseesawmechanism. Phys. Rev. D, 62:011702, 2000

    work page 2000

  54. [54]

    Dobrescu

    Thomas Appelquist, Hsin-Chia Cheng, and Bogdan A. Dobrescu. Bounds on universal extra dimensions. Phys. Rev. D, 64:035002, 2001

    work page 2001

  55. [55]

    Matchev, and Martin Schmaltz

    Hsin-Chia Cheng, Konstantin T. Matchev, and Martin Schmaltz. Bosonic supersymmetry? Get- ting fooled at the CERN LHC.Phys. Rev. D, 66:056006, 2002

    work page 2002

  56. [56]

    Deciphering Universal Extra Di- mension from the top quark signals at the CERN LHC.JHEP, 08:051, 2010

    Debajyoti Choudhury, Anindya Datta, and Kirtiman Ghosh. Deciphering Universal Extra Di- mension from the top quark signals at the CERN LHC.JHEP, 08:051, 2010

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    Geraldine Servant and Timothy M. P. Tait. Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate? Nucl. Phys. B, 650:391–419, 2003

    work page 2003

  58. [58]

    Dobrescu, Eduardo Ponton, and Ho-Ung Yee

    Thomas Appelquist, Bogdan A. Dobrescu, Eduardo Ponton, and Ho-Ung Yee. Proton stability in six-dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87:181802, 2001

    work page 2001

  59. [59]

    Phenomenology of spinless adjoints in two Universal Extra Dimensions

    Kirtiman Ghosh and Anindya Datta. Phenomenology of spinless adjoints in two Universal Extra Dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B, 800:109–126, 2008

    work page 2008

  60. [60]

    Probing two Universal Extra Dimension model with leptons and photons at the LHC and ILC.JHEP, 04:049, 2009

    Kirtiman Ghosh. Probing two Universal Extra Dimension model with leptons and photons at the LHC and ILC.JHEP, 04:049, 2009

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    Search for the minimal universal extra dimension model at the LHC with√s=7 TeV.Phys

    Biplob Bhattacherjee and Kirtiman Ghosh. Search for the minimal universal extra dimension model at the LHC with√s=7 TeV.Phys. Rev. D, 83:034003, 2011

    work page 2011

  62. [62]

    Dobrescu and Erich Poppitz

    Bogdan A. Dobrescu and Erich Poppitz. Number of fermion generations derived from anomaly cancellation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87:031801, 2001

    work page 2001

  63. [63]

    Dobrescu, and Eduardo Ponton

    Gustavo Burdman, Bogdan A. Dobrescu, and Eduardo Ponton. Resonances from two universal extra dimensions. Phys. Rev. D, 74:075008, 2006

    work page 2006

  64. [64]

    Bounds on Universal Extra Dimension from LHC Run I and II data.Phys

    Debajyoti Choudhury and Kirtiman Ghosh. Bounds on Universal Extra Dimension from LHC Run I and II data.Phys. Lett. B, 763:155–160, 2016

    work page 2016

  65. [65]

    Minimal and non-minimal Universal Extra Dimension models in the light of LHC data at 13 TeV.Phys

    Avnish, Kirtiman Ghosh, Tapoja Jha, and Saurabh Niyogi. Minimal and non-minimal Universal Extra Dimension models in the light of LHC data at 13 TeV.Phys. Rev. D, 103:115011, 2021

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    Light custodians in natural composite Higgs models

    Roberto Contino, Leandro Da Rold, and Alex Pomarol. Light custodians in natural composite Higgs models. Phys. Rev. D, 75:055014, 2007

    work page 2007

  67. [67]

    Realistic Composite Higgs Mod- els

    Charalampos Anastasiou, Elisabetta Furlan, and Jose Santiago. Realistic Composite Higgs Mod- els. Phys. Rev. D, 79:075003, 2009

    work page 2009

  68. [68]

    Discovering the composite Higgs through the decay of a heavy fermion

    Natascia Vignaroli. Discovering the composite Higgs through the decay of a heavy fermion. JHEP, 07:158, 2012

    work page 2012

  69. [69]

    A First Top Partner Hunter’s Guide.JHEP, 04:004, 2013

    Andrea De Simone, Oleksii Matsedonskyi, Riccardo Rattazzi, and Andrea Wulzer. A First Top Partner Hunter’s Guide.JHEP, 04:004, 2013

    work page 2013

  70. [70]

    Modified Higgs Physics from Composite Light Flavors.JHEP, 09:090, 2013

    Cédric Delaunay, Christophe Grojean, and Gilad Perez. Modified Higgs Physics from Composite Light Flavors.JHEP, 09:090, 2013

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    Vector- like Bottom Quarks in Composite Higgs Models.JHEP, 03:037, 2014

    Gillioz, Marc and Gröber, Ramona and Kapuvari, Andreas and Mühlleitner, Margarete. Vector- like Bottom Quarks in Composite Higgs Models.JHEP, 03:037, 2014. 46

    work page 2014

  72. [72]

    Constraining Composite Higgs Models using LHC data.JHEP, 03:062, 2018

    Avik Banerjee, Gautam Bhattacharyya, Nilanjana Kumar, and Tirtha Sankar Ray. Constraining Composite Higgs Models using LHC data.JHEP, 03:062, 2018

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    Logan, Bob McElrath, and Lian-Tao Wang

    Tao Han, Heather E. Logan, Bob McElrath, and Lian-Tao Wang. Phenomenology of the little Higgs model. Phys. Rev. D, 67:095004, 2003

    work page 2003

  74. [74]

    Collider signature of T- quarks

    Marcela Carena, Jay Hubisz, Maxim Perelstein, and Patrice Verdier. Collider signature of T- quarks. Phys. Rev. D, 75:091701, 2007

    work page 2007

  75. [75]

    LHC signals of T-odd heavy quarks in the Littlest Higgs model

    Debajyoti Choudhury and Dilip Kumar Ghosh. LHC signals of T-odd heavy quarks in the Littlest Higgs model. JHEP, 08:084, 2007

    work page 2007

  76. [76]

    Cornell, A

    S.Rai Choudhury, Alan S. Cornell, A. Deandrea, Naveen Gaur, and Ashok Goyal. Lepton flavour violation in the little Higgs model.Phys. Rev. D, 75:055011, 2007

    work page 2007

  77. [77]

    Testing the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity at the Large Hadron Collider.Phys

    Shigeki Matsumoto, Takeo Moroi, and Kazuhiro Tobe. Testing the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity at the Large Hadron Collider.Phys. Rev. D, 78:055018, 2008

    work page 2008

  78. [78]

    Dijet Signals of the Little Higgs Model with T-Parity.JHEP, 07:013, 2012

    Debajyoti Choudhury, Dilip Kumar Ghosh, and Santosh Kumar Rai. Dijet Signals of the Little Higgs Model with T-Parity.JHEP, 07:013, 2012

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    A Fermionic Top Partner: Naturalness and the LHC

    Joshua Berger, Jay Hubisz, and Maxim Perelstein. A Fermionic Top Partner: Naturalness and the LHC. JHEP, 07:016, 2012

    work page 2012

  80. [80]

    Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors

    Brian Patt and Frank Wilczek. Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors. 5 2006

    work page 2006

Showing first 80 references.