{"as_of":"2026-08-13T01:52:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:ece305bd7d1d208753ea3ee4d611db37217dd4c636b887f6391734d4d66a549c","coverage":[{"denominator":73,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":73,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.249725Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":74,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":74,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:49:22.097447Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:49:22.338007Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2411.14515","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:49:22.338007Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"212401b7-3b36-47a5-b1fc-d1a2571f5109","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.18893","last_updated":"2024-11-28T03:54:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T00:11:42.211555Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-28T03:54:09Z","title":"CovHuSeg: An Enhanced Approach for Kidney Pathology Segmentation","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:49:22.097447Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2411.14515","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.18893"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4e6750e6bfcd31cffb7e34d3f2f8951f387cb26c918c7b56df23f9a8b10a4cce","observation_id":"41d3f5af-ff41-4fff-8a8b-318e5b7bda0b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:49:22.343299Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2411.14515/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2411.14515/integrity","json":"/paper/2411.14515/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.458005Z","title":"Our-normal-skin, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":"74e9b92c-d27e-4897-901f-2767d7264036","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.904358Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:904d1cc494c56efef6f419924c5c92171a68bcb068f003b1e37097196d6d899c","observation_id":"57ce27c4-fc51-4cdf-a1b4-3a231d1579d2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.463358Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.441661Z","title":"Skip-ganomaly: Skip connected and adversarially trained encoder-decoder anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"9f725dea-9ce1-4518-bc42-ea67a540497e","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.909503Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1cf6d3cad10b391bbf54bc85622b17c538341a3438eeab5bfd2a24bda23b0e8c","observation_id":"ccf74a9f-fb88-4600-b263-978acb0de76e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.447018Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.424677Z","title":"Anomalib: A deep learning library for anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"70f61b87-5fb1-4a1a-8605-35ed8095a2e3","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.914148Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:73cc14f3b9324ac1145353a51b670af5acd917803edb0d9edb594767898d4d41","observation_id":"506b8c58-d8af-4b7f-b51e-a485b1f324bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.429810Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.407700Z","title":"Pni: Indus- trial anomaly detection using position and neighborhood in- formation","venue":null,"work_id":"e6d43874-d9c8-497d-9d3d-1ebd6843d37d","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.918836Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:22b73aae389d4a4cebc23ef95fafd0d4d93e9cdfad493bc7b1fc0befff9003f5","observation_id":"3a56f803-4fbf-47ca-b4a3-c3b235af0c1a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.412543Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.391552Z","title":"Mvtec ad–a comprehensive real-world dataset for unsupervised anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"56e0bd2b-df3c-4bf5-a0cc-7cb55548c19d","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.924520Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2ca03eaa209875729da95a8689c61410832478c67af2a407dcc31656bd31cc0b","observation_id":"b703ccc0-540d-4821-bcbc-bb678b024797","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.396893Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.929857Z","title":"Uninformed students: Student-teacher anomaly detection with discriminative latent embeddings","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.929857Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1ea0fb40f295a5dc7cdb6b28b6afc400f21ca9b99bf753fb4b4c9b778f8c5063","observation_id":"8860563e-6318-45a3-b65f-27a3ca78c1e6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.929857Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2403.09303","last_updated":"2024-07-09T01:14:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T00:54:23.796073Z","submitted_at":"2024-03-14T11:51:01Z","title":"Rethinking Autoencoders for Medical Anomaly Detection from A Theoretical Perspective","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2403.09303","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2403.09303","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.383659Z","title":"Rethinking Autoencoders for Medical Anomaly Detection from A Theoretical Perspective","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"2b875017-2138-4a05-a836-c760f1412ed2","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.935628Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2403.09303","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:21bca8cca1fef6bba2b357b395d4ff6a0eb3e50373cf6d6c3f3c2ce4206be9e0","observation_id":"d5995b1d-5ca2-4e05-b58f-2a2f4d7ef58c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.389096Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.365946Z","title":"Anomaly de- tection under distribution shift","venue":null,"work_id":"0d354ad4-ff03-4244-a6f9-74b014365851","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.940861Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0baa16ce893e2f88cf2858a9f089b3d63593a3c415efbca62e87a77e923182c0","observation_id":"7db936e6-12c9-4077-9530-0b14be7fc80f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.370367Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.349795Z","title":"Deep one-class classification via interpolated gaussian descriptor","venue":null,"work_id":"016d33e0-f9eb-4b9b-aa94-ec8fedb5862d","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.945828Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:00b95dc37e20ea47964fa440fcbc34adb21eb766c102a4cf82ceac1546ac1722","observation_id":"41751ebe-55c1-4ca4-9c72-f7f89377c7e9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.355156Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1902.03368","last_updated":"2019-03-29T17:36:27Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:04.331762Z","submitted_at":"2019-02-09T04:18:10Z","title":"Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1902.03368","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.950678Z","title":"Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection 2018: A challenge hosted by the interna- tional skin imaging collaboration (isic)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.950678Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1902.03368","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:54f77e5462734abc71a246c97dd1f4df8040844316deaf596a955714372de8f6","observation_id":"9c7b9e2c-d7f1-43a0-addc-4207db385f8e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.950678Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.333408Z","title":"Dataset for covid-19 segmen- tation and severity scoring","venue":null,"work_id":"bffd96ad-67e1-4569-9b77-2b8390e98c4b","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.956397Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6c8c52286c5d722297db49835966c42f1aa2e899fced12e34729a2fab6e604da","observation_id":"eb585ffa-6707-4343-8912-99a49b3df2c7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.338573Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.317266Z","title":"Anomaly detection via reverse distillation from one-class embedding","venue":null,"work_id":"c9c65808-5966-48de-ae37-f3ec4fc40a76","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.961412Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f83ea47feea89785f553526cfdd63964e1b1f31d58b9a0b7dce157e601079bdc","observation_id":"1ac342c8-d512-4752-9c8b-4cf118ddde52","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.322548Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2308.15939","last_updated":"2024-02-27T00:07:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T16:12:14.281695Z","submitted_at":"2023-08-30T10:35:36Z","title":"Bootstrap Fine-Grained Vision-Language Alignment for Unified Zero-Shot Anomaly Localization","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2308.15939","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.966531Z","title":"Anovl: Adapting vision-language models for unified zero- shot anomaly localization","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.966531Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2308.15939","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6d24e2561a7263405a5b6eddb95f62e149078c95fbe0797fcb5439995a69371c","observation_id":"eaf5a236-97ab-44ff-8172-a856982eddd2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.966531Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.300267Z","title":"Di- abetic retinopathy detection","venue":null,"work_id":"813007a0-e604-4291-bc81-964244a54637","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.971863Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:68759c7377066c0bc10906926b4c607b4cd9c03c7b58805cdc5c9a466fcf3f06","observation_id":"6bc38190-11d7-4208-b8d7-c3bfb0e13d16","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.305578Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.281914Z","title":"Memorizing normality to detect anomaly: Memory-augmented deep autoencoder for unsupervised anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"ff5b9907-7e7c-4a63-b473-fedda3226689","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.976646Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e4bf7494179df96f91554eca69d16921150b2485dba6c5bec99094aa812a34de","observation_id":"bb4676a3-c82a-4346-b760-a43f74b4decb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.287335Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.263561Z","title":"Drocc: Deep robust one- class classification","venue":null,"work_id":"9612ec26-1687-4800-ac88-4535f5deb475","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.981819Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b92efe0a80fa09d0595d5c098aba8cd50e49b0e548681b13710665ab2692b5cd","observation_id":"60a5413c-3f92-4ed8-a455-cf4b56feea09","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.269095Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.244803Z","title":"Remembering normality: Memory- guided knowledge distillation for unsupervised anomaly de- tection","venue":null,"work_id":"7dedd989-a2aa-47d4-ac24-51da4683b840","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.986254Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:aa71af4eea713be15c3dfeff00f405b59cb23270b49ff2e81366afe8df2fe46b","observation_id":"b7e344c2-bd2e-487a-89ae-af8bb9361b3d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.250368Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.227227Z","title":"Cflow-ad: Real-time unsupervised anomaly detection with localization via conditional normalizing flows","venue":null,"work_id":"8ad41ced-df91-40f1-aad6-12b5ec90ea03","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.991059Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c1cb5031fb62bcf1f6d5c3a3b58892414714b3145a5e3c29f2e367ee9708c6fc","observation_id":"6077f1f5-b2e6-4899-9a88-42045f6f68d1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.232543Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.209556Z","title":"Adbench: Anomaly detection benchmark","venue":null,"work_id":"a26b8eb8-28de-4645-99e4-cb5ca4909c79","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:13.995473Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:304e5a483ccbb4f1cb45548f436c663da7e574e81919cf77b53abb8543382540","observation_id":"f0a45c61-fa23-4a4d-bec0-e8c4c4a4c65b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.214481Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.192357Z","title":"The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve","venue":null,"work_id":"62ae40ef-d973-4541-ae9e-a1d551d28e78","year":1982},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.000325Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1ad05c03f2c564c6d9d94af2269a7ad1b3389b0a72905b0596ac0a9e725b3042","observation_id":"817bdb44-d3d4-4813-b703-8f47e68534f6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.197716Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.175912Z","title":"A diffusion-based framework for multi-class anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"aa39d634-54ec-4d3b-ba1e-0a35d8e6c216","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.005531Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:374218e15165a50810e79aba6ee9925f9f9fafe5297e325c761831d47ca910ce","observation_id":"c7cfc94d-c3fe-4dba-ac35-8122625a259c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.181103Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.010274Z","title":"Benchmarking neu- ral network robustness to common corruptions and perturba- tions","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.010274Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:af100cf186fefbb75d549e1b1235f1bcd3e9c05757b214cee7bb362b401b5006","observation_id":"9bd36b9e-f56d-4f75-98c5-9d7e30ef7b81","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.010274Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.145847Z","title":"Divide-and-assemble: Learning 9 block-wise memory for unsupervised anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"a19a6a3c-dd77-40cd-b40e-b386ab82e49a","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.015092Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:59b09d234716f1db0853849f251ff8c3fcbdf73f6a96d1b4d09e3fa38734b3ae","observation_id":"f9278cf9-86ca-432f-ad3e-3ac6150a87e7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.151297Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.127518Z","title":"Mmad: The first-ever comprehensive benchmark for mul- timodal large language models in industrial anomaly detec- tion","venue":null,"work_id":"0cc167e6-a5cc-4d1d-8f06-b1da0590aa5b","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.019601Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a45d5fa58c120318c91abdc093374bebb5d16ecf18be3a0c66eae797d6378090","observation_id":"f975abc3-9253-4dd0-b402-132bee507425","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.134109Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.110261Z","title":"A new measure of rank correlation","venue":null,"work_id":"8a286126-336a-4f2f-8986-89bdbc626f1a","year":1938},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.023456Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d3909aaf6c6acf41d2ccd37a35fb21d6f8903c976f7287b5a01b222e5b2316da","observation_id":"39bd0412-1f0c-4411-af8d-007410f0d641","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.115818Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.091074Z","title":"Novel dataset for fine-grained image categorization","venue":null,"work_id":"bd966c35-9f86-4952-bd67-a722c4dd5bc6","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.027714Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:adaf43008eabd6baf2c57084e485a1e6f4c6e68c6fbcf94c54628ba43d09e34f","observation_id":"cbf37d9e-86e2-42cb-9480-6ce13393a3f6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.097184Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.075626Z","title":"Pyramid- flow: High-resolution defect contrastive localization using pyramid normalizing flow","venue":null,"work_id":"32b08dbe-3825-41e3-b692-d4596d8e202a","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.032011Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0879c7823d23071dcfa10abf06e3a5a8a65f4ed9f6f64526d6a749229ad2e786","observation_id":"95831785-3c98-4f19-8ec2-ed7b3db1a9d6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.079922Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.061134Z","title":"Cutpaste: Self-supervised learning for anomaly de- tection and localization","venue":null,"work_id":"c1b8e7eb-74f1-4314-99c3-78c6f9de2ab7","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.036480Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dfbc5186897ccf27eab441769f78683611a92c2f9718eb4977a30f07f4bdbd33","observation_id":"490e6532-2b2c-429f-a03c-da7693115b50","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.065838Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.044981Z","title":"Promptad: Learn- ing prompts with only normal samples for few-shot anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"3fb34f7a-fcb4-413d-8baf-3f40c7de6eaa","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.042170Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e9b0b7131c3b11f9c6120bbba823ded1cbc009ec9200700133183acff818d901","observation_id":"5cd48758-7e3f-44dd-8e26-9c6f43b98f0d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.049419Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2203.00259","last_updated":"2023-07-03T09:54:11Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:21:45.098913Z","submitted_at":"2022-03-01T06:35:15Z","title":"Omni-frequency Channel-selection Representations for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2203.00259","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2203.00259","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.326314Z","title":"Omni-frequency Channel-selection Representations for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection","venue":"cs.CV","work_id":"49f00e3a-aff8-49e1-a011-8304924fa9e9","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.046601Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2203.00259","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cef06aeb828cbe4a2b5cddee5224e87a46e0c8761c2308c3716ad5f045a27f18","observation_id":"dc274bb0-fda3-4f33-ae03-becff8c6bb63","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.333896Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.027771Z","title":"Omni-frequency channel- selection representations for unsupervised anomaly detec- tion","venue":null,"work_id":"8f290905-edba-4c6d-951b-e2fbe381437f","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.051413Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cbe2cb1a7ba48b2eda3abaa2f5426313682778fe1ac88093848a2c5e8a448632","observation_id":"206a37ad-ee49-4c1a-a976-e0149c4efe38","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:15.033816Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.056255Z","title":"Simplenet: A simple network for image anomaly detection and localization","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.056255Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a31228aa3e7fd2ad539d830ffada27db37bb05ce02af19f4d8a0662ac8320356","observation_id":"3e15ac47-9512-4251-ad47-4f84da9f4727","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.056255Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.994348Z","title":"Hierarchical vector quantized transformer for multi-class unsupervised anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"58f14569-032c-40c8-bd6d-2e8499d34315","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.061882Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f3297f8d4c5c3f86f542a87196decf2d005e7e6debd822488c5e09f1c41d2698","observation_id":"772e1044-a254-4586-9b05-66a3092befea","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.999591Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.978714Z","title":"Fake it until you make it: Towards accurate near-distribution novelty detection","venue":null,"work_id":"f92c1c27-f1ee-480d-9276-e6cc9865311b","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.066728Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:57da29b7dff1b7c14c7aad59f6235774f3261aa2949eb8c5ae604c99e68a9618","observation_id":"6c6be44a-7f9c-4e9f-a79f-28cbb142d6d6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.983726Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.963107Z","title":"Automated flower classification over a large number of classes","venue":null,"work_id":"6ddc91ac-50c6-4d83-9f99-752adf9c42e5","year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.071501Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ad5921a7203b9d62280454f617e1d23791cee79fc3dc7b4d88c99000147cb6b7","observation_id":"64f46978-6532-4fbc-accc-2d8711846966","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.968183Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.947305Z","title":"Learning memory-guided normality for anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"4a681659-8afc-4861-affc-89972f33d1ba","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.076366Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8345aa9ce238c6a99c3d1495fcff003b4d6679a00f9e09458a845961ea60f760","observation_id":"4728d06b-0aef-4b10-94c0-575ef1daad0e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.952366Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.931648Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"abcdaa52-0826-456e-9f98-159fa83c3e2e","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.080792Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f82cc1913d86e91d6b19033e3b9c2f343f16a75eabe8291ac2261b4f52592fad","observation_id":"49d425fa-facb-4aae-8597-4dd6c847973f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.936614Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.914156Z","title":"G2d: Generate to detect anomaly","venue":null,"work_id":"8c5e8cf9-0710-4c41-8aae-bd9d2dfaea81","year":2003},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.085678Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53cc74c35f212ac9ad27b3b87c7a4685ca34d75ebd068a481b723c91c92b4343","observation_id":"ced4f157-421f-49b1-a9b8-66b4883829a3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.919930Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.893637Z","title":"Towards to- tal recall in industrial anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"6eba8a14-7a8d-4721-b67c-452d7cdf25fe","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.090151Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:892b849eab728ea5a7a443b89c31a90944b5c61bd579586f01cfe4f5c13d982c","observation_id":"dc702c68-7f41-4335-9105-82958ec32a30","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.902087Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.877344Z","title":"Deep one-class classifica- tion","venue":null,"work_id":"ca2348ff-5857-4920-aa2e-f94a1537ac7b","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.094614Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7944850d90e141783ecd9c9064f417992bb9632541e3ec5485de3bce475d32eb","observation_id":"e2699d4b-e67a-4505-9064-3e73936649ed","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.882435Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.861493Z","title":"Deep end-to-end one-class classifier","venue":null,"work_id":"ebc7cb21-8d34-4210-a60e-f7c276b7463c","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.099150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dbdd3d42479cd5cdf035e67989709d58b10ea0450ccd3cceed7b63314e3954b9","observation_id":"1fececfa-07f3-4951-abcd-c4001c364c4e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.866490Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.846569Z","title":"Multiresolution knowledge distillation for anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"51144f3f-e35d-49c6-a8b4-1b06346594ad","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.103832Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b9e8f48e4e2e54480d5364b07735ae92b307059e3f2ffdaee859a61ca6cbe4e0","observation_id":"ae64c686-c915-4b97-8159-b2cbf037f751","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.851304Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.831541Z","title":"f-anogan: Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks","venue":null,"work_id":"0a49d6e5-cb87-4808-b47b-22bead9465ba","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.108610Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:74abd8022beaff7e1b0e8a3d95029540f57305be158811af9acdf7514c699082","observation_id":"f61e9345-8d6c-4edb-baa0-e690e4667e0a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.836111Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.113458Z","title":"Natural synthetic anomalies for self-supervised anomaly detection and localization","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.113458Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:95ad283a1550e8ae08b7e2648e67bbc11ea0ed268663f3f70d90ee447fdd7340","observation_id":"3a9ebcba-d11f-4569-92d5-fd3d7f18b20f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.113458Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.805391Z","title":"Estimating the sup- port of a high-dimensional distribution","venue":null,"work_id":"7c54b947-cbf9-4149-a0e0-5afcbc2b61d6","year":2001},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.118317Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2ad16d050cb8238d9dde7101825086b079a8f512b751579c6858fc4b8fa8dec9","observation_id":"e62225b3-5d5e-46e3-bcf9-9112bf63f8d0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.810137Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.789064Z","title":"Anomaly detection using score-based per- turbation resilience","venue":null,"work_id":"c72f1385-da61-405c-a5ad-f8114c1dd2c4","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.122803Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c2452a55af2c8e0b53e5ecf3565f507ea55463f95397b898f4f15f68cc3268d1","observation_id":"a2c68da0-cb92-498e-896c-e8581d559950","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.794021Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.773513Z","title":"Anomaly detection in medical imaging with deep perceptual autoencoders","venue":null,"work_id":"0aba78c4-5d56-484a-9650-680ed5d0f1e3","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.127225Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:108603e75ad66e8550b270be5c6420c6414853ebc7ddd9ccdb7289ab311c7abc","observation_id":"23ea94bb-f758-4447-8618-1091166182d9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.778237Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.757561Z","title":"Support vector data description","venue":null,"work_id":"f1180b52-bd4f-4923-9461-fa87f84ca3e0","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.131732Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:586cb301ad41825be178b455c3fc2d79be0487dfca48a0735409455c03be3f4a","observation_id":"e16c9d6b-d56e-40b0-99a5-f3c3396bc69b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.762763Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.741926Z","title":"Revisiting reverse distillation for anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"570e02fd-badd-4518-a682-5b12b9d79281","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.136540Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:302e7a2a6f1b1407b57414293ba027286aa697847949a5f366f81aa62f14a174","observation_id":"91854304-8a3c-4a57-82ba-e3e50fdccaf3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.747131Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.724877Z","title":"The ham10000 dataset, a large collection of multi-source der- matoscopic images of common pigmented skin lesions","venue":null,"work_id":"cd813a45-e8a7-4c50-a781-bb0a6e45fb57","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.140881Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9662e3032683eb3709a8fd15250144403ef99a87a345d81117e1bb1ff1c1d9a0","observation_id":"89658f96-6228-42da-af77-1126ba5a3bb3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.730797Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.707592Z","title":"On the c-statistics for eval- uating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data","venue":null,"work_id":"105e322c-45e8-4d9b-8f1d-76c328f2cf3e","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.145299Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bac96323e62f8a598903e7e9f2834233ee5ec2c8252ce2b358b0aad685329f1b","observation_id":"93f1c1d3-aa95-46cb-91b9-253cabf43019","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.713157Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.691347Z","title":"Real-iad: A real-world multi-view dataset for benchmarking versatile industrial anomaly detec- tion","venue":null,"work_id":"f3bd31e3-1b85-4702-b1c4-0b3b51d4cee9","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":52,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.150182Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bdad57e7b1299fced1ce8bb85ca262d3078339cf94a29b23e42e6d758e0314ee","observation_id":"05b481ad-2f92-4bdd-b7ad-56864411fed7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.696282Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2103.04257","last_updated":"2021-10-28T09:17:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:00:30.967037Z","submitted_at":"2021-03-07T04:25:04Z","title":"Student-Teacher Feature Pyramid Matching for Anomaly Detection","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2103.04257","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.154430Z","title":"Student-teacher feature pyramid matching for anomaly de- tection","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":53,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.154430Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2103.04257","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:98e6bbd49e2822821dcd0ecb49258e0ca23c32721ec8ff249b0a495133c3c118","observation_id":"5b7d2a69-4cdd-48bb-a021-5791cb03d980","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.154430Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.676000Z","title":"Caltech-ucsd birds 200","venue":null,"work_id":"e3c380d5-d5c6-4ea9-9dd2-0211e5fb0bb3","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":54,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.159639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c441df6fa91339277b850dcb72d1303255f70bc8d96bc2f1699c0aaf0471f1c3","observation_id":"68365cb4-22fc-4b6d-b30e-52f47311622d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.680551Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.661219Z","title":"A deep one-class neural network for anomalous event detection in complex scenes","venue":null,"work_id":"1d5224d7-6718-4011-8a50-bd8648b06ee9","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":55,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.164162Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f82331f683447689f53c78cb86fa440fe20eea54e8132f8833ac49a135b958bb","observation_id":"e08a4e36-00dc-4a8b-95b8-4870aa5d405c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.665516Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.646203Z","title":"Im-iad: Indus- trial image anomaly detection benchmark in manufacturing","venue":null,"work_id":"5f1a8f8c-8453-4da2-850a-7151b02287d0","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":56,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.168646Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3fe9057e3513b4f47594d87c8bc3efc0ec473a0e50b2f87c35b4c885cc93f11d","observation_id":"40793be2-74a0-48ba-986c-5f169dc30c99","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.650928Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.630321Z","title":"Learning semantic context from nor- mal samples for unsupervised anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"cb42df14-258a-46c9-8eab-11bfbaf9b42d","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":57,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.173847Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f7966795886d70c19bfd63cf5c0a83b8b88334bbb2078a0197f109b41256ef3b","observation_id":"833f2297-c90e-49dd-ba3c-b7f09f764c7a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.635357Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.613930Z","title":"Patch svdd: Patch-level svdd for anomaly detection and segmentation","venue":null,"work_id":"5df2dd58-59b8-4d5c-93a5-e473e47b9f30","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.178064Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c75d6dc449111da2f2d8fb900d517c9b1885edbc02a17609581c47107b655086","observation_id":"f9fe8844-535a-40d7-aa5c-7b1a6bee47b3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.619935Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.182219Z","title":"A unified model for multi-class anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":59,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.182219Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1b1a4d9cd352576ab0883be1e41adec5eef03c1874c1b8092e86bd81c2924957","observation_id":"c7e3b517-9440-42e1-9f3e-ebcc192eefbd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.182219Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.587622Z","title":"Old is gold: Redefining the adversarially learned one-class classifier training paradigm","venue":null,"work_id":"d6daf539-f5d1-470b-984b-a16adda7406c","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":60,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.186335Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:89d017be33c2d78be7350c1521ee1d8a5c526a9ddc1712f2d5f9f5e6b8ce5ed4","observation_id":"aea19c2b-1e68-4bf7-814f-ee8b8cfe52d7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.592801Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.191728Z","title":"Spearman rank correlation","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":61,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.191728Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0aa3bc19c382a8568f4a750874f384052b9051f6d7dc4c6810fac656d5d2a197","observation_id":"f5572459-0c4c-4b6d-adcb-0a428ce6dbc8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.191728Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.560774Z","title":"Draem- a discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for sur- face anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"d8551a2b-5130-44a6-a9e6-08799e467310","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":62,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.196363Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:adb113af3a2a86410d8187d3f5f5fb25990d3d50e399616df41d26ee217347a3","observation_id":"1c3305f2-855a-4f74-98ec-73beade7f646","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.565529Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.544816Z","title":"Recon- struction by inpainting for visual anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"2b7a0212-6cd0-4fcb-a62f-b5a59043dc46","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":63,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.200872Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:36ab912da8288ffbda556075b608c0115ca0cfc4ef51a162ba1da4418bf225e9","observation_id":"37a4d817-fb81-4d07-af99-7f88aa57894d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.549927Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.527755Z","title":"Dsr– a dual subspace re-projection network for surface anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"e0400203-4ea2-45f9-9b3c-928736a55d4a","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":64,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.205740Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4d8de713088af51493fc7f4f958bfa2aff7f94c9427736f03326ea27ee821505","observation_id":"59dd4f6a-f154-4e0f-89ae-44425a5c492e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.533274Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.03262","last_updated":"2025-08-19T02:35:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T23:49:36.587285Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-05T13:40:07Z","title":"A Comprehensive Library for Benchmarking Multi-class Visual Anomaly Detection","version":6},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2406.03262","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.210299Z","title":"Ader: A comprehensive benchmark for multi-class visual anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":65,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.210299Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.03262","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4340962f53009cf76abf70b90511f596ea7676c674800e6b8fc80faf83dd0c28","observation_id":"ce233d42-7c87-4af4-a073-6242c8a5e566","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.210299Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.215390Z","title":"Destseg: Segmentation guided denoising student-teacher for anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":66,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.215390Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6b8bac4bab9b2c471b97e0d31171e95dbc2deb3cf753218ef4ba4b349996472e","observation_id":"8df769c8-ecbd-4d6e-9ee3-e0df35fe09d1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.215390Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.500870Z","title":"Realnet: A feature selection network with realistic synthetic anomaly for anomaly detection","venue":null,"work_id":"9b63c3c1-3afc-4635-a664-334a8a5acc4a","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":67,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.219936Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:428dc753dc1e9f2a8f34e3eae87df8939bf566a87230794e0af5d69a953a448b","observation_id":"598904c5-3e5c-414f-97ce-7a40aad200e5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.506210Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.485094Z","title":"Toward generalist anomaly detection via in-context residual learning with few-shot sam- ple prompts","venue":null,"work_id":"e835d25b-657d-416e-8895-24cedcfceb51","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":68,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.224764Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:60be12a90d34acbd35084ff8bd848b2f48f459d157f54fab15587df81668e199","observation_id":"10a6d91a-2e75-4901-8b11-bdc15f7aeb1c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.490010Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.467089Z","title":"Spot-the-difference self-supervised pre- training for anomaly detection and segmentation","venue":null,"work_id":"bd2b891e-e2f0-40f7-beaa-9d151723e78e","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":69,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.229572Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:549c671075e05ac859f7de970ced532c593a4e52b41c3e00187c11a7a4655ffb","observation_id":"4f631410-a52a-48e3-8f9e-ca3d9a825b05","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.472276Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.450186Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"36be7a0c-823e-4e2a-95d9-6710f6425a16","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":70,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.234264Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2d32e2f75fb1f8bd81edf429d2627882b7d513a7f82ac71aef4a72d3abcca969","observation_id":"eb86d804-e639-4a41-a2b5-f1fabc2a2b6a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.455063Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.434735Z","title":"The pair is discordant if it is in the reverse ordering for severity levels and anomaly score, or the values are arranged in opposite directions","venue":null,"work_id":"43a01826-af47-4ecd-9620-3aa6626da615","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":71,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.239171Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e08c6f002b6cfad8a4bd071737f58477352e57c390b6f0fac023b06bcc81d213","observation_id":"987380da-9dd9-4728-a1eb-507ed122d689","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.439499Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.417196Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"721523e7-7cee-4ecf-9929-f893a8d151c6","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":72,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.244653Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:937b4f0c7c0b46683c63d30dfc3c1243988f6c3db94b17f28e308ed2576fe4a1","observation_id":"ece6bc70-8b05-4ce3-8f9f-cfaa5c14f07d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.422764Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.400340Z","title":"The two observations are tied if the severity level of sample xi is equal that of xj and/or the anomaly score of sample xi is equal that of xj","venue":null,"work_id":"e18671c4-0a4b-48ad-8ca1-eb24954ac363","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection","version":1},"reference_index":73,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.249725Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2411.14515"},"observation_digest":"sha256:78b072010e1453e0bcb13676d83344b77c5d37536c8cd5df5956062d72ee7407","observation_id":"91f3d8b8-fd6e-46c1-b149-f850421460d7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:32:14.405494Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.14515","last_updated":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:44:50.795234Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-21T14:18:37Z","title":"Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":73,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":1,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":14,"verified_exact":2,"verified_fuzzy":56},"total_outbound_references":73},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T06:34:36.333875+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 13 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 73 of 73 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2411.14515."}