pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.17186 · v4 · submitted 2024-11-26 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc· hep-th

Scalar-Induced Electromagnetic Radiation: Comparison with Axion-Like Particles and Implications for Modified Gravity

Wenyi Wang , Sousuke Noda , Taishi Katsuragawa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 16:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HEgr-qchep-th
keywords scalar fieldselectromagnetic radiationaxion-like particlesmodified gravityresonance effectsscalar-tensor theorydark energyparity properties
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scalar fields can produce observable electromagnetic signatures through resonance effects that depend on their coupling to the electromagnetic field and differ from those of axion-like particles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how scalar fields introduced in scalar-tensor theories of gravity, which may act as dynamical dark energy, generate electromagnetic radiation when oscillating. It contrasts this radiation with that from axion-like particles, highlighting the parity-even coupling of scalars to the electromagnetic field strength squared versus the parity-odd coupling of ALPs. The analysis applies prior methods to demonstrate that resonance can amplify the scalar-induced signals under conditions set by the coupling and background magnetic field. This setup offers a route to distinguish the two types of fields observationally while testing modified gravity parameters such as mass and coupling strength.

Core claim

Oscillating scalar field configurations produce electromagnetic radiation whose strength and spectrum can be enhanced by resonance effects that depend on the coupling structure and the background magnetic field configuration; these resonance phenomena accentuate differences from ALP-induced radiation and thereby provide a framework for treating pure and pseudo-scalar fields on equal footing within scalar-tensor gravity.

What carries the argument

The parity-even coupling term φ F_μν F^μν that governs how scalar fields interact with electromagnetism, producing radiation whose resonance amplification depends on the background field and differs from the parity-odd ALP case.

If this is right

  • Resonance effects can accentuate differences in signal strength and spectral features, potentially aiding distinction between scalar fields and ALPs.
  • The same framework applies to both pure and pseudo-scalar fields.
  • Mass and coupling parameters enter discussions of observational tests of modified gravity.
  • The approach opens new avenues for testing modified gravity scenarios together with ALP models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Electromagnetic searches in regions of strong magnetic fields could target scalar dark energy candidates if the resonance mechanism operates as described.
  • The parity distinction implies the method could extend to other even- or odd-parity couplings in particle physics.
  • Numerical modeling of field evolution in expanding cosmologies would be a natural next step to quantify signal detectability.

Load-bearing premise

Analytical methods developed for axion-like particles transfer directly to the scalar case without gaps arising from the parity difference in the couplings.

What would settle it

Detection or absence of resonance peaks at frequencies set by the scalar mass and the strength of the background magnetic field in electromagnetic observations of candidate oscillating regions would confirm or refute the predicted amplification.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17186 by Sousuke Noda, Taishi Katsuragawa, Wenyi Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Plots of the spherically symmetric, oscillating field configuration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The radiated power as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The radiated power as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The radiated power as a function of Ω in the case of the alternating magnetic field with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The radiated power as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The blue and red curves represent the spectral flux densities of axion and scalar, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The scalar-tensor theory of gravity, a modified gravity theory, introduces a fundamental scalar field that can serve as dynamical dark energy, driving the late-time accelerated expansion of the Universe. In this work, we analyze electromagnetic (EM) radiations arising from scalar fields and compare these features with those induced by axion-like particles (ALPs). Scalar and ALP fields couple differently to the EM field due to their distinct parity properties, $\phi F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}$ for scalar fields and $\phi F_{\mu\nu} \tilde{F}^{\mu\nu}$ for ALPs. Building on analytical methods developed for ALPs, this work presents a theoretical feasibility analysis that demonstrates how the scalar field could produce observable EM signatures from oscillating field configurations. We also show that resonance effects can amplify the EM radiation for the scalar field under specific conditions, and that the enhancement mechanisms depend on the coupling structure and the configuration of the background magnetic field. Resonance phenomena can accentuate the differences in signal strength and spectral features, potentially aiding future observations in distinguishing scalar fields from ALPs. Although our studies apply to general scalar fields, we embed them within the framework of scalar-tensor theory and discuss the mass and coupling parameter in the context of testing modified gravity. This work provides a theoretical framework for studying generic pure and pseudo-scalar fields on an equal footing and suggests new avenues for observational tests of modified gravity scenarios alongside ALP models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes electromagnetic radiation induced by oscillating scalar fields in scalar-tensor gravity theories, comparing signatures to those from axion-like particles (ALPs). It claims that scalar fields with the parity-even coupling φFμνFμν can produce observable EM signatures from oscillating configurations, with resonance effects amplifying radiation under specific conditions depending on coupling structure and background B-field configuration; this builds on ALP analytical methods to provide a theoretical feasibility analysis for distinguishing scalars from ALPs and testing modified gravity via mass and coupling parameters.

Significance. If the claimed resonance amplification and spectral distinctions hold after explicit verification, the work would supply a useful framework for treating pure and pseudo-scalar fields on equal footing and could open new observational channels for modified-gravity tests alongside ALP searches. The emphasis on coupling-structure dependence and B-field configuration is a constructive step, though its value hinges on the transferability of prior methods.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central feasibility claim that 'resonance effects can amplify the EM radiation for the scalar field under specific conditions' rests on transferring ALP analytical methods without an explicit re-derivation of the sourced wave equation or resonance condition for the parity-even interaction φFμνFμν. The parity-odd ALP coupling induces curl-like mixing enabling ω ≈ m conversion in transverse B, while the scalar term produces a divergence-like or effective-permittivity modification; without the new dispersion relation and damping terms shown, the asserted enhancement and distinguishability cannot be verified as following from the ALP template.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and discussion of modified-gravity embedding: the statement that resonance phenomena 'accentuate the differences in signal strength and spectral features' is load-bearing for the modified-gravity testability claim, yet no explicit calculation of the scalar-induced inhomogeneous Maxwell equations or resulting resonance window is supplied to confirm that the ALP-derived resonance survives the parity change.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the two couplings is introduced clearly in the abstract but should be repeated with explicit Lagrangian terms in the main text for readers who skip the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. The major comments correctly identify that the abstract and manuscript would benefit from explicit derivations of the wave equations and resonance conditions for the parity-even coupling to substantiate the feasibility claims. We address each point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central feasibility claim that 'resonance effects can amplify the EM radiation for the scalar field under specific conditions' rests on transferring ALP analytical methods without an explicit re-derivation of the sourced wave equation or resonance condition for the parity-even interaction φFμνFμν. The parity-odd ALP coupling induces curl-like mixing enabling ω ≈ m conversion in transverse B, while the scalar term produces a divergence-like or effective-permittivity modification; without the new dispersion relation and damping terms shown, the asserted enhancement and distinguishability cannot be verified as following from the ALP template.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract summarizes results without showing the explicit re-derivation. The manuscript adapts ALP methods to the parity-even case via the effective permittivity modification, but to allow direct verification we will add a new subsection deriving the sourced inhomogeneous Maxwell equations, the resulting dispersion relation, and the resonance window for φFμνFμν. This will explicitly demonstrate how the resonance arises and differs from the ALP curl-like mixing. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and discussion of modified-gravity embedding: the statement that resonance phenomena 'accentuate the differences in signal strength and spectral features' is load-bearing for the modified-gravity testability claim, yet no explicit calculation of the scalar-induced inhomogeneous Maxwell equations or resulting resonance window is supplied to confirm that the ALP-derived resonance survives the parity change.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes the absence of the explicit scalar-specific calculations in the presented text. We will revise the abstract and main text to include the full derivation of the inhomogeneous equations and resonance conditions for the parity-even interaction. This addition will confirm that resonance effects persist (albeit with different dependence on background B-field configuration) and thereby support the distinguishability and modified-gravity testability claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on external ALP methods with distinct couplings

full rationale

The paper states it builds on analytical methods for ALPs (parity-odd coupling) to analyze scalar fields (parity-even φFF coupling) via a theoretical feasibility analysis of oscillating configurations and resonance. No quoted equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations reduce any claimed prediction or resonance condition to an input defined within this work. The comparison of signal features is presented as an extension rather than a tautology, satisfying the default expectation of a self-contained analysis against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on the standard parity properties of the two couplings and the assumption that oscillating scalar configurations exist in scalar-tensor cosmology; no new free parameters beyond the usual mass and coupling are introduced, and no invented entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • scalar mass and coupling strength
    Treated as parameters to be constrained by observations in the context of testing modified gravity; values not fitted within the paper itself.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Scalar fields couple via φ Fμν Fμν while ALPs couple via φ Fμν ~Fμν due to parity properties.
    Invoked in the abstract to differentiate the two cases and justify separate resonance behavior.
  • domain assumption Analytical methods for ALP-induced radiation apply to the scalar case.
    Stated as the foundation for the feasibility analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5803 in / 1469 out tokens · 27302 ms · 2026-05-23T16:46:57.994999+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 41 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977)

    work page 1977

  2. [2]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978)

    work page 1978

  3. [3]

    Cheng, Phys

    H.-Y. Cheng, Phys. Rept. 158, 1 (1988)

    work page 1988

  4. [4]

    Monodromy in the CMB: Gravity Waves and String Inflation

    E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, Phys. Rev. D 78, 106003 (2008), arXiv:0803.3085 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    A review of Axion Inflation in the era of Planck

    E. Pajer and M. Peloso, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 214002 (2013), arXiv:1305.3557 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    Natural Inflation: Consistency with Cosmic Microwave Background Observations of Planck and BICEP2

    K. Freese and W. H. Kinney, JCAP 03, 044, arXiv:1403.5277 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. B 120, 127 (1983)

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. B 120, 133 (1983)

    work page 1983

  9. [9]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, Phys. Lett. B 120, 137 (1983)

    work page 1983

  10. [10]

    J. E. Kim, Phys. Rept. 150, 1 (1987). 26

    work page 1987

  11. [11]

    L. D. Duffy and K. van Bibber, New J. Phys. 11, 105008 (2009), arXiv:0904.3346 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  12. [12]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    D. J. E. Marsh, Phys. Rept. 643, 1 (2016), arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    J. E. Kim and H. P. Nilles, Phys. Lett. B 553, 1 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0210402

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  15. [15]

    Acceleressence: Dark Energy from a Phase Transition at the Seesaw Scale

    Z. Chacko, L. J. Hall, and Y. Nomura, JCAP 10, 011, arXiv:astro-ph/0405596

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 451 (2010), arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  17. [17]

    A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B 108, 389 (1982)

    work page 1982

  18. [18]

    A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B 129, 177 (1983)

    work page 1983

  19. [19]

    Ratra and P

    B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Phys. Rev. D 37, 3406 (1988)

    work page 1988

  20. [20]

    H. Chen, T. Katsuragawa, and S. Matsuzaki, Chin. Phys. C 46, 105106 (2022), arXiv:2206.02130 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Can F(R)-gravity be a viable model: the universal unification scenario for inflation, dark energy and dark matter

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, in 17th Workshop on General Relativity and Gravitation in Japan (2008) pp. 3–7, arXiv:0801.4843 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    Dark energy, inflation and dark matter from modified F(R) gravity

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, TSPU Bulletin N8(110), 7 (2011), arXiv:0807.0685 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [23]

    J. A. R. Cembranos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 141301 (2009), arXiv:0809.1653 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    Can Dark Matter be an artifact of extended theories of gravity?

    S. Choudhury, M. Sen, and S. Sadhukhan, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 494 (2016), arXiv:1512.08176 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Modified Gravity Explains Dark Matter?

    T. Katsuragawa and S. Matsuzaki, Phys. Rev. D 95, 044040 (2017), arXiv:1610.01016 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Radial acceleration relation from symmetron fifth forces

    C. Burrage, E. J. Copeland, and P. Millington, Phys. Rev. D 95, 064050 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 129902 (2017)], arXiv:1610.07529 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    Symmetron Scalar Fields: Modified Gravity, Dark Matter or Both?

    C. Burrage, E. J. Copeland, C. K¨ ading, and P. Millington, Phys. Rev. D 99, 043539 (2019), arXiv:1811.12301 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    H. Chen, T. Katsuragawa, S. Matsuzaki, and T. Qiu, JHEP 02, 155, arXiv:1908.04146 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 1908

  29. [29]

    Shtanov, Phys

    Y. Shtanov, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136469 (2021), arXiv:2105.02662 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    K¨ ading, Astronomy2, 128 (2023), arXiv:2304.05875 [astro-ph.CO]

    C. K¨ ading, Astronomy2, 128 (2023), arXiv:2304.05875 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Shtanov, JCAP 12, 028, arXiv:2409.05027 [hep-ph]

    Y. Shtanov, JCAP 12, 028, arXiv:2409.05027 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Fujikawa, Phys

    K. Fujikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1733 (1980)

    work page 1980

  33. [33]

    A new estimate of the mass of the gravitational scalar field for Dark Energy

    Y. Fujii, Fundam. Theor. Phys. 183, 59 (2016), arXiv:1512.01360 [gr-qc]. 27

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    P. G. Ferreira, C. T. Hill, and G. G. Ross, Phys. Rev. D 95, 064038 (2017), arXiv:1612.03157 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [36]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON), Phys. Rev. D 102, 072004 (2020), arXiv:2006.09721 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [37]

    Homma and Y

    K. Homma and Y. Kirita, JHEP 09, 095, arXiv:1909.00983 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 1909

  37. [38]

    C. P. Salemi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 081801 (2021), arXiv:2102.06722 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [39]

    A. S. Chou et al. (GammeV), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 030402 (2009), arXiv:0806.2438 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  39. [40]

    J. H. Steffen, A. Upadhye, A. Baumbaugh, A. S. Chou, P. O. Mazur, R. Tomlin, A. Weltman, and W. Wester (GammeV), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 261803 (2010), arXiv:1010.0988 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  40. [41]

    A Search for Scalar Chameleons with ADMX

    G. Rybka et al. (ADMX), Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 051801 (2010), arXiv:1004.5160 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  41. [42]

    P. Brax, C. Burrage, A.-C. Davis, D. Seery, and A. Weltman, JHEP 09, 128, arXiv:0904.3002 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [43]

    Improved Search for Solar Chameleons with a GridPix Detector at CAST

    V. Anastassopoulos et al. (CAST), JCAP 01, 032, arXiv:1808.00066 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [44]

    Vagnozzi, L

    S. Vagnozzi, L. Visinelli, P. Brax, A.-C. Davis, and J. Sakstein, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063023 (2021), arXiv:2103.15834 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [45]

    Katsuragawa, S

    T. Katsuragawa, S. Matsuzaki, and K. Homma, Phys. Rev. D 106, 044011 (2022), arXiv:2107.00478 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [46]

    Kyriazis, JHEP 11, 014, arXiv:2209.11700 [hep-ph]

    A. Kyriazis, JHEP 11, 014, arXiv:2209.11700 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  46. [47]

    Di and H

    H. Di and H. Shi, Phys. Rev. D 108, 103038 (2023), arXiv:2308.07263 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [48]

    Gravitational radiation from an axion cloud around a black hole: Superradiant phase

    H. Yoshino and H. Kodama, PTEP 2014, 043E02 (2014), arXiv:1312.2326 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [49]

    Omiya, T

    H. Omiya, T. Takahashi, T. Tanaka, and H. Yoshino, JCAP06, 016, arXiv:2211.01949 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  49. [50]

    M. A. Amin, A. J. Long, Z.-G. Mou, and P. Saffin, JHEP 06, 182, arXiv:2103.12082 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  50. [51]

    S. Sen, S. Sen, L. Sivertsen, and L. Sivertsen, JHEP 05, 192, [Erratum: JHEP 07, 062 (2022)], arXiv:2111.08728 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [52]

    Massive hidden photons as lukewarm dark matter

    J. Redondo and M. Postma, JCAP 02, 005, arXiv:0811.0326 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [53]

    Solar constraints on hidden photons re-visited

    J. Redondo and G. Raffelt, JCAP 08, 034, arXiv:1305.2920 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [54]

    Hardy, A

    E. Hardy, A. Sokolov, and H. Stubbs, (2024), arXiv:2410.17347 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [55]

    Brax, Class

    P. Brax, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 214005 (2013)

    work page 2013

  55. [56]

    Tests of Chameleon Gravity

    C. Burrage and J. Sakstein, Living Rev. Rel. 21, 1 (2018), arXiv:1709.09071 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [57]

    P. Brax, S. Casas, H. Desmond, and B. Elder, Universe 8, 11 (2021), arXiv:2201.10817 [gr-qc]. 28

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [58]

    Chameleon Fields: Awaiting Surprises for Tests of Gravity in Space

    J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171104 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0309300

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  58. [59]

    Chameleon Cosmology

    J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Phys. Rev. D 69, 044026 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0309411

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  59. [60]

    J. A. Pons and U. Geppert, Astron. Astrophys. 470, 303 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0703267

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  60. [61]

    K. N. Gourgouliatos and A. Cumming, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 171101 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [62]

    Detecting Axion Stars with Radio Telescopes

    Y. Bai and Y. Hamada, Phys. Lett. B 781, 187 (2018), arXiv:1709.10516 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  62. [63]

    P. E. Dewdney, P. J. Hall, R. T. Schilizzi, and T. J. L. Lazio, Proceedings of the IEEE 97, 1482 (2009)

    work page 2009

  63. [64]

    R. Nan, D. Li, C. Jin, Q. Wang, L. Zhu, W. Zhu, H. Zhang, Y. Yue, and L. Qian, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20, 989 (2011), arXiv:1105.3794 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  64. [65]

    The Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA Survey: I. Science Goals, Survey Design and Strategy

    R. Giovanelli et al., Astron. J. 130, 2598 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0508301

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  65. [66]

    R. M. Prestage, K. T. Constantikes, T. R. Hunter, L. J. King, R. J. Lacasse, F. J. Lockman, and R. D. Norrod, Proceedings of the IEEE 97, 1382 (2009)

    work page 2009

  66. [67]

    White, F

    E. White, F. Ghigo, R. Prestage, D. Frayer, R. Maddalena, P. Wallace, J. Brandt, D. Egan, J. Nelson, and J. Ray, Astronomy & Astrophysics 659, A113 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [68]

    A. Hook, Y. Kahn, B. R. Safdi, and Z. Sun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 241102 (2018), arXiv:1804.03145 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  68. [69]

    Realizing the relaxion from multiple axions and its UV completion with high scale supersymmetry

    K. Choi and S. H. Im, JHEP 01, 149, arXiv:1511.00132 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [70]

    D. E. Kaplan and R. Rattazzi, Phys. Rev. D 93, 085007 (2016), arXiv:1511.01827 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [71]

    Experimental Targets for Photon Couplings of the QCD Axion

    P. Agrawal, J. Fan, M. Reece, and L.-T. Wang, JHEP 02, 006, arXiv:1709.06085 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [72]

    Kouvaris, T

    C. Kouvaris, T. Liu, and K.-F. Lyu, Phys. Rev. D 109, 023008 (2024), arXiv:2202.11096 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [73]

    Brans and R

    C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Physical review 124, 925 (1961)

    work page 1961

  73. [74]

    G. W. Horndeski, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 10, 363 (1974)

    work page 1974

  74. [75]

    Fujii and K.-i

    Y. Fujii and K.-i. Maeda, The scalar-tensor theory of gravitation (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  75. [76]

    Faraoni and V

    V. Faraoni and V. Faraoni, Scalar-Tensor Gravity (Springer, 2004)

    work page 2004

  76. [77]

    FRBCAT: The Fast Radio Burst Catalogue

    E. Petroff, E. D. Barr, A. Jameson, E. F. Keane, M. Bailes, M. Kramer, V. Morello, D. Tab- bara, and W. van Straten, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 33, e045 (2016), arXiv:1601.03547 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  77. [78]

    J. I. Katz, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31, 1630013 (2016), arXiv:1604.01799 [astro-ph.HE]. 29

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [79]

    F. E. Schunck and E. W. Mielke, Class. Quant. Grav. 20, R301 (2003), arXiv:0801.0307 [astro- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  79. [80]

    J. H. Buckley, P. S. B. Dev, F. Ferrer, and F. P. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043015 (2021), arXiv:2004.06486 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  80. [81]

    M. S. Turner, Phys. Rept. 197, 67 (1990)

    work page 1990

Showing first 80 references.